Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:56:59.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Hard and Soft Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

By
Gregory Shaffer  and
Mark A. Pollack
Edited by
Jeffrey L. Dunoff  and
Mark A. Pollack
Jeffrey L. Dunoff
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Mark A. Pollack
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Political scientists and legal scholars have increasingly explored the concepts of hard and soft law in international governance. Although the concept of soft law remains to some extent controversial in the legal academy, the burgeoning literature of the past decade has generated valuable insights regarding the adoption of hard and soft law as a design choice, the advantages and disadvantages of each form under different conditions, the ways in which hard and soft legal instruments interact over time, and the impact and effectiveness of hard and soft legal provisions in various issue areas.

In this chapter, we review and assess this literature, with a focus on the insights generated by interdisciplinary international law/international relations (IL/IR) scholarship. The first four parts cover the four core areas of IL/IR theorizing about hard and soft law: definition, design, interaction, and impact. That is, we first address a key definitional question, noting the substantial disagreements among positivist, rational institutionalist, and constructivist scholars about the definitions and the key features of hard and soft law, respectively. Next, we examine the question of hard and soft law as a design choice, asking under what conditions states (or other actors) might opt for hard- or soft-law commitments in international relations. Here, we distinguish between a nearly ubiquitous functionalist approach and a nascent but promising distributive approach distinctive to contemporary IL/IR scholarship. Third, we examine the question of how hard and soft law interact in an increasingly complex and fragmented international legal landscape, arguing that hard and soft law can interact not only as alternatives or complements, but also, under certain conditions, as antagonists. Fourth, we examine the sparse but suggestive scholarship on the impact of hard and soft law beyond the law-making stage (i.e., in terms of legal interpretation, as well as compliance and effectiveness). A brief final section concludes with a discussion of the value-added contributions, as well as the lacunae and blind spots, of the IL/IR literature in this area.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations
The State of the Art
 , pp. 197 - 222
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan (2000). “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 421–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan (2004). “Pathways to Cooperation,” in Benvenisti, Eyal and Hirsch, Moshe (eds.), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspectives (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 50–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan, Snidal (2009). “The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State,” in Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 44--88.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie (2009). “The Politics of International Regime Complexity,” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andonova, Liliana B., Betsill, Michele M, and Bulkeley, Harriet (2009). “Transnational Climate Governance,” Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andonova, Liliana, and Elsig, Manfred (2012). “Informal International Lawmaking – a Conceptual View from International Relations,” in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses, and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Boyle, Alan E. (1999). “Some Reflections on the Relationship of Treaties and Soft Law,” International Law Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 901–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, and Meyer, John W. (1998). “Modern Law as a Secularized and Global Model,” Sociale Welt, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 213–32.Google Scholar
Brewster, , , Rachel (2013). “Reputation in International Relations and International Law Theory,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 524–43.Google Scholar
Brown Weiss, Edith (1997). International Compliance with Nonbinding Accords (Washington, DC: The American Society of International Law).Google Scholar
Brown Weiss, Edith (2000). “Conclusions: Understanding Compliance with Soft Law,” in Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 535–53.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. (2013). “Constructivism and International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 119–45.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim, and Mattli, Walter (2011). New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler (1995). The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Chinkin, Christine (1989). “The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 850–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinkin, Christine (2000). “Normative Development in the International Legal System,” in Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 21–42.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. (2007). All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey, Ratner, Steven, and Wippman, David (2010). International Law: Norms, Actors, Process: A Problem-Oriented Approach, 3rd ed. (New York: Aspen Law and Business Publishers).Google Scholar
Fearon, James (1998). “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Toope, Stephen J. (2001). “Alternatives to ‘Legalization’: Richer Views of Law and Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 743–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek (2004). “How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law,” Duke Law Journal, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 621–703.Google Scholar
Graber, Cristoph Beat (2006). “The New UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity: A Counterbalance to the WTO?,” Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 553–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. (2005). “The Design of International Agreements,” The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 579–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. (2008). How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., and Meyer, Timothy L. (2009). “International Common Law: The Soft Law of International Tribunals,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 515–35.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., and Meyer, Timothy L. (2010). “International Soft Law,” Journal of Legal Analysis, Vol. 2. No. 1, pp. 171–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Lawrence R. (2004). “Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of Intellectual Property Lawmaking,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 29, pp. 1–83.Google Scholar
Helfer, Lawrence R. (2013). “Flexibility in International Agreements,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 175–96.Google Scholar
Ho, Daniel E. (2002). “Compliance and International Soft Law: Why Do Countries Implement the Basle Accord?,” Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 647–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, Duncan B., and Newcomer, Joshua J. (2009). “‘Political” Commitments and the Constitution,” Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 507–84.Google Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, and Snidal, Duncan (2006). “The Choice of International Institutions: Cooperation, Alternatives and Strategies,” available at , accessed March 25, 2012.CrossRef
Keohane, Robert O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2000). “Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 457–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, John J., and Trebilcock, Michael J. (2004). “Introduction: Hard Choices and Soft Law in Sustainable Global Governance,” in Kirton, John J. and Trebilcock, Michael J. (eds.), Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment, and Social Governance (London: Ashgate), pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan (1996). “The Redundancy of Soft Law,” Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, Jan (1998). “The Undesirability of Soft Law,” Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 381–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara (2013). “Institutionalism and International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan (2001). “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” International Organization Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 761–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1991). “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier,” World Politics, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 336–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levit, Janet Koven (2004). “The Dynamics of International Trade Finance Regulation: The Arrangement on Officially Supported Export Credits,”Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 65–182.Google Scholar
Lipson, Charles (1991). “Why Are Some Agreements Informal?” International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 495–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, , , Lisa L. (2013). “Against Compliance,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 591–610.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Büthe, Tim (2003). “Setting International Standards,” World Politics, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, Richard (2009). “Beyond the Prisoners’ Dilemma: Game Theory, Coordination, and Law,” Southern California Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 209–58.Google Scholar
Meyer, Timothy L. (2012). “Codifying Custom,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 160, No. 4, pp. 995–1069.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, , , Andrew (2013). “Liberal Theories of International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 83–118.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses, and Wouters, Jan (2012) (eds.). Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark A., and Shaffer, Gregory C. (2009). The International Law and Politics of Genetically Modified Foods (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A., and Shaffer, Gregory C. (2012). “The Interaction of Formal and Informal Lawmaking,” in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal (2000). “Compliance and Effectiveness in International Regulatory Cooperation,” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 387–440.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal (2005). “Form and Substance in International Agreements,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 581–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G. (1998). “Conclusions,” in Victor, David G., Raustiala, Kal, and Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (eds.), The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 659–707.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G. (2004). “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources,” International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinicke, Wolfgang, and Witte, Jan Martin (2000). “Interdependence, Globalization and Sovereignty: The Role of Non-binding International Legal Accords,” in Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 75–100.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael (1992). “The Concept and Functions of Soft Law in International Politics,” in Bello, Emmanuel G. and Ajibola, Bola A. (eds.), Essays in Honour of Judge Taslim Olawale Elias, Volume I: Contemporary International Law and Human Rights (Heidelberg: Springer), pp. 135–45.Google Scholar
Rhodes, , , Martin, and Citi, Manuele (2007). “New Modes of Governance in the European Union: A Critical Survey and Analysis,” in Jørgensen, Knud Erik, Pollack, Mark A., and Rosamond, Ben (eds.), The Handbook of European Union Politics (New York: Sage Publications), pp. 463–82.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard (1998). “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 855–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H. (2006). “Epilogue: Accountability without Sovereignty,” in de Búrca, Gráinne and Scott, Joanne (eds.), Law and New Governance in the EU and the US (Oxford: Hart Publishing), pp. 395–412.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C., and Pollack, Mark A. (2010). “Hard Law vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists in International Governance,” Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 706–99.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C., and Pollack, Mark A. (2011). “Hard Law, Soft Law, and International Security: The Cases of Nuclear Weapons and the Responsibility to Protect,” Boston College Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 1147–1241.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah (ed.) (2000a). Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah (2000b). “Law, Non-law, and the Problem of ‘Soft Law,’” in Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Sindico, Francesco (2006). “Soft Law and the Elusive Quest for Sustainable Global Governance,” Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 829–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Richard (2002). “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO,” International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 339–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and , Thomas L. Brunell, (1998). “Constructing a Supranational Constitution: Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Daniel (2001). The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Trubek, David, Cottrell, Patrick, and Nance, Mark (2006). “‘Soft Law,’ ‘Hard Law,’ and European Integration: Toward a Theory of Hybridity,” in de Búrca, Gráinne and Scott, Joanne (eds.), Law and New Governance in the EU and the US (Oxford: Hart), pp. 65–94.Google Scholar
van Asselt, Harro, Sindico, Francesco, and Mehling, Michael A. (2008). “Global Climate Change and the Fragmentation of International Law,” Law and Policy, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 423–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veggeland, Frode, and Borgen, Svein Ole (2005). “Negotiating International Food Standards: The World Trade Organization's Impact on the Codex Alimentarius Commission,” Governance, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 675–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihma, Antto (2009). “Friendly Neighbor or Trojan Horse? Assessing the Interaction of Soft Law Initiatives and the UN Climate Regime,” International Environmental Agreements, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 239–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik (2013). “International Judicial Independence,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 421–44.Google Scholar
Voon, , , Tania (2006). “UNESCO and WTO: A Clash of Cultures?” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 635–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Andrew (2007). “Do Voluntary Standards Work among Governments? The Experience of International Financial Standards in East Asia,” in Woods, Ngaire and Brown, Dana (eds.), Making Global Self-Regulation Effective in Developing Countries (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 32–61.Google Scholar
Weil, Prosper (1983). “Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 413–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×