[1] A., Abouelsaood, C. G., Callan, C. R., Nappi, S. A., Yost, Open strings in background gauge fields, Nucl. Phys. B 280 (1987) 599Google Scholar

[2] I., Affleck, Universal term in the free energy at a critical point and the conformal anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 746Google Scholar

[3] I., Affleck, Conformal field theory approach to the Kondo effect, Acta Phys. Polon. B 26 (1995) 1869, cond-mat/9512099Google Scholar

[4] I., Affleck, A. W. W., Ludwig, Critical theory of overscreened Kondo fixed points, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 641; The Kondo effect, conformal field theory and fusion rules, Nucl. Phys. B 352 (1991) 849Google Scholar

[5] I., Affleck, A. W. W., Ludwig, Universal noninteger ‘groundstate degeneracy’ in critical quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 161Google Scholar

[6] I., Affleck, A. W. W., Ludwig, Exact conformal field theory results on the multichannel Kondo effect: single-fermion Green's function, self-energy, and resistivity, Phys. Rev. B 48 (1993) 7297Google Scholar

[7] I., Affleck, M., Oshikawa, H., Saleur, Boundary critical phenomena in the three-state Potts model, cond-mat/9804117

[8] I., Affleck, Edge critical behaviour of the 2-dimensional tri-critical Ising model, J. Phys. A 33 (2000) 6473, cond-mat/0005286Google Scholar

[9] M., Aganagic, R., Gopakumar, S., Minwalla, A., Strominger, Unstable solitons in noncommutative gauge theory, J. High Energy Phys. 0104 (2001) 001, hep-th/0009142Google Scholar

[10] A. Yu., Alekseev, S., Fredenhagen, T., Quella, V., Schomerus, Non-commutative gauge theory of twisted D-branes, hep-th/0205123

[11] A. Yu., Alekseev, A., Recknagel, V., Schomerus, Generalization of the Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov equations, Lett. Math. Phys. 41 (1997) 169, hep-th/9610066Google Scholar

[12] A. Yu., Alekseev, A., Recknagel, V., Schomerus, Non-commutative world-volume geometries: branes on SU(2) and fuzzy spheres, J. High Energy Phys. 9909 (1999) 023, hep-th/9908040Google Scholar

[13] A. Yu., Alekseev, A., Recknagel, V., Schomerus, Brane dynamics in background fluxes and non-commutative geometry, hep-th/0003187

[14] A. Yu., Alekseev, V., Schomerus, D-branes in the WZW model, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 061901, hep-th/9812193Google Scholar

[15] A. Yu., Alekseev, V., Schomerus, RR charges of D2-branes in the WZW model, hep-th/0007096

[16] A. Yu., Alekseev, S., Shatashvili, From geometric quantization to conformal field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 128 (1990) 197; Quantum groups and WZW models, Commun. Math. Phys. 133 (1990) 353Google Scholar

[17] L., Alvarez-Gaumé, D. Z., Freedman, Geometrical structure and ultraviolet finiteness in the supersymmetric sigma model, Commun. Math. Phys. 80 (1981) 443Google Scholar

[18] L., Alvarez-Gaumé, C., Gomez, G., Sierra, Quantum group interpretation of some conformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B 220 (1989) 142Google Scholar

[19] L., Alvarez-Gaumé, C., Gomez, G., Sierra, Topics in conformal field theory, in Physics and Mathematics of Strings, L., Brink, D., Friedan, A. M., Polyakov (eds.), World Scientific 1990Google Scholar

[20] C., Angelantonj, M., Bianchi, G., Pradisi, A., Sagnotti, Y. S., Stanev, Comments on Gepner models and type I vacua in string theory, Phys. Lett. B 387 (1996) 743, hep-th/9607229Google Scholar

[21] C., Angelantonj, A., Sagnotti, Open strings, Phys. Rept. 371 (2002) 1, Erratum: C. Angelantonj, A. Sagnotti, Open strings, Phys. Rept. 376 (2003) 339, hep-th/0204089Google Scholar

[22] I., Antoniadis, C., Bachas, Branes and the gauge hierarchy, Phys. Lett. B 450 (1999) 83, hep-th/9812093Google Scholar

[23] F., Ardalan, H., Arfaei, M. M., Sheikh-Jabbari, Noncommutative geometry from strings and branes, J. High Energy Phys. 9902 (1999) 016, hep-th/9810072Google Scholar

[24] S. K., Ashok, E., Dell'Aquila, D. E., Diaconescu, Fractional branes in Landau–Ginzburg orbifolds, hep-th/0401135

[25] P. S., Aspinwall, The Landau–Ginzburg to Calabi–Yau dictionary for D–branes, J. Math. Phys. 48 (2007) 082304, hep-th/0610209Google Scholar

[26] P. S., Aspinwall, M. R., Douglas, D-brane stability and monodromy, J. High Energy Phys. 0205 (2002) 031, hep-th/0110071Google Scholar

[27] C., Bachas, D-brane dynamics, Phys. Lett. B 374 (1996) 37, hep-th/9511043Google Scholar

[28] C., Bachas, Lectures on D-branes, hep-th/9806199

[29] C., Bachas, On the symmetries of classical string theory, arXiv:0808.2777 [hep-th]

[30] C., Bachas, J., de Boer, R., Dijkgraaf, H., Ooguri, Permeable conformal walls and holography, J. High Energy Phys. 0206 (2002) 027, hep-th/0111210Google Scholar

[31] C., Bachas, M. R., Douglas, C., Schweigert, Flux stabilization of D-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 0005 (2000) 048, hep-th/0003037Google Scholar

[32] C., Bachas, M. R., Gaberdiel, Loop operators and the Kondo problem, J. High Energy Phys. 0411 (2004) 065, hep-th/0411067Google Scholar

[33] F. A., Bais, P., Bouwknegt, M., Surridge, K., Schoutens, Extensions of the Virasoro algebra constructed from Kac–Moody algebras using higher order Casimir invariants, Nucl. Phys. B 304 (1988) 348; Coset construction for extended Virasoro algebras, Nucl. Phys. B 304 (1988) 371Google Scholar

[34] V., Balasubramanian, R. G., Leigh, D-branes, moduli and supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 6415, hep-th/9611165Google Scholar

[35] T., Banks, L. J., Dixon, D., Friedan, E., Martinec, Phenomenology and conformal field theory or Can string theory predict the weak mixing angle?, Nucl. Phys. B 299 (1988) 613Google Scholar

[36] P., Bantay, Characters and modular properties of permutation orbifolds, Phys. Lett. B 419 (1998) 175, hep-th/9708120; Permutation orbifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 633 (2002) 365, hep-th/9910079Google Scholar

[37] M., Bauer, Aspects de I'invariance conformé, Universitè Paris VII, 1990Google Scholar

[38] M., Bauer, P., Di Francesco, C., Itzykson, J.-B., Zuber, Covariant differential equations and singular vectors in Virasoro representations, Nucl. Phys. B 362 (1991) 515Google Scholar

[39] M., Bauer, H., Saleur, On some relations between local height properties and conformal invariance, Nucl. Phys. B 320 (1989) 591Google Scholar

[40] K., Becker, M., Becker, D. R., Morrison, H., Ooguri, Y., Oz, Z., Yin, Supersymmetric cycles in exceptional holonomy manifolds and Calabi–Yau 4-folds, Nucl. Phys. B 480 (1996) 225, hep-th/9608116Google Scholar

[41] K., Becker, M., Becker, A., Strominger, Fivebranes, membranes and non-perturbative string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 456 (1995) 130, hep-th/9507158Google Scholar

[42] R. E., Behrend, P. A., Pearce, J.-B., Zuber, Integrable boundaries, conformal boundary conditions and A–D–E fusion rules, J. Phys. A 31 (1998) 1763, hep-th/9807142Google Scholar

[43] R. E., Behrend, P. A., Pearce, V. B., Petkova, J.-B., Zuber, On the classification of bulk and boundary conformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B 444 (1998) 163, hep-th/9809097Google Scholar

[44] R. E., Behrend, P. A., Pearce, V. B., Petkova, J.-B., Zuber, Boundary conditions in rational conformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 579 (2000) 525, 525 (2000) 707, hep-th/9908036Google Scholar

[45] A. A., Belavin, A. M., Polyakov, A. B., Zamolodchikov, Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 241 (1984) 333Google Scholar

[46] L., Benoit, Y., Saint-Aubin, Degenerate conformal field theories and explicit expressions of some null vectors, Phys. Lett. B 215 (1988) 517Google Scholar

[47] O., Bergman, M. R., Gaberdiel, A non-supersymmetric open string theory and S-duality, Nucl. Phys. B 499 (1997) 183, hep-th/9701137Google Scholar

[48] O., Bergman, M. R., Gaberdiel, Stable non-BPS D-particles, Phys. Lett. B 441 (1998) 133, hep-th/9806155Google Scholar

[49] M., Berkooz, M. R., Douglas, R. G., Leigh, Branes intersecting at angles, Nucl. Phys. B 480 (1996) 265, hep-th/9606139Google Scholar

[50] M., Bershadsky, S., Cecotti, H., Ooguri, C., Vafa, Kodaira–Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes, Commun. Math. Phys. 165 (1994) 311; hep-th/9309140Google Scholar

[51] M., Bertolini, P., Fré, F., Hussain, R., Iengo, C., Nuñez, C., Scrucca, Black hole – D-brane correspondence: an example, hep-th/9807209

[52] M., Bertolini, P., Fré, R., Iengo, C., Nuñez, C., Scrucca, Black holes as D3-branes on Calabi–Yau threefolds, Phys. Lett. B 431 (1998) 22, hep-th/9803096Google Scholar

[53] M., Bianchi, G., Pradisi, A., Sagnotti, Toroidal compactification and symmetry breaking in open string theories, Nucl. Phys. B 376 (1992) 365Google Scholar

[54] M., Bianchi, A., Sagnotti, On the systematics of open string theories, Phys. Lett. B 247 (1990) 517Google Scholar

[55] M., Bianchi, A., Sagnotti, Twist symmetry and open string Wilson lines, Nucl. Phys. B 361 (1991) 519Google Scholar

[56] M., Bianchi, Y. S., Stanev, Open strings on the Neveu–Schwarz pentabrane, Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998) 193, hep-th/9711069Google Scholar

[57] M., Billo, D., Cangemi, P., Di Vecchia, Boundary states for moving D-branes, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 63, hep-th/9701190Google Scholar

[58] M., Billó, B., Craps, F., Roose, Orbifold boundary states from Cardy's condition, J. High Energy Phys. 0101 (2001) 038, hep-th/0011060Google Scholar

[59] L., Birke, J., Fuchs, C., Schweigert, Symmetry breaking boundary conditions and WZW orbifolds, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 671, hep-th/9905038Google Scholar

[60] H. W. J., Bloete, J. L., Cardy and M. P., Nightingale, Conformal invariance, the central charge, and universal finite size amplitudes at criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 742Google Scholar

[61] R., Blumenhagen, W., Eholzer, A., Honecker, K., Hornfeck, R., Hübel, Unifying W-algebras, Phys. Lett. B 332 (1994) 51, hep-th/9404113Google Scholar

[62] R., Blumenhagen, M., Flohr, A., Kliem, W., Nahm, A., Recknagel, R., Varnhagen, W-algebras with two and three generators, Nucl. Phys. B 361 (1991) 255Google Scholar

[63] R., Blumenhagen, E., Plauschinn, Introduction to conformal field theory, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 779, Springer 2000Google Scholar

[64] R., Blumenhagen, T., Weigand, Chiral supersymmetric Gepner model orientifolds, J. High Energy Phys. 0402 (2004) 041, hep-th/0401148Google Scholar

[65] R., Blumenhagen, A., Wisskirchen, Spectra of 4D, N = 1 type I string vacua on non-toroidal CY threefolds, Phys. Lett. B 438 (1998) 52, hep-th/9806131Google Scholar

[66] J., Böckenhauer, D. E., Evans, Modular invariants, graphs and α-induction for nets of subfactors I,II,II, Commun. Math. Phys. 197 (1998) 361, hep-th/9801171; Commun. Math. Phys. 200 (1999) 57, hep-th/9805023; Commun. Math. Phys. 205 (1999) 183, hep-th/9812110Google Scholar

[67] J., Böckenhauer, D. E., Evans, Y., Kawahigashi, On α-induction, chiral generators and modular invariants for subfactors, math.OA/9904109; Chiral structure ofmodular invariants for subfactors, math.OA/9907149

[68] R., Borcherds, Vertex algebras, Kac–Moody algebras, and the monster, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 (1986) 3068; Monstrous moonshine and monstrous Lie superalgebras, Invent. Math. 109 (1992) 405Google Scholar

[69] P., Bouwknegt, V., Mathai, D-branes, B-fields and twisted K-theory, J. High Energy Phys. 0003 (2000) 007, hep-th/0002023Google Scholar

[70] P., Bouwknegt, K., Schoutens (eds.), W-Symmetry, World Scientific 1995

[71] I., Brunner, On orientifolds of WZW models and their relation to geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 0201 (2002) 007, hep-th/0110219Google Scholar

[72] I., Brunner, M. R., Douglas, A., Lawrence, C., Röomelsberger, D-branes on the quintic, J. High Energy Phys. 0008 (2000) 015, hep-th/9906200Google Scholar

[73] I., Brunner, R., Entin, C., Romelsberger, D-branes on T4/ℤ2 and T-Duality, J. High Energy Phys. 9906 (1999) 016, hep-th/9905078Google Scholar

[74] I., Brunner, M., Gaberdiel, Matrix factorisations and permutation branes, J. High Energy Phys. 0507 (2005) 012, hep-th/0503207Google Scholar

[75] I., Brunner, M. R., Gaberdiel, The matrix factorisations of the D-model, J. Phys. A A38 (2005) 7901, hep-th/0506208Google Scholar

[76] I., Brunner, M. R., Gaberdiel, C. A., Keller, Matrix factorisations and D-branes on K3, J. High Energy Phys. 0606 (2006) 015, hep-th/0603196Google Scholar

[77] I., Brunner, M., Herbst, W., Lerche, B., Scheuner, Landau–Ginzburg realization of open string TFT, J. High Energy Phys. 0611 (2006) 043, hep-th/0305133Google Scholar

[78] I., Brunner, M., Herbst, W., Lerche, J., Walcher, Matrix factorizations and mirror symmetry: the cubic curve, J. High Energy Phys. 0611 (2006) 006, hep-th/0408243Google Scholar

[79] I., Brunner, K., Hori, Notes on orientifolds of rational conformal field theories, J. High Energy Phys. 0407 (2004) 023, hep-th/0208141Google Scholar

[80] I., Brunner, K., Hori, K., Hosomichi, J., Walcher, Orientifolds of Gepner models, hep-th/0401137

[81] I., Brunner, D., Roggenkamp, B-type defects in Landau–Ginzburg models, J. High Energy Phys. 0708 (2007) 093, arXiv:0707.0922 [hep-th]Google Scholar

[82] I., Brunner, D., Roggenkamp, Defects and bulk perturbations of boundary Landau–Ginzburg orbifolds, J. High Energy Phys. 0804 (2008) 001, arXiv:0712.0188 [hep-th]Google Scholar

[83] I., Brunner, V., Schomerus, D-branes at singular curves of Calabi–Yau compactifications, J. High Energy Phys. 0004 (2000) 020, hep-th/0001132Google Scholar

[84] I., Brunner, V., Schomerus, On superpotentials for D-branes in Gepner models, J. High Energy Phys. 0010 (2000) 016, hep-th/0008194Google Scholar

[85] A. O., Caldeira, A. J., Leggett, Influence of dissipation on quantum tunneling in macros, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46 (1981) 211; Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion, Physica A 121 (1983) 587; Quantum tunnelling in a dissipative system, Annals Phys. 149 (1983) 374Google Scholar

[86] C. G., Callan, J. A., Harvey, A., Strominger, World sheet approach to heterotic instantons and solitons, Nucl. Phys. B 359 (1991) 611; Worldbrane actions for string solitons, Nucl. Phys. B 367 (1991) 60Google Scholar

[87] C. G., Callan, I. R., Klebanov, D-Brane boundary state dynamics, Nucl. Phys. B 465 (1996) 473, hep-th/9511173Google Scholar

[88] C. G., Callan, I. R., Klebanov, A. W. W., Ludwig, J. M., Maldacena, Exact solution of a boundary conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 422 (1994) 417, hep-th/9402113Google Scholar

[89] C. G., Callan, C., Lovelace, C. R., Nappi, S. A., Yost, Adding holes and crosscaps to the superstring, Nucl. Phys. B 293 (1987) 83; Loop corrections to superstring equations of motion, Nucl. Phys. B 308 (1988) 221Google Scholar

[90] C. G., Callan, J. M., Maldacena, D-brane approach to black hole quantum mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B 472 (1996) 591, hep-th/9602043Google Scholar

[91] C. G., Callan, L., Thorlacius, Open string theory as dissipative quantum mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B 329 (1990) 117Google Scholar

[92] C. G., Callan, L., Thorlacius, World sheet dynamics of string junctions, Nucl. Phys. B 534 (1998) 121, hep-th/9803097Google Scholar

[93] P., Candelas, X. C., de la Ossa, P. S., Green, L., Parkes, An exactly soluble superconformal theory from a mirror pair of Calabi–Yau manifolds, Phys. Lett. B 258 (1991) 118; A pair of Calabi–Yau manifolds as an exactly soluble superconformal theory, Nucl. Phys. B 359 (1991) 21Google Scholar

[94] P., Candelas, X. C., de la Ossa, A., Font, S., Katz, D. R., Morrison, Mirror symmtry for two parameter models I, Nucl. Phys. B 416 (1994) 481, hep-th/9308083Google Scholar

[95] P., Candelas, A., Font, S., Katz, D. R., Morrison, Mirror symmtry for two parameter models II, Nucl. Phys. B 429 (1994) 626, hep-th/94030187Google Scholar

[96] A., Cappelli, D., Friedan, J. I., Latorre, C-theorem and spectral representation, Nucl. Phys. B 352 (1991) 616Google Scholar

[97] A., Cappelli, C., Itzykson, J.-B., Zuber, The ADE classification of minimal and conformal invariant theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 113 (1987) 1Google Scholar

[98] J. L., Cardy, Conformal invariance and surface critical behavior, Nucl. Phys. B 240 (1984) 514Google Scholar

[99] J. L., Cardy, Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories, Nucl. Phys. B 270 (1986) 186Google Scholar

[100] J. L., Cardy, Boundary conditions, fusion rules and the Verlinde formula, Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989) 581Google Scholar

[101] J. L., Cardy, Conformal invariance and statistical mechanics, Lectures given at the Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics, 1988Google Scholar

[102] J. L., Cardy, D. C., Lewellen, Bulk and boundary operators in conformal field theory, Phys. Lett. B 259 (1991) 274Google Scholar

[103] S., Carlip, What we don't know about BTZ black hole entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 15 (1998) 3609, hep-th/9806026; Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the Cardy formula, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 4175, gr-qc/0005017Google Scholar

[104] U., Carow-Watamura, S., Watamura, Noncommutative geometry and gauge theory on fuzzy sphere, Commun. Math. Phys. 212 (2000) 395, hep-th/9801195Google Scholar

[105] N., Carqueville, Matrix factorisations and open topological string theory, J. High Energy Phys. 0907 (2009) 005, arXiv:0904.0862 [hep-th]Google Scholar

[106] N., Carqueville, L., Dowdy, A., Recknagel, Algorithmic deformation of matrix factorisations, J. High Energy Phys. 1204 (2012) 014, arXiv:1112.3352 [hep-th]Google Scholar

[107] N., Carqueville, I., Runkel, Rigidity and defect actions in Landau–Ginzburg models, Commun. Math. Phys. 310 (2012) 135, arXiv:1006.5609 [hep-th]Google Scholar

[108] M., Caselle, G., Ponzano, F., Ravanini, Towards a classification of fusion rule algebras in rational conformal field theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 6 (1992) 2075Google Scholar

[109] A. S., Cattaneo, G., Felder, A path integral approach to the Kontsevich quantization formula, math.QA/9902090

[110] A. H., Chamseddine, J., Fröohlich, Some elements of Connes' non-commutative geometry, and space-time geometry, in Chen Ning Yang, a Great Physicist of the Twentieth Century, C. S., Liu and S.-T., Yau (eds.), International Press 1995, hep-th/9307012Google Scholar

[111] Y.-K. E., Cheung, M., Krogh, Noncommutative geometry from D0-branes in a background B-field, Nucl. Phys. B 528 (1998) 185, hep-th/9803031Google Scholar

[112] L., Chim, Boundary S-matrix for the tricritical Ising model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11 (1996) 4491, hep-th/9510008Google Scholar

[113] P., Christe, R., Flume, The four point correlations of all primary operators of the D = 2 conformally invariant SU(2) sigma model with Wess–Zumino term, Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 466Google Scholar

[114] C., Chu, P., Ho, Noncommutative open string and D-brane, Nucl. Phys. B 550 (1999) 151, hep-th/9812219Google Scholar

[115] A., Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press 1994Google Scholar

[116] A., Coste, T., Gannon, Remarks on Galois symmetry in rational conformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B 323 (1994) 316Google Scholar

[117] B., Craps, M. R., Gaberdiel, Discrete torsion orbifolds and D branes 2, J. High Energy Phys. 0104 (2001) 013, hep-th/0101143Google Scholar

[118] A., Dabholkar, Lectures on Orientifolds and Duality, hep-th/9804208

[119] J., Dai, R. G., Leigh, J., Polchinski, New connections between string theories, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 2073Google Scholar

[120] U., Danielsson, G., Ferretti, B., Sundborg, D-particle dynamics and bound states, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11 (1996) 5463, hep-th/9603081Google Scholar

[121] P., Di Francesco, P., Mathieu, D., Sénéchal, Conformal Field Theory, Springer 1997Google Scholar

[122] P., Di Francesco, J.-B., Zuber, SU(N) lattice integrable models associated with graphs, Nucl. Phys. B 338 (1990) 602Google Scholar

[123] P., Di Vecchia, M., Frau, I., Pesando, S., Sciuto, A., Lerda, R., Russo, Classical p-branes from boundary states, Nucl. Phys. B 507 (1997) 259, hep-th/9707068Google Scholar

[124] D. E., Diaconescu, M. R., Douglas, J., Gomis, Fractional branes and wrapped branes, J. High Energy Phys. 9802 (1998) 013, hep-th/9712230Google Scholar

[125] D.-E., Diaconescu, J., Gomis, Fractional branes and boundary states in orbifold theories, J. High Energy Phys. 0010 (2001) 001, hep-th/9906242Google Scholar

[126] D.-E., Diaconescu, Enhanced D-brane categories from string field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 0106 (2001) 016, hep-th/0104200Google Scholar

[127] D.-E., Diaconescu, C., Römelsberger, D-branes and bundles on elliptic fibrations, Nucl. Phys. B 574 (2000) 245, hep-th/9910172Google Scholar

[128] R., Dijkgraaf, Les Houches lectures on fields, strings and duality, in Les Houches 1995, Quantum Symmetries, A., Connes, K., Gawȩdzki (eds.) Elsevier 1995, pp. 3–147, hep-th/ 9703136Google Scholar

[129] R., Dijkgraaf, J. M., Maldacena, G. W., Moore and E. P., Verlinde, A black hole farey tail, hep-th/0005003

[130] R., Dijkgraaf, C., Vafa, E., Verlinde, H., Verlinde, Operator algebra of orbifold models, Commun. Math. Phys. 123 (1989) 485Google Scholar

[131] R., Dijkgraaf, E., Verlinde, Modular invariance and the fusion algebra, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 5B (1988) 87Google Scholar

[132] R., Dijkgraaf, E., Verlinde, H., Verlinde, C = 1 conformal field theories on Riemann surfaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 115 (1988) 649Google Scholar

[133] R., Dijkgraaf, E., Verlinde, H., Verlinde, Toplogical strings in D < 1, Nucl. Phys. B 352 (1991) 59Google Scholar

[134] J., Distler, B. R., Greene, Some exact results on the superpotential from Calabi–Yau compactifications, Nucl. Phys. B 309 (1988) 295Google Scholar

[135] L. J., Dixon, Some world sheet properties of superstring compactifications, on orbifolds and otherwise, Lectures given at Trieste HEP Workshop 1987

[136] L. J., Dixon, J. A., Harvey, C., Vafa, E., Witten, Strings on orbifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 261 (1985) 678; Strings on orbifolds 2, Nucl. Phys. B 274 (1986) 285Google Scholar

[137] S., Doplicher, K., Fredenhagen, J. E., Roberts, The quantum structure of space-time at the Planck scale and quantum fields, Commun. Math. Phys. 172 (1995) 187, hep-th/ 0303037Google Scholar

[138] S., Doplicher, R., Haag, J. E., Roberts, Local observables and particle statistics I, II, Commun. Math. Phys. 23 (1971) 199, 35 (1974) 49Google Scholar

[139] S., Doplicher, J. E., Roberts, A new duality theory for compact groups, Invent. Math. 98 (1989) 157; Why there is a field algebra with a compact gauge group describing the superselection structure in particle physics?, Commun. Math. Phys. 131 (1990) 51Google Scholar

[140] P., Dorey, A., Pocklington, R., Tateo, G., Watts, TBA and TCSA with boundaries and excited states, Nucl. Phys. B 525 (1998) 641, hep-th/9712197Google Scholar

[141] P., Dorey, I., Runkel, R., Tateo, G., Watts, g-function flow in perturbed boundary conformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 578 (2000) 85, hep-th/9909216Google Scholar

[142] V. S., Dotsenko, V. A., Fateev, Conformal algebra and multipoint correlation functions in two-dimensional statistical models, Nucl. Phys. B 240 (1984) 312; Four point correlation functions and the operator algebra in the two-dimensional conformal invariant theories with the central charge c ≤ 1, Nucl. Phys. B 251 (1985) 691Google Scholar

[143] M. R., Douglas, Branes within branes, hep-th/9512077

[144] M. R., Douglas, Two lectures on D-geometry and noncommutative geometry, hep-th/9901146; Topics in D-geometry, hep-th/9910170; D-branes on Calabi–Yau manifolds, math.ag/0009209

[145] M. R., Douglas, D-branes, categories and N = 1 supersymmetry, J. Math. Phys. 42, 2818 (2001), hep-th/0011017; D-branes and N = 1 supersymmetry, hep-th/0105014; Dirichlet branes, homological mirror symmetry, and stability, math.ag/0207021Google Scholar

[146] M. R., Douglas, B., Fiol, C., Röomelsberger, Stability and BPS branes, J. High Energy Phys. 0509 (2005) 006, hep-th/0002037; The spectrum of BPS branes on a noncompact Calabi-Yau manifold, J. High Energy Phys. 0509 (2005) 057 (2005), hep-th/0003263Google Scholar

[147] M. R., Douglas, B. R., Greene, D. R., Morrison, Orbifold resolution by D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 506 (1997) 84, hep-th/9704151Google Scholar

[148] M. R., Douglas, C., Hull, D-branes and the noncommutative torus, J. High Energy Phys. 9802 (1998) 008, hep-th/9711165Google Scholar

[149] M. R., Douglas, D., Kabat, P., Pouliot, S. H., Shenker, D-branes and short distances in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 485 (1997) 85, hep-th/9608024Google Scholar

[150] M. R., Douglas, G. W., Moore, D-branes, quivers, and ALE instantons, hep-th/9603167

[151] M. R., Douglas, N. A., Nekrasov, Noncommutative field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2002) 977, hep-th/0106048Google Scholar

[152] M. J., Duff, R. R., Khuri, J. X., Lu, String solitons, Phys. Rept. 259 (1995) 213, hep-th/9412184Google Scholar

[153] E., D'Hoker, String theory, Lecture Notes Princeton 1997; see http://www.math.ias.edu/QFT/spring /index.html

[154] T., Eguchi, S.-K. Yang, N = 2 superconformal models as topological field theories, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 5 (1990) 1693Google Scholar

[155] S., Elitzur, G., Sarkissian, D-branes on a gauged WZW model, Nucl. Phys. B 625 (2002) 166, hep-th/0108142Google Scholar

[156] H., Enger, A., Recknagel, D., Roggenkamp, Permutation branes and linear matrix factorisations, J. High Energy Phys. 0601 (2006) 087, hep-th/0508053Google Scholar

[157] D. E., Evans, Y., Kawahigashi, Orbifold subfactors from Hecke algebras, Commun. Math. Phys. 165 (1994) 445Google Scholar

[158] F., Falceto, K., Gawedzki, Lattice Wess–Zumino–Witten model and quantum groups, J. Geom. Phys. 11 (1993) 251, hep-th/9209076Google Scholar

[159] B. L., Feigin, D. B., Fuchs, Invariant skew-symmetric differential operators on the line and Verma modules over the Virasoro algebra, Funct. Anal. Appl. 16 (1982) 114; Verma modules over the Virasoro algebra, in Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1060, Springer 1984, p. 230Google Scholar

[160] B. L., Feigin, T., Nakanishi, H., Ooguri, The annihilating ideals of minimal models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 7 Suppl. 1A (1992) 217Google Scholar

[161] G., Felder, BRST Approach to Minimal Models, Nucl. Phys. B 317 (1989) 215, Erratum: G. Felder, BRST Approach to Minimal Models, Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989) 548Google Scholar

[162] G., Felder, J., Fröhlich, J., Fuchs, C., Schweigert, The geometry of WZW branes, J. Geom. Phys. 34 (2000) 162, hep-th/9909030Google Scholar

[163] G., Felder, J., Fröhlich, J., Fuchs, C., Schweigert, Conformal boundary conditions and three-dimensional topological field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 1659, hep-th/9909140; Correlation functions and boundary conditions in RCFT and three-dimensional topology, Compos. Math. 131 (2002) 189, hep-th/9912239Google Scholar

[164] G., Felder, J., Fröhlich, G., Keller, On the structure of unitary conformal field theoryCommun. Math. Phys. 124 (1989) 417, 30 (1990) 1Google Scholar

[165] G., Felder, J., Fröhlich, G., Keller, Braid matrices and structure constants for minimal conformal models, Commun. Math. Phys. 124 (1989) 647Google Scholar

[166] G., Felder, K., Gawȩdzki, A., Kupiainen, Spectra of Wess–Zumino–Witten models with arbitrary simple groups, Commun. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 127; The spectrum of Wess–Zumino–Witten models, Nucl. Phys. B 299 (1988) 355Google Scholar

[167] P., Fendley, F., Lesage, H., Saleur, A unified framework for the Kondo problem and for an impurity in a Luttinger liquid, J. Stat. Phys. 85 (1996) 211, cond-mat/9510055Google Scholar

[168] P., Fendley, H., Saleur, N. P., Warner, Exact solution of a massless scalar field with a relevant boundary interaction, Nucl. Phys. B 430 (1994) 577, hep-th/9406125Google Scholar

[169] J. M., Figueroa-O'Farrill, S., Schrans, The spin 6 extended conformal algebra, Phys. Lett. B 245 (1990) 471Google Scholar

[170] J. M., Figueroa-O'Farrill, S., Stanciu, D-brane charge, flux quantization and relative (co)homology, J. High Energy Phys. 0101 (2001) 006, hep-th/0008038Google Scholar

[171] J., Fjelstad, J., Fuchs, I., Runkel, C., Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 5: Proof of modular invariance and factorisation, Theor. Appl. Categor. 16 (2006) 342, hep-th/0503194Google Scholar

[172] S., Förste, D., Ghoshal, S., Panda, An orientifold of the solitonic fivebrane, Phys. Lett. B 411 (1997) 46, hep-th/9706057Google Scholar

[173] A., Font, L. E., Ibañez, D., Luüst, F., Quevedo, Strong–weak coupling duality and nonperturbative effects in string theory, Phys. Lett. B 249 (1990) 35Google Scholar

[174] E. S., Fradkin, A. A., Tseytlin, Nonlinear electrodynamics from quantized strings, Phys. Lett. B 160 (1985) 69Google Scholar

[175] M., Frau, I., Pesando, S., Sciuto, A., Lerda, R., Russo, Scattering of closed strings from many D-branes, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 52, hep-th/9702037Google Scholar

[176] K., Fredenhagen, K.-H., Rehren, B., Schroer, Superselection sectors with braid group statistics and exchange algebras I, II, Commun. Math. Phys. 125 (1989) 201, Rev. Math. Phys. Special issue (1992) 111Google Scholar

[177] S., Fredenhagen, Dynamics of D-branes in curved backgrounds, Ph.D. thesis (2002), available via http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?irn=5331455

[178] S., Fredenhagen, Organizing boundary RG flows, Nucl. Phys. B 660 (2003) 436, hep-th/0301229Google Scholar

[179] S., Fredenhagen, M. R., Gaberdiel, C. A., Keller, Bulk induced boundary perturbations, J. Phys. A 40 (2007) F17, hep-th/0609034Google Scholar

[180] S., Fredenhagen, M. R., Gaberdiel, C., Schmidt-Colinet, Bulk flows in Virasoro minimal models with boundaries, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 495403, arXiv:0907.2560 [hep-th]Google Scholar

[181] S., Fredenhagen, V., Schomerus, Branes on group manifolds, gluon condensates, and twisted K-theory, J. High Energy Phys. 0104 (2001) 007, hep-th/0012164Google Scholar

[182] S., Fredenhagen, V., Schomerus, Brane dynamics in CFT backgrounds, hep-th/0104043

[183] S., Fredenhagen, V., Schomerus, D-branes in coset models, J. High Energy Phys. 0202 (2002) 005, hep-th/0111189Google Scholar

[184] D., Friedan, The space of conformal boundary conditions for the c = 1 Gaussian model, unpublished note (1999), http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/pages/friedan/

[185] D., Friedan, A., Konechny, On the boundary entropy of one-dimensional quantum systems at low temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 030402, hep-th/0312197Google Scholar

[186] D., Friedan, E., Martinec, S. H., Shenker, Conformal invariance, supersymmetry and string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 271 (1986) 93Google Scholar

[187] D., Friedan, Z., Qiu, S. H., Shenker, Conformal invariance, unitarity and two-dimensional critical exponents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 1575Google Scholar

[188] J., Frohlich, New superselection sectors (‘soliton states’) in two-dimensional Bose quantum field theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 47 (1976) 269Google Scholar

[189] J., Fröhlich, Statistics of fields, the Yang–Baxter equation and the theory of knots and links, in Non-perturbative Quantum Field Theory, G.t', Hooftet al. (eds.), Plenum 1988Google Scholar

[190] J., Fröhlich, The non-commutative geometry of two-dimensional supersymmetric conformal field theory, in PASCOS, Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Particles, Strings and Cosmology, K. C., Wali (ed.), World Scientific 1995Google Scholar

[191] J., Fröhlich, J., Fuchs, I., Runkel, C., Schweigert, Kramers–Wannier duality from conformal defects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 070601, cond-mat/0404051; Defect lines, dualities, and generalised orbifolds, arXiv:0909.5013 [math-ph]Google Scholar

[192] J., Fröhlich, F., Gabbiani, Braid statistics in local quantum theory, Rev. Math. Phys. 2 (1990) 251Google Scholar

[193] J., Fröhlich, K., Gawȩdzki, Conformal field theory and the geometry of strings, CRM Proceedings and Lecture Notes, Vol. 7, CRM 1994, 57, hep-th/9310187Google Scholar

[194] J., Fröhlich, O., Grandjean, A., Recknagel, Supersymmetric quantum theory, non-commutative geometry, and gravitation, in Les Houches 1995, Elsevier 1995, Quantum Symmetries, A., Connes, K., Gawȩdzki (eds.), hep-th/9706132

[195] J., Fröhlich, O., Grandjean, A., Recknagel, V., Schomerus, Fundamental strings in Dp–Dq brane systems, Nucl. Phys. B 583 (2000) 381, hep-th/9912079Google Scholar

[196] J., Fröhlich, T., Kerler, Quantum groups, quantum categories and quantum field theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1542, Springer 1993Google Scholar

[197] J., Fröhlich, C., King, The Chern–Simons theory and knot polynomials, Commun. Math. Phys. 126 (1989) 167; Two-dimensional conformal field theory and three-dimensional topology, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 4 (1989) 5321Google Scholar

[198] J., Fuchs, Affine Lie Algebras and Quantum Groups: An Introduction, with Applications in Conformal Field Theory, Cambridge University Press 1992Google Scholar

[199] J., Fuchs, Fusion rules in conformal field theory, Fortsch. Phys. 42 (1994) 1, hep-th/9306162Google Scholar

[200] J., Fuchs, A., Klemm, C., Scheich, M. G., Schmidt, Gepner models with arbitrary affine invariants and the associated Calabi–Yau spaces, Phys. Lett. B 232 (1989) 317; Spectra and symmetries of Gepner models compared to Calabi–Yau compactifications, Ann. Phys. 204 (1990) 1Google Scholar

[201] J., Fuchs, I., Runkel, C., Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 1: Partition functions, Nucl. Phys. B 646 (2002) 353, hep-th/0204148; TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 2: Unoriented world sheets, Nucl. Phys. B 678 (2004) 511, hep-th/0306164;TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 3: Simple currents, Nucl. Phys. B 694 (2004) 277, hep-th/0403157; TFT construction of RCFT correlators 4: Structure constants and correlation functions, Nucl. Phys. B 715 (2005) 539, hep-th/ 0412290Google Scholar

[202] J., Fuchs, A. N., Schellekens, C., Schweigert, A matrix S for all simple current extensions, Nucl. Phys. B 473 (1996) 323, hep-th/9601078Google Scholar

[203] J., Fuchs, C., Schweigert, Symmetries, Lie Algebras and Representations: A Graduate Course for Physicists, Cambridge University Press 1997Google Scholar

[204] J., Fuchs, C., Schweigert, A classifying algebra for boundary conditions, Phys. Lett. B 414 (1997) 251, hep-th/9708141Google Scholar

[205] J., Fuchs, C., Schweigert, Branes: from free fields to general conformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 530 (1998) 99, hep-th/9712257Google Scholar

[206] J., Fuchs, C., Schweigert, Completeness of boundary conditions for the critical three-state Potts model, Phys. Lett. B 441 (1998) 141, hep-th/9806121Google Scholar

[207] J., Fuchs, C., Schweigert, Orbifold analysis of broken bulk symmetriesPhys. Lett. B 447 (1999) 266, hep-th/9811211; Symmetry breaking boundaries I. General theory, Nucl. Phys. B 558 (1999) 419, hep-th/9902132; Symmetry breaking boundaries II. More structures; examples, Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000) 543, hep-th/9908025Google Scholar

[208] J., Fuchs, C., Schweigert, J., Walcher, Projections in string theory and boundary states for Gepner models, Nucl. Phys. B 588 (2000) 110, hep-th/0003298Google Scholar

[209] P., Furlan, G. M., Sotkov, I. T., Todorov, Two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 12 (1989) 1Google Scholar

[210] F., Gabbiani, J., Fröhlich, Operator algebras and conformal field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 155 (1993) 569Google Scholar

[211] M. R., Gaberdiel, Fusion in conformal field theory as the tensor product of the symmetry algebra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9 (1994) 4619, hep-th/9307183Google Scholar

[212] M. R., Gaberdiel, An introduction to conformal field theory, Rept. Prog. Phys. 63 (2000) 607, hep-th/9910156Google Scholar

[213] M. R., Gaberdiel, Discrete torsion orbifolds and D branes, J. High Energy Phys. 0011 (2000) 026, hep-th/0008230Google Scholar

[214] M. R., Gaberdiel, P., Goddard, Axiomatic conformal field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 209 (2000) 549, hep-th/9810019Google Scholar

[215] M. R., Gaberdiel, A., Recknagel, Conformal boundary states for free bosons and free fermions, J. High Energy Phys. 0111 (2001) 016, hep-th/0108238Google Scholar

[216] M. R., Gaberdiel, A., Recknagel, G. M. T., Watts, The conformal boundary states for SU(2) at level 1, Nucl. Phys. B 626 (2002) 344, hep-th/0108102Google Scholar

[217] M. R., Gaberdiel, A., Konechny, C., Schmidt-Colinet, Conformal perturbation theory beyond the leading order, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 105402, arXiv:0811.3149 [hep-th]Google Scholar

[218] T., Gannon, The classification of affine SU(3) modular invariant partition functions, Commun. Math. Phys. 161 (1994) 233, hep-th/9212060; The classification of SU(3) modular invariants revisited, Annales Henri Poincaré: Phys. Theor. 65 (1996) 15, hep-th/9404185; The level 2 and 3 modular invariants of SU(n), Lett. Math. Phys. 39 (1997) 289, hep-th/9511040Google Scholar

[219] T., Gannon, Integers in the open string, Phys. Lett. B 473 (2000) 80, hep-th/9910148Google Scholar

[220] T., Gannon, Boundary conformal field theory and fusion ring representations, Nucl. Phys. B 627 (2002) 506, hep-th/0106105Google Scholar

[221] M. R., Garousi, R. C., Myers, Superstring scattering from D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 475 (1996) 193, hep-th/9603194Google Scholar

[222] E., Gava, J. F., Morales, K. S., Narain, G., Thompson, Bound states of type I D-strings, Nucl. Phys. B 528 (1998) 95, hep-th/9801128Google Scholar

[223] K., Gawȩdzki, Quadrature of conformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 328 (1989) 733; Coulomb gas representation of the SU(2) WZW correlators at higher genera, Lett. Math. Phys. 33 (1995) 335, hep-th/9404012; SU(2) WZW theory at higher genera, Commun. Math. Phys. 169 (1995) 329, hep-th/9402091Google Scholar

[224] K., Gawȩdzki, Lectures on conformal field theory, Lecture Notes Princeton 1996; see http://www.math.ias.edu/QFT/fall/index.html

[225] K., Gawȩdzki, Conformal field theory: a case study, hep-th/9904145

[226] K., Gawȩdzki, Boundary WZW, G/H, G/G and CS theories, Annales Henri Poincarée 3 (2002) 847, hep-th/0108044Google Scholar

[227] K., Gawȩdzki, A., Kupiainen, G/H conformal field theory from gauged WZW model, Phys. Lett. B 215 (1988) 119; Coset construction from functional integrals, Nucl. Phys. B 320 (1989) 625Google Scholar

[228] D., Gepner, Space-time supersymmetry in compactified string theory and superconformal models, Nucl. Phys. B 296 (1988) 757Google Scholar

[229] D., Gepner, Lectures on N=2 string theory, Lectures at the Trieste Spring School on Superstrings 1989Google Scholar

[230] D., Gepner, Z., Qiu, Modular invariant partition functions for parafermionic field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 285 (1987) 423Google Scholar

[231] D., Gepner, E., Witten, String theory on group manifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 278 (1986) 493Google Scholar

[232] A. A., Gerasimov, S. L., Shatashvili, On exact tachyon potential in open string field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 0010 (2000) 034, hep-th/0009103Google Scholar

[233] G. W., Gibbons, N. S., Manton, Classical and quantum dynamics of BPS monopoles, Nucl. Phys. B 274 (1986) 183Google Scholar

[234] E. G., Gimon, J., Polchinski, Consistency conditions for orientifolds and D-manifolds, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 1667, hep-th/9601038Google Scholar

[235] P., Ginsparg, Applied conformal field theory, Lectures given at the Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics 1988Google Scholar

[236] P., Ginsparg, Curiosities at c = 1, Nucl. Phys. B 295 (1988) 153Google Scholar

[237] V., Ginzburg, Lectures on Noncommutative Geometry, math.AG/0506603

[238] A., Giveon, D., Kutasov, Brane dynamics and gauge theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 (1999) 983, hep-th/9802067Google Scholar

[239] P., Goddard, Meromorphic conformal field theory, in Infinite-dimensional Lie Algebras and Lie Groups, V. G., Kac (ed.), World Scientific 1989Google Scholar

[240] P., Goddard, A., Kent, D. I., Olive, Virasoro algebras and coset space models, Phys. Lett. B 152 (1985) 88; Unitary representations of the Virasoro and Supervirasoro algebras, Commun. Math. Phys. 103 (1986) 105Google Scholar

[241] P., Goddard, D. I., Olive, Kac–Moody and Virasoro algebras in relation to quantum physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1 (1986) 303Google Scholar

[242] J., Gomis, D-branes on orbifolds with discrete torsion and topological obstruction, J. High Energy Phys. 0005 (2000) 006, hep-th/0001200Google Scholar

[243] R., Gopakumar, S., Minwalla, A., Strominger, Noncommutative solitons, J. High Energy Phys. 0005 (2000) 020, hep-th/0003160Google Scholar

[244] S., Govindarajan, J., Majumder, Crosscaps in Gepner models and type IIA orientifolds, J. High Energy Phys. 0402 (2004) 026, hep-th/0306257Google Scholar

[245] K., Graham, I., Runkel, G. M. T., Watts, Minimal model boundary flows and c = 1 CFT, Nucl. Phys. B 608 (2001) 527, hep-th/0101187Google Scholar

[246] K., Graham, G. M. T., Watts, Defect lines and boundary flows, J. High Energy Phys. 0404 (2004) 019, hep-th/0306167Google Scholar

[247] M. B., Green, A gas of D-instantons, Phys. Lett. B 354 (1995) 271, hep-th/9504108Google Scholar

[248] M. B., Green, M., Gutperle, Symmetry breaking at enhanced symmetry points, Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 77, hep-th/9509171Google Scholar

[249] M. B., Green, M., Gutperle, Light-cone supersymmetry and D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 476 (1996) 484, hep-th/9604091Google Scholar

[250] M. B., Green, M., Gutperle, D-instanton partition functions, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 046007, hep-th/9804123Google Scholar

[251] M. B., Green, J. A., Harvey, G., Moore, I-brane inflow and anomalous couplings on D-branes, Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) 47, hep-th/9605033Google Scholar

[252] M. B., Green, J. H., Schwarz, E., Witten, Superstring Theory I, II, Cambridge University Press 1987Google Scholar

[253] B. R., Greene, String theory on Calabi–Yau manifolds, TASI lectures, hep-th/9702155

[254] B. R., Greene, M. R., Plesser, Duality in Calabi–Yau moduli spaces, Nucl. Phys. B 338 (1990) 14Google Scholar

[255] B. R., Greene, C., Vafa, N. P., Warner, Calabi–Yau manifolds and renormalization group flows, Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989) 371Google Scholar

[256] M. T., Grisaru, A. E. M., van de Ven, D., Zanon, Four loop beta function for the N =1 and N = 2 supersymmetric nonlinear sigma model in two dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 173 (1986) 423; Two-dimensional supersymmetric sigma models on Ricci flat Kahler manifolds are not finite, Nucl. Phys. B 277 (1986) 388Google Scholar

[257] D. J., Gross, N. A., Nekrasov, Monopoles and strings in noncommutative gauge theory, J. High Energy Phys. 0007 (2000) 034, hep-th/0005204Google Scholar

[258] H., Grosse, C., Klimčík, P., Prešnajder, Towards finite quantum field theory in noncommutative geometry, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35 (1996) 231, hep-th/9505175; Field theory on a supersymmetric lattice, Commun. Math. Phys. 185 (1997) 155, hep-th/9507074; Simple field theoretical models on noncommutative manifolds, Lecture Notes Clausthal 1995, hep-th/9510177Google Scholar

[259] S. S., Gubser, A., Hashimoto, I. R., Klebanov, J. M., Maldacena, Gravitational lensing by p-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 472 (1996) 231, hep-th/9601057Google Scholar

[260] S. S., Gubser, I. R., Klebanov, A. M., Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105, hep-th/9802109Google Scholar

[261] S., Gukov, I. R., Klebanov, A. M., Polyakov, Dynamics of (n, 1) strings, Phys. Lett. B 423 (1998) 64, hep-th/9711112Google Scholar

[262] M., Gutperle, Aspects of D-instantons, hep-th/9712156

[263] M., Gutperle, Y., Satoh, D-branes in Gepner models and supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 543 (1999) 73, hep-th/9808080Google Scholar

[264] M., Gutperle, Y., Satoh, D0-branes in Gepner models and N = 2 black holes, Nucl. Phys. B 555 (1999) 477, hep-th/9902120Google Scholar

[265] R., Haag, Local Quantum Physics, Springer 1992Google Scholar

[266] M., Hamermesh, Group Theory and its Applications to Physical Problems, Addison-Wesley 1962Google Scholar

[267] A., Hanany, E., Witten, Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics, Nucl. Phys. B 492 (1997) 152, hep-th/9611230Google Scholar

[268] J. A., Harvey, Komaba lectures on noncommutative solitons and D-branes, hep-th/0102076

[269] J. A., Harvey, P., Kraus, F., Larsen, Exact noncommutative solitons, J. High Energy Phys. 0012 (2000) 024, hep-th/0010060Google Scholar

[270] R., Harvey, H. B., Lawson, Calibrated geometries, Acta Math. 148 (1982) 47Google Scholar

[271] A., Hashimoto, I. R., Klebanov, Decay of excited D-branes, Phys. Lett. B 381 (1996) 437, hep-th/9604065; Scattering of strings from D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 55B (1997) 118, hep-th/9611214Google Scholar

[272] K., Hashimoto, K., Krasnov, D-brane solutions in non-commutative gauge theory on fuzzy sphere, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 046007, hep-th/0101145Google Scholar

[273] M., Herbst, K., Hori, D., Page, Phases of N = 2 theories in 1+1 dimensions with boundary, arXiv:0803.2045 [hep-th]

[274] M., Herbst, C. I., Lazaroiu, Localization and traces in open–closed topological Landau–Ginzburg models, J. High Energy Phys. 0505 (2005) 044, hep-th/0404184Google Scholar

[275] M., Herbst, C. I., Lazaroiu, W., Lerche, Superpotentials, A-infinity relations and WDVV equations for open topological strings, J. High Energy Phys. 0502 (2005) 071, hep-th/0402110Google Scholar

[276] Y., Hikida, M., Nozaki, Y., Sugawara, Formation of spherical D2-brane from multiple D0-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 617 (2001) 117, hep-th/0101211Google Scholar

[277] C., Hofman, On the open–closed B-model, J. High Energy Phys. 0311 (2003) 069, hep-th/0204157Google Scholar

[278] J., Hoppe, Diffeomorphism groups, quantization and SU(∞), Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 4 (1989) 5235Google Scholar

[279] P., Horava, E., Witten, Heterotic and type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 506, hep-th/9510209; Eleven-dimensional supergravity on a manifold with boundary, Nucl. Phys. B 475 (1996) 94, hep-th/9603142Google Scholar

[280] K., Hori, Boundary RG flows of N = 2 minimal models, hep-th/0401139

[281] K., Hori, A., Iqbal, C., Vafa, D-branes and mirror symmetry, hep-th/0005247

[282] K., Hori, S., Katz, A., Klemm, R., Pandharipande, R., Thomas, C., Vafa, R., Vakil, E., Zaslow (eds.), Mirror Symmetry, Clay Mathematics Monographs 2003

[283] K., Hori, J., Walcher, F-term equations near Gepner points, J. High Energy Phys. 0501 (2005) 008, hep-th/0404196Google Scholar

[284] G. T., Horowitz, The origin of black hole entropy in string theory, gr-qc/9604051

[285] G. T., Horowitz, A., Strominger, Black strings and p-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 197Google Scholar

[286] S., Hosono, A., Klemm, S., Theisen, Mirror symmetry, mirror map and applications to Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 167 (1995) 301, hep-th/9308122; Lectures on Mirror Symmetry, hep-th/9403096Google Scholar

[287] B.-Y., Hou, K.-J., Shi, P., Wang, R.-H., Yue, The crossing matrices of WZW SU(2) model and minimal models with the quantum 6j symbols, Nucl. Phys. B 345 (1990) 659Google Scholar

[288] P. S., Howe, P. C., West, N = 2 Superconformal models, Landau–Ginzburg Hamiltonians and the epsilon expansion, Phys. Lett. B 223 (1989) 377Google Scholar

[289] Y. Z., Huang, Vertex operator algebras and the Verlinde conjecture, math.qa/0406291; Vertex operator algebras, the Verlinde conjecture and modular tensor categories, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 5352, math.qa/0412261; Rigidity and modularity of vertex tensor categories, math.qa/0502533; Vertex operator algebras, fusion rules and modular transformations, math.qa/0502558

[290] T., Hubsch, Calabi–Yau Manifolds: A Bestiary for Physicists, World Scientific 1992Google Scholar

[291] L. R., Huiszoon, A. N., Schellekens, N., Sousa, Klein bottles and simple currents, Phys. Lett. B 470 (1999) 95, hep-th/9909114Google Scholar

[292] F., Hussain, R., Iengo, C., Nuñez, C. A., Scrucca, Interaction of moving D-branes on orbifolds, Phys. Lett. B 409 (1997) 101, hep-th/9706186; Interaction of D-branes on orbifolds and massless particle emission, hep-th/9711021; Aspects of D-brane dynamics on orb-ifolds, hep-th/9711020; Closed string radiation from moving D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 517 (1998) 92, hep-th/9710049Google Scholar

[293] K. A., Intriligator, Bonus symmetry in conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 332 (1990) 541Google Scholar

[294] N., Ishibashi, The boundary and crosscap states in conformal field theories, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 251Google Scholar

[295] N., Ishibashi, T., Onogi, Conformal field theories on surfaces with boundaries and cross-caps, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 161Google Scholar

[296] C., Itzykson, H., Saleur, J.-B., Zuber (eds.), Conformal Invariance and Applications to Statistical Mechanics, World Scientific 1988

[297] C., Itzykson, J. B., Zuber, Two-dimensional conformal invariant theories on a torus, Nucl. Phys. B 275 (1986) 580Google Scholar

[298] R. A., Janik, Exceptional boundary states at c = 1, Nucl. Phys. B 618 (2001) 675, hep-th/0109021Google Scholar

[299] D. P., Jatkar, G., Mandal, S. R., Wadia, K. P., Yogendran, Matrix dynamics of fuzzy spheres, J. High Energy Phys. 0201 (2002) 039, hep-th/0110172Google Scholar

[300] D., Kabat, P., Pouliot, A comment on zero-brane quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1004, hep-th/9603127Google Scholar

[301] S., Kachru, J., McGreevy, Supersymmetric three-cycles and (super)symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 026001, hep-th/9908135Google Scholar

[302] A., Kapustin, D-branes in a topologically nontrivial B-field, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4 (2000) 127, hep-th/9909089Google Scholar

[303] A., Kapustin, Y., Li, D-branes in Landau–Ginzburg models and algebraic geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 0312 (2003) 005, hep-th/0210296Google Scholar

[304] A., Kapustin, Y., Li, Topological correlators in Landau–Ginzburg models with boundaries, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 (2004) 727, hep-th/0305136Google Scholar

[305] A., Kapustin, Y., Li, D-branes in topological minimal models: the Landau–Ginzburg approach, J. High Energy Phys. 0407 (2004) 045, hep-th/0306001Google Scholar

[306] A., Kapustin, D., Orlov, Remarks on A branes, mirror symmetry, and the Fukaya category, J. Geom. Phys. 48 (2003) 84, hep-th/0109098Google Scholar

[307] A., Kapustin, D., Orlov, Lectures on mirror symmetry, derived categories, and D-branes, math.AG/0308173

[308] P., Kaste, W., Lerche, C. A., Lütken, J., Walcher, D-branes on K3-fibrations, Nucl. Phys. B 582 (2000) 203, hep-th/9912147Google Scholar

[309] H., Kausch, G. M. T., Watts, A study of W-algebras using Jacobi identities, Nucl. Phys. B 354 (1991) 740Google Scholar

[310] Y., Kazama, H., Suzuki, New N = 2 superconformal field theories and superstring compactification, Nucl. Phys. B 321 (1989) 232Google Scholar

[311] R., Kedem, T. R., Klassen, B. M., McCoy, E., Melzer, Fermionic quasiparticle representations for characters of, Phys. Lett. B 304 (1993) 263, hep-th/9211102; Fermionic sum representations for conformal field theory characters, Phys. Lett. B 307 (1993) 68, hep-th/9301046Google Scholar

[312] R., Kedem, B. M., McCoy, Construction of modular branching functions from Bethe's equations in the 3-state Potts chain, hep-th/9210129

[313] B., Keller, Introduction to A-infinity algebras and modules, Homology, Homotopy Appl. 3 (2001) 1, math.RA/9910179Google Scholar

[314] A. N., Kirillov, N. Y., Reshetikhin, Representations of the algebra U(q)(sl(2), q-orthogonal polynomials and invariants of links, in New Developments in the Theory of Knots, T., Kohno (ed.), World Scientific 1990Google Scholar

[315] C., Klimčík, A nonperturbative regularization of the supersymmetric Schwinger model, Commun. Math. Phys. 206 (1999) 567, hep-th/9903112Google Scholar

[316] J., Knapp, H., Omer, Matrix factorizations, minimal models and Massey products, J. High Energy Phys. 0605 (2006) 064, hep-th/0604189Google Scholar

[317] V. G., Knizhnik, A. B., Zamolodchikov, Current algebra and Wess–Zumino model in two dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 247 (1984) 83Google Scholar

[318] A., Konechny, g function in perturbation theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19 (2004) 2545, hep-th/0310258Google Scholar

[319] A., Konechny, A., Schwarz, Introduction to M(atrix) theory and noncommutative geometry, Phys. Rept. 360 (2002) 353, hep-th/0012145Google Scholar

[320] A., Konechny, A., Schwarz, Introduction to M(atrix) theory and noncommutative geometry, Part II, Phys. Rept. 360 (2002) 353, hep-th/0107251Google Scholar

[321] M., Kontsevich, Homological algebra of mirror symmetry, alg-geom/9411018

[322] M., Kontsevich, Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds I, Lett. Math. Phys. 66 (2003) 157, q-alg/9709040Google Scholar

[323] M., Kontsevich, Y., Soibelman, Homological mirror symmetry and torus fibrations, math.SG/0011041

[324] D., Kutasov, M., Marino, G. W., Moore, Some exact results on tachyon condensation in string field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 0010 (2000) 045, hep-th/0009148; Remarks on tachyon condensation in superstring field theory, hep-th/0010108Google Scholar

[325] O. A., Laudal, Matric Massey products and formal moduli I, in Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1183, Springer 1986, p. 218Google Scholar

[326] C. I., Lazaroiu, On the structure of open–closed topological field theory in two dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 603 (2001) 497, hep-th/0010269Google Scholar

[327] C. I., Lazaroiu, On the boundary coupling of topological Landau–Ginzburg models, J. High Energy Phys. 0505 (2005) 037, hep-th/0312286Google Scholar

[328] R. G., Leigh, Dirac–Born–Infeld action from Dirichlet sigma model, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 2767Google Scholar

[329] W., Lerche, Recent developments in string theory, hep-th/9710246

[330] W., Lerche, B., Schellekens, N. P., Warner, Lattices and strings, Phys. Rept. 177 (1989) 1Google Scholar

[331] W., Lerche, C., Vafa, N. P., Warner, Chiral rings in N = 2 superconformal theories, Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989) 427Google Scholar

[332] F., Lesage, H., Saleur, Boundary conditions changing operators in non conformal theories, Nucl. Phys. B 520 (1998) 563, hep-th/9801089Google Scholar

[333] F., Lesage, H., Saleur, P., Simonetti, Boundary flows in minimal models, Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 85, hep-th/9802061Google Scholar

[334] D. C., Lewellen, Sewing constraints for conformal field theories on surfaces with boundaries, Nucl. Phys. B 372 (1992) 654Google Scholar

[335] M., Li, Boundary states of D-branes and Dy-strings, Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 351, hep-th/9510161Google Scholar

[336] A. W. W., Ludwig, Field theory approach to critical quantum impurity problems and applications to the multi-channel Kondo effect, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 8 (1994) 347; Methods of conformal field theory in condensed matter physics: an introduction to nonabelian bosonization, in: Low-dimensional Quantum Field Theories for Condensed Matter Physicists, S. Lundqvist, G. Morandi, Y. Lu (eds.), World Scientific 1995Google Scholar

[337] D., Lüst, S., Theisen, Lectures on string theory, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 346, Springer 1989Google Scholar

[338] G., Mack, V., Schomerus, Quasi-Hopf quantum symmetry in quantum theory, Nucl. Phys. B 370 (1991) 185; Action of truncated quantum groups on quasi-quantum planes and a quasi-associative differential geometry and calculus, Commun. Math. Phys. 149 (1992) 513Google Scholar

[339] J., Madore, The fuzzy sphere, Class. Quant. Grav. 9 (1992) 69Google Scholar

[340] J., Madore, An Introduction to Noncommutative Differential Geometry and its Physical Applications, Cambridge University Press 1999Google Scholar

[341] J., Majumder, A., Sen, ‘Blowing up’ D-branes on non-supersymmetric cycles, J. High Energy Phys. 9909 (1999) 004, hep-th/9906109Google Scholar

[342] J. M., Maldacena, Black holes in string theory, hep-th/9607235

[343] J. M., Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231, hep-th/9711200Google Scholar

[344] J. M., Maldacena, G. W., Moore, N., Seiberg, Geometrical interpretation of D-branes in gauged WZW models, J. High Energy Phys. 0107 (2001) 046, hep-th/0105038Google Scholar

[345] J. M., Maldacena, G. W., Moore, N., Seiberg, D-brane instantons and K-theory charges, J. High Energy Phys. 0111 (2001) 062, hep-th/0108100Google Scholar

[346] N. S., Manton, A remark on the scattering of BPS monopoles, Phys. Lett. B 110 (1982) 54Google Scholar

[347] D., Matalliotakis, H. P., Nilles, S., Theisen, Matching the BPS spectra of heterotic – type I–type I' strings, Phys. Lett. B 421 (1998) 169, hep-th/9710247Google Scholar

[348] K., Matsubara, V., Schomerus, M., Smedbäack, Open strings in simple current orbifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 626 (2002) 53, hep-th/0108126Google Scholar

[349] G., Moore, N., Reshetikhin, A comment on quantum group symmetry in conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 328 (1989) 557Google Scholar

[350] G., Moore, N., Seiberg, Polynomial equations for rational conformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B 212 (1988) 451; Classical and conformal quantum field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 123 (1989) 177; Lectures on rational conformal field theory, http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~gmoore/LecturesRCFT.pdfGoogle Scholar

[351] J. E., Moyal, Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 45 (1949) 99Google Scholar

[352] R. C., Myers, Dielectric-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 9912 (1999) 022, hep-th/9910053Google Scholar

[353] W., Nahm, Lie group exponents and SU(2) current algebras, Commun. Math. Phys. 118 (1988) 171Google Scholar

[354] W., Nahm, Quantum field theories in one and two dimensions, Duke Math. J. 54 (1987) 579; Chiral algebras of two-dimensional chiral field theories and their normal ordered products, Proceedings of the Trieste Conference on Recent Developments in Conformational Field Theories, Trieste, October 1989Google Scholar

[355] W., Nahm, A proof of modular invariance, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 6 (1991) 2837Google Scholar

[356] W., Nahm, Quasi-rational fusion products, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 8 (1994) 3693, hep-th/9402039Google Scholar

[357] W., Nahm, Conformal quantum field theories in two dimensions, in preparation

[358] W., Nahm, A., Recknagel, M., Terhoeven, Dilogarithm identities in conformal field theory, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 8 (1993) 1835, hep-th/9211034Google Scholar

[359] W., Nahm, K., Wendland, A Hiker's guide to K3: aspects of N = (4, 4) superconformal field theory with central charge c = 6, Commun. Math. Phys. 216 (2001) 85, hep-th/9912067Google Scholar

[360] M., Naka, M., Nozaki, Boundary states in Gepner models, J. High Energy Phys. 0005 (2000) 027, hep-th/0001037Google Scholar

[361] N., Nekrasov, A., Schwarz, Instantons on noncommutative ℝ4 and (2,0) superconformal six dimensional theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 198 (1998) 689, hep-th/9802068Google Scholar

[362] N. A., Obers, B., Pioline, U-duality and M-theory, Phys. Rept. 318 (1999) 113, hep-th/9809039; Eisenstein series and string thresholds, Commun. Math. Phys. 209 (2000) 275, hep-th/9903113Google Scholar

[363] A., Ocneanu, Quantized groups, string algebras and Galois theory for algebras, in Operator Algebras and Applications II, London Mathematical Society, Cambridge University Press 1989; Quantum symmetry, differential geometry of finite graphs and classification of subfactors, University of Tokyo Seminary Notes 45, recorded by Y. Kawahigashi, July 1990Google Scholar

[364] H., Ooguri, Y., Oz, Z., Yin, D-branes on Calabi–Yau spaces and their mirrors, Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 407, hep-th/9606112Google Scholar

[365] H., Ooguri, Z., Yin, TASI lectures on perturbative string theories, hep-th/9612254

[366] D., Orlov, Derived categories of coherent sheaves and triangulated categories of singularities, in Algebra, Arithmetic, and Geometry: in Honor of Yu. I. Manin, vol. II, Birkhäauser 2009, math.AG/0503632Google Scholar

[367] M., Oshikawa, I., Affleck, Boundary conformal field theory approach to the critical two-dimensional Ising model with a defect line, Nucl. Phys B 495 (1997) 533, condmat/9612187Google Scholar

[368] B., Ovrut, N =1 supersymmetric vacua in heterotic M-theory, hep-th/9905115

[369] V., Pasquier, Operator content of the ADE lattice models, J. Phys. A 20 (1987) 5707; Two-dimensional critical systems labeled by Dynkin diagrams, Nucl. Phys. B 285 (1987) 162; Etiology of IRF models, Commun. Math. Phys. 118 (1988) 355Google Scholar

[370] V. B., Petkova, J.-B., Zuber, On structure constants of sl(2) theories, Nucl. Phys. B 438 (1995) 347, hep-th/9410209Google Scholar

[371] V. B., Petkova, J.-B., Zuber, From CFT to graphs, Nucl. Phys. B 463 (1996) 161, hep-th/9510175; Conformal field theory and graphs, hep-th/9701103Google Scholar

[372] V. B., Petkova, J.-B., Zuber, Generalized twisted partition functions, Phys. Lett. B 504 (2001) 157, hep-th/0011021Google Scholar

[373] V. B., Petkova, J.-B., Zuber, The many faces of Ocneanu cells, Nucl. Phys. B 603 (2001) 449, hep-th/0101151Google Scholar

[374] J., Polchinski, Combinatorics of boundaries in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 6041, hep-th/9407031Google Scholar

[375] J., Polchinski, Dirichlet branes and Ramond-Ramond charges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 4724, hep-th/9510017Google Scholar

[376] J., Polchinski, TASI lectures on D-branes, hep-th/9611050

[377] J., Polchinski, String Theory I, II, Cambridge University Press 1998Google Scholar

[378] J., Polchinski, Y., Cai, Consistency of open superstring theories, Nucl. Phys. B 296 (1988) 91Google Scholar

[379] J., Polchinski, S., Chaudhuri, C. V., Johnson, Notes on D-Branes, hep-th/9602052

[380] J., Polchinski, L., Thorlacius, Free fermion representation of a boundary conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 622, hep-th/9404008Google Scholar

[381] A. P., Polychronakos, Flux tube solutions in noncommutative gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B 495 (2000) 407, hep-th/0007043Google Scholar

[382] G., Pradisi, A., Sagnotti, Open string orbifolds, Phys. Lett. B 216 (1989) 59Google Scholar

[383] G., Pradisi, A., Sagnotti, Y. S., Stanev, Planar duality in SU(2) WZW models, Phys. Lett. B 354 (1995) 279, hep-th/9503207; The open descendants of non-diagonal SU(2) WZW models, Phys. Lett. B 356 (1995) 230, hep-th/9506014Google Scholar

[384] G., Pradisi, A., Sagnotti, Y. S., Stanev, Completeness conditions for boundary operators in 2d conformal field theory, Phys. Lett. B 381 (1996) 97, hep-th/9603097Google Scholar

[385] A., Pressley, G., Segal, Loop Groups, Clarendon 1988Google Scholar

[386] A., Recknagel, Permutation branes, J. High Energy Phys. 0304 (2003) 041, hep-th/0208119Google Scholar

[387] A., Recknagel, On Permutation branes, Fortsch. Phys. 51 (2003) 824Google Scholar

[388] A., Recknagel, D., Roggenkamp, V., Schomerus, On relevant boundary perturbations in unitary minimal models, Nucl. Phys. B 588 (2000) 552, hep-th/0003110Google Scholar

[389] A., Recknagel, V., Schomerus, D-branes in Gepner models, Nucl. Phys. B 531 (1998) 185, hep-th/9712186Google Scholar

[390] A., Recknagel, V., Schomerus, Boundary deformation theory and moduli spaces of D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 545 (1999) 233, hep-th/9811237Google Scholar

[391] A., Recknagel, V., Schomerus, Moduli spaces of D-branes in CFT-backgrounds, Fortsch. Phys. 48 (2000) 195, hep-th/9903139Google Scholar

[392] K.-H., Rehren, Markov traces as characters for local algebras, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 18B (1990) 259; Braid group statistics and their superselection rules, in The Algebraic Theory of Superselection Sectors. Introduction and Recent Results, D. Kastler (ed.), World Scientific 1990; Quantum symmetry associated with braid group statistics, in Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 370, Springer 1990; Quantum symmetry associated with braid group statistics II, in: Quantum Symmetries Doebner et al. (eds.), World Scientific 1993Google Scholar

[393] K.-H., Rehren, B., Schroer, Einstein causality and Artin braids, Nucl. Phys. B 312 (1989) 715Google Scholar

[394] S.-J., Rey, The confining phase of superstrings and axionic strings, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 526Google Scholar

[395] A., Rocha-Caridi, Vacuum vector representations of the Virasoro algebra, in Vertex Operators in Mathematics and Physics, J., Lepowskyet al. (eds.), Springer 1985Google Scholar

[396] D., Roggenkamp, K., Wendland, Limits and degenerations of unitary conformal field theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 251 (2004) 589, hep-th/0308143Google Scholar

[397] I., Runkel, Boundary structure constants for the A-series Virasoro minimal models, Nucl. Phys. B 549 (1999) 563, hep-th/9811178Google Scholar

[398] I., Runkel, Structure constants for the D-series Virasoro minimal models, Nucl. Phys. B 579 (1999) 561, hep-th/9908046Google Scholar

[399] A., Sagnotti, Open strings and their symmetry groups, in Non-perturbative Methods in Field Theory, G., Macket al. (eds.), Lecture Notes Cargese 1987Google Scholar

[400] A., Sagnotti, Some properties of open string theories, hep-th/9509080

[401] A., Sagnotti, Surprises in open-string perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 56B (1997) 332, hep-th/9702093Google Scholar

[402] E., Scheidegger, D-branes on some one- and two-parameter Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces, J. High Energy Phys. 0004 (2000) 003, hep-th/9912188Google Scholar

[403] E., Scheidegger, D0-branes in Gepner models, J. High Energy Phys. 0208 (2002) 001, hep-th/0109013Google Scholar

[404] E., Scheidegger, D-branes on Calabi–Yau spaces, Ph.D. thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich (2001), available at http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/archive/00000445Google Scholar

[405] A. N., Schellekens, S., Yankielowicz, Extended chiral algebras and modular invariant partition functions, Nucl. Phys. B 327 (1989) 673; Modular invariants from simple currents: an explicit proof, Phys. Lett. B 227 (1989) 387Google Scholar

[406] A. N., Schellekens, S., Yankielowicz, Simple currents, modular invariants and fixed points, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5 (1990) 2903Google Scholar

[407] A. N., Schellekens, S., Yankielowicz, Field identification fixed points in the coset construction, Nucl. Phys. B 334 (1990) 67Google Scholar

[408] V., Schomerus, Construction of field algebras with quantum symmetry from local observables, Commun. Math. Phys. 169 (1995) 193, hep-th/9401042Google Scholar

[409] V., Schomerus, Non-compact string backgrounds and non-rational CFT, Phys. Rept. 431 (2006) 39, hep-th/0509155.Google Scholar

[410] V., Schomerus, D-branes and deformation quantization, J. High Energy Phys. 9906 (1999) 030, hep-th/9903205Google Scholar

[41l] M., Schottenloher (ed.), A mathematical introduction to conformal field theory, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 759, Springer 2008, p. 1

[412] J. H., Schwarz, Superstring theory, Phys. Rept. 89 (1982) 223Google Scholar

[413] A., Schwimmer, N., Seiberg, Comments on the N = 2, N = 3, N = 4 superconformal algebras in two dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 184 (1987) 191Google Scholar

[414] G., Segal, The definition of conformal field theory, in Differential Geometrical Methods in Theoretical Physics, K., Bleuler, M., Werner (eds.), Kluwer 1988Google Scholar

[415] N., Seiberg, E., Witten, String theory and noncommutative geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 9909 (1999) 032, hep-th/9908142Google Scholar

[416] A., Sen, Tachyon condensation on the brane antibrane system, J. High Energy Phys. 9808 (1998) 012, hep-th/9805170; Stable non-BPS bound states of BPS D-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 9808 (1998) 010, hep-th/9805019; Stable non-BPS states in string theory, J. High Energy Phys. 9806 (1998) 007, hep-th/9803194Google Scholar

[417] A., Sen, SO(32) spinors of type I and other solitons on brane–antibrane pair, J. High Energy Phys. 9809 (1998) 023, hep-th/9808141Google Scholar

[418] A., Sen, Developments in superstring theory, hep-ph/9810356

[419] A., Sen, Type I D-particle and its interactions, J. High Energy Phys. 9810 (1998) 021, hep-th/9809111Google Scholar

[420] A., Sen, Descent relations among bosonic D-branes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14 (1999) 4061, hep-th/9902105Google Scholar

[421] A., Sen, Non-BPS states and branes in string theory, hep-th/9904207

[422] A., Sen, Moduli space of unstable D-branes on a circle of critical radius, J. High Energy Phys. 0403 (2004) 070, hep-th/0312003Google Scholar

[423] A., Sen, Tachyon dynamics in open string theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20 (2005) 5513, hep-th/0410103Google Scholar

[424] S. L., Shatashvili, Comment on the background independent open string theory, Phys. Lett. B 311 (1993) 83, hep-th/9303143; On the problems with background independence in string theory, Alg. Anal. 6 (1994) 215, hep-th/9311177.Google Scholar

[425] M. M., Sheikh-Jabbari, Classification of different branes at angles, Phys. Lett. B 420 (1998) 279, hep-th/9710121; More on mixed boundary conditions and D-branes bound states, Phys. Lett. B 425 (1998) 48, hep-th/9712199Google Scholar

[426] S. H., Shenker, Another length scale in string theory?, hep-th/9509132

[427] S., Stanciu, D-branes in Kazama–Suzuki models, Nucl. Phys. B 526 (1998) 295, hep-th/9708166Google Scholar

[428] S., Stanciu, D-branes in group manifolds, J. High Energy Phys. 0001 (2000) 025, hep-th/9909163Google Scholar

[429] S., Stanciu, A note on D-branes in group manifolds: flux quantization and D0-charge, J. High Energy Phys. 0010 (2000) 015, hep-th/0006145Google Scholar

[430] S., Stanciu, A., Tseytlin, D-branes in curved spacetime: Nappi–Witten background, J. High Energy Phys. 9806 (1998) 010, hep-th/9805006Google Scholar

[431] Y. S., Stanev, talk given at the Workshop on Conformal Field Theory of D-Branes, DESY, Hamburg, September 1998. http://www.desy.de/~jfuchs/CftD-s.html

[432] K. S., Stelle, Lectures on supergravity p-branes, hep-th/9701088; BPS branes in super-gravity, hep-th/9803116

[433] A., Strominger, Open p-branes, Phys. Lett. B 383 (1996) 44, hep-th/9512059Google Scholar

[434] A., Strominger, C., Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 99, hep-th/9601029Google Scholar