Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:24:44.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Genes Are Not the Whole Story: Retrotransposons as New Determinants of Male Fertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2022

Stéphane Viville
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Génétique Médicale de Strasbourg and Laboratoire de diagnostic génétique, Strasbourg
Karen D. Sermon
Affiliation:
Reproduction and Genetics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Get access

Summary

The release of the human genome sequence has revealed that our genes represent only a minor fraction, with exons making up less than 2% of our DNA. In contrast, transposable elements represent some 45% of the genomic mass. Contrary to other species such as Drosophila or plants, these elements are not clustered in specific chromosomal regions in mammals, but are rather scattered throughout the genome, residing between but also inside genes. The transposon landscape of our genome reflects an evolutionary tug-of-war between integration and propagation events orchestrated by these elements, and counteracting defense mechanisms exerted by the host.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ostertag, EM, Kazazian, HH, Jr. Twin priming: a proposed mechanism for the creation of inversions in L1 retrotransposition. Genome Res 2001;11:2059–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordaux, R, Batzer, MA. The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nature Rev Genet 2009;10:691703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamudio, N, Bourc’his, D. Transposable elements in the mammalian germline: a comfortable niche or a deadly trap? Heredity (Edinb) 2010;105:92104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourc’his, D, Bestor, TH. Meiotic catastrophe and retrotransposon reactivation in male germ cells lacking Dnmt3L. Nature 2004;431:96–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Feschotte, C, Gilbert, C. Endogenous viruses: insights into viral evolution and impact on host biology. Nature Rev Genet 2012;13:283–96.Google Scholar
Burns, KH, Boeke, JD. Human transposon tectonics. Cell 2012;149:740–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoye, JP. Studies of endogenous retroviruses reveal a continuing evolutionary saga. Nature Rev Microbiol 2012;10:395406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esnault, C, Priet, S, Ribet, D, et al. A placenta-specific receptor for the fusogenic, endogenous retrovirus-derived, human syncytin-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:17532–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolze, PA, Mommert, M, Mallet, F. Contribution of syncytins and other endogenous retroviral envelopes to human placenta pathologies. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2017;145:111–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lander, ES, Linton, LM, Birren, B, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001;409:860921.Google Scholar
Shi, X, Seluanov, A, Gorbunova, V. Cell divisions are required for L1 retrotransposition. Mol Cell Biol 2007;27:1264–70.Google Scholar
Yoder, JA, Walsh, CP, Bestor, TH. Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet 1997;13:335–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsui, T, Leung, D, Miyashita, H, et al. Proviral silencing in embryonic stem cells requires the histone methyltransferase ESET. Nature 2010;464:927–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, KN, Holmes, RK, Sheehy, AM, et al. Cytidine deamination of retroviral DNA by diverse APOBEC proteins. Curr Biol 2004;14:1392–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauregard, A, Curcio, MJ, Belfort, M. The take and give between retrotransposable elements and their hosts. Annu Rev Genet 2008;42:587617.Google Scholar
Obbard, DJ, Gordon, KH, Buck, AH, Jiggins, FM. The evolution of RNAi as a defence against viruses and transposable elements. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009;364:99115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaneko, H, Dridi, S, Tarallo, V, et al. DICER1 deficit induces Alu RNA toxicity in age-related macular degeneration. Nature 2011;471:325–30.Google Scholar
Aravin, AA, van der Heijden, GW, Castaneda, J, et al. Cytoplasmic compartmentalization of the fetal piRNA pathway in mice. PLoS Genet 2009;5(12):e1000764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmell, MA, Girard, A, van de Kant, HJ, et al. MIWI2 is essential for spermatogenesis and repression of transposons in the mouse male germline. Dev Cell 2007;12:503–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gasior, SL, Wakeman, TP, Xu, B, Deininger, PL. The human LINE-1 retrotransposon creates DNA double-strand breaks. J Mol Biol 2006;357:1383–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popp, C, Dean, W, Feng, S, et al. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 2010;463:1101–5.Google Scholar
Hajkova, P, Erhardt, S, Lane, N, et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech Dev 2002;117:1523.Google Scholar
Lane, N, Dean, W, Erhardt, S, et al. Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Genesis 2003;35:8893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner-Geva, L, Boyko, V, Ehrlich, S, et al. Possible risk for cancer among children born following assisted reproductive technology in Israel. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017;64(4):e26292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, F, Yan, L, Guo, H, et al. The transcriptome and DNA methylome landscapes of human primordial germ cells. Cell 2015;161:1437–52.Google Scholar
Tang, WW, Dietmann, S, Irie, N, et al. A unique gene regulatory network resets the human germline epigenome for development. Cell 2015;161:1453–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuramochi-Miyagawa, S, Kimura, T, Ijiri, TW, et al. Mili, a mammalian member of piwi family gene, is essential for spermatogenesis. Development 2004;131:839–49.Google Scholar
Ollinger, R, Childs, AJ, Burgess, HM, et al. Deletion of the pluripotency-associated Tex19.1 gene causes activation of endogenous retroviruses and defective spermatogenesis in mice. PLoS Genet 2008;4(9):e1000199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, L, Buchold, GM, Greenbaum, MP, et al. GASZ is essential for male meiosis and suppression of retrotransposon expression in the male germline. PLoS Genet 2009;5(9):e1000635.Google Scholar
Frost, RJ, Hamra, FK, Richardson, JA, et al. MOV10L1 is necessary for protection of spermatocytes against retrotransposons by Piwi-interacting RNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:11847–52.Google Scholar
Zheng, K, Xiol, J, Reuter, M, et al. Mouse MOV10L1 associates with Piwi proteins and is an essential component of the Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:11841–6.Google Scholar
Kuramochi-Miyagawa, S, Watanabe, T, Gotoh, K, et al. MVH in piRNA processing and gene silencing of retrotransposons. Genes Dev 2010;24:887–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoji, M, Tanaka, T, Hosokawa, M, et al. The TDRD9–MIWI2 complex is essential for piRNA-mediated retrotransposon silencing in the mouse male germline. Dev Cell 2009;17:775–87.Google Scholar
Soper, SF, van der Heijden, GW, Hardiman, TC, et al. Mouse maelstrom, a component of nuage, is essential for spermatogenesis and transposon repression in meiosis. Dev Cell 2008;15:285–97.Google Scholar
Reuter, M, Berninger, P, Chuma, S, et al. Miwi catalysis is required for piRNA amplification-independent LINE1 transposon silencing. Nature 2011;480:264–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ernst, C, Odom, DT, Kutter, C. The emergence of piRNAs against transposon invasion to preserve mammalian genome integrity. Nat Commun 2017;8:1411.Google Scholar
Mackay, DJ, Temple, IK. Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus type 1. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2010;154C:335–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urdinguio, RG, Bayon, GF, Dmitrijeva, M, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation patterns of spermatozoa in men with unexplained infertility. Hum Reprod 2015;30:1014–28.Google Scholar
Boissonnas, CC, Abdalaoui, HE, Haelewyn, V, et al. Specific epigenetic alterations of IGF2-H19 locus in spermatozoa from infertile men. Eur J Hum Genet 2010;18:7380.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H, Hiura, H, John, RM, et al. DNA methylation errors at imprinted loci after assisted conception originate in the parental sperm. Eur J Hum Genet 2009;17:1582–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marques, CJ, Costa, P, Vaz, B, et al. Abnormal methylation of imprinted genes in human sperm is associated with oligozoospermia. Mol Hum Reprod 2008;14:6774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klaver, R, Bleiziffer, A, Redmann, K, et al. Routine cryopreservation of spermatozoa is safe: evidence from the DNA methylation pattern of nine spermatozoa genes. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012;29:943–50.Google Scholar
El Hajj, NZechner, USchneider, E, et al. Methylation status of imprinted genes and repetitive elements in sperm DNA from infertile males. Sex Dev 2011;5(2):60–9.Google Scholar
Gou, LT, Kang, JY, Dai, P, et al. Ubiquitination-deficient mutations in human Piwi cause male infertility by impairing histone-to-protamine exchange during spermiogenesis. Cell 2017;169:1090–104 .e13.Google Scholar
Gu, A, Ji, G, Shi, X, et al. Genetic variants in Piwi-interacting RNA pathway genes confer susceptibility to spermatogenic failure in a Chinese population. Human Reprod 2010;25:2955–61.Google Scholar
Hadziselimovic, F, Hadziselimovic, NO, Demougin, P, Krey, G, Oakeley, EJ. Deficient expression of genes involved in the endogenous defense system against transposons in cryptorchid boys with impaired mini-puberty. Sex Dev 2011;5:287–93.Google Scholar
Heyn, H, Ferreira, HJ, Bassas, L, et al. Epigenetic disruption of the PIWI pathway in human spermatogenic disorders. PLoS One 2012;7(10):e47892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromer, JG, Zhou, Y, Taylor, MB, Doherty, L, Taylor, HS. Bisphenol-A exposure in utero leads to epigenetic alterations in the developmental programming of uterine estrogen response. FASEB J 2010;24:2273–80.Google Scholar
Yang, S, Bo, J, Hu, H, et al. Derivation of male germ cells from induced pluripotent stem cells in vitro and in reconstituted seminiferous tubules. Cell Prolif 2012;45:91100.Google Scholar
Hirota, T, Ohta, H, Powell, BE, et al. Fertile offspring from sterile sex chromosome trisomic mice. Science 2017;357:932–5.Google Scholar
Wissing, S, Munoz-Lopez, M, Macia, A, et al. Reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells activates LINE-1 retroelement mobility. Hum Mol Genet 2012;21:208–18.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×