Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:22:25.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Van Lange et al.: Proximate and ultimate distinctions must be made to the CLASH model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Tomás Cabeza de Baca ,
Steve C. Hertler  and
Curtis S. Dunkel
Tomás Cabeza de Baca
Affiliation:
Health Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118tomas.cabezadebaca@ucsf.eduhttp://profiles.ucsf.edu/tommy.cabezadebaca
Steve C. Hertler
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, College of New Rochelle, New Rochelle, NY 10801stevenhertler@hotmail.comhttp://www.psycho-diagnostics.com
Curtis S. Dunkel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Western Illinois University, Waggoner Hall, Macomb, IL 61455. C-Dunkel@wiu.eduhttp://www.wiu.edu/cas/psychology/faculty/dunkelcurtis/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Transcending reviewed proximate theories, Van Lange et al.'s CLASH model attempts to ultimately explain the poleward declension of aggression and violence. Seasonal cold is causal, but, we contend, principally as an ecologically relevant evolutionary pressure. We further argue that futurity and restraint are life history variables, and that Life History Theory evolutionarily explains the biogeography of aggression and violence as strategic adaptation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e81
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anokhin, A. P., Grant, J. D., Mulligan, R. C. & Heath, A. C. (2015) The genetics of impulsivity: Evidence for the heritability of delay discounting. Biological Psychiatry 77(10):887–94.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L. & Draper, P. (1991) Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development 62(4):647–70.Google Scholar
Copping, L. T., Campbell, A. & Muncer, S. (2014) Psychometrics and life history strategy: The structure and validity of the high K strategy scale. Evolutionary Psychology 12(1):200–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkel, C. S., Mathes, E. & Beaver, K. M. (2013) Life history theory and the general theory of crime: Life expectancy effects on low self-control and criminal intent. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 7(1):12–23.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Cabeza de Baca, T., Black, C. J., García, R. A., Fernandes, H. B. F., Wolf, P. S. A. & Woodley of Menie, M. A. (2015a) Methodologically sound: Evaluating the psychometric approach to the assessment of human life history [Reply to Copping, Campbell, & Muncer, 2014]. Evolutionary Psychology 13(2):299–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Patch, E. A. & Ceballos, C. E. G. (2015b) A life history approach to the dynamics of social selection. In: Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology, ed.Zeigler-Hill, V., Welling, L. L. M. & Shackelford, T. K., pp. 363–72. Springer International.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J. & Rushton, J. P. (2009) Evidence for shared genetic dominance between the general factor of personality, mental and physical health, and life history traits. Twin Research and Human Genetics 12(06):555–63.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Sefcek, J. A., Kirsner, B. R. & Jacobs, W. J. (2005) The K-factor: Individual differences in life history strategy. Personality and Individual Differences 39(8):1349–60.Google Scholar
Hertler, S. C. (2015) Migration load, ecological opportunity, and obsessive compulsive personality disorder etiology: Obsessive character as an adaptation to seasonality. Evolutionary Psychological Science 1(1):52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertler, S. C. (2016) The biology of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder symptomatology: Identifying an extremely K-selected life history variant. Evolutionary Psychological Science 2(1):1–15.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Maes, H. H., Lönn, S. L., Morris, N. A., Lichtenstein, P., Sundquist, J. & Sundquist, K. (2015) A Swedish national twin study of criminal behavior and its violent, white-collar and property subtypes. Psychological Medicine 45(11):2253–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynn, R. (1991) Race differences in intelligence: A global perspective. Mankind Quarterly 31:255–96.Google Scholar
Mittal, C., Griskevicius, V., Simpson, J. A., Sung, S. & Young, E. S. (2015) Cognitive adaptations to stressful environments: When childhood adversity enhances adult executive function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 109(4):604–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moynihan, D. P. (1993) Defining deviancy down. American Scholar 62:17–33.Google Scholar
Niv, S., Tuvblad, C., Raine, A., Wang, P. & Baker, L. A. (2012) Heritability and longitudinal stability of impulsivity in adolescence. Behavior Genetics 42(3):378–92.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P. (1985a) Differential K theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences. Personality and Individual Differences 6:441–52.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Fulker, D. W., Neale, M. C., Nias, D. K. & Eysenck, H. J. (1986) Altruism and aggression: The heritability of individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(6):1192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott-Phillips, T. C., Dickins, T. E. & West, S. A. (2011) Evolutionary theory and the ultimate–proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1):38–47.Google Scholar
Stearns, S. C. (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodley, M. A. (2011) The cognitive differentiation-integration effort hypothesis: A synthesis between the fitness indicator and life history models of human intelligence. Review of General Psychology 15(3):228.Google Scholar