Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:30:26.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicidal Weed Control in Stubble No-Till Planted Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

George Kapusta
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Southern Illinois Univ. Carbondale, Il 62901
C.F. Strieker
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Southern Illinois Univ. Carbondale, Il 62901

Abstract

Several dozen herbicide systems were evaluated over a 4-yr period for weed control in stubble no-till planted corn (Zea mays L.). Crop tolerance and corn yield data also were obtained. Paraquat (1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ion) and glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] afforded excellent desiccation of all emerged vegetation each year. The oil-soluble formulation of dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol) also afforded complete contact control of emerged vegetation in 1975, the only year it was evaluated. A herbicide system consisting of an acetanilide plus a triazine afforded the most consistent residual weed control. The specific herbicides affording satisfactory control largely depended on the weed spectrum. Fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx.), large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.], and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) were the weeds most difficult to control with the herbicide systems used in these studies. Corn yields were influenced primarily by the degree of weed control achieved, and in several instances by secondary effects of stand reduction or injury.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bennett, O.L., Mathias, E.L., and Lundberg, P.E. 1973. Crop responses to no-till management practices on hilly terrain. Agron. J. 65:488491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Erbach, D.C. and Lovely, W.G. 1975. Effect of plant residue on herbicide performance in no-tillage corn. Weed Sci. 23:512515.Google Scholar
3. Moody, J.E., Shear, G.M., and Jones, J.N. Jr. 1961. Growing corn without tillage. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 25:516517.Google Scholar
4. Moschler, W.W., Shear, G.M., Martens, D.C., Jones, G.D., and Wilmouth, R.R. 1972. Comparative yield and fertilizer efficiency of no-tillage and conventionally tilled corn. Agron. J. 64: 229231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Robison, L.R. and Wittmus, H.D. 1973. Evaluation of herbicides for use in zero and minimized tilled corn and sorghum. Agron. J. 65: 283286.Google Scholar
6. Triplett, G.B. Jr. 1966. Herbicide systems for no-tillage corn (Zea mays L.) following sod. Agron. J. 58:157159.Google Scholar
7. Triplett, G.B. Jr. and Lytle, G.D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453457.Google Scholar
8. Triplett, G.B. Jr., Van Doren, D. M. Jr., and Johnson, W.H. 1964. Non-plowed, strip-tilled corn culture. Trans. Am. Soc. Agr. Eng. 7:105107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar