Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:49:50.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Purple Nutsedge by Bensulide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. Powell Anderson  and
Max P. Dunford
W. Powell Anderson
Affiliation:
New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico
Max P. Dunford
Affiliation:
New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soil incorporated into the tuber zone of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) at 1 to 9 kg/ha, O,O-diisopropyl phosphorodithioate S-ester with N-(2-mercaptoethyl)benzenesulfonamide (bensulide) inhibited the growth of roots on plants developing from these tubers. The inhibitory effect was temporary and occurred only when bensulide was in intimate contact with the tubers and developing plants. When tubers were removed from bensulide-treated soil, washed, and replanted in untreated soil, root growth was normal. The production of shoots from tubers planted in bensulide-treated soil apparently was not affected, but shoot-growth was retarded when root growth was suppressed. When bensulide was incorporated into the upper 5-cm layer of soil, the shoots of nutsedge plants developing from tubers located below this layer grew through the treated soil with no adverse effect; the roots of these plants developed from basal bulbs below the layer of treated soil and were normal. Leaching bensulide-treated soil with 37.6 hectare-cm of water did not move enough bensulide into the soil to cause inhibitory growth effects on purple nutsedge.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , May 1970 , pp. 338 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, O. 1958. Studies on the absorption and translocation of amitrol (3-amino-1,2,4-triazole) by nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus L.). Weeds 6:370–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Barnes, W. C. and Sitterly, W. R. 1963. Control of nutsedge and other weeds in vegetable crops. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 83:728–733.Google Scholar
3. Burgis, D. S. 1969. Phytotoxicity to purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) and soil persistence of six forms of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide. So. Weed Sci. Soc. 22:328–331.Google Scholar
4. Davis, C. H. and Hawkins, R. S. 1943. Eradication and control of nutgrass. Arizona Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 189:1–20.Google Scholar
5. Day, B. E. 1953. Soil fumigation with chlorobromopropene for the control of nutgrass. Hilgardia 21:593–605.Google Scholar
6. Day, B. E. 1956. Status of the nutgrass problem in California. Proc. California Weed Conf. 15:125–129.Google Scholar
7. Day, B. E. and Russell, R. C. 1955. The effect of drying on survival of nutgrass tubers. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 751. 6 p.Google Scholar
8. Hardcastle, W. S., Wilkinson, R. E., and Thompson, J. T. 1968. Fall application of dichlobenil for nutsedge control. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 21:313.Google Scholar
9. Hauser, E. W. 1962. Establishment of nutsedge from space-planted tubers. Weeds 10:209–212.Google Scholar
10. Hauser, E. W. 1962. Development of purple nutsedge under field conditions. Weeds 10:315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hauser, E. W. 1963. Response of purple nutsedge to amitrole, 2,4-D, and EPTC. Weeds 11:251–252.Google Scholar
12. Holm, L. 1969. Weed problems in developing countries. Weed Sci. 17:113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Holt, E. C., Long, J. A., and Allen, W. W. 1962. The toxicity of EPTC to nutsedge. Weeds 10:103–105.Google Scholar
14. Leonard, O. A. and Harris, V. C. 1950. Methyl bromide eradicates nutgrass. Down To Earth 6(1): 13.Google Scholar
15. Loustalot, A. J., Muzik, T. J., and Cruzado, H. J. 1954. Studies on nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus L.) and its control. U. S. Dep. Agr., Fed. Exp. Sta., Puerto Rico Bull. 52. 30 p.Google Scholar
16. Peng, S. Y. and Sze, W. B. 1967. Preliminary study on chemical weed control in sugar cane intercropped with soybeans and peanuts. Proc. Asian-Pacific Weed Contr. Interch. 1:85–87.Google Scholar
17. Smith, E. V. and Fick, G. L. 1937. Nutgrass eradication studies. I. Relation to life history of nutgrass, Cyperus rotundus L., to possible methods of control. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 29:1007–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Smith, E. V. and Mayton, E. L. 1938. Nutgrass eradication studies. II. The eradication of nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus L.) by certain tillage treatments. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 30: 18–22.Google Scholar
19. Widigier, R. E. 1966. Weeds controlled by the methanearsonates. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 19:51–56.Google Scholar