Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:46:18.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Putative Prodiamine-Resistant Annual Bluegrass (Poa annua) Population is Controlled by Indaziflam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James T. Brosnan ,
Eric H. Reasor ,
Jose J. Vargas ,
Gregory K. Breeden ,
Dean A. Kopsell ,
Matthew A. Cutulle  and
Thomas C. Mueller
James T. Brosnan*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 252 Ellington Plant Sciences Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
Eric H. Reasor
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 252 Ellington Plant Sciences Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
Jose J. Vargas
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 252 Ellington Plant Sciences Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
Gregory K. Breeden
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 252 Ellington Plant Sciences Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
Dean A. Kopsell
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 252 Ellington Plant Sciences Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
Matthew A. Cutulle
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 252 Ellington Plant Sciences Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
Thomas C. Mueller
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 252 Ellington Plant Sciences Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jbrosnan@utk.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prodiamine is a mitotic inhibiting herbicide regularly used to control annual bluegrass PRE. A population of annual bluegrass not controlled by prodiamine at 1,120 g a.i. ha−1 was identified on a golf course in Alcoa, TN, in 2012. A whole-plant hydroponics bioassay was used to screen this biotype for prodiamine resistance (PR) compared with a known susceptible population (SS). Multitiller (i.e., > 4 tillers) PR and SS annual bluegrass plants were established in hydroponic culture and exposed to 0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.10, 1.0, and 10.0 mM prodiamine. Exposure to prodiamine at 0.001 mM reduced root growth of the SS biotype to 26% of the nontreated check (i.e., 0 mM prodiamine) but had no effect on the PR biotype. When exposed to 10 mM prodiamine, root growth of the PR biotype was reduced to 24% of the nontreated check compared with 9% for the SS biotype. I 50 values for the PR and SS biotypes were 0.04 and 2.8 × 10−6 mM prodiamine, respectively. The PR biotype measured lower in plant height and leaf width than the SS population. In field trials, prodiamine at 560, 840, 1,120, and 1,400 g ha−1 only controlled the PR biotype 0 to 22%. PRE applications of the cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor indaziflam at 35, 52.5, and 70 g a.i. ha−1 controlled this PR biotype 70 to 97%. This marks the second instance of annual bluegrass developing resistance to prodiamine in Tennessee during the past 5 yr. Future research should evaluate indaziflam efficacy for control of other prodiamine-resistant biotypes of annual bluegrass as well as annual bluegrass biotypes resistant to herbicidal inhibitors of 5-enolpyruvylshikimic acid-3-phosphate synthase, acetolactate synthase, and photosystem II.

Keywords

Indaziflamprodiamineannual bluegrass, Poa annua L. var. annuabermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon L. PersCellulose; cellulose biosynthesis inhibitordinitroanilinegolf courseherbicide resistancemitotic inhibitorturfturfgrass
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 138 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anthony, RG, Hussey, PJ (1999) Dinitroaniline herbicide resistance and the microtubule cytoskeleton. Trend Plant Sci. 4:112–116.Google Scholar
Barbham, CB, Debolt, S (2013) The mode of action of indaziflam. Proc. Weed Sci Soc Am. 370. http://wssaabstracts.com/public/17/abstract-370.html. Accessed April 9, 2013 [Abstract]Google Scholar
Brosnan, JT, Breeden, GK, McCullough, PE, Henry, GM (2012) PRE and POST control of annual bluegrass (Poa annua) with indaziflam. Weed Technol 26:48–53.Google Scholar
Cutulle, MA, McElroy, JS, Millwood, RW, Sorochan, JC, Stewart, CN Jr. (2009) Selection of bioassay method influences detection of annual bluegrass resistance to mitotic-inhibiting herbicides. Crop Sci. 49:1088–1095.Google Scholar
Darmency, H, Picard, JC, Wang, T (2011) Fitness costs linked to dinitroaniline resistance mutation in Setaria . Heredity 107:80–86.Google Scholar
Dernoeden, PH (1998) Use of prodiamine as a preemergence herbicide to control annual bluegrass in Kentucky bluegrass. HortScience 33:845–846.Google Scholar
Ellis, WM (1973) The breeding system and variation in populations of Poa annua L. Evolution 27:656–662.Google Scholar
Heap, I (2013) International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed March 27, 2013Google Scholar
Hoagland, DR, Arnon, DI (1950) The Water-Culture Method for Growing Plants without Soil. Berkeley, CA California Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 347. 2 p.Google Scholar
Isgrigg, J III, Yelverton, FH, Brownie, C, Warren, LS Jr. (2002) Dinitroaniline resistant annual bluegrass in North Carolina. Weed Sci. 50:86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopsell, DA, McElroy, JS, Sams, CE (2007) Genetic variation in carotenoid concentrations among diploid and amphidiploid rapid-cycling Brassica species. Hort Sci. 42:461–465.Google Scholar
McIntosh, MS (1983) Analysis of combined experiments. Agron J. 75:153–155.Google Scholar
Meyers, DF, Hanrahan, R, Michel, J, Monke, B, Mudge, L, Olsen, C, Parker, A, Smith, J, Spak, D (2009) Indaziflam/BCS AA170717—A new herbicide for preemergent control of grasses and broadleaves in turf and ornamentals. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 62:393.Google Scholar
Perry, DH, McElroy, JS, Doroh, MC, Walker, RH (2011) Indaziflam utilization for controlling problematic turfgrass weeds. Appl Turf Sci., DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0428-01-RS [Online]Google Scholar
Sabba, RP, Vaughn, KC (1999) Herbicides that inhibit cellulose biosynthesis. Weed Sci. 47:757–763.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, SS, Jensen, JE, Fuerst, EP (1995) Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose–response relationships. Weed Technol 9:218–227.Google Scholar
Sweeney, PM, Danneberger, TK (1995) RAPD characterization of Poa annua L. populations on golf course greens and fairways. Crop Sci. 35:1676–1680.Google Scholar
Toler, JE, Willis, TG, Estes, AG, McCarty, LB (2007) Postemergent annual bluegrass control in dormant nonoverseeded bermudagrass turf. Hort Sci. 42:670–672.Google Scholar
Tresch, S, Grossmann, K (2003) Quinclorac does not inhibit cellulose (cell wall) biosynthesis in sensitive barnyardgrass and maize roots. Pest Biochem Phys 75:73–78.Google Scholar
Vaughn, KC, Lehnen, LP (1991) Mitotic disruptor herbicides. Weed Sci. 39:450–457.Google Scholar