Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T10:11:41.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coordination frictions and economic growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2022

Miroslav Gabrovski
Miroslav Gabrovski*
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii at Manoa
*
Email: mgabr@hawaii.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In practice, firms face a number of scarce innovation projects. They choose one towards which to direct their effort, but do not coordinate these choices. This gives rise to coordination frictions. This paper develops an expanding-variety endogenous growth model to study the implications of these frictions for growth and welfare. We find that the coordination failure generates a number of foregone innovations and reduces the economy-wide research intensity. Both effects decrease the growth rate. This creates a general equilibrium effect that endogenously amplifies the fraction of wasteful simultaneous innovation. Furthermore, formalizing the coordination frictions uncovers a novel link between the “stepping on toes” and “standing on shoulders” externalities—their magnitudes are endogenously determined through the ratio of firms to innovation projects. We find that the “stepping on toes” externality is larger for all parameter values.

Keywords

GrowthFrictionsCoordinationSimultaneous InnovationSearch for IdeasO30O31O32O33O40
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , September 2023 , pp. 1528 - 1548
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Previously circulated under the title “Simultaneous Innovation and Economic Growth”. I thank the associate editor, two annonymous referees, Javier Birchenall, William Branch, Hector Chade, Areendam Chanda, Emanuel Gasteiger, Francois Geerolf, Athanasios Geromichalos, Jang-Ting Guo, Christian Hellwig, Lucas Herrenbrueck, Nir Jaimovich, Gregor Jarosch, Peter Klenow, Bruce McGough, David Malueg, Victor Ortego-Marti, Hiroki Nishimura, Nicolas Petrosky-Nadeau, Latchezar Popov, Vincenzo Quadrini, Marlo Raveendran, Guillaume Rocheteau, Peter Rupert, Pierre-Daniel Sarte, Christopher Tonetti, Aman Ullah, Liang Wang, Xiaojun Wang, Pierre-Olivier Weill, Yaniv Yedid-Levi, Alwyn Young, participants at the Spring 2017 Mid-West Macroeconomics Meeting, Spring 2017 West Coast Search and Matching Workshop, UC Graduate Student Macroeconomics Colloquium at UC Irvine, at UC Santa Barbara and at UC Riverside, and seminar participants at Academia Sinica, the Federal Reserve Board, the College of William and Mary, Grinnell College, Lund University, UC Irvine, Temple University, and University of Hawaii, Manoa for helpful comments and suggestions. All errors are my own.

References

Acemoglu, D. (2009) Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Akcigit, U.. (2012) Intellectual property rights policy, competition and innovation. Journal of the European Economic Association 10(1), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P., Akcigit, U. and Howitt, P.. (2014) Chapter 1 - What do we learn from Schumpeterian growth theory? In: Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 2, pp. 515–563. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R. and Howitt, P.. (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(2), 701–728.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P.. (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2), 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akcigit, U., Celik, M. A. and Greenwood, J.. (2016) Buy, keep, or sell: Economic growth and the market for ideas. Econometrica 84(3), 943–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akcigit, U. and Liu, Q.. (2016) The role of information in innovation and competition. Journal of the European Economic Association 14(4), 828–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X.. (2003) Economic Growth. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, J., Perla, J. and Tonetti, C.. (2014) Catch-up and fall-back through innovation and imitation. Journal of Economic Growth 19(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdett, K., Shi, S. and Wright, R.. (2001) Pricing and matching with frictions. Journal of Political Economy 109(5), 1060–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, P.-H., Chu, A. C., Chu, H. and Lai, C.-C.. (2021) Optimal capital taxation in an economy with innovation-driven growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 1–34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/macroeconomic-dynamics/article/abs/optimal-capital-taxation-in-an-economy-with-innovationdriven-growth/CF5E7E1672FB5A0F9890B58BDB8793DD#article Google Scholar
Chiu, J., Meh, C. and Wright, R.. (2017) Innovation and growth with financial, and other frictions. International Economic Review 58(1), 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, A. C. and Wang, X.. (2022) Effects of R&D subsidies in a hybrid model of endogenous growth and semi-endogenous growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics 26(3), 813–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. and Ishii, J.. (2005) Competition, innovation and racing for priority at the US Patent and Trademark Office. USC CLEO Research Paper, (C05-13), 05–22.Google Scholar
Cohen, W., Nelson, R. and Walsh, J.. (2000) Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why US Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corriveau, L. (1994) Entrepreneurs, growth and cycles. Economica 61, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corriveau, L. (1998) Innovation races, strategic externalities and endogenous growth. Economica 65(259), 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. and Hashimoto, K.-I.. (2015) R&D subsidies, international knowledge diffusion, and fully endogenous productivity growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics 19(8), 1816–1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P. (1981) Mobility costs, frictional unemployment, and efficiency. Journal of Political Economy 89(4), 798–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P. (1982) Aggregate demand management in search equilibrium. Journal of Political Economy 90(5), 881–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrovski, M. (2020) Simultaneous innovation and the cyclicality of R&D. Review of Economic Dynamics 36, 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrovski, M. and Ortego-Marti, V.. (2021) Efficiency in the Housing Market with Search Frictions. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Gautier, P. and Teulings, C.. (2009) Search and the city. Regional Science and Urban Economics 39(3), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomis-Porqueras, P., Julien, B. and Wang, C.. (2017) Strategic advertising and directed search. International Economic Review 58(3), 783–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M. and Sena, V.. (2014) The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. Journal of Economic Literature 52(2), 375–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopenhayn, H. and Squintani, F.. (2021) On the direction of innovation. Journal of Political Economy 129(7), 1991–2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosios, A. (1990) On the efficiency of matching and related models of search and unemployment. The Review of Economic Studies 57(2), 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howitt, P. and McAfee, R. P.. (1987) Costly search and recruiting. International Economic Review 28(1), 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. and Williams, J.. (2000) Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. Journal of Economic Growth 5(1), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, B., Kennes, J. and King, I.. (2000) Bidding for labor. Review of Economic Dynamics 3(4), 619–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, B., Kennes, J. and Ritter, M.. (2014) Efficient club formation in a frictional environment. Economics Letters 125(3), 372–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, B., Kennes, J. and Ritter, M.. (2018) Bidding for teams. Labour Economics 52, 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klette, T. J. and Kortum, S.. (2004) Innovating firms and aggregate innovation. Journal of Political Economy 112(5), 986–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortum, S. (1997) Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 65(6), 1389–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kultti, K. and Takalo, T.. (2008) Optimal fragmentation of intellectual property rights. International Journal of Industrial Organization 26(1), 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kultti, K., Takalo, T. and Toikka, J.. (2007) Secrecy versus patenting. The RAND Journal of Economics 38(1), 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemley, M. (2011) The myth of the sole inventor. Michigan Law Review 110, 709.Google Scholar
Lu, X. and McAfee, R. P.. (1996) The evolutionary stability of auctions over bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior 15(2), 228–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. Jr. and Moll, B.. (2014) Knowledge growth and the allocation of time. Journal of Political Economy 120(1), 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morimoto, T. and Tabata, K.. (2020) Higher education subsidy policy and R&D-based growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics 24(8), 2019–2168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngai, L. R. and Tenreyro, S.. (2014) Hot and cold seasons in the housing market. American Economic Review 104(12), 3991–4026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perla, J. and Tonetti, C.. (2014) Equilibrium imitation and growth. Journal of Political Economy 120(1), 52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrongolo, B. and Pissarides, C.. (2006) Scale effects in markets with search. The Economic Journal 116(508), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pissarides, C. (2000) Equilibrium Unemployment Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Romer, P. M. (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segerstrom, P. S., Anant, T. C. A. and Dinopoulos, E.. (1990) A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. The American Economic Review 80(5), 1077–1091.Google Scholar
Shi, S. (2001) Frictional assignment. I. Efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory 98(2), 232–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, S. (2005) Frictional assignment, Part II: Infinite horizon and inequality. Review of Economic Dynamics 5(1), 106–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimer, R. (2005) The assignment of workers to jobs in an economy with coordination frictions. Journal of Political Economy 113(5), 996–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strulik, H. (2007) Too much of a good thing? The quantitative economics of R&D-driven growth revisited. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109(2), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolinsky, A. (1988) Dynamic markets with competitive bidding. The Review of Economic Studies 55(1), 71–84.10.2307/2297530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. (2021) Welfare effects of patent protection in a growth model with R&D and capital accumulation. Macroeconomic Dynamics 25(2), 579–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeira, J. (2011) Innovations, patent races and endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth 16(2), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar