Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T22:16:35.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trends in the description of extinct genera among mammalian orders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Jan Peczkis
Jan Peczkis*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago 60625
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Probably 90 percent of extant mammals are already known (Goto, 1982), while extinct ones are continually being discovered. Seldom, if ever, has there been an analysis of the approximate rates of discovery of extinct genera per order. Specialists work within their groups and seldom see how their orders compare with those outside their specialty. Questions about intensity of research (on a given order), splitting versus lumping, and general collective interest in an order can partly be answered through a comparative analysis with other orders.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 63 , Issue 6 , November 1989 , pp. 947 - 950
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, M., and Hand, S. 1984. Background to the search for Australia's oldest mammals, p. 517–567. In Archer, M. and Clayton, G. (eds.), Vertebrate Zoogeography and Evolution in Australasia. Hesperion Press, Carlisle, Australia.Google Scholar
Buffetaut, E. 1987. A Short History of Vertebrate Paleontology. Croom Helm, London, 223 p.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1988. Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. Freeman and Company, New York, 698 p.Google Scholar
Clemens, W. A. 1986. On Triassic and Jurassic mammals, p. 237–246. In Padian, K. (ed.), The Beginning of the Age of Dinosaurs. Cambridge University Press, London, New York.Google Scholar
Dawson, M. R., and Krishtalka, L. 1984. Fossil history of the families of Recent mammals, p. 13. In Anderson, S. and Jones, J. K. (eds.), Orders and Families of Recent Mammals of the World. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Fleagle, J. G. 1988. Primate Adaptation and Evolution. Academic Press, New York, London, 486 p.Google Scholar
Goto, H. E. 1982. Animal Taxonomy. Edward Arnold, London, 60 p.Google Scholar
Hill, J. E., and Smith, J. D. 1984. Bats: A Natural History. University of Texas Press, Austin, 243 p.Google Scholar
Peczkis, J. 1988. Predicting body-weight distribution of mammalian genera in families and orders. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 132:509–510.Google Scholar
Ride, W. D. L. 1964. A review of the Australian fossil marsupials. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 47:97–131.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 468 p.Google Scholar
Savage, D. E., and Russell, D. E. 1983. Mammalian Paleofaunas of the World. Addison-Wesley, London, Amsterdam, 432 p.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W. III. 1985. Real and apparent trends in species richness through time, p. 129–151. In Valentine, J. W. (ed.), Phanerozoic Diversity Patterns. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1973. Are categories in different phyla comparable? Taxon, 22:333–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1975. Group selection, sex, and fossils. Evolution, 29:87–94.Google Scholar