Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T07:40:35.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Retrotapes del Río, 1997 (Bivalvia, Veneridae) and systematic analysis of its taxa from Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2019

Maximiliano Jorge Alvarez
Maximiliano Jorge Alvarez*
Affiliation:
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia, Buenos Aires, C1405DJR, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the genus Retrotapes was erected, some authors have favored or opposed its validity, or argued about the assignment of the extant species R. exalbidus and R. lenticularis to Retrotapes. Some authors synonymized Retrotapes with the Miocene genus Frigichione, and others with the extant genus Eurhomalea to which most of the species that belong to Retrotapes were previously assigned. In the present contribution, a phylogenetic analysis of the genus is performed to test these controversies. In addition, a systematic revision of the Chilean species of the genus is performed to complete the analysis of Retrotapes taxa from Patagonia and Antarctica started by previous authors. This study demonstrates that Retrotapes is a monophyletic genus, which is not closely related to Frigichione or Eurhomalea. Instead, Retrotapes is closely related to some Austral taxa from Kerguelen Island (Paleomarcia), New Zealand (Atamarcia), and Australia (Katelysia), a relationship previously unknown. Besides, the extant species R. lenticularis and R. exalbidus belong to Retrotapes and were recovered as part of a clade closely related to the type species of the genus, R. ninfasiensis (Miocene, Patagonia). Retrotapes is reported in Chile beginning in the late Eocene, where it was represented by R. difficilis n. comb., which is a taxon that resembles some Eocene species of the same genus from Antarctica. In the late Oligocene–early Miocene, it was represented by R. navidadis and later in the Pliocene by three species: the fossil R. fuenzalidae and the two extant ones.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , July 2019 , pp. 685 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © 2019, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, A., and Reeve, L., 1848–1850, Mollusca, in Adams, A., ed., The Zoology of the Voyage of H.M.S. Samarang, under the command of the Captain Sir Edward Belcher, C.B., F.R.A.S., F.G.S., during the years 1843–1846: London, Reeve and Benham, 87 p.Google Scholar
Alvarez, M.J., and Pérez, D.E., 2016, Gerontic intraspecific variation in the Antarctic bivalve Retrotapes antarcticus: Ameghiniana, v. 53, p. 485–494.Google Scholar
Alvarez, M.J., del Río, C.J., and Marenssi, S.A., 2014, Revisión del género Retrotapes del Río (Bivalvia: Veneridae) en el Eoceno de la Antártida: Ameghiniana, v. 51, p. 61–78.Google Scholar
Bapst, D.W., 2012, Paleotree: an R package for paleontological and phylogenetic analyses of evolution: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, v. 3, p. 803–807.Google Scholar
Bernard, F.R., 1983, Catalogue of the living Bivalvia of the Eastern Pacific Ocean: Bering Strait to Cape Horn: Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, v. 61, 203 p.Google Scholar
Beu, A.G., 2009, Before the ice: biogeography of Antarctic Paleogene molluscan faunas: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology v. 284, p. 191–226.Google Scholar
Beu, A.G., and Taviani, M., 2014, Early Miocene Mollusca from McMurdo Sound, Antarctica (ANDRILL 2A drill core), with a review of Antarctic Oligocene and Neogene Pectinidae (Bivalvia): Palaeontology, v. 57, p. 299–342.Google Scholar
Born, I., 1778, Index rerum naturalium Musei Caesarei Vindobonensis, pars prima. Testacea: Wien, Officina Krausiana, 458 p.Google Scholar
Carcelles, A., 1944, Catálogo de los moluscos marinos de Puerto Quequén: Revista del Museo de La Plata (Nueva Serie), Sección Zoología v. 3, p. 233–309.Google Scholar
Castellanos, Z.J.A., 1970, Catálogo de los Moluscos Marinos Bonaerenses: Anales de la Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, v. 8, p. 1–365.Google Scholar
Chemnitz, I.H., 1795, Neues Systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet: Nürnberg, Raspe, 310 p.Google Scholar
Chen, J., Li, Q., Kong, L., and Zheng, X., 2011, Molecular phylogeny of Venus clams (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Veneridae) with emphasis on the systematic position of taxa along the coast of mainland China: Zoologica Scripta, v. 40, p. 260–271.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M., 1920, Rectifications de nomenclature: Revue Critique de Paléozoologie, v. 24, p. 81–83.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1902, Synopsis of the family Veneridae and of the North American Recent species: Proceedings of the United States National Museum, v. 26, p. 355–412.Google Scholar
del Río, C.J., 1997, Cenozoic biogeographic history of the eurythermal genus Retrotapes, new genus (subfamily Tapetinae) from southern South America and Antarctica: The Nautilus, v. 110, p. 77–93.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.P., 1835, Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vértebrés ou tableau général des classes, des orders et des genres de ces animaux par J.B.P.A. de Lamarck (deuxième édition), Tome 6. Histoire des mollusques: París, J.B. Baillière, 600 p.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.P., 1854, Descriptions of new shells from the collection of Hugh Cuming, Esq: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, v. 22, p. 317–371.Google Scholar
DeVries, T.J., and Frassinetti, D., 2003, Range extensions and biogeographic implications of Chilean Neogene mollusks found in Peru: Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Chile, v. 52, p. 119–135.Google Scholar
Dillwyn, L.W., 1817, A descriptive catalogue of Recent shells, arranged according to the Linnean method; with particular attention to the synonymy: London, John and Arthur Arch, v. 1, 580 p.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1835–1846, Voyage dans l'Amerique meridionale (Le Brasil, l'Uruguay executé pendant les anné 1826–1833): Paris, P. Bertrand and Strasbourg, V. Levrault, v. 3, [1842], 290 p.Google Scholar
Encinas, A., 2006, Estratigrafía y sedimentología de los depósitos marinos mio-pliocenos del área de navidad (33°00'–34°30'S), Chile central. Implicaciones con respecto a la tectónica del antearco [Tesis Doctoral]: Santiago, Chile, Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Geología, 177 p.Google Scholar
Encinas, A., Le Roux, J.P., Buatois, L.A., Nielsen, S.N., Finger, K.L., Fourtanier, E., and Lavenu, A., 2006, Nuevo esquema estratigráfico para los depósitos marinos mio-pliocenos del área de Navidad (33°00’–34°30’), Chile central: Revista Geológica de Chile v. 33, p. 221–246.Google Scholar
Encinas, A., Folguera, A., Bechis, F., Finger, K.L., Zambrano, P., Pérez, F., Bernabé, P., Tapia, F., Riffo, R., Buatois, L., Orts, D., Nielsen, S.N., Valencia, V., Cuitiño, J., Oliveros, V., De Girolamo Del Mauro, L., and Ramos, V., 2018, The late Oligocene–early Miocene marine transgression of Patagonia, in Folguera, A., Contreras Reyes, E., Heredia, N., Encinas, A., Iannelli, S.B., Oliveros, V., Dávila, F.M., Collo, G., Giambiagi, L., Maksymowicz, A., Iglesia Llanos, M.P., Turienzo, M., Naipauer, M., Orts, D., Litvak, V.D., Alvarez, O., and Arriagada, C., eds., The Evolution of the Chilean-Argentinean Andes: Cham, Switzerland, Springer Earth System Sciences, Springer, p. 443–474.Google Scholar
Farris, J.S., Albert, V.A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D., and Kluge, A.G., 1996, Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining: Cladistics, v. 12, p. 99–124.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J., 1985, Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap: Evolution, p. 783–791.Google Scholar
Finger, K.L., Encinas, A., Nielsen, S.N., and Peterson, D.E., 2003, Microfaunal indications of late Miocene deep-water basins of the central coast of Chile: 10° Congreso Geológico Chileno, Resúmenes extendidos, Concepción, Chile, p. 8.Google Scholar
Finger, K., Nielsen, S.N., DeVries, T.J., Encinas, A., and Peterson, D., 2007, Paleontologic evidence for sedimentary displacement in Neogene forearc basins of central Chile: Palaios, v. 22, p. 3–16.Google Scholar
Finger, K.L., Encinas, A., and Nielsen, S.N., 2013, Comment on ‘Evidence for an Early–Middle Miocene age of the Navidad Formation (central Chile): paleontological, paleoclimatic and tectonic implications’ of Gutiérrez et al. (2013, Adean Geology 40 (I): 66–78): Andean Geology, v. 40, p. 571–579.Google Scholar
Fletcher, H.O., 1938, Marine Tertiary fossils and a description of a Recent Mytilus from Kerguelen Islands: British, Australian and New Zealand Antarctic Research Expedition Reports, ser. A, v. 2, p. 101–116.Google Scholar
Forcelli, D.O., and Narosky, T., 2015, Uruguayan Seashells—Moluscos Marinos, Argentina, Uruguay, Brasil: Buenos Aires, Vázquez Mazzini Editores, 272 p.Google Scholar
Frassinetti, D., 1974, El género Venus en la colección de fósiles Terciarios y Cuartarios de R.A. Philippi (1887): Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Chile, v. 33, p. 43–51.Google Scholar
Frassinetti, D., 1997, Moluscos del Plioceno Superior marino de la Isla Guafo, Sur de Chile. Parte I. Bivalvia: Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Chile, v. 46, p. 55–79.Google Scholar
Frassinetti, D., 2004, Moluscos fósiles del Mioceno marino de la Isla Ipún, Sur de Chile: Boletín del Museo de Historia Natural, Chile, v. 53, p. 71–83.Google Scholar
Frassinetti, D., 2006, Moluscos fósiles del Mioceno marino de islas Crosslet y Hereford (Golfo Tres Montes, Aisén, Chile): Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Chile, v. 55, p. 61–74.Google Scholar
Frassinetti, D., and Covacevich, V., 1995, Moluscos del Plioceno Superior marino de Isla Guamblín, Archipiélago de los Chonos, sur de Chile: Revista Geológica de Chile, v. 22, p. 47–73.Google Scholar
Frassinetti, D., and Covacevich, V., 1999, Invertebrados fósiles marinos de la Formación Guadal (Oligoceno superior-Mioceno inferior) en Pampa Castillo, Región de Aisén, Chile: Boletín del Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, v. 51, p. 1–96.Google Scholar
Frizzell, D.L., 1936, Preliminary reclassifications of veneracean pelecypodes: Bulletin du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle Belgique, v. 12, p. 1–84.Google Scholar
Gallardo, M.H., González, C., Mena, C., Lomovasky, B., Morriconi, E., and Clasing, E., 2003, Allozimic variation in the clam genus Eurhomalea (Bivalvia: Veneriidae) along southern South American coast: Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, v. 76, p. 501–507.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J.F., 1791, Vermes, in Gmelin, J.F., ed., Caroli a Linnaei Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae: Editio Decima Tertia, Aucta Reformata: Leipzig, G.E. Beer, Tome 1, Pars 6, p. 3021–3910.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P.A., 1993, Estimating character weights during tree search: Cladistics, v. 9, p. 83–91.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Oxelman, B., Ramírez, M.J. and Szumik, C.A., 2003, Improvements to resampling measures of group support: Cladistics v. 19, p. 324–332.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., and Nixon, K.C., 2008, TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis: Cladistics, v. 24, p. 774–786.Google Scholar
Gordillo, S., 2006, Pleistocene Retrotapes del Río, 1997 (Veneridae, Bivalvia) from Tierra del Fuego, Argentina: Ameghiniana, v. 43, p. 757–761.Google Scholar
Gray, J.E., 1851, List of the specimens of British animals in the collection of the British Museum. Part 7. Mollusca Acephala and Brachiopoda: London, Richard Taylor, 167 p.Google Scholar
Griffin, M., and Nielsen, S., 2008, A revision of the type specimens of Tertiary molluscs from Chile and Argentina described by d'Orbigny (1842), Sowerby (1846) and Hupé (1854): Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 6, p. 251–316.Google Scholar
Guzmán, N., Marquardt, C., Ortlieb, L. and Frassinetti, D., 2000, La malacofauna neógena y cuaternaria del área de Caldera (27–28 S): especies y rangos bioestratigráficos: 9° Congreso Geológico Chileno, Puerto Varas, Chile, v. 1, p. 476–481.Google Scholar
Harte, M., 1998, Is Cyclininae a monophyletic subfamily of Veneridae (Bivalvia)?: Malacologia, v. 40, p. 297–304.Google Scholar
Herm, D., 1969, Marines Pliozän und Pleistozän in Nord- und Mittel-Chile unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung der Mollusken-Faunen: Zitteliana, v. 2, p. 1–159.Google Scholar
Huber, M., 2010, Compendium of bivalves. A full-color guide to 3,300 of the world's marine bivalves. A status on Bivalvia after 250 years of research: Hackenheim, Germany, ConchBooks, 901 p., 1 CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Hupé, H., 1854, Malacología y conquiliología, in Gay, C., ed.,: Historia Física y Política de Chile, Zoología 8, Atlas 2, Conquiliología 1–6, Malacología 1–8: Paris, E. Thunot y Co and Lesauvage, p. 5–385.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. von, 1897, Os molluscos dos terrenos terciarios de Patagonia: Revista del Museo Paulista v. 2, p. 217–382.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. von, 1907, Les Mollusques fossiles du Tertiaire et du Crétacé Superieur de l'Argentina: Anales del Museo de Buenos Aires, Serie 3, p. 1–611.Google Scholar
Jukes-Browne, A.J., 1909, Application of Gomphina, Marcia, Hemitapes, and Katelysia: Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, v. 8, p. 223–246.Google Scholar
Kappner, I., and Bieler, R., 2006, Phylogeny of venus clams (Bivalvia: Venerinae) as inferred from nuclear and mithochondrial gene sequences: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, v. 40, p. 317–331.Google Scholar
Keen, A.M., 1954, Nomenclatural notes on the pelecypod family Veneridae: Minutes of the Conchological Club of Southern California, v. 139, p. 50–55.Google Scholar
Lamarck, P.A., 1818, Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, préséntant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres, et la citation des principales espèces qui s'y rapportent; precedes d'une Introduction offrant la determination des caracteres essentiels de l`Animal, sa distinction du vegetal et desautres corps naturels, enfin, l'Exposition des Principes fondamentaux de la Zoologie: Paris, Deterville. 612 p.Google Scholar
Lamy, E., and Fischer-Piette, E., 1938, Notes sur les espèces Lamarckiennes de Clausinella, de Salacia, de Protothaca, et de Samarangia (Moll. Lamellibr.): Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, ser. 2, v. 10, p. 611–614.Google Scholar
Lauriat-Rage, A., Carriol, R., Lozouet, P., Giret, A. and Leyrit, H., 2002, Miocene molluscs and barnacles from Mont Rond, Kerguelen Islands: Alcheringa, v. 6, p. 251–316.Google Scholar
Le Roux, J.P., Achurra, L., Henríquez, Á., Carreño, C., Rivera, H, Suárez, M.E., Ishman, S.E., Pyenson, N.D., and Guststein, C.S., 2016, Oroclinal bending of the Juan Fernández Ridge suggested by geohistory analysis of the Bahía Inglesa Formation, north-central Chile: Sedimentary Geology, v. 333, p. 34–49.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758, Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum clases, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis, Editio decima, reformata: Holmiae [Stockholm], Laurentius Salvius,, 824 p.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1767, Systema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis., Ed. 12. 1., Regnum Animale, 2: Holmiae [Stockholm], Laurentii Salvii, p. 533–1327.Google Scholar
Marwick, J., 1927, The Veneridae of New Zealand: Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, v. 57, p. 567–635.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, P., Bieler, R., Kappner, I., and Rawlings, T., 2006, Phylogeny of Veneroida (Mollusca: Bivalvia) based on morphology and molecules: Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 148, p. 439–521.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S.N., 2013, A new Pliocene mollusk fauna from Mejillones, northern Chile: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 87, p. 33–66.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S.N., and Encinas, A., 2014, The genus Struthiochenopus (Gastropoda: Aporrhaidae): new Miocene records from southern Chile: Journal of Paleontology v. 88, p. 152–159.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S.N., and Glodny, J., 2009, Early Miocene subtropical water temperatures in the southeast Pacific: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 280, p. 480–488.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S.N., and Valdovinos, C., 2008, Early Pleistocene mollusks of the Tubul Formation, south-central Chile: Nautilus, v. 122, p. 201–216.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E., 1899, The fauna of the Magellanian beds of Punta Arenas, Chili: The American Journal of Science, v. 8, p. 427–432.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E., 1902, Tertiary invertebrates, in Scott, W.B., ed., Reports of the Princeton University Expedition to Patagonia 1896–1899: Princeton, New Jersey, J. Pierpoint Morgan Publishing Foundation, v. 4, Paleontology I, p. 45–332.Google Scholar
Paredes, C. and Cardoso, F. 2003, Nuevos registros de bivalvos para el Mar Peruano: Revista Peruana de Biología, v. 10, p. 209–216.Google Scholar
Pérez, D.E., and Ezcurra, M., 2018, Quantitative palaeobiogeographical analysis of South American Neogene Chioninae (Bivalvia: Veneridae): Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 495, p. 278–283.Google Scholar
Pérez, D.E., del Río, C.J., and Nielsen, S.N., 2013, Sistemática y filogenia del género Ameghinomya Ihering, 1907 (Bivalvia: Chioninae) del Cenozoico de Argentina y Chile: Ameghiniana v. 50, p. 354–374.Google Scholar
Philippi, R.A., 1887, Los fósiles terciarios y cuartarios de Chile: Leipzig, Brockhaus, 256 p.Google Scholar
Powell, A.W.B., 1960, Antarctic and subantarctic Mollusca: Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum, v. 5, p. 117–193.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team, 2018, R: a language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C.S., 1815, Analyse de la nature, ou tableau de l'Universe et des corps organisées: Palermo, Jean Barravecchia, 224 p.Google Scholar
Ramorino, L., 1968, Pelecypoda de la Bahía Valparaiso: Revista de Biología marina, La Plata, v. 13, p. 175–285.Google Scholar
Reeve, L.A., 1863–1864, Monograph of the genus Venus. Conchologia Iconica: or, Illustrations of the Shells of Molluscous Animals, v. 14, London, L. Reeve & Co., p. 1–17.Google Scholar
Ríos, E.C., 1994, Seashells of Brazil (2° edition): Rio Grande, Museu Oceanográfico Fundação Universidade do Rio Grande, 328 p.Google Scholar
Römer, E., 1857, Kritische Untersuchung der Arten des Molluskengeschlechts Marcia bei Linné und Gmelin mit Berücksichtigung der später beschriebenen Arten: Cassel, Luckhardt, 135 p.Google Scholar
Sharman, G., and Newton, E.T., 1894, Notes on some fossils from Seymour Island, in the Antarctic regions obtained by Dr. Donald: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 37, p. 707–709.Google Scholar
Sowerby I, G.B., 1835, Characters of and observations on new genera and species of Mollusca and Conchifera collected by M. Cumming: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, v. 1835, p. 21–28, 41–48.Google Scholar
Sowerby II, G.B., 1853, Monograph of the genus Venus. Supplementary Veneridae. First index to Veneridae. Thesaurus conchyliorum, or monograph of genera of shells: London, G. B. Sowerby, v. 2, p. 703–762.Google Scholar
Stewart, R.B., 1930, Gabb's California Cretaceous and Tertiary type Lamellibranchs: Special Publication of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 3, p. 1–314.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J.D., and Zinsmeister, W.J., 1992, Molluscan Systematics and Biostratigraphy. Lower Tertiary La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula: American Geophysical Union, Antarctic Research Series, v. 55, p. 1–192.Google Scholar
Tate, R., 1900, Description of new genera and species of Australian Mollusca (chiefly Tasmanian): Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, v. 24, p. 104–108.Google Scholar
Tavera, J., 1979, Estratigrafía y paleontología de la Formación Navidad, Provincia de Colchagua, Chile (Lat 30°50'S–34°S): Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Chile, v. 36, 176 p.Google Scholar
Tavera, J., and Veyl, C., 1957, Reconocimiento geológico de la Isla Mocha: Anales de la Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, v. 14, p. 155–188.Google Scholar
Wilckens, O., 1911, Die Mollusken der Antarktischen Tertiär formation: Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar Expedition, v. 3, p. 1–62.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W.J., 1984, Late Eocene bivalves (Mollusca) from the La Meseta Formation, collected during the 1974–1975 joint Argentine-American Expedition to Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula: Journal of Paleontology, v. 58, p. 1497–1527.Google Scholar