Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:45:24.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study on the Interfacial Characterization of the Co5/Cu3/Co5 trilayer and Co3/Cu/Co/Cu3/Co/Cu/Co3 Multilayer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Xiaoyu Yuan ,
Xiaofang Bi ,
Jiaxiang Shang  and
Huibin Xu
Xiaoyu Yuan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China
Xiaofang Bi*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China
Jiaxiang Shang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China
Huibin Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: bixf@163bj.com
Get access

Abstract

Comprehensive results are presented on the influence of interfaces on electronic structure and giant magnetoresistance (GMR). Two structures were calculated for Co5/Cu3/Co5 and Co3/Cu/Co/Cu3/Co/Cu/Co3, where numbers stand for monolayer numbers of atoms, by employing the discrete variational method in the framework of the local spin density approximation. It has been found that the electron spin-dependent scattering is very strong at the interfaces compared to the interiors of the ferromagnetic layers, independent of the moment alignment configuration. The calculation results of total energy for various magnetization configuration revealed that antiferromagnetic exchange coupling was present between any of the ferromagnetic layers separated by Cu layers at zero field in the Co3/Cu/Co/Cu3/Co/Cu/Co3. The evaluated GMR ratio for the Co3/Cu/Co/Cu3/Co/Cu/Co3 (about 35.1%) was much larger than that of the Co5/Cu3/Co5 (about 21.0%), indicating large GMR effect could be expected with more interfaces when the thicknesses were the same. The result also indicated that the negative polarization of 4s electrons could reduce the GMR effect.

Keywords

ab initio calculationElectronic structureMagnetic properties
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , March 2004 , pp. 741 - 745
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Dieny, B., Speriosu, V.S., Parkin, S.S.P. and Gurnoy, B.A., Phys. Rev. B 43 1297 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Zhang, S. and Levy, P.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 916 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Zahn, P. and Mertig, I., Phys. Rev. B 63, 104412 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Barthelemy, A., Fert, A., Contour, J-P. and Bowen, M., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 68 242 (2002).Google Scholar
5Parkin, S.S.P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1641 (1993).Google Scholar
6Prados, C. and Dimitrov, D.V., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 192, 19 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Swagten, H.J.M., Strijkers, G.J. and Verschueren, G.L.J., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 176, 169 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Itoh, H., Inoue, J. and Mackawa, S., Phys. Rev. B 47, 5809 (1993).Google Scholar
9Kai, T. and Shiiki, K., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 195, 537 (1999).Google Scholar
10Averill, F.W. and Ellis, D.E., J. Chem. Phys. 59, 6412 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Baerenda, E.J., Ellis, D.E., Ros, P.. J. Chem. Phys. 2, 41 (1973).Google Scholar
12Ellis, D.E., Benesh, G.A. and Byrom, E., Phys. Rev. B 16, 3308 (1977).Google Scholar
13Guenzburger, D. and Ellis, D.E., Phys. Rev. B 36, 6971 (1987).Google Scholar
14Guenzburger, D. and Ellis, D.E., Phys. Rev. B 52, 13390 (1995).Google Scholar
15Gomez, J.A. and Guenzburger, D., J. Magn. Magn. Mater, 226-230, 381 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Mulliken, R.S., J. Chem. Phys. 23, 1833 (1955).Google Scholar
17Kobayashi, Y., Aoki, Y., Sato, H. and Kamijo, A., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 126, 501 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Butler, W.H., Zhang, X-G., Nicholson, D.M.C. and Maclaren, J.M., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 151, 354 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Dieny, B., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 136, 335 (1994).Google Scholar
20Egelhoff, W.F.J. Appl. Phys. 82, 6142 (1997).Google Scholar
Edwards, D.M., Muniz, R.B. and Mathon, J., IEEE. Trans. Magn. 27, 3548 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar