Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:47:37.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generalized plane strain analysis of a bimaterial composite containing a free surface normal to the interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

V.K. Tewary  and
R.D. Kriz
V.K. Tewary
Affiliation:
Materials Reliability Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80303
R.D. Kriz
Affiliation:
Materials Reliability Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80303
Get access

Abstract

The elastic plane strain Green's function calculated in earlier papers is modified to account for generalized plane strain and applied to calculating the stress and the displacement field in a bimaterial composite containing a free surface normal to the interface and subjected to an out-of-plane load. The result is obtained in terms of a closed integral representation which is evaluated numerically as well as analytically. The method is applied to a cubic solid containing a Σ-5 grain boundary and to fiber-reinforced laminated composites. The singularities in the stress are identified and discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 6 , Issue 12 , December 1991 , pp. 2609 - 2622
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Tewary, V. K., Wagoner, R. H., and Hirth, J. P., J. Mater. Res. 4, 113 (1989) (referred to as I).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Tewary, V. K., Wagoner, R. H., and Hirth, J. P., J. Mater. Res. 4, 124 (1989) (referred to as II).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Tewary, V. K., J. Mater. Res. 6, 2592 (1991) (referred to as III).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Zwiers, R. I., Ting, T. C. T., and Spilker, R. L., J. Appl. Mech. 49, 561 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Ting, T. C. T. and Chou, S. C., “Fracture of Composite Materials” (Proceedings of the II U.S.A.-U.S.S.R. Symposium, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, held on March 9–12, 1981, edited by Sih, G. C. and Tamuzs, V. P., 1982), p. 265.Google Scholar
6.Pipes, R. B. and Pagano, N. J., J. Comp. Mater. 4, 538 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Pagano, N. J. and Pipes, R. B., J. Comp. Mater. 7, 679 (1973).Google Scholar
8.Pagano, N. J., Int. J. Solids Structures 14, 385 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Wang, A. S. D. and Crossman, F. W., J. Comp. Mater. 11, 92 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kriz, R. D., “Effect of Material Properties on Interlaminar Stresses in Angle-Ply Composite Laminates” (Report No. VPI–77–16, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 1977). (A copy of this report can be obtained from R. D.K.)Google Scholar
11.Stolarski, H. K. and Chiang, M. Y. M., Int. J. Solids Structures 25, 75 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Bakis, C. E. and Stinchcomb, W. W., Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture, ASTM STP-907 (American Society for Testing and Materials, edited by Hahn, H. T., 1986), p. 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Tewary, V. K. and Kriz, R. D., “Effect of a Free Surface on Stress Distribution in a Bimaterial Composite”, N. I.S. T. (United States Department of Commerce) Tech. Rep. SP 802 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Morse, P. M. and Feshbach, H., Methods of Mathematical Physics, Part I (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953).Google Scholar
15.Stroh, A. N., J. Math. Phys. 41, 77 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar