Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:28:46.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neurocognitive Changes in Tertiary Neurosyphilis: A Retrospective Chart Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2014

Philippe Beauchemin  and
Robert Laforce Jr.
Philippe Beauchemin
Affiliation:
Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire, Département des Sciences Neurologiques, CHU de Québec
Robert Laforce Jr.*
Affiliation:
Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire, Département des Sciences Neurologiques, CHU de Québec Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
*
Robert Laforce Jr, Département des Sciences Neurologiques, CHU de Québec, 1401, 18ième rue, Québec, G1J 1Z4, Canada. Email: robert.laforce@fmed.ulaval.ca.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Context:

Since the beginning of the new millennium, prevalence of syphilis has re-increased and is once again, a major public health problem. Neurosyphilis is the extension of syphilitic infection to the nervous system. It is considered by many as a cause of reversible dementia, when treated early. However, scarce data exist on the evolution of cognitive and behavioral impairments in patients affected by tertiary neurosyphilis.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to explore the cognitive and behavioral changes in a cohort of patients diagnosed with neurosyphilis.

Design:

A retrospective study based on systematized chart review between 2000 and 2012 in a large neurological tertiary care facility.

Outcome measure:

Clinical evaluations by treating physicians.

Results:

Eighteen patients were identified with tertiary neurosyphilis. Out of this group, only two had systematic neuropsychological follow-up despite physician reports of significant and persistent cognitive and psychiatric changes. For these two cases, only slight improvements were noted in memory and executive skills while improvements in attention were marked. None of our patients had previous psychiatric history yet a large proportion developed symptoms after the infection.

Conclusion:

Although neurosyphilis is traditionally considered a reversible form of dementia, we found limited support for this claim in our two patients with close follow-up. Quality data on the cognitive and psychiatric changes in the rest of our cohort was dramatically lacking, and this could not be explained by absence of symptoms at presentation. Given the recrudescence of syphilis, we propose a systematic approach to the evaluation and follow-up of this disorder.

Type
Original Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 452 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2014

References

1.French, P.Syphilis. BMJ. 2007;334(7585):143–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Musher, DM.Syphilis, neurosyphilis, penicillin, and AIDS. J Infect Dis. 1991;163(6):1201–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Workowski, KA, Berman, S.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Dec 17;59(RR-12):1–110.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux (MSSS). Syphilis infectueuse au Québec. Appel à la vigilance. Québec, Qué: MSSS; 2010.Google Scholar
5.Clark, EG, Danbolt, N.The Oslo study of the natural history of untreated syphilis; an epidemiologic investigation based on a restudy of the Boeck-Bruusgaard material; a review and appraisal. J Chronic Dis. 1955;2(3):311–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Rosahn, PD.U.S. Federal Security Agency. Public Health Service. Autopsy studies in syphilis. 1947;suppl 21.Google Scholar
7.Merritt, HH, Adams, RD, Solomon, HC.Neurosyphilis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1946.Google Scholar
8.Marra, CM.Update on neurosyphilis. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2009;11(2):127–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Lukehart, SA, Hook, EW 3rd, Baker-Zander, SA, Collier, AC, Critchlow, CW, Handsfield, HH.Invasion of the central nervous system by Treponema pallidum: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109(11):855–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Guler, E, Leyhe, T.A late form of neurosyphilis manifesting with psychotic symptoms in old age and good response to ceftriaxone therapy. Int Psychogeriatr. 2011;23(4):666–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Wharton, M, Chorba, TL, Vogt, RL, Morse, DL, Buehler, JW.Case definitions for public health surveillance. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1990;39(RR-13):1–43.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Rosenbaum, M.Similarities of psychiatric disorders of AIDS and syphilis: history repeats itself. Bull Menninger Clin. 1994;58(3):375–82.Google Scholar
13.Zheng, D, Zhou, D, Zhao, Z, et al. The clinical presentation and imaging manifestation of psychosis and dementia in general paresis: a retrospective study of 116 cases. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;23(3):300–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Timmermans, M, Carr, J.Neurosyphilis in the modern era. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(12):1727–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Wilner, E, Brody, JA.Prognosis of general paresis after treatment. Lancet. 1968;2(7583):1370–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Brightbill, TC, Ihmeidan, IH, Post, MJ, Berger, JR, Katz, DA.Neurosyphilis in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients: neuroimaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16(4):703–11.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Hama, K, Ishiguchi, H, Tuji, T, Miwa, H, Kondo, T.Neurosyphilis with mesiotemporal magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities. Intern Med. 2008;47(20):1813–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Jeong, YM, Hwang, HY, Kim, HS.MRI of neurosyphilis presenting as mesiotemporal abnormalities: a case report. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10(3):310–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Kodama, K, Okada, S, Komatsu, N, et al. Relationship between MRI findings and prognosis for patients with general paresis. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;12(2):246–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed