Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:57:17.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unit sum numbers of right self-injective rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Dinesh Khurana  and
Ashish K. Srivastava
Dinesh Khurana
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Panjab University, Chandigarh-160014, India e-mail: dkhurana@pu.ac.in
Ashish K. Srivastava
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, United States of America e-mail: ashish@math.ohiou.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a recent paper (which is to appear in J. Algebra Appl.) we proved that every element of a right self-injective ring R is a sum of two units if and only if R has no factor ring isomorphic to ℤ2 and hence the unit sum number of a nonzero right self-injective ring is 2, ω or ∞. In this paper we characterise right self-injective rings with unit sum numbers ω and ∞. We prove that the unit sum number of a right self-injective ring R is ω if and only if R has a factor ring isomorphic to ℤ2 but no factor ring isomorphic to ℤ2 × ℤ2, and also in this case every element of R is a sum of either two or three units. It follows that the unit sum number of a right self-injective ring R is ∞ precisely when R has a factor ring isomorphic to ℤ2 × ℤ2. We also answer a question of Henriksen (which appeared in J. Algebra, Question E, page 192), by giving a large class of regular right self-injective rings having the unit sum number ω in which not all non-invertible elements are the sum of two units.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , June 2007 , pp. 355 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2007

References

[1]Ara, P., Goodearl, K.R., O'Meara, K. C. and Pardo, E., ‘Diagonalization of matrices over regular rings’, Linear Algebra Appl. 265 (1997), 147–163.Google Scholar
[2]Ashrafi, N. and Vámos, P., ‘On the unit sum number of some rings’, Quart. J. Math. 56 (2005), 1–12.Google Scholar
[3]Fisher, W., Snider, R. L, ‘Rings generated by their units’, J. Algebra 42 (1976), 363–368.Google Scholar
[4]Goodearl, K.R., von Neumann regular rings (Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL, 1991).Google Scholar
[5]Goldsmith, B., Meehan, C. and Wallutis, S. L, ‘On unit sum numbers of rational groups’,Proceedings of the Second Honolulu Conference on Abelian Groups and Modules(Honolulu, HI,2001),Rocky Mountain J. Math. 32 (2002), 1431–1450.Google Scholar
[6]Göbel, R. and Opdenhövel, A., ‘Every endomorphism of a local Warfield module of finite torsion-free rank is the sum of two automorphisms’, J. Algebra 233 (2000), 758–771.Google Scholar
[7]Goldsmith, B., Pabst, S. and Scott, A., ‘Unit sum numbers of rings and modules’, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 49 (1998), 331–344.Google Scholar
[8]Asensio, P.A. Guil and Herzog, I., ‘Left cotorsion ring’, Bull. London Math Soc. 36 (2004), 303–309.Google Scholar
[9]Handelman, D., ‘Perspectivity and cancellation in regular rings’, J. Algebra 48 (1977), 1–16.Google Scholar
[10]Henriksen, M., ‘Two classes of rings generated by their units’, J. Algebra 31 (1974), 182–193.Google Scholar
[11]Hill, P., ‘Endomorphism rings generated by units’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 141 (1969), 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Kaplansky, I., Rings of operators (Benjamin, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
[13]Khurana, D. and Srivastava, A. K., ‘Right self-injective rings in which every element is sum of two units’, J. Algebra Appl. (to appear).Google Scholar
[14]Osofsky, B.L., ‘Endomorphism rings of quasi-injective modules’, Canad. J. Math. 20 (1968), 895–903.Google Scholar
[15]Raphael, R., ‘Rings which are generated by their units’, J. Algebra 28 (1974), 199–205.Google Scholar
[16]Skornyakov, L.A., Complemented modular lattices and regular rings (Oliver Boyd, Edinburgh, 1964).Google Scholar
[17]Utumi, Y., ‘On continuous regular rings and semisimple self-injective rings’, Canad. J. Math. 12 (1960), 597–605.Google Scholar
[18]Utumi, Y., ‘Self-injective rings’, J. Algebra 6 (1967), 56–64.Google Scholar
[19]Vámos, P., ‘2-good rings’, Quart. J. Math. 56 (2005), 417–430.Google Scholar
[20]Zelinsky, D., ‘Every linear transformation is a sum of nonsingular ones’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (1954), 627–630.Google Scholar