Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:52:32.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adaptations in the calcium and phosphorus metabolism of sheep in response to an intravenous infusion of Ca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G. D. Braithwaite
G. D. Braithwaite
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The effect on calcium and phosphorus metabolism of a high rate of Ca infused directly into the blood of Ca-deficient wethers, already receiving an adequate Ca intake, has been studied by a combination of balance and radioisotope techniques.

2. The rate of Ca retention, which was already high, increased only slightly during the infusion before it reached a maximum. The surplus Ca was compensated for by a decrease in the rate of absorption and an increase in the rate of urinary Ca excretion.

3. These findings support the theory that at maximum retention the rate of Ca absorption becomes regulated according to the rate at which Ca can be stored in bone.

4. Results suggest that the decreased absorption was due to a decrease in the rate of active absorption and that the low rate remaining was due to diffusion.

5. The rate of P retention was increased by the Ca infusion, possibly as a result of the increased Ca retention.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , July 1978 , pp. 17 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, no. 2, Ruminants. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Aubert, J.-P. & Milhaud, G. (1960). Biochim. biophys. Acta 39, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 31, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. (1976). J. Dairy Res. 43, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 39, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D., Glascock, R. F. & Riazuddin, Sh. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D., Glascock, R. F. & Riazuddin, Sh. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. & Riazuddin, Sh. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Care, A. D. (1969). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 28, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLuca, H. F. (1974). Fed. Proc. 33, 2211.Google Scholar
DeLuca, H. F. (1975). Acta orthop. scand. 46, 286.Google Scholar
Gran, F. C. (1960). Acta Physiol. scand. 48, Suppl.167.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1968). Publs. natn. Res. Counc., Wash. no. 1693.Google Scholar
Preston, R. L. & Pfander, W. H. (1964). J. Nutr. 83, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramberg, C. F. Jr & Kronfeld, D. S. (1971). J. Dairy Sci. 54, 794.Google Scholar
Ramberg, C. F. Jr, Mayer, G. P., Kronfeld, D. S., Phang, J. M. & Berman, M. (1970). Am. J. Physiol. 219, 1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toverud, S. U. (1964). Acta Physiol. scand. 62, Suppl.234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, R. H. & Taylor, A. N. (1969). In Mineral Metabolism, Vol. 3, ch. 5 [Comar, C. L. and Bronner, F., editors]. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Young, V. R., Lofgreen, G. P. & Luick, J. R. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, V. R., Richards, W. P. C., Lofgreen, G. P. & Luick, J. R. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar