Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:11:54.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical solutions of the Euler equations governing axisymmetric and three-dimensional transonic flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. M. Causon
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Salford
P. J. Ford
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Salford

Summary

A computational method is presented for solving numerically the three dimensional Euler equations for transonic flow around practical aircraft forebodies. The Euler solver is pseudo-time dependent, split and cast in finite volume form. Shock waves are captured crisply without the need for additional smoothing by means of an operator-switching facility which more accurately reflects the direction of propagation of signals.

The method is illustrated by examples of computed external, axisymmetric flows and some, simulated, realistic aircraft fore-bodies. The computational meshes employed in the three dimensional cases are essentially of cylindrical polar, flow conforming, type and relatively coarse. Closer attention to the mesh generation is expected to refine the results presented here. The method is versatile, robust, and holds promise for treating complex three dimensional geometries within economically viable run times.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1985 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Magnus, B. and Yoshihara, H. Inviscid Transonic Flow Over Airfoil, JAIAA, 1970, 8, 12.Google Scholar
2. Murman, E. M. and Cole, J. D. Calculation of Plane Steady Transonic Flows, JAIAA, 1971, 9, 1.Google Scholar
3. Reyhner, T. A. Transonic Potential Flow Computation About Three Dimensional Inlets, Ducts and Bodies. AIAA Paper No. 80-1364,1980.Google Scholar
4. Boppe, C. W. Computational Transonic Flow About Realistic Aircraft Configurations, AIAA Paper No. 78-104, 16th Aerospace Sci Mtg, 1978.Google Scholar
5. Salas, M. D., Jameson, A. and Melnik, R. E. A Comparative Study of the Non-Uniqueness Problem of the Potential Equation, AIAA Paper, No 83-1888,6th CFD Conf, 1983.Google Scholar
6. Lerat, A. and Sides, J. A New Finite Volume Method for the Euler Equations with Applications to Transonic Flows, Num Meths Aero Fluid Dyn, Roe, P. L. (Ed), Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
7. Jameson, A., Schmidt, W. and Turkel, E. A Numerical Solution of the Euler Equations by Finite-Volume Methods Using the Runge-Kutta Time Stepping Schemes, AIAA Paper No 81-1259,1981.Google Scholar
8. Denton, J. D. An Improved Time-Marching Method for Turbo-machinery Flows, Num Meth Aero Fluid Dyn, Roe, P. L. (Ed), Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
9. Rizzi, A. A Damped Euler Equation Method to Compute Transonic Flow Around Wing-Body Combinations, JAIAA, 1982, 20.Google Scholar
10. Roe, P. L. Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors and Difference Schemes, J Comp Phys, 1981, 43, 321352.Google Scholar
11. Roe, P. L. Numerical Modelling of Shock Waves and other Discontinuities, Num Meth, Aero, Fluid Dyn, Roe, P. L. (Ed), Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
12. Osher, S. Shock Modelling in Aeronautics Num Meths for Fluid Dyn, Morton, K. W. and Baines, M. J. (Ed), Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar
13. Yang, J. Y., Lombard, C. K. and Bershader, D. A Characteristic Flux-Difference Splitting for the Hyperbolic Conservation Laws of Inviscid Gas Dynamics, AIAA Paper No 83-0040, 1983.Google Scholar
14. Chakravarthy, S. Numerical Experiments with the Osher Upwind Scheme for the Euler Equations, AIAA Paper No 82-0975,1982.Google Scholar
15. Causon, D. M. and Ford, P. J. Improvements in Techniques for the Numerical Simulation of Steady Transonic Flows, AIAA Paper No 84-0089,22nd Aerospace Sci, Mtg, 1984.Google Scholar
16. Kordulla, W., and Vinokur, M. Efficient Computation of Volumes in Flow Predictions, JAIAA, 1983, 21.Google Scholar
17. Strang, G. On the Construction and Comparison of Difference Schemes. SIAMJ of Num Anal, 1968, 5, 506517.Google Scholar
18. Harten, A. and Zwas, G. Self-Adjusting Hybrid Schemes for Shock Computations, J Comp Phys, 1972, 9, 568.Google Scholar
19. Jameson, A. Steady-State Solution of the Euler Equations for Transonic Flow, Adv in Sci Comp, Transonic Shock and Multidimensional Flows, Meyer, R. E. (Ed), Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
20. Rizzi, A. Computations in Rotational Transonic Flow, Num Meth for the Comp of Inv Transonic Flow, A GAMM Workshop, Rizzi, A. and Viviand, H. (Ed) Vieweg, 1981.Google Scholar
21. Warming, R. F. and Beam, R. M. Upwind Second-Order Difference Schemes and Applications in Aerodynamic Flows, JAIAA, 1976, 14.Google Scholar
22. Causon, D. M. and Ford, P. J. Computations in External Transonic Flow, 5th GAMM Conf on Num Meth in FI Mech, Vieweg, 1984.Google Scholar
23. Causon, D. M. and Ford, P. J. The Calculation of Axisymmetric Flows Over Bodies at High Speeds, Internal Report CAG No 8410, Dept Aero and Mech Eng, Univ of Salford, UK, 1983.Google Scholar
24. Townsend, J. C. Howell, D. T., Collins, I. K. and Hayes, C. Surface Data on a Series of Analytic Forebodies at Mach Numbers from 1.70 to 4.50 and Combined Angles of Attack and Sideslip. NASA TM-80062,1979.Google Scholar
25. Shankar, V., Szema, K. Y. and Osher, S. A Conservative Type-Dependent Full-Potential Method for the Treatment of Supersonic Flows with Embedded Subsonic Regions, AIAA Paper No 83-1887, 6th CFU Conf, 1983.Google Scholar
26. Arlinger, B. Computation of Supersonic Flow Around Bodies, AIAA Paper No 84-0259, 22nd Aerospace Sci Mtg, 1984.Google Scholar
27. Numerical Grid Generation Techniques Proc of Workshop sponsored by NASA and the Inst for Computer Applic in Sci and Eng, held at NASA Langley Research Centre, 1980, NASA CP-2166.Google Scholar