Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:46:04.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Insights about Insightful Problem Solving

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Janet E. Davidson
Edited by
Janet E. Davidson  and
Robert J. Sternberg
Janet E. Davidson
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Psychology, Lewis & Clark College
Janet E. Davidson
Affiliation:
Lewis and Clark College, Portland
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Many years ago, I tried to go night skiing with some friends. We were driving to the mountain wishing we had checked the ski report to find out whether there would be snow, when suddenly we found ourselves in a blizzard. Cars were skidding off the road and getting stuck in large snowdrifts. The car I was in also went off the road, but the driver, who had never before driven in a blizzard, somehow managed to get it back on course. (I cannot tell you how he did this because I had my eyes closed.)

A similar situation occurs when people try to solve nonroutine problems. Nonroutine problems can be difficult because we do not possess preexisting procedures for solving them (Mayer, 1995). This difficulty is compounded when the givens, goals, and obstacles in the problems are not well specified. Under these conditions, there are times when we all go off track. Some people manage to get on course and successfully solve the problem; others remain stuck. In this chapter I claim that the ability to get on track when solving nonroutine problems often involves conceptual change and insight. In addition, getting on track in one's problem solving, after being off course, is frequently accompanied by a feeling of suddenly knowing what to do.

Insight has long been associated with creative thoughts and products. For example, Graham Wallas (1926) proposed four stages involved in the creative process.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Psychology of Problem Solving , pp. 149 - 175
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, R. E. (1952). Functional fixedness as related to problem solving: A repetition of three experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 288–291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adamson, R. E., & Taylor, D. W. (1954). Functional fixedness as related to elapsed time and set. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 122–216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihaly, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press
Csikszentmihaly, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins Publishers
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press
Csikszentmihaly, M., & Sawyer, K. (1995). Creative insight: The social dimension of a solitary moment. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 329–363). New York: Cambridge University Press
Davidson, J. E. (1986). Insight and intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 201–222). New York: Cambridge University Press
Davidson, J. E. (1995). The suddenness of insight. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 125–155). New York: Cambridge University Press
Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986). What is insight? Educational Horizons, 64, 177–179Google Scholar
DiVesta, F. J., & Walls, R. T. (1967). Transfer of object-function in problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 63, 596–602Google Scholar
Dominowski, R. L. (1981). Comment on “An examination of the alleged role of ‘fixation’ in the solution of ‘insight’ problems.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 199–203Google Scholar
Dominowski, R. L., & Dallob, P. (1995). Insight and problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 33–62). New York: Cambridge University Press
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365–395). New York: Cambridge University Press
Dunbar, K. (2001). The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings, yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), Whole No. 270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellen, P. (1982). Direction, past experience, and hints in creative problem solving: Reply to Weisberg and Alba. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Frijda, N. H., & de Groot, A. D. (Eds.). (1982). Otto Selz: His contribution to psychology. The Hague: Mouton
Gruber, H. E. (1981). On the relation between “Aha! experiences” and the construction of ideas. History of Science, 19, 41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Analogical thinking and human intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 199–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Kaplan, C. A., & Davidson, J. E. (1988). Hatching a theory of incubation effects. Technical Report, CIP No. 472, Carnegie-Mellon University
Kaplan, C. A., & Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 374–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace
Kohler, W. (1969). The task of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
Kuczaj, S. A. II, Gory, J. D., & Xitco, M. J. (1998). Using programs to solve problems: Imitation versus insight. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 695–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P., & Jones, R. (1988). A computational model of scientific insight. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 177–201). New York: Cambridge University Press
Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zytkow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335–1342CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 54(6), Whole No. 248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. S. (1950). New experimental attempts at preventing mechanization in problem solving. Journal of General Psychology, 42, 279–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lung, C., & Dominowski, R. L. (1985). Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine dot problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 804–811Google Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. (1930). Reasoning in humans: II. On direction. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. (1940). The behavior mechanisms concerned with problem solving. Psychological Review, 47, 43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. (1970). Problem solving and creativity. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole
Mayer, R. E. (1995). The search for insight. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 3–32.) New York: Cambridge University Press
Mednick, M. T., Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, E. V. (1964). Incubation of creative performance and specific associative priming. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 69, 84–88CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, J. (1986a). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 288–294Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. (1986b). Premonitions of insight predict impending error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 623–634Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J., & Weibe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238–246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullis, K. (1998). Dancing naked in the mind field. New York: Vintage Books
Murray, H. G., & Denny, J. P. (1969). Interaction of ability level and interpolated activity (opportunity for incubation) in human problem solving. Psychological Reports, 24, 271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Ohlsson, S. (1984a). Restructuring revisited: I. Summary and critique of the Gestalt theory of problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 25, 65–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (1984b). Restructuring revisited: II. An information processing theory of restructuring and insight. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 25, 117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, D. (1981). The Mind's Best Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Scheerer, M. (1963). Problem solving. Scientific American, 208, 118–128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schooler, J. W., & Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. Smith, T. Ward, & R. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 97–133). Cambridge: MIT Press
Seifert, C. M., Meyer, D. E., Davidson, N., Patalno, A. L., & Yaniv, I. (1995). Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 65–124). New York: Cambridge University Press
Siegler, R. S. (2000). Unconscious insights. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegler, R. S., & Stern, E.(1998). Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 377–397CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, H. A. (1986). The information processing explanation of Gestalt phenomena. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 241–255Google Scholar
Simon, H. A., Newell, A., & Shaw, J. C. (1979). The process of creative thinking. In H. A. Simon (Ed.), Models of thought (pp. 144–174). New Haven: Yale University Press
Simonton, D. K. (1995). Foresight in insight? A Darwinian answer. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 465–494). New York: Cambridge University Press
Smith, R. W., & Kounios, J. (1996). Sudden insight: All-or-none processing revealed by speed-accuracy decomposition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1443–1462Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 229–251). New York: Cambridge University Press
Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1989). Incubation effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 311–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. M. & Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 61–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1982). The mind of the puzzler. Psychology Today, 16, 37–44Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1989). A four-prong model for intellectual skills development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22, 22–28Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1999). Insight. In M. Runco (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York: Macmillan
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace
Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and Other Myths. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co
Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond genius and other myths. New York: Freeman
Weisberg, R. W. (1995). Prolegomena to theories of insight. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 157–196). New York: Cambridge University Press
Weisberg, R. W. & Alba, J. W. (1981). An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution of “insight” problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 169–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. & Alba, J. W. (1982). Problem solving is not like perception: More on Gestalt theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 326–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1945/1959). Productive thinking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1945.)
Woodsworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Henry Holt
Worthy, M. (1975). Aha! A puzzle approach to creative thinking. Chicago: Nelson Hall

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×