Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:26:32.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Hedgehog transduction pathway is involved in pattern formation in Drosophila melanogaster tergites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2009

M. Marí-Beffa
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology, Genetics and Physiology, Faculty of Science, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain
Manuel Marí-Beffa
Affiliation:
Universidad de Málaga, Spain
Jennifer Knight
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
Get access

Summary

OBJECTIVE OF THE EXPERIMENT Lewis Wolpert originally proposed that a gradient of a diffusible molecule could control pattern formation depending on its concentration (Wolpert, 1969). Hedgehog (Hh) is one such widely accepted morphogenetic signal. In this exercise, we will study the function of the Hh transduction pathway in the control of pattern formation during the development of tergites (the dorsal cuticle of each abdominal segment) of Drosophila melanogaster.

DEGREE OF DIFFICULTY Moderate. The experiments described are relatively easy, inexpensive and can be carried out quickly.

INTRODUCTION

Pattern formation is one of the fundamental topics in Developmental Biology. Lewis Wolpert proposed a theoretical explanation of this process in his positional information model (Wolpert, 1969). Although a previous related model was also published (von Ubisch, 1953), the positional information model has been widely applied to a variety of developing systems. On the basis of previous results from hydra (Chapter 1) and insect segments (Locke, 1959; Lawrence, 1966; Stumpf, 1966; 1968), Wolpert (1969) suggested the existence of a gradient of a diffusible substance. This diffusible substance would be differentially interpreted into positional values. Depending on its position and how each cell interpreted the concentration of the substance, a variety of cell types could then differentiate. In order to explain his model better, Wolpert (1969) proposed the French flag model (Figure 16.1). The different colours in a cellular flag would appear as the differential expression of genes induced by the concentration of a diffusible molecule, or morphogen, distributed in a gradient away from a source or organiser (Figure 16.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryant, P. J., and Schneiderman, H. A. (1969). Cell lineage, growth, and determination in the imaginal leg discs of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 20, 263–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y., and Struhl, G. (1996). Dual roles for Patched in sequestering and transducing Hedgehog. Cell, 87, 553–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denef, N., Neubuser, D., Pérez, L., and Cohen, S. M. (2000). Hedgehog induces opposite changes in turnover and subcellular localization of patched and smoothened. Cell, 18, 521–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Bellido, A., and Merriam, J. R. (1971). Parameters of the wing imagiant disc development of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 24, 61–87
Ingham, P. W. (1998). Transducing Hedgehog: The story so far. EMBO J., 17, 3505–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopp, A, and Duncan, I. (1997). Control of cell fate and polarity in the adult abdominal segments of Drosophila by optomotorblind. Development, 124, 3715–26Google Scholar
Kopp, A., Muskavitch, M. A. T., and Duncan, I. (1997). The roles of hedgehog and engrailed in patterning adult abdominal segments of Drosophila. Development, 124, 3703–14Google ScholarPubMed
Kopp, A., and Duncan, I. (2002). Anteroposterior patterning in adult abdominal segments of Drosophila. Dev. Biol., 242, 15–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornberg, T. (1981). Compartments in the abdomen of Drosophila and the role of the engrailed locus. Dev. Biol., 86, 363–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, P. (1966). Development and determination of hairs and bristles in the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus (Lygaediae, Hemiptere). J. Cell Sci., 1, 475–98Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. A., Casal, J., and Struhl, G. (1999 a). hedgehog and engrailed: Pattern formation and polarity in the Drosophila abdomen. Development, 126, 2431–9Google ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, P. A., Casal, J., and Struhl, G. (1999b). The Hedgehog morphoan and gradients of cell affinity in the abdomen of Drosophila. Development, 126, 2441–2449
Lawrence, P. A., Casal, J., and Struhl, G. (2002). Towards a model of the organisation of planar polarity and pattern in the Drosophila abdomen. Development, 129, 2749–60Google ScholarPubMed
Locke, M. (1959). The cuticular pattern in an insect, Rhodnius prolixus Sta¥l. J. Exp. Biol., 36, 459–77Google Scholar
Madhavan, M. M., and Madhavan, K. (1982). Pattern regulation in tergite of Drosophila: A model. J. Theor. Biol., 95, 731–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marí-Beffa, M., Celis, J. F., and García-Bellido, A. (1991). Genetic and developmental analyses of chaetae pattern formation in Drosophila tergites. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol., 200, 132–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, V., Carrillo, G., Torroja, C., and Guerrero, I. (2001). The sterol-sensing domain of Patched protein seems to control smoothened activity through Patched vesicular trafficking. Curr. Biol., 11, 601–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meinhardt, H. (1983). Cell determination boundaries as organizing regions for secondary embryonic fields. Dev. Biol., 96, 375–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, H. J. (1932). Further studies on the nature and causes of gene mutations. Proc. 6th Int. Cong. Genet., 1, 213–55Google Scholar
Robertson, C. W. (1936). The metamorphosis of Drosophila melanogaster, including an accurately timed account of the principal morphological changes. J. Morphol., 59, 351–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roseland, C. R., and Schneiderman, H. A. (1979). Regulation and metamorphosis of the abdominal histoblasts of Drosophila melanogaster. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol., 186, 235–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamaría, P., and García-Bellido, A. (1972). Localization and growth pattern of the tergite anlage of Drosophila. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 28, 397–417Google ScholarPubMed
Struhl, G., Barbash, D. A., and Lawrence, P. A. (1997a). Hedgehog acts by distinct gradient and signal relay mechanisms to organise cell type and polarity in the Drosophila abdomen. Development, 124, 2155–65Google Scholar
Struhl, G., Barbash, D. A., and Lawrence, P. A. (1997b). Hedgehog organises the pattern and polarity of epidermal cells in the Drosophila abdomen. Development, 124, 2143–54Google Scholar
Strutt, H., Thomas, C., Nakano, Y., Stark, D., Neave, B., Taylor, A. M., and Ingham, P. W. (2001). Mutations in the sterol-sensing domain of Patched suggest a role for vesicular trafficking in Smoothened regulation. Curr Biol., 11, 608–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stumpf, H. F. (1966). Mechanisms by which cells measure their position within the body. Nature, 212, 430–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stumpf, H. F. (1968). Further studies on gradient-dependent diversification in the pupal cuticle of Galleria mellonella. J. Exp. Biol., 49, 49–60Google Scholar
Xu, T., and Rubin, G. M. (1993). Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development, 117, 1223–37Google ScholarPubMed
Von Ubisch, L. (1953). Entwicklungsprobleme. Jena: Gustav Fischer
Wolpert, L. (1969). Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J. Theor. Biol., 25, 430–1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×