Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:46:14.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Invasive hemodynamic monitoring

from Section 3 - Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

By
Jonathan Aron  and
Maurizio Cecconi
Edited by
Robert G. Hahn
Robert G. Hahn
Affiliation:
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting , pp. 100 - 109
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shoemaker, WC, Appel, PL, Kram, HB, Waxman, K, Lee, TS. Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 1988, 94 : 1176–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackland, GL, Igbal, S, Paredes, LG, et al. for the POM-O (PostOperative Morbidity-Oxygen delivery) study group. Individualised oxygen delivery targeted hemodynamic therapy in high-risk surgical patients: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled, mechanistic trial. Lancet Respir Med 2015; 3 : 33–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, O, Grounds, RM, Bennett, ED. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients. JAMA 1993; 270 : 2699–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lobo, SM, Salgado, PF, Castillo, VG, et al. Maximizing O2 delivery in high-risk elderly surgery patients improves survivorship without altering O2 consumption. Crit Care Med 2000; 28 : 3396–404.Google Scholar
JrConnors, AF, Speroff, T, Dawson, NV, et al. for the SUPPORT Investigators. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA 1996; 276 : 889–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pölönen, P, Ruokonen, E, Hippeläinen, M, Pöyhonen, M, Takala, J. A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 90 : 1052–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakeling, HG, McFall, MR, Jenkins, CS, et al. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95 : 634–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, S, James, S, Singer, M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1997; 315: 909–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, MA, Cecconi, M, Rhodes, A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011; 112 : 1392–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecconi, M, Corredor, C, Arulkumaran, N, et al. Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups. Crit Care 2013; 17 : 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, JW, Shoemaker, WC. Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 1686–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grocott, MP, Dushianthan, A, Hamilton, MA, et al. Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes following surgery, Optimisation Systematic Review Steering Group. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: CD004082.Google Scholar
Srinivasa, S, Taylor, MH, Singh, PP, et al. Randomized clinical trial of goal-directed fluid therapy within an enhanced recovery protocol for elective colectomy. Br J Surg 2013; 100 : 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenny, M, Conroy, P, Wong, A, et al. A randomised prospective trial of intra-operative esophageal Doppler-guided fluid administration in major gynecological surgery. Anaesthesia 2013; 68 : 1224–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearse, RM, Harrison, DA, MacDonald, N, et al. for the OPTIMISE Study Group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA 2014; 311 : 2181–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, MA, Timmins, AC, Yau, EH, et al. Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 1994; 330 : 1717–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Critchley, LA, Critchley, JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15 : 85–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecconi, M, Rhodes, A, Poloniecki, J, Della Rocca, G, Grounds, RM. Bench-to-bedside review. The importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies – with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009; 13 : 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanshawe, M, Ellis, C, Habib, S, Konstadt, SN, Reich, DL. A retrospective analysis of the costs and benefits related to alterations in cardiac surgery from routine intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg 2002; 95 : 824–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecconi, M, De Backer, D, Antonelli, M, et al. for the Task Force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40 : 1795–815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajaram, SS, Desai, NK, Kalra, A, et al. Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2 : CD003408.Google Scholar
Harvey, S, Harrison, DA, Singer, M, et al. PAC-Man study collaboration. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 472–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandham, JD, Hulkl, RD, Brant, RF, et al. for the Canadian Critical Care Clinical Trials Group. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 : 5–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, AP, Bernard, GR, Thompson, BT, et al. for the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006; 354 : 2213–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Goedje, O, Hoeke, K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff, M, et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27 : 2407–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gepfert, MS, Reuter, DA, Akyol, D, et al. Goal-directed fluid management reduces vasopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, N, Hofer, CK, Marx, G, et al. Clinical validation of a new thermodilution system for the assessment of cardiac output and volumetric parameters. Crit Care 2012; 16: R98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mora, B, Ince, I, Birkenberg, B, et al. Validation of cardiac output measurement with the LiDCOTM pulse contour system in patients with impaired left ventricular function after cardiac surgery. J Anesth 2011; 66: 675–81.Google Scholar
Costa, MG, Della Rocca, G, Chiarandini, P, et al. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement in hyperdynamic conditions: pulmonary artery catheter vs. lithium dilution technique. Intensive Care Med 1008; 34: 257–63.Google Scholar
Pearse, R, Dawson, D, Fawcett, J, et al. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial. Crit Care 2005; 9: 687–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Ostergaard, M, Nielsen, J, Nygaard, E. Pulse contour cardiac output: an evaluation of the FloTrac method. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26: 484–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phan, TD, Wan, C, Wong, D, Padayachee, A. A comparison of three minimally invasive cardiac output devices with thermodilution in elective cardiac surgery. Anesthesiol Intensive Care 2011; 39: 1014–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Penn, A, Button, D, Zollinger, A, Hofer, CK. Assessment of cardiac output changes using a modified FloTrac/ Vigileo algorithm in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care 2009; 13: R32.Google Scholar
Cecconi, M, Fasano, N, Langiano, N, et al. Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy during elective total hip arthroplasty under regional anesthesia. Crit Care 2011; 15: R132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadian, M, Kim, HK, Severyn, DA, Pinsky, MR. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care 2010; 14: R212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monnet, X, Anguel, N, Naudin, B, et al. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output in septic patients: different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices. Crit Care 2010; 14: R109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romano, SM, Pistolesi, M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 1834–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giomarelli, P. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26: 515–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calamandrei, M, Mirabile, L, Muschetta, S, et al. Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008; 9: 310–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecconi, M, Parsons, AK, Rhodes, A. What is a fluid challenge? Current opinion in critical care. Crit Care 2011; 17: 290–5.Google Scholar
Cecconi, M, Hofer, C, Teboul, JL, et al. Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: a global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41: 1529–37.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×