Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-jkwcl Total loading time: 3.192 Render date: 2022-11-27T04:24:24.390Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Chungmin Lee
Affiliation:
Seoul National University
Greg B. Simpson
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Youngjin Kim
Affiliation:
Ajou University, Republic of Korea
Ping Li
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaronson, Doris and Ferres, Steven 1983. Lexical categories and reading tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 675–99.Google Scholar
Abney, Steven 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Adams, Karen and Conklin, N. F. 1973. Toward a theory of natural classification. Paper from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1–10.
Adlard, Alan and Hazan, Valerie 1998. Speech perception abilities in children with specific reading difficulties (dyslexia). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 153–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andréa, Aguiar and Baillargeon, Renée 1998. Eight-and-a-half-month-old infants' reasoning about containment events. Child Development, 16, 636–53.Google Scholar
Ahn, Hee-Don 1991. Light verbs, VP-movement, negation and clausal architecture of Korean and English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Ahn, Hee-Don and Yoon, Hang-Jin 1989. Functional categories in Korean. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III (pp. 79–88). Department of Linguistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ahn, Seong-Woo 1997. Is manually coded Korean language? [in Korean]. Communication Disorders, 20, 49–65.Google Scholar
Ahn, Sung-Ho 1990. Korean quantification and Universal Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Ahn, Tae Sun, Hwang, Mina, Park, Chang Il and Kim, Duk Yong 2002. Production of grammatical morphemes in adults with Broca's aphasia [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Korean Academy of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology in 2002 (pp. 162–9).
Ainsworth-Darnell, Kim, Shulman, Harvey and Boland, Julie 1997. Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 112–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith 2003. Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko (ed.) 1995. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 4. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Akatsuka, Noriko, Hoji, Hajime, Iwasaki, Shoichi, Sohn, Sung-Ock and Strauss, Susan (eds.) 1998. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 7. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Akatsuka, Noriko, Iwasaki, Shoichi and Strauss, Susan (eds.) 1996. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 5. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Akatsuka, Noriko, Strauss, Susan and Comrie, Bernand (eds.) 2002. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Akhtar, Nameera 1999. Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26, 339–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan 1988. The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: the Case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. and Slobin, Dan I. 1985. The acquisition of Turkish. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (vol. II: The Data). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. and Slobin, Dan I. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Chafe, Wallace L. and Nichols, Johanna (eds.) Evidentiality: the Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Allen, Shanley E. M. and Schröder, Heike 2003. Preferred argument structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data. In Du Bois, Kumpf and Ashby, (eds.) Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for function.
Anderson, Steven 1971. On the role of deep structure in semantic interpretation. Foundations of Language, 6, 197–219.Google Scholar
Annett, Marian 1970. Classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 303–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antinucci, Francesco and Miller, Ruth 1976. How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language, 3, 167–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, Renè and Muysken, Peter 1987. Language Contact and Bilingualism. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia and Baltazani, Mary 2005. Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic Typology: the Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. London/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ås, Arvid 1962. The recovery of forgotten language knowledge through hypnotic age regression: a case report. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 5, 24–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asher, James and Garcia, Ramiro 1969. The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 53, 334–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, Agnes and Lovegrove, Bill 2001. Temporal processing ability in above average and average readers. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 148–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Au, Terry Kit-fong 2007. Salvaging heritage languages. In Brinton, Donna and Kagan, Olga (eds.), Heritage Language Acquisition: a New Field Emerging (pp. 337–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Au, Terry Kit-fong, Dapretto, Mirella and Song, You-kyung 1994. Input vs. constraints: early word acquisition in Korean and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, Terry Kit-fong, Knightly, Leah M., Jun, Sun-Ah and Oh, Janet Sae 2002. Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13, 238–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Au, Terry Kit-fong and Romo, Laura 1997. Does childhood language experience help adult learners? In Chen, Hsuan-chih (ed.), The Cognitive Processing of Chinese and Related Asian Languages (pp. 417–41). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter 1984. Bilingual Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter 1992. Introduction: John Gumperz' approach to contextualization. In Auer, Peter and di Luzio, Aldo (eds.), The Contextualization of Language (pp. 1–38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter(ed.) 1998. Code-switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Azuma, Shoji 1996. Speech production units among bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25 (3), 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, Alan D. 1986. Working Memory. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baek, Judy Yoo-Kyung 1997. Negation and object shift in early child Korean. In The Interpretive Tract, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (vol. 25, pp. 73–86). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Baek, Judy Yoo-Kyung 2000. Acquisition of negation in Korean: object constructions in the optional infinitive stage. Language Research, 36, 181–203.Google Scholar
Baek, Judy Yoo-Kyung and Wexler, Kenneth 2000. The role of the unique checking constraint in the syntax and acquisition of Korean negation. Unpublished manuscript.
Bailes, Cynthia N. 2001. Integrative ASL-English language arts: bridging paths to literacy. Sign Language Studies, 1, 147–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillargeon, Renée 1995. A model of physical reasoning in infancy. In Rovee-Collier, Carolyn and Lipsett, Lewis P. (eds.), Advances in Infancy Research (vol. 9, pp. 305–71). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, Renée and Hanko-Summers, Stephanie 1990. Is the top object adequately supported by the bottom object? Young infants' understanding of support relations. Cognitive Development, 5, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Carl 1979. Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Theory, 10, 533–81.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark 1988. Incorporation. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baluch, Bahman and Besner, Derek 1991. Visual word recognition: evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 644–52.Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael 1996. Emotion talk(s): the role of perspective in the construction of emotions. In Niemeier, Susanne and Dirven, René (eds.), The Language of Emotions (pp. 209–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Banaji, Mahzarin R. and Hardin, Curtis D. 1996. Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bang, Hee-Jeong 1990. The contextual effects on reference resolution during text comprehension [in Korean]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Woman's University, Korea.
Barnum, Martha 1984. In support of bilingual/bicultural education for deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 129, 404–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartke, Susanne 2004. Passives in German children with Williams Syndrome. In Bartke, Susanne and Siegmueller, Julia (eds.), Williams Syndrome Across Languages (pp. 345–70). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassano, Dominique, Hickmann, Maya and Champaud, Christian 1992. Epistemic modality in French children's discourse: “to be sure” or “not to be sure”? Journal of Child Language, 19, 389–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastiaanse, Roelien, Jonker, Roel, Quak, Christine and Put, Maria Varela 1996. The production of finite and nonfinite verb forms in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 55, 1–11.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, Dale, Philip S. and Thal, Donna 1994. Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Fletcher, Paul and MacWhinney, Brian (eds.), Handbook of Child Language (pp. 96–151). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, Devescovi, Antonella and Wulfeck, Beverly 2001. Psycholinguistics: a cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 369–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, Elizabeth, Friederici, Angela D. and Wulfeck, Beverly 1987a. Grammatical morphology in aphasia: evidence from three languages. Cortex, 23, 545–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, Elizabeth, Friederici, Angela D. and Wulfeck, Beverly 1987b. Comprehension in aphasia: a crosslinguistic study. Brain and Language, 32, 19–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth and MacWhinney, Brian 1982. Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, Eric and Gleitman, Lia R. (eds.), Language Acquisition: the State of Art. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth and MacWhinney, Brian 1987. Competition, variation, and language learning. In MacWhinney, Brian (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp. 157–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth and MacWhinney, Brian 1989. Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, Brian and Bates, Elizabeth (eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing (pp. 3–73). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, Marchman, Virginia, Thal, Donna, Fenson, Larry, Dale, Philip, Reznick, Steven J., Reilly, Judy and Hartung, Jeff 1994. Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 21 (1), 85–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumgaertner, Annette, Weiller, Cornelius and Christian, Büchel 2002. Event-related fMRI reveals cortical sites involved in contextual sentence integration. Neuroimage, 16, 736–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beale, Ian L., Mathew, Peter J., Oliver, Simon and Corballis, Michael. C. 1987. Performance of disabled and normal readers on the continuous performance test. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 229–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckman, Mary E. and Ayers-Elam, Gayle 1997. Guidelines for ToBI Labelling. Online MS and accompanying files. Available at www.ling.ohio-state.edu/research/phonetics/E_ToBI/.
Beckman, Mary E. and Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–309.Google Scholar
Bedecker, William and Caramazza, Alfonso 1986. A final brief in the case against agrammatism: the role of theory in the selection data. Cognition, 24, 277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belazi, Hedi, Rubin, Edward and Toribio, Jacquiline 1994. Code-switching and X-bar theory: the functional head constraint. Linguistic Inquiry, 25 (2), 221–37.Google Scholar
Bell-Berti, Fredericka, Raphael, Lawrence J., Pisoni, David B. and Sawusch, James R. 1979. Some relationships between articulation and perception. Phonetica, 36 (6), 373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellugi, Ursula 1971. Simplification in children's language. In Huxley, Renira and Ingram, Elisabeth (eds.), Language Acquisition: Models and Methods. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola 1990. The late acquisition of preferred argument structure in Venezuelan spoken Spanish. In Carol, Bernard (ed.), Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Linguists. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Beretta, Alan, Maria, Piñango, Patterson, Janet and Harford, Cardyn 1999. Recruiting comparative crosslinguistic evidence to address competing accounts of agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language, 67, 149–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beretta, Alan, Schmitt, Cristina, Halliwell, John, Munn, Alan, Cuetos, Fernando and Kim, Sujung 2001. The effects of scrambling on Spanish and Korean agrammatic interpretation: why linear models fail and structural models survive. Brain and Language, 79, 407–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berk-Seligson, Susan 1986. Linguistic constraints on intrasentential code-switching: a study of Spanish/Hebrew bilingualism. Language in Society, 15, 313–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent and Kay, Paul 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth 1994. Developmental perspectives on transitivity: a confluence of cues. In Levy, Yonata (ed.), Other Children, Other Languages: Issues in the Theory of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berndt, Rita Sloan and Caramazza, Alfonso 1999. How regular is sentence comprehension in Broca's aphasia? It depends on how you select the patients. Brain and Language, 67, 242–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berndt, Rita Sloan, Mitchum, Charlotte C. and Haendiges, Anne N. 1996. Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: a meta-analysis. Cognition, 58, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berndt, Rita Sloan, Mitchum, Charlotte C., Haendiges, Anne N. and Sandson, Jennifer 1997. Verb retrieval in aphasia: 1. characterizing single word impairments. Brain and Language, 56, 68–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berndt, Rita Sloan, Mitchum, Charlotte C. and Wayland, Sarah 1997. Patterns of sentence comprehension in aphasia: a consideration of three hypotheses. Brain and Language, 60, 197–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berwick, Robert C. 1985. The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas G. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, John, R. (ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language (pp. 274–353). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas G. 1974. The ascent of the specious, or there's a lot we don't know about mirrors. In Cohen, David. (ed.), Explaining Linguistic Phenomena (pp. 173–200). Washington: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen 1997. The structure of age: in search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13, 116–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen and Hakuta, Kenji 1994. In Other Words: the Science and Psychology of Second-Language Acquisition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen and Hakuta, Kenji 1999. Confounded age: linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In Birdsong, David (ed.), Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 161–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen and Miller, Barry 1999. The problem of age in second-language acquisition: influence from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2 (2), 127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek 1989. The child, the bioprogram and the input data: a commentary on Cziko. First Language, 9 (25), 33–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bien, Zeungnam, Jang, Won, Kim, Jung-Bae, Kim, Dae-Jin and Cho, Sung Sik 2000. Development of sign language translation system for the education of hearing impaired people [in Korean]. In A Report of Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST).
Bierwisch, Manfred 1967. Some semantic universals of German adjectivals. Foundations of Language, 5, 153–84.Google Scholar
Birch, Stacy L. and Garnsey, Susan M. 1995. The effect of focus on memory for words in the sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 232–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, David (ed.) 1999. Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bishop, Dorothy V. M., Carlyon, Robert P., Deeks, John M. and Bishop, Sonia J. 1999. Auditory temporal processing impairment: neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 1295–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjork, Elizabeth L. and Bjork, Robert A. 1996. Continuing influences of to-be-forgotten information. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 5, 176–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjork, Robert A. and Bjork, Elizabeth L. 1992. A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In Healy, Alive F., Kosslyn, Stephen M. and Shiffrin, Richard M. (eds.), From Learning Processes to Cognitive Processes: Essays in Honor of William K. Estes (vol. II, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, Robert 1990. The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20 (1–2), 3–49.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, Robert 1996. Conservative pattern accumulation in foreign language learning. Paper presented at the EUROSLA 6 Conference.
Bley-Vroman, Robert 1997. Features and patterns in foreign language learning. Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum, Michigan State University.
Bley-Vroman, Robert, Felix, Sascha and Ioup, Georgia 1988. The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research, 4 (1), 1–32.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, Robert and Kweon, Soo-Ok 2002. Acquisition of the constraints on wanna-contraction by advanced second language learners: Universal Grammar and imperfect knowledge. (www.sls.hawaii.edu/bley-vroman/).
Bloom, Lois 1970. Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Lois 1973. One Word at a Time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bloom, Lois, Lightbrown, Patsy and Hood, Lois 1975. Structure and variation in child language. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40 (Serial No. 160).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Paul 2000, How Children Learn the Meanings of Words, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boeschoten, Hendrik and Verhoeven, Ludo 1987. Language-mixing in children's speech: Dutch language use in Turkish discourse. Language Learning, 37, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight 1980. Language, the Loaded Weapon. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight 1981. Consonance, dissonance, and grammaticality: the case of wanna. Language and Communication, 1, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, Theo, Summeren, Chantal, Planken, Brigitte and Schils, Erik 1997. Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boothroyd, Arthur 1986. Speech Acoustics and Perception. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit and Wexler, Kenneth 1987. The maturation of syntax. In Roeper, Thomas and Williams, Edwin (eds.), Parameter Setting (pp. 123–72). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit and Wexler, Kenneth 1992. Bi-unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10, 147–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsting, Eric, Ridder, William H., Dudeck, Kisten, Kelley, Carol, Matsui, Lisa and Motoyama, Janice 1996. The presence of magnocellular dyslexia depends on the type of dyslexia. Vision Research, 36, 1047–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bortolini, U., Caselli, M. and Leonard, L. 1997. Grammatical deficits in Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 41, 1185–92.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 1973. Early Syntactic Development: a Crosslinguistic Study, With Special Reference to Finnish. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 1982. Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactical development. In Wanner, Eric and Gleitman, Lila R. (eds.), Language Acquisition: the State of the Art (pp. 319–46). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 1990. Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: are children helped by innate linking rules? Linguistics, 28, 1253–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 1996. Learning how to structure space for language: a crosslinguistic perspective. In Bloom, Paul, Peterson, Mary, Nadel, Lynn and Garrett, Merrill F. (eds.), Language and Space (pp. 385–486). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa and Choi, Soonja 1994. Linguistic and nonlinguistic determinants of spatial semantic development: a crosslinguistic study of English, Korean, and Dutch. Presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
Bowerman, Melissa and Choi, Soonja 2001. Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In Bowerman, Melissa and Levinson, Steven C. (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development (pp. 475–511). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa and Choi, Soonja 2003. Space under construction: language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In Gentner, Dedre and Glodin-Meadow, Susan (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (pp. 387–428). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa and Pederson, Eric 1992. Crosslinguistic perspectives on topological spatial relationships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco, CA.
Boysson-Bardies, Benedict 1999. How Language Comes to Children. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, Benedict, Sagart, Laurent and Durand, Catherine 1984. Discernible differences in the babbling of infants according to target language. Journal of Child Language, 11, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, Diane 1980. Lexical representation of derivational relation. In Aronoff, Mark and Kean, Mary-Louise (eds.), Juncture (pp. 37–55). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Braine, Martin D. S. 1976. Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41 (1, Serial No. 164).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, Martin D. S., Brody, Ruth E., Fisch, Shalom M., Weisberger, Mara J. and Blum, Monica 1990. Can children use a verb without exposure to its argument structure? Journal of Child Language, 17, 313–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braine, Martin D. S. and Brooks, Patricia J. 1995. Verb argument structure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar. In Tomasello, Michael and Merriman, William E. (eds.), Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs (pp. 331–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brausse, Ursula 1998. Was ist Asverstivitaet? aber oder und? [in German]. Deutsche Sprache, 26, 138–59. Quoted in Ewald Lang 2000.Google Scholar
Bregman, Alan S. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis: the Perceptual Organization of Sounds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Ursula 1997. The Locative Alternation in German: Its Structure and Acquisition (Language Acquisition and Language Disorder 15). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Patricia J. and Braine, Martin 1996. What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each? Cognition, 60, 235–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Patricia J. and Tomasello, Michael 1999. How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75, 720–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Patricia J. and Zizak, Otto 2002. Does preemption help children learn verb transitivity? Journal of Child Language, 29, 759–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broselow, Ellen and Finer, Daniel 1991. Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research, 7, 35–59.Google Scholar
Brown, H. Douglas 1971. Children's comprehension of relativized English sentences. Child Development, 42, 1923–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope 1994. The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions: the semantics of static descriptions of location. Linguistics, 32, 743–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope 1998. Early Tzeltal verbs: Argument structure and argument representation. In Clark, Eve (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 129–40). Stanford University: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger 1973. A First Language: the Early Stage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger and Bellugi, Ursula 1964. Three processes in the child's acquisition of syntax. In Lenneberg, Eric (ed.), New Directions in the Study of Language (pp. 131–61). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger and Fraser, Colin 1963. The acquisition of syntax. In Cofer, Charles N. and Musgrave, Barbara S. (eds.), Verbal Behavior and Learning: Problems and Processes (pp. 158–97). New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Gösta 1977. Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Bucci, Wilma 1978. The interpretation of universal affirmative propositions: a developmental study. Cognition, 6, 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budwig, Nancy and Narasimhan, Bhuvana 2001. Input variation and the development of argument structure: an examination of Hindi-speaking caregiver-child discourse. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MA.
Burr, David C., Morrone, M. Concetta and Ross, John 1994. Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature, 371, 511–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, Brian 1983. Lexical Representation. In Butterworth, Brian (ed.), Language Production (vol. II, pp. 257–94). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, David 1983. A note on the “word-order problem” in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 20, 155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, David 1985. Syntactic and semantic structures in agrammatism. In Kean, Mary-Louise (ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 125–52). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, David 1991. Agrammatism is a theoretically coherent aphasic category. Brain and Language, 40, 274–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, David 1995. Issues arising in contemporary studies of disorders of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension in agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 50, 325–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, David, Baker, Catherine and Dehaut, François 1985. Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia. Cognition, 21, 117–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, David and Futter, Christine 1986. Assignment of thematic roles to nouns in sentence comprehension by an agrammatic patient. Brain and Language, 27, 117–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, David and Hildebrandt, Nancy 1988. Disorders of Syntactic Comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, David and Waters, Gloria S. 1999. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, Alfonso, Laudanna, Alessandro and Cristina, Romani 1988. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 207–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, Alfonso and Zurif, Edgar B. 1976. Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, Susan 1978. The child as word learner. In Halle, Morris, Bresnan, Joan and Miller, George A. (eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality (pp. 264–93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carey, Susan 1994. Does learning a language require the child to reconceptualize the world? Lingua, 92, 143–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Kathie 1987. How children learn to classify nouns in Thai. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
Carpenter, Kathie 1991. Later rather than sooner: extra-linguistic categories in the acquisition of Thai Classifiers. Journal of Child Language, 18, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, Manuel, Alvarez, Carlos and Vega, Manuel 1993. Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, Manuel, Gernsbacher, Morton A. and Villa, Victor 1995. The advantage of first-mention in Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 124–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casasola, Marianella and Cohen, Leslie 2002. Infant categorization of containment, support and tight-fit spatial relationships. Developmental Science, 5, 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, Maria Cristina, Bates, Elizabeth, Casadio, Paola, Fenson, Judi, Fenson, Larry, Sanderl, Lisa and Weir, Judy 1995. A crosslinguistic study of early lexical development. Cognitive Development, 10, 159–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Anne, Davis, Chris and Letcher, Tessa 1999. Neighbourhood effects in masked form-priming in children and adults. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, Courtney 1968. The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. Child Development, 39, 433–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chafe, Wallace L. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Tomlin, Russell S. (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: the Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Charlene, Morford, Jill P. and Mayberry, Rachel I. (eds.), 2000. Language Acquisition By Eye. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chang, Frederick R. 1980. Active memory process in visual sentence comprehension: clause effects and pronominal reference. Memory and Cognition, 8, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Sok-Chin 1996. Korean (London Oriental and African Language Library vol. 4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chang, Suk-Jin 1977. Korean reflexive pronoun caki and its referential NP's point of view [in Korean]. Language Research, 13 (1), 35–48.Google Scholar
Chang-Song, You-kyung 1997. Early word acquisition in Korean: evidence for constraints View (I) [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Human Development, 4 (1), 76–86.Google Scholar
Chang-Song, You-kyung 2004. Early lexical development of Korean infants: 8~17 months [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Psychology, 23 (1), 77–99.Google Scholar
Chang-Song, You-kyung and Pae, Soyeong 2003. Noun versus verb bias revisited. Korean Journal of Speech Sciences, 10, 131–41.Google Scholar
Charles-Luce, Jan and Luce, Paul A. 1995. An examination of similarity neighbourhoods in young children's receptive vocabularies. Journal of Child Language, 22, 727–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chay, Wan 1990. Functions and meanings of Korean classifiers [in Korean]. Cintanhakpo, 70.Google Scholar
Chen, Chunhui, Zhou, Xinlin, Chen, Chuansheng, Dong, Qi, Zang, Yufeng, Qiao, Sibing, Yang, Tao and Gong, Qiyong 2007. The neural basis of processing anomalous information. Neuroreport, 18, 747–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Hsuan-Chih, d'Arcais, Flores, Giovanni, B. and Cheung, Sim-Ling 1995. Orthographic and phonological activation in recognizing Chinese characters. Psychological Research, 58, 144–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiat, Shulamuth 1981. Context-specificity and generalization in the acquisition of pronominal distinctions. Journal of Child Language, 8, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiba, Tsutomu and Kajiyama, Masato 1941. The Vowel – Its Nature and Structure. Tokyo: Kaiseikan.Google Scholar
Chien, Yu-Chin and Wexler, Kenneth 1987. A comparison between Chinese-speaking and English-speaking children's acquisition of reflexives and pronouns. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
,CHILDES 2005. Jiwon corpus accessible in zip format at http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/data/EastAsian/Korean/.
Cho, Choon-Hak 1975. The scope of negation in Korean. In The Korean Language: Its Structure and Social Projection. The Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Cho, Dong-In 1994. Functional projections and verb movement. In Kim-Renaud, Young-Key (ed.), Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics (pp. 233–54). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Cho, Jeung-Ryeul and Chen, Hsuan-Chih 1998. Phonology and orthography in recognizing Hanja in skilled and less-skilled readers [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 10, 17–35.Google Scholar
Cho, Jeung-Ryeul and Chen, Hsuan-Chih 1999. Orthographic and phonological activation in the semantic processing of Korean Hanja and Hangul. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14 (5/6), 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Jeung-Ryeul and Chen, Hsuan-Chih 2005. Semantic and phonological processing in reading Korean Hangul and Hanja words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 401–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, Kyung-Hee and Lee, Jung-Mo 1992. The processing characteristics of contrast information embedded in different story structures and in different abstraction level [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4, 76–92.Google Scholar
Cho, Kyung-Ja and Han, Kwang-Hee 1996. The effect of syllable type and familiarity on Hangul recognition processing [in Korean]. In Proceedings of Spring Conference of the Korean Society for Cognitive Science (pp. 179–89).Google Scholar
Cho, Kyu-Young and Jin, Young-Sun 1991. The effect of length and visual angle in reading rotated Korean words [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 3, 63–75.Google Scholar
Cho, Sookeun 1999. The acquisition of relative clauses: experimental studies on Korean. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Cho, Sook Whan 1981. The acquisition of word order in Korean. Master's thesis, University of Calgary.
Cho, Sook Whan 1985. Issues in the structure and acquisition of Korean anaphora. An unpublished doctoral dissertation submitted to the University of Alberta. Edmonton, Alberta.
Cho, Sook Whan 1989. Parameter, subset principle, and the acquisition of the Korean reflexive pronoun. In Proceedings for the Cognitive Science Conference (pp. 296–301). Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Cho, Sook Whan 1991. Null subjects in complements and adjuncts in Korean. In Lee, Chungmin and Whitman, John B. (eds.), Korean Syntax and Semantics: ‘91 LSA Linguistic Institute Workshop. Seoul, Korea: Thae-Hak-Sa.Google Scholar
Cho, Sook Whan 1992. The syntax and acquisition of ‘kyay’ (‘s/he’) and ‘caki’(‘self’) [in Korean]. Studies in Generative Grammar, 2, 361–92.Google Scholar
Cho, Sook Whan 1994. Null arguments and mood categories. In Kim-Renaud, Young-Key (ed.), Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics (pp. 443–62). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Cho, Sook Whan 1996. Caki (‘self’) as a nominal anaphor and a free pronoun in Korean. Paper presented at the annual convention organized by the Linguistic Society of America (LSA – 1996).
Cho, Sook Whan 1999. Caki as a Jekyll and Hyde. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VIII (pp. 252–65).
Cho, Sook Whan 2001. Subjectless sentences spoken by young children in Korean. Qualifying paper. Harvard University.
Cho, Sook Whan 2002. Lexical and semantic idiosyncracies of the predicates and caki (‘self’) in Korean. Ene-wa Cengpo Sahoy (Language and Information Society), 1, 1–20.Google Scholar
Cho, Sook Whan 2004. Syntax, Pragmatics, and Acquisition of Korean Reflexive Anaphora. Seoul, Korea: Sogang University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong 1996. Vowel correlates to consonant phonation: an acoustic-perceptual study of Korean obstruents. M.A. thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.
Cho, Taehong and Keating, Patricia 2001. Articulatory strengthening at the onset of prosodic domains in Korean. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 155–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Young-Mee Yu 1987. Phrasal phonology of Korean. In Kuno, Susumu, Lee, Ik-Hwan, Whitman, John, Bak, Sung-Yun and Kang, Young-Se (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-Mee Yu and Hong, Ki-Sun 1988. Evidence for the VP constituent from child Korean. In Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 27. Stanford, CA: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Choe, Hyŏn-bae 1971. Uri Malbon. Seoul, Korea: Chŏngŭm-sa (originally published in 1937).Google Scholar
Choe, Hyun-Sook 1988. Restructuring parameters and complex predicates: a transformational approach. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Choi, Gwon-Jin 1997. Viewpoint shifting in Korean and Bulgarian: the use of kinship terms. Pragmatics, 7 (3), 389–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Jae-Oh 1991. Korean-English code switching: switch-alpha and linguistic constraints. Linguistics, 29, 877–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Kwangill 2001. Ambiguity of relative clause in Korean. Unpublished Master's thesis, Ajou University.
Choi, Kwangill and Kim, Youngjin 2002. Ambiguity of relative clause attachment in Korean. The Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 14, 187–204.Google Scholar
Choi, Sang-bae and Ahn, Seong-Woo 2003. Analysis of relationship between Korean Sign Language ability and reading ability [in Korean]. Journal of Special Education, 10, 151–68.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1988. Caregiver input in English and Korean: use of nouns and verbs in book-reading and toy-play contexts. Journal of Child Language, 27, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1991. Early acquisition of epistemic meanings in Korean: a study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language, 11, 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Soonja (ed.) 1993. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 3. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1995. The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. In Bybee, Joan and Fleischman, Suzanne (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1997. Language-specific input and early semantic development: evidence from children learning Korean. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (vol. 5: Expanding the Contexts, pp. 41–133). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1998a. Acquisition of Korean. In Leonard, Laurence (ed.), Language Acquisition in North America: Cross Cultural and Crosslinguistic perspectives (pp. 281–336). San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1998b. Verbs in early lexical and syntactic development in Korean. Linguistics, 36, 755–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1999. Early development of verb structures and caregiver input in Korean: two case studies. International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 241–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Soonja 2000. Caregiver input in English and Korean: use of nouns and verbs in book-reading and toy-play contexts. Journal of Child Language, 27, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, Soonja 2002. Language-specific influences on early semantic and cognitive development. presented at the International Congress for the Study of Child Language (IASCL), Madison, WI.
Choi, Soonja 2006. Acquisition of modality. In Frawley, William (ed.), The Expression of Modality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja and Bowerman, Melissa 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, Soonja and Gopnik, Alison 1995. Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: a crosslinguistic study. Journal of Child Language, 22, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Soonja, McDonough, Laraine, Bowerman, Melissa and Mandler, Jean 1999. Early sensitivity to language-specific spatial categories in English and Korean. Cognitive Development, 14, 241–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Yang-Gyu 1986. The influence of the number of syllables on recognition of Korean words [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Pusan National University.
Choi, Youngon 2003. Preschool aged children's use of prosody in sentence processing: the case of Korean children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke University.
Choi, Youngon and Mazuka, Reiko 2001. Are prosodic units universally important to children in their early language acquisition? Korean children's detection and use of language-specific prosodic units. Journal of Cognitive Science, 2 (2), 171–93.Google Scholar
Choi, Youngon and Mazuka, Reiko 2003. Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 197–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, Young-Sik 1999. Negation, its scope and NPI licensing in Korean. In Daly, Rebecca and Riehl, Anastasia (eds.), Proceedings of ESCOL (pp. 25–36). Cornell University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1977. On Wh-Movement. In Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas and Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal Syntax (pp. 71–132). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1980a. On binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 1–46.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1980b. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986b. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Lasnik, Howard 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 425–504.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Lasnik, Howard 1978. A remark on contraction. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 268–74.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kathee M. 1993. A multicultural approach to education of children who are deaf. In Christensen, Kathee M. and Delgado, Gilbert L. (eds.), Multicultural Issues in Deafness (pp. 17–27). White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kathee M. 2000. Emerging literacy in bilingual/multicultural education of children who are deaf: a communication-based perspective. In Christensen, Kathee M. (ed.), Deaf Plus: a Multicultural Perspective (pp. 41–58). San Diego, CA: Dawn Sign Press.Google Scholar
Chun, Nan-hee 1998. The study for development of literal vocabulary ability in deaf students [in Korean]. M.A. thesis, Kong-Ju National University.
Chung, Daeho and Park, Hong-Keun 1997. NPIs outside of negation scope. In Sohn, Ho-Min and Haig, John (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 6 (pp. 415–35). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Chung, GyeongHee No 1994. Acquisition of Case marking in Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Cinque, Guglielmo 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: a Crosslinguistic Perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1980. Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In Chafe, Wallace L. (ed.), The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production (pp. 127–202). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1984. The acquisition of subjects in Korean. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual University Conference on Language Development. Boston, USA.
Clancy, Patricia M. 1985. The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (vol. I: The Data). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M.(ed.) 1993. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 2. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1993. Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition. In Clark, Eve (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 307–14). Stanford University: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1995. Subject and object in Korean acquisition: surface expression and casemarking. In Kuno, Susumu, Whitman, John, Kang, Young-Se, Lee, Ik-Hwan, Maling, Joan and Kim, Young-Joo (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VI (pp. 3–17). Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1996. Referential strategies and the co-construction of argument structure in Korean acquisition. In Fox, Barbara (ed.), Studies in Anaphora (pp. 33–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1997. Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean acquisition. In Sohn, Ho-min and Haig, John (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 6 (pp. 639–59). Stanford University: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 2000. Transitivity in Korean acquisition: discourse-functional foundations. In Clark, Eve (ed.), The Proceedings of the 13th Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M.(ed.) 2002. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 11. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 2003. The lexicon in interaction: developmental origins of preferred argument structure in Korean. In Du Bois, John W., Kumpf, Lorraine and Ashby, William (eds.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function (pp. 81–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., Lee, Hyeonjin and Zoh, Myeong-Han 1986. Processing strategies in the acquisition of relative clauses: universal principles and language-specific realizations. Cognition, 24, 225–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, Eve V. 1973a. What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, Timothy (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 65–110). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1973b. Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition, 2, 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1977. Universal categories: on the semantics of classifiers and children's early word meaning. In Juilland, Alphonse (ed.), Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg (pp. 449–62). Sarratoga, CA: Anma Libri and Co.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1987. The principle of contrast: a constraint on language acquisition. In MacWhinney, Brian (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition: the 20th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1993. The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1965. Some structural properties of simple active and passive clauses. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 365–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1973. Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Moore, Timothy E. (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, Charles, Jr. 2000. Evaluating models of human sentence processing. In Crocker, Matthew W., Pickering, Martin and Clifton, Charles (eds.), Architecture and Mechanisms for Language Processing (pp. 31–55). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clifton, Charles, Jr., Traxler, Matthew J., Mohamed, Mohamed Taha, Williams, Rihana, S., Morris, Robin, K. and Rayner, Keith, E. 2003. The use of thematic role information in parsing: syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clumeck, Harold 1980. The acquisition of tone. In Yeni-Komshian, Grace H., Kavanagh, James F. and Ferguson, Charles A. (eds.), Child Phonology (vol. I: Production). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer 1988. The acquisition of the meanings of modality in children aged eight and twelve. Journal of Child Language, 15, 425–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, Pascale, Segui, Juan and Taft, Marcus 1997. Words and morphemes as units for lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 312–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella and Sung, Li-May 1990. Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 1–22.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter and Sung, Li-May 1994. Head movement and long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 355–406.Google Scholar
Coltheart, Max 1980. Reading phonological recoding and deep dyslexia. In Coltheart, Max, Patterson, Karalyn and Marshal, John, C. (eds.), Deep Dyslexia (pp. 197–226). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Coltheart, Max, Rastle, Kathleen, Perry, Conrad, Langdon, Robin and Ziegler, Johannes 2001. DRC: a dual route cascade model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard 1984. Form and function in explaining language universals. In Butterworth, Brian, Comrie, Bernard, and Dahl, Osten (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals (pp. 87–103). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Conway, Andrew R. A. and Engle, Randy W. 1994. Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 354–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copland, David, Zubicaray, Greig, McMahon, Katie, Wilson, Stephen, Eastburn, Matt and Chenery, Helen 2003. Brain activity during automatic semantic priming revealed by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage, 20, 302–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbett, Albert T. and Chang, Frederick R. 1983. Pronoun disambiguation: accessing potential antecedent. Memory and Cognition, 16, 283–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortese, Michael, Simpson, Greg and Woolsey, Steph 1997. Effects of association and imageability on phonological mapping. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 226–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosky, Michael J. 1976. The role of letter recognition in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 4, 204–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cossu, Giuseppe, Shankweiler, Donald, Liberman, Isabelle, Katz, Leonard and Tola, Giuseppe 1988. Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children, Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette G. 1986. Jacaltec noun classifiers: a study in language and culture. In Craig, Colette G. (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization: Proceedings of a Symposium on Categorization and Noun Classification (pp. 264–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen and McKee, Cecile 1985. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of NELS 16.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen and Thornton, Rosalind 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: a Guide to Research in Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen, Thornton, Rosalind, Boster, Carole, Conway, Laura, Lillo-Martin, Diane and Woodams, Elaine 1996. Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition, 5 (2), 83–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Matthew W. 1996. Computational Psycholinguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David 1979. Prosodic development. In Fletcher, Paul and Garman, Michael (eds.), Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne and Butterfield, Sally 1992. Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 218–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Anne, Mehler, Jacques, Norris, Dennis and Segui, Juan 1986. The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, Meredyth and Carpenter, Patricia A. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, Meredyth and Green, Ian. 1986. Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In Rescher, Nicholas (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Chris, Castles, Anne, McAnally, Ken and Gray, Jacquie 2001. Lapses of concentration and dyslexic performance on the Ternus Task. Cognition, 81, B21–B31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleser, Ria 1987. From agrammatism to paragrammatism: German aphasiological traditions and grammatical disturbances. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 187–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleser, Ria and Kauschke, Christina 2003. Acquisition and loss of nouns and verbs: parallel or divergent patterns? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 213–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCasper, Anthony J., Lecanuet, Jean-Pierre and Busnel, Marie-Claire 1994. Fetal reactions to recurrent maternal speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 17 (2), 159–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCasper, Anthony J. and Spence, Melanie J. 1986. Prenatal maternal speech influences newborn's perception of speech sounds. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, Greg, Simpson, Greg, Yates, Mark and Locker, Lawrence, Jr. 2003. Flexible use of lexical and phonological information in word recognition. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, Robert 2000. The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–534.Google Scholar
Demb, Jonathan B., Boynton, Geoffrey M., Best, Mary and Heeger, David J. 1998 Psychophysical evidence for a magnocellular pathway deficit in dyslexia. Vision Research, 38, 1555–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demuth, Katherine 1992. Accessing functional categories in Sesotho: interactions at the morpho-syntax interface. In Meisel, Jurgen M. (ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition (pp. 83–107). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, Katherine 1994. On the “underspecification” of functional categories in early grammars. In Lust, Barbara, Suñer, Magarita and Whitman, John (eds.), Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Perspectives (vol. I: Heads, Projections and Learnability, pp. 119–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Demuth, Katherine 1996. Prosodic structure of early words. In Morgan, James L. and Demuth, Katherine (eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition (pp. 171–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
León, Lourdes 1999. Verbs in Tzotzil (Mayan) early syntactic development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 219–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeStefano, Johanna S. 1978. Language, the Learner and the School. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Swart, Henriette 1991. Adverbs of quantification: a generalized quantifier approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
Deutsch, Avital, Frost, Ram and Forster, Kenneth 1998. Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1238–55.Google Scholar
Villiers, Jill G., Tager-Flusberg, Helen B., Hakuta, Kenji and Cohen, Michael 1979. Children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 499–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincenzi, Marica 1991. Syntactic Parsing Strategies in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincenzi, Marica 2000. Crosslinguistic psycholinguistics. In Crocker, Matthew W., Pickering, Martin, and Clifton, Charles (eds.), Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (pp. 282–300). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dick, Frederic, Bates, Elizabeth, Wulfeck, Beverly, Utman, Jennifer, Dronkers, Nina and Gernsbacher, Morton A. 2001. Language deficits, localization, and grammar: evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. Psychological Review, 108, 759–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diehl, Randy L. 1989. Remarks on Stevens' quantal theory of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 71–8.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part I: the Structure of the Clause. Functional Grammar Series 9. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Mari, Muysken, Peter and Singh, Ravendra 1986. Government and code-switching. Journal of Linguistics, 22, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Do, Kyung Soo 1992. Integration process of consonants and vowels in Korean letter perception [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1–15.Google Scholar
Do, Kyung Soo 1994. Representation of causal information in reading: causality, causal field, and multiple cause [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 6, 164–77.Google Scholar
Doctor, Estelle A. and Coltheart, Max 1980. Children's use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Memory and Cognition, 8, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doetjes, Jenny, Neeleman, Ad and Koot, Hans 1998. Degree expressions and the autonomy of syntax. UCL Working Papers, 10, 323–67.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Margaret 1978. Children's Minds. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Margaret and Lloyd, Peter 1974. Sentences and situations: children's judgments of match and mismatch. In Bresson, Francois (ed.), Current Problems in Psycholinguistics. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Dowty, David 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drozd, Kenneth 1998. Children's weak interpretations of universally quantified questions. In Bowerman, Melissa and Levinson, Stephen (eds.), Conceptual Development and Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drozd, Kenneth and Philip, William 1992. Event quantification in preschoolers' comprehension of negation. In Clark, Eve (ed.), Child Language Research Forum (vol. 24). Stanford, CA: CLRF.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63, 805–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2002. Discourse and grammar. In Tomasello, Michael, (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language (vol. II). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2003. Argument structure: grammar in use. In Du Bois, Kumpf and Ashby, (eds.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function (pp. 12–60).
Du Bois, John W., Kumpf, Lorraine and Ashby, William (eds.) 2003. Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Duffy, Susan A., Morris, Robin K. and Rayner, Keith 1988. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Lynne G., Seymour, Philip K. H. and Hill, Shirley 2000. A small-to-large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading?The Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 53a, 1081–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro 1994. From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Western Samoan Village. Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dyke, Julie A. and McElree, Brian 2006. Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 157–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebbinghaus, Hermann 1964. Memory: a Contribution to Experimental Psychology (Ruger, & Bussenius, , translators; original work published 1885), New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Echols, Catharine H. 1996. A role for stress in early speech segmentation. In Morgan, James L. and Demuth, Katherine (eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition (pp. 151–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Echols, Catherine H., Crowhurst, Meagan J. and Childers, Jane B. 1997. The perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 202–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Barbara and Potter, Mary C. 1985. Clause and the semantic representation of words. Memory and Cognition, 13, 371–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, Guinevere, F., Meter, John W., Rumsey, Judith M., Maisog, José M., Woods, Roger P. and Zeffiro, Thomas A. 1996. Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging. Nature, 382, 66–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eimas, Peter, Siqueland, Einar R., Jusczyk, Peter W. and Vigorito, James 1971. Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbourne, Paul 2001. E-type anaphora as NP deletion. Natural Language Semantics, 9, 241–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 355–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph 1978. The verbal complex V'-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 151–75.Google Scholar
Emslie, Hazel C. and Stevenson, Rosemary I. 1981. Pre-school children's use of the articles in definite and indefinite referring expressions. Journal of Child Language, 8, 313–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enç, Mürvet 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 1–25.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel, Flynn, Suzanne and Martohardjono, Gita 1996. Second language acquisition: theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 677–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbaugh, S. Mary 1984. Scissors, paper, stone: perceptual foundations of noun classifier system. In Papers and Reports on Child Language Development (vol. 23, pp. 41–9).
Erbaugh, S. Mary 1986. Taking stock: the development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. In Craig, Colette G. (ed.), Typological Studies in Language: Noun Classes and Categorization (vol. 7, pp. 399–436). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan, Nakamura, Kei and Jiansheng, Guo. 1995. Shifting face from Asia to Europe. In Shibatani, Masayoshi and Thompson, Sandra (eds.), Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore (pp. 43–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eubank, Lynn 1993/1994. On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition, 3, 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Fuxi 1985. An experiment of the use of classifier by 4–6 year olds. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 17 (4), 384–92.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar 1956. On the predictability of formant levels and spectrum envelopes from formant frequencies. In Halle, Morris, Lunt, Horace and MacLean, Hugh (eds.), For Roman Jakobson (pp. 109–20). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar 1968. Analysis and synthesis of speech processes. In Malmberg, Bertil (eds.), Manual of Phonetics (pp. 243–53). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar 1970. Acoustical Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar 1975. Vocal tract wall effects, losses, and resonance bandwidths. STL-QPSR, 2 (3), 1–19.Google Scholar
Farmer, Mary E. and Klein, Raymond M. 1995. The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: a review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 460–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fathman, Ann 1975. The relationship between age and second language learning ability. Language Learning, 25, 245–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigenbaum, E. A. and Simon, H. A. 1984. EPAM-like models of recognition and learning. Cognitive Science, 8, 305–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, Anne 1985. Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 181–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles 1988. The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar.”Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Lily Wong 2000. The loss of family languages by immigrant children: should educators be concerned?Theory into Practice, 39, 203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Daniel 1991. Binding parameters in second language acquisition. In Eubank, Lynn (ed.), Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 351–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Daniel and Broselow, Ellen 1986. Second language acquisition of reflexive-binding. In Berman, Stephen, Choe, Jae-Woong and McDonough, Joyce (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 154–68). Amherst, MA: University Of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistics Student Association.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1987. A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages?Applied Linguistics, 8, 162–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E. 1999. Age of learning and second language speech. In Birdsong, David (ed.), Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 101–32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Flege, James E., Bohn, Ocke-Schwen and Jang, Sunyoung 1997. Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E. and Liu, Serena 2001. Effect of experience in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–52.Google Scholar
Flege, James E., Munro, Murray J. and MacKay, Ian R. A. 1995. Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97 (5), 3125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E., Yeni-Komshian, Grace H. and Liu, Serena 1999. Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Suzanne 1983. A study of the effects of principal branching direction in second language acquisition: the generalization of a parameter of universal grammar from first to second language acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Flynn, Suzanne 1987. A Parameter-setting Model of L2 Acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Suzanne and Foley, Claire 2004. On the developmental primacy of free relatives. In Csirmaz, Aniko, Gualmini, Andrea and Nevins, Andrew (eds.), Plato's Problem: Papers on Language Acquisition, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 48 (pp. 59–69). Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics, MIT.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet and Sag, Ivan 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 355–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 2000. The treatment of contrasts in interaction. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Kortmann, Bernd (eds.). Cause-Condition-Concession-Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Forster, Kenneth I. 1976. Accessing the mental lexicon. In Wales, Roger J. and Walker, Edward (eds.), New Approaches to Language Mechanisms (pp. 257–87). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Forster, Kenneth I. and Chamber, Susan M. 1973. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fougeron, Cecile and Keating, Patricia 1997. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3728–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, Barbara A. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language, 66, 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny and Grodzinsky, Yosef 1998. Children's passive: a view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 311–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Robert A. 1982. Individual variation in the perception of vowels: implications for a perception-production link. Phonetica, 39, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frazier, Lyn 1979. On Comprehending Sentences: Syntactic Parsing Strategies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn 1987. Syntactic processing: evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 519–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, Lyn and Rayner, Keith 1982. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, John R. 1981. Sources of process interaction in reading. In Lesgold, Alan M. and Perfetti, Charles A. (eds.), Interactive Processes in Reading (pp. 361–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Freeman, Norman, Sinha, Chris and Stedmon, Jacqueline 1982. All the cars-which cars? from word meaning to discourse analysis. In Beveridge, Michael (ed.), Children Thinking Through Language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Freeman, Norman and Stedmon, Jacqueline 1986. How children deal with natural language quantification. In Kurez, I., Shugar, G. W. and Danks, J. H. (eds.), Knowledge and Language. North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Friederici, Angela D. 1995. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D. and Frazier, Lyn 1992. Thematic analysis in agrammatic comprehension: syntactic structures and task demands. Brain and Language, 42, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D. and Graetz, Patty A. M. 1987. Processing passive sentences in aphasia: deficits and strategies. Brain and Language, 30, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D. and Mecklinger, Axel 1996. Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: first-pass and second-pass parsing processes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 157–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D., Steinhauer, Karsten and Frisch, Stefan 1999. Lexical integration: sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information. Memory and Cognition, 27, 438–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedmann, Naama 1994. Morphology in agrammatism: a dissociation between tense and agreement. Master's Thesis, Tel Aviv University.
Friedmann, Naama and Grodzinsky, Yosef 1997. Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language, 56, 397–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedmann, Naama and Shapiro, Lewis P. 2003. Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 288–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, Uta 1999. Paradoxes in the definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 5, 192–214.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromm, Erica 1970. Age regression with unexpected reappearance of a repressed childhood language. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 18, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, Ram, Katz, Leonard and Bentin, Shlomo 1987. Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Fruchter, Arlene, Wilbur, Ronnie B. and Fraser, Brian 1984. Comprehension of idioms by hearing-impaired students. Volta Review, 86, 7–18.Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki, Miyagawa, Shigeru and Tenny, Carol 1985. Verb Classes in English and Japanese: a Case Study in the Interaction of Syntax, Morphology and Semantics (Lexicon Project Working Papers vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Gandour, Jack, Petty, Soranee H., Dardarananda, Rochana, Dechongkit, Sumalee and Mukngoen, Sunne 1984. Acquisition of numeral classifiers in Thai. Linguistics, 22, 455–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlock, Victoria M., Walley, Amanda C. and Metsala, Jamie L. 2001. Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 468–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, Wendell R. 1978. Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 287–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnham, Alan, Oakhill, Jane and Reynolds, David 2002. Are inferences from stereotyped role name to characters' gender made elaboratively?Memory and Cognition, 30, 439–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrod, Simon and Sanford, Anthony 1990. Referential processes in reading: focusing on roles and individuals. In Balota, David A., Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B. and Rayner, Keith (eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading (pp. 465–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gee, Julie and Salvasir, Iskender 1985. On the use of ‘will’ and ‘gonna’: toward a description of activity-types for child language. Discourse Processes, 8, 143–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, Fred 1988. Neuropsychology and acquisition of second language learning. In Beebe, Leslie M. (ed.), Issues in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 81–112). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Genneri, Silvia, Sloman, Steven, Malt, Barbara and Fitch, W. Tecumseh 2002. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, Dedre 1978. On relational meaning: the acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development, 49, 988–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, Dedre 1982. Why are nouns learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Kuczaj, Stan A. II (ed.), Language Development (vol. II: Language, Thought and Culture). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Julie 1991. The meanings and use of modals hafta, needta and wanna in children's speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 531–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, LouAnn 1991. The metrical basis for children's subjectless sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, LouAnn 1996. Prosodic structure in young children's language production. Language, 72 (4), 683–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, LouAnn, Landau, Barbara and Remez, Robert E. 1990. Function morphemes in young children's speech perception and production. Developmental Psychology, 26 (2), 204–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton A. 1989. Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gernsbacher, Morton A. 1990. Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton A. 1997. Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gernsbacher, Morton A. and Hargreaves, David 1988. Accessing sentence participants: the advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gernsbacher, Morton A., Hargreaves, David and Beeman, Mark 1989. Building and accessing clausal representations: the advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 735–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gernsbacher, Morton A., Varner, Kathleen R. and Faust, Mark E. 1990. Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Gibson, Edward 1998. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependence. Cognition, 68, 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Eleanor J. and Levin, Harry 1975. The Psychology of Reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giraudo, Hélène and Grainger, Jonathan 2000. Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana 1997. The categorial status of determiners. In Haegeman, Lilian (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax (pp. 95–123). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy 1986. The Pragmatics of Word Order: Predictability, Importance, and Attention. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gleitman, Lila 1990. The structural sources of verb meaning. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Mark 1967. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10, 447–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele 1995. Constructions: a Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele 1998. Patterns of experience in patterns of language. In Tomasello, Michael (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure (pp. 203–19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, Roberta M., Hirsh-Pasek, Kathryn, Cauley, Kathleen and Gordon, Laura 1987. The eyes have it: lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 14, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, Harold 1993. Understanding Aphasia. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodhart, Wendy 1984. Morphological complexity, ASL, and the acquisition of sign language in deaf children. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
Goodluck, Helen 1991. Language Acquisition: a Linguistic Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gopnik, Alison 2001. Theories, language, and culture: Whorf without wincing. In Bowerman, Melissa and Levinson, Stephen C. (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, Alison and Choi, Soonja 1990. Do linguistic differences lead to cognitive differences?: a crosslinguistic study of semantic and cognitive development. First Language, 10, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, Alison and Choi, Soonja 1995. Names, relational words, and cognitive development in English and Korean speakers: nouns are not always learned before verbs. In Tomasello, Michael and Merriman, William E. (eds.), Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs (pp. 63–80). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter C. 1982. The acquisition of syntactic categories: the case of the count/mass distinction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Gordon, Peter C. 1985. Evaluating the semantic categories hypothesis: the case of the count/mass distinction. Cognition, 29, 31–54.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter C. 1988. Count/mass category acquisition: distributional distinction in children's speech. Journal of Child Language, 15, 109–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter C. and Chafetz, Jill 1990. Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children's comprehension of passives. Cognition, 36, 227–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, Peter C. and Hendrick, Randall 2005. Relativization, ergativity, and corpus frequency. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 456–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall and Johnson, Marcus 2001. Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 1411–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall and Johnson, Marcus 2004. Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter, C., Hendrick, Randall, Johnson, Marcus and Lee, Yoonhyoung 2006. Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: evidence from eye tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 1304–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall and Levine, William H. 2002. Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13, 425–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gökmen, Seda and Lee, Chungmin 2002. Aspects of the acquisition of (past) tense and (telic) aspect in Turkish and Korean. Language Research, 38, 1317–47.Google Scholar
Graesser, Arthur C., Singer, Murray and Trabasso, Tom 1994. Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, Georgia H. 1989. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grice, Martine and Benzmüller, Ralf 1995. Transcription of German intonation using ToBI-tones – the Saarbrücken system. Phonus, 1, 33–51.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane 1981. Form, function, and the language acquisition device. In Baker, Carl L. and McCarthy, John J. (eds.), The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef 1986. Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain and Language, 27, 135–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Yosef 1989. Agrammatic comprehension of relative clauses. Brain and Language, 37, 480–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Yosef 1995a. A restrictive theory of trace deletion in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 50, 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef 1995b. Trace deletion, theta-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language, 51, 469–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Yosef 2000. The neurology of syntax: language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Yosef, Piñango, Maria M., Zurif, Edgar and Drai, Dan 1999. The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: comprehension regularities in Broca's aphasia. Brain and Language, 67, 134–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grojean, François 1982. Life with Two Languages: An Introduction to Bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grojean, François 1988. Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 233–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grojean, François 1997. Processing mixed language: issues, findings, and models. In Groot, Annette and Kroll, Judith (eds.), Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives (pp. 225–54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grojean, François and Soares, Carlos 1986. Processing mixed language: some preliminary findings. In Vaid, Jyotsna (ed.), Language Processing in Bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and Neuropsychological Perspective (pp. 123–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gropen, Jess, Pinker, Steven, Hollander, Michelle and Goldberg, Richard 1991a. Syntax and semantics in the acquisition of locative verbs. Journal of Child Language, 18, 115–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gropen, Jess, Pinker, Steven, Hollander, Michelle and Goldberg, Richard 1991b. Affectedness and direct object: the role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure. Cognition, 41, 153–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruber, Jeffrey S. 1967. Topicalization in child language. Foundations of Language, 3, 37–65.Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa 1992. Verb syntax in Italian child grammar. In Geneva Generative Papers (vol. 1, pp. 145–62).Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, Eithne and Noonan, Máire 1992. Functional categories and language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 241–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982a. Conversational code-switching. In Gumperz, John J. (ed.), Discourse Strategies (pp. 59–99). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982b. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1992. Contextualization revisited. In Auer, Peter and di Luzio, Aldo (eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 39–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. and Hernandez-Chavez, Eduardo 1975. Cognitive aspects of bilingual communication. In Hernandez-Chavez, Eduardo, Cohen, Andrew and Beltramo, Anthony (eds.), El lenguaje de los Chicanos. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ha, Eun Jin 2000. The development of comprehension and production of causative and passive sentences of 4–9 year old normal children [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Ewha Womens University, Korea.
Haarmann, Henk J. and Kolk, Herman H. 1991a. A computer model of the temporal course of agrammatic sentence understanding: the effects of variation in severity and sentence complexity. Cognitive Science, 15, 49–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haarmann, Henk J. and Kolk, Herman H. 1991b. Syntactic priming in Broca's aphasics: evidence for slow activation. Aphasiology, 5, 247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haarmann, Henk J. and Kolk, Herman H. 1994. On-line sensitivity to subject-verb agreement violations in Broca's aphasics: the role of syntactic complexity and time. Brain and Language, 46, 493–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberlandt, Karl and Graesser, Arthur C. 1990. Integration and buffering of new information. In Graesser, Arthur C. and Bower, Gordon H. (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (vol. 25, pp. 71–87). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haggerty, Rita and Stamm, John S. 1978. Dichotic auditory fusion levels in children with learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 12, 349–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagiwara, Hiroko 1995. The breakdown of functional categories and the economy of derivation. Brain and Language, 50, 92–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagoort, Peter, Brown, Colin and Groothusen, Jolanda 1993. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrom, Paul 2000. Phrasal movement in Korean negation. In Proceedings of SCIL 9 (pp. 127–42). Cambridge: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Hagstrom, Paul 2002. Implications of child error for the syntax of negation in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11, 211–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Kyung-Ja Park 1981. The development of negation in one Korean child. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii, Manoa.
Hahne, Anja and Friederici, Angela D. 1999. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 194–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahne, Anja and Friederici, Angela D. 2002. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 339–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajime, Hoji 1990. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 1. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hakuta, Kenji 1994. Distinguishing among proficiency, choice, and attitudes in questions about language for bilinguals. In Lamberty, Gontran and Coll, Cynthia G. (eds.), Puerto Rican Women and Children: Issues in Health, Growth, and Development (pp. 191–209). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, Kenji and Daniel, D'Andrea 1992. Some properties of bilingual maintenance and loss in Mexican background high-school students. Applied Linguistics, 13, 72–99.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Hassan, Ruqaiya 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliwell, John F. 2000. Korean agrammatic production. Aphasiology, 14, 1187–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-hye 1998. Asymmetry in the interpretation of –(n)un in Korean. In Akatsuka, Noriko, Hoji, Hajime, Iwasaki, Shoichi, Sohn, Sung-Ock and Strauss, Susan (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 7 (pp. 1–15). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye 2007. In search of evidence for the placement of the verb in Korean and Japanese. In McGloin, Naomi H. (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 15. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye and Lee, Chungmin 2007. On negative imperatives in Korean. Linguistic Inquiry, 38 (2).
Han, Chung-hye, Lidz, Jeffrey and Musolino, Julien 2007. V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Ho 1997. Development of functional categories in child Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Han, Ho and Park, Myung-Kwan 1994. The syntax of negation in Korean and its development in child language. In Proceedings of ESCOL ‘94 (pp. 152–62).Google Scholar
Harada, S. I., Uyeno, Tazuko, Hayashibe, Hideo and Yamada, Hiroshi 1976. On the development of perceptual strategies in children: a case study on the Japanese child's comprehension of the relative clause constructions. Annual Bulletin of the Research Institute Logopedics Phoniatrics, 10, 199–224. University of Tokyo.
Harley, Birgit and Wang, Wenxia 1997. The critical period hypothesis: where are we now? In Groot, Annette M.B. and Kroll, Judith F. (eds.) Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives (pp. 19–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Roger and Yet-hung Chan, Cecilia 1997. The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: the failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research, 13 (3), 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidorn, George E. 2000. Intelligence writing assistance. In Dale, Robert, Moisl, Hermann and Somers, Harold (eds.), A Handbook of Natural Language Processing: Techniques and Applications for the Processing of Language as Text (pp. 181–207). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Heilman, Kenneth M. and Scholes, Robert J. 1976. The nature of comprehension errors in Broca's, conduction and Wernicke's aphasics. Cortex, 12, 258–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heim, Irene 1991. Articles and definiteness, published in German as “Artikel und Definitheit.” In v. Stechow, Arnim and Wunderlich, Dieter (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Helenius, Päivi, Uutela, Kimmo and Hari, Riitta 1999. Auditory stream segregation in dyslexic adults. Brain, 122, 907–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, Monica (ed.) 1988. Codeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef
Henderson, Leslie, Wallis, Julie and Knight, Denise 1984. Morphemic structure and lexical access. In Bouma, Herman and Bouwhuis, Don G. (eds.), Attention and Performance X (pp. 211–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hickok, Gregory S. 1992. Agrammatic Comprehension and the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis. MIT Occasional Paper 45.
Hickok, Gregory S. and Avrutin, Sergey 1995. Comprehension of wh-questions by two agrammatic Broca's aphasics. Brain and Language, 51, 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillert, Dieter 1998. From Alexander to Wilhelm Von Humboldt: a crosslinguistic perspective. In Hillert, Dieter (ed.), Syntax and Semantics (vol. 31, pp. 1–31.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne 1999. Involuntary language loss among immigrants: Asian American linguistic autobiographies. ERIC Digest (www.eric.ed.gov).Google Scholar
Hirose, Hitoshi 1992. An investigation of the recognition process for jukugo by use of priming paradigms [in Japanese]. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 63, 303–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Christopher and Wexler, Kenneth 2004. Children's passives and their resulting interpretation. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA). University of Hawaii at Manoa. December, 2004.
Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy, Nelson, Kemler, Jusczyk, Deborah G., Wright-Cassidy, Peter W., Kimberly, Druss, B. and Kennedy, Lori 1987. Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition, 26, 269–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirst, William and Weil, Joyce 1982. Acquisition of epistemic and deontic meaning of modals. Journal of Child Language, 9, 659–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekstra, Teun and Jordens, Peter 1994. From adjunct to head. In Hoekstra, Teun and Schwartz, Bonnie (eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar (pp. 119–49). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmeister, Robert J. 2000. A piece of the puzzle: ASL and reading comprehension in deaf children. In Chamberlain, Morford and Mayberry, Language Acquisition By Eye (pp. 131–41).
Hogaboam, Thomas W. and Perfetti, Charles A. 1975. Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 265–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Ki-Sun 1987. Consciousness condition on the Korean reflexive. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 161–69). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hong, Sung Eun 2001. An empirical survey on animal classifiers in Korean Sign Language. A paper presented at Conference on Sign Linguistics Deaf Education and Deaf Culture in Asia, Hong Kong, 17th–19th December 2001.
Hong, Yunsook 1985. A quantitative analysis of KA/I and (N)UN as subject markers in spoken and written Korean. In Proceedings of the 1985 Harvard Workshop on Korean Linguistics (pp. 145–53).
Horgan, Dianne 1978. The development of the full passive. Journal of Child Language, 5, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Ellis, Sahni, Sartaj and Anderson-Freed, Susan 1992. Fundamentals of Data Structures in C. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Hsiao, Fanny and Gibson, Edward 2003. Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition, 90, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, Chun-chieh N., Hurewitz, Felicia and Phillips, Colin 2006. Contextual and syntactic cues for head-final relative clauses in Chinese. In Proceedings of CUNY 2006 Conference.
Hu, Quian 1993. The acquisition of Chinese classifiers by young Mandarin speaking children. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
Hudson, Mutsuko Endo, Sells, Peter and Jun, Sun-Ah (eds.) 2008. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 13. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Hurford, James 1975. A child and the English question formation rule. Journal of Child Language, 2, 299–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Do-Soon 1994. The syntactic structure and development of the sign language by Korean deaf students [in Korean]. Doctoral dissertation, Dankook University, Korea.
Hwang, Juck-Ryoon 1990. “Deference” versus “politeness” in Korean speech. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 82, 41–55.Google Scholar
Hwang, Mina 2002. Sentence comprehension of Korean-speaking adults with Broca's aphasia [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Communication Disorders, 7, 64–84.Google Scholar
Hwang, Mina 2003. The production of grammatical morphemes of Korean children with developmental language impairment [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Speech Sciences, 10, 47–64.Google Scholar
Hwang, Mina and Kim, Yoon-Ju 2004. Comprehension of relative clauses in Korean-speaking adults with Broca's aphasia. Poster presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Philadelphia, PA.
Hwang, Yu Mi 2000. Difference between deixis and anaphora shown in aphasics [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
Hwang, Yu Mi, Kim, Dong-Hwee and Nam, Kichun 2003. The structure and processing of the Korean functional category in Aphasics [in Korean]. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 12, 197–216.Google Scholar
Hwang, Yu Mi, Kwon, Youan, Lim, HeuiSeok and Nam, Kichun 2002. A model of Korean morphological passive processing [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the 16th KSCS Annual Spring Conference (pp. 137–41).
Hwang, Yu Mi, Moon, Youngsun, Jung, Jaebum and Nam, Kichun 2000. Characteristics of processing semifinal verbal inflections in Korean [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Winter Conference of the Korean Society of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 29–40).
Hwang, Yu Mi, Moon, Youngsun, Park, Hye-Sung and Nam, Kichun 2000. Characteristics of processing functional categories in Korean [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Spring Conference on Korean Cognitive Science (pp. 273–78).
Hwang, Yu Mi, Nam, Kichun and Kang, Myung-Yoon 2000. The structure and processing of the Korean functional category [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Korean Society of Communication Disorders (pp. 137–42).
Hwang, Yu Mi, Nam, Kichun and Kang, Myung-Yoon 2001. The research of deictic pronoun and anaphoric pronoun in aphasic case [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Communication Disorders, 6 (1), 131–59.Google Scholar
Hyams, Nina 1992. The genesis of clausal structure. In Meisel, Jurgen M. (ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition (pp. 371–400). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, Nina and Sigurjonsdottir, Sigridur 1990. The development of “long distance anaphora”: a crosslinguistic comparison with special reference to Icelandic. Journal of Developmental Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hyun, Jung Moon 2003. Retrieval of nouns and verbs in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Yonsei University, Korea.
Im, Hong-Bin 1991a. On the discrimination standard of Korean classifiers [in Korean]. In Lee Swunhwun Sensayng Hoykap Kinyem Nonchong. Korea: Sekceng Leeswunhwun sensayng hoykap kinyem nonchong kanhayng wiwenhoy.Google Scholar
Im, Hong-Bin 1991b. On the characteristics of Korean classifiers: New understanding and development of Korean studies [in Korean]. In Kim Wancong Sensayng Hoykap Kinyem Nonchong. Seoul National University Tayhakwen Kwuke Yenkwuhoy Phyen.Google Scholar
Imai, Mutsumi and Gentner, Dedre 1997. A crosslinguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62, 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens-Bailey, Alison L. 1996. Ancestral language acquisition: implications for aspects of ethnic identity among Armenian American children and adolescents. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 422–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens-Bailey, Alison L. 2001. Language background and ethnic identity: a study of bilingual and English-only speaking children of Armenian descent. In Olshtain, Elite and Horenczyk, Gabriel (eds.), Language, Identity, and Immigration (pp. 255–69). Hebrew University Magnes Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, David 1989. First Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inhelder, Barbel and Piaget, Jean 1958. The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhelder, Barbel and Piaget, Jean 1964. The Early Growth of Logic in the Child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
,Institute of Language and Information Studies 1998. Frequency Analysis of Korean Usage (Publication No. CLID-WP-98–02–28). Seoul, Korea: Yonsei University.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania 2003. Article semantics in second language acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Ionin, Tania 2006. This is definitely specific: specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics, 14, 175–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Ko, Heejeong and Wexler, Kenneth 2003. Specificity as a grammatical notion: evidence from L2-English use. In Garding, Gina and Tsujimura, Mimu, Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 22 (pp. 245–58). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Ko, Heejeong and Wexler, Kenneth 2004. Article semantics in L2-acquisition: the role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 3–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Ko, Heejeong and Wexler, Kenneth 2007. The role of semantic features in the acquisition of English articles by Russian and Korean speakers. In Liceras, Juana M. et al. (eds.), The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, Second language research acquisition series (Theoretical and Methodological Issues). New York and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa and Maldonado, Salvador Bautista, 2008. Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles. Lingua, 118, 554–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, George 1975. Some universals for quantifier scope. Syntax and Semantics, 4, 37–58.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry, 2, 21–35.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray 1996. The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, 305–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo 1980. Remarks on to contraction. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 239–46.Google Scholar
Jang, Jindeok 1999. Ambiguity resolution processes of Korean datives. Unpublished Master's thesis, Ajou University.
Jang, Jin-Kwon 1995. The etymological meanings of Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Dankook University.
Jared, Debra and Seidenberg, Mark S. 1991. Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Javella, R. and Meijers, G. 1983. Recognizing morphemes in spoken words: some evidence for a stem-organized mental lexicon. In Flores D'Arcais, Giovanni B. and Jarvella, R. (eds.), The Processing of Language Understanding (pp. 81–112). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Jeon, Moongee, Lee, Jung-Mo and Lee, Jae-Ho 2001. Processing of connectives in discourse with causal or additive connections [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 13, 287–306.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 1994. Headed nominalizations in Korean: relative clauses, clefts and comparatives. Doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
Jhang, Se-Eun 1997. Sign language and reduplication [in Korean]. Eoneohag: Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea, 21, 263–87.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 1999a. Study on phonological structure of Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Journal of Language Sciences, 6, 81–109.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 1999b. Wh-questions in American Sign Language and Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Linguistics, 7, 297–319.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 2000. A recent research trend and its linguistic approach to American Sign Language and Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Paykyang Inmun Noncip, 5, 5–47. Korea: Humanities Center, Shilla University.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 2004. The mapping between Korean Sign Language and reading ability: evidence from Korean deaf children. The Linguistic Association of Korean Journal, 12 (3), 225–38.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 2006. An overview of Korean sign language. The New Korean Journal of English Language and Literature, 48, 237–56.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 2008. Verb types and numeral classifiers in Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Journal of Language Sciences, 15 (3), 101–35.Google Scholar
Jia, Xiangdong, Brooks, Patricia and Braine, Martin 1995. A study of Chinese children's comprehension of universal quantifiers. In Clark, Eve (ed.), Child Language Research Forum (vol. 27). Stanford, CA: CLRF.Google Scholar
Jo, Hey-young 2001. “Heritage” language learning and ethnic identity: Korean Americans' struggle with language authorities. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 14, 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Jacqueline and Newport, Elissa 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Jacqueline and Newport, Elissa 1991. Critical period effects on universal properties of language: the status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition, 39, 215–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Judith and Slobin, Dan I. 1979. The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian, and Turkish. Journal of Child Language, 16, 531–47.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne and Bobaljik, Jonathan 1996. Subject positions and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry, 27 (2), 195–236.Google Scholar
Joo, Yanghee 1989. A crosslinguistic approach to quantification in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Jordens, Peter 1988. The acquisition of word order in Dutch and German as L1 and L2. Second Language Research, 4, 41–65.Google Scholar
Joshi, Arvind 1985. Processing of sentences with intrasentential code-switching. In Dawty, David, Karttunen, Lauri and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 190–205). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Terry 1999. Lexical access and the mental lexicon for two-kanji compound word: a priming paradigm study. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Science and the 17th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society (pp. 511–14).
Joyce, Terry 2002. Constituent-morpheme priming: implications from the morphology of two-kanji compound words. Japanese Psychological Research, 44, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, Alan 1996. Learnability and the Lexicon: Theories and Second Language Acquisition Research (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 12). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, Jong Sup 2001a. Korean “standard sign language” is not a sign language. Journal of Cognitive Science, 2, 211–30.Google Scholar
Jun, Jong Sup 2001b. The agent-first strategy and the development of language: cases of learning two languages simultaneously. In Kuno, Susumu et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics IX (pp. 46–55). Hanshin Publishing Company, Korea, and Harvard University.Google Scholar
Jun, Jong Sup and Lee, Chungmin 2004. Children's strategic processing of Korean relative clauses. Language Research, 40 (2), 465–88.Google Scholar
Jun, M. G., Lee, J-M. and Lee, J-H. 2001. Processing of connectives in discourse with causal or additive connections. [In Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 13, 287–306.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah 1993. The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University. [Published in 1996 by New York: Garland.]
Jun, Sun-Ah 1995. A phonetic study of stress in Korean. Paper presented at the 130th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, St. Louis, MO.
Jun, Sun-Ah 1998. The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 15 (2), 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah 2000. K-ToBI (Korean ToBI) labelling conventions – Version 3. Journal of Speech Sciences, 7 (1), 143–69. [Version 3.1 in UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 99, 149–73. URL: www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/jun/ktobi/K-tobi.html].Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah 2003a. Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32 (2), 219–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jun, Sun-Ah 2003b. The effect of phrase length and speech rate on prosodic phrasing. In The Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona, Spain.
Jun, Sun-Ah 2004. Intonational phonology of Korean revisited. A talk presented at the Japanese-Korean Linguistics conference, Tucson, AZ [The paper appeared in Japanese–Korean Linguistics 14. Stanford: CSLI. 2006.]
Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) 2005. Prosodic Typology: the Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah 2006. Phonological development of Korean: a case study. In Kuno, Susumu, Lee, Ik-Hhan, Whitman, John, Maling, Joan, Kang, Young-Se., Sells, Peter and Sohn, Hyang-Sook (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics XI (pp.17–33). Korea: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah and Kim, Sahyang 2004. Default phrasing and attachment preference in Korean. In The Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Jeju, Korea.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah and Oh, Mira 1996. A prosodic analysis of three types of wh-phrases in Korean. Language and Speech, 39 (1), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jun, Sun-Ah and Oh, Mira 2000. Acquisition of 2nd language intonation. In Proceedings of International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (vol. 4, pp. 76–9). Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Jung, Jaebum, Kim, Mira, Kim, Taehoon, Chae, Sookyung and Nam, Kichun 1999. Morphological processing in Broca's aphasia [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the 13th KSCS Annual Spring Conference (pp. 15–21).
Jung, Jaebum, Lim, HeuiSeok and Nam, Kichun 2003. Morphological representations of Korean compound nouns [in Korean]. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 12, 77–95.Google Scholar
Jung, Jae-Bum, Pyun, Sung-Bom, Kim, Tae-Hoon and Nam, Kichun 2002. The processing and representations of ambiguous morphemes in Korean words: centered in aphasics [in Korean]. In The Proceedings of Conference of Korean Society of Cognitive Science (pp. 151–6).
Jung, Jingab and Yi, Kwangoh 2004. Morphological representation and processing of Korean words [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Korean Society for Experimental Psychology (pp. 89–95).
Jung, Jongmin and Pae, Soyeong 2004. The fast mapping abilities of Korean hearing impaired children [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Communication Disorders, 9 (2), 49–64.Google Scholar
Jung, Kyung Soon 2002. Effects on the use of case markers, ending markers, and vocabulary of Korean deaf students in the application of standard sign language for signed Korean [in Korean]. In A Report of Research on Field Special Education for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People. General Association of Special Education of Korea.Google Scholar
Jung, Woo Hyun and Park, SooJin 2006. Word and coding-unit superiority effect in the perception of Korean letters [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 139–56.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W. 1993. From general to language-specific capacities: the WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 3–28.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W. 1997. The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W. 1999. How infants begin to extract words from speech. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 323–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, Peter W. and Aslin, Richard N. 1995. Infants' detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, Peter W., Cutler, Anne and Redanz, Nancy J. 1993. Infants' sensitivity to predominant stress patterns in English. Child Development, 64, 675–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W., Friederici, Angela D., Wessels, Jeanine M. I., Svenkerud, Vigdis Y. and Jusczyk, Ann M. 1993. Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 402–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W., Pisoni, David B.. and Mullennix, John 1992. Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants. Cognition, 43 (3), 253–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, Marcel A. and Carpenter, Patricia A. 1992. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, Marcel A. and Varma, Sashank 2002. A hybrid architecture for working memory: reply to MacDonald and Christiansen 2002. Psychological Review, 109, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, Edith 2001. Effects of NP type on the resolution of word-order ambiguities. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 529–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaan, Edith and Vasic, Nada 2004. Cross-serial dependencies in Dutch: testing the influence of NP type on processing load. Memory and Cognition, 32, 175–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamide, Yuki and Mitchell, Don C. 1997. Relative clause attachment: nondeterminism in Japanese parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 247–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampen, Jacqueline 1997. First steps in wh-movement. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.
Kaneko, Yumina 1996. Knowledge of the English article system in second language learning: to ‘the’ or not to ‘the’. Undergraduate thesis, Smith College.
Kaneko, Yumina 1998. Mwunpep-kwa ene sayong (Grammar and language use). Kwukehak (Korean Linguistics), 31, 165–204.Google Scholar
Kaneko, Yumina 2001. The grammar and use of Korean reflexives. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 6, 134–50.Google Scholar
Kang, Hye-Kyung 2000. Aspects of the acquisition of quantification: experimental studies of English and Korean children. Doctoral dissertation, University College London.
Kang, Hye-Kyung 2001. Quantifier spreading: linguistic and pragmatic considerations. Lingua, 111, 591–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Hyewon and Simpson, Greg B. 1996. Development of semantic and phonological priming in a shallow orthography. Developmental Psychology, 32, 860–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Hyewon and Simpson, Greg B. 2001. Local strategic control of information in visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 29, 648–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, Hyun-Seok 1996. Acoustic and intonational correlates of the informational status of referring expressions in Seoul Korean. Language and Speech, 39 (4), 307–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, In Ku and Lee, Hang Sei 1969. A method of Korean character pattern extraction [in Korean]. Journal of Korea Institute of Electronics Engineers, 9 (2), 1–5.Google Scholar
Kang, Soyoung and Speer, Shari R. 2003. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic clause boundaries in Korean. A paper presented at WCCFL XXII. San Diego, CA.
Karins, Krisjanis and Nagy, Naomi 1993. Non-categorical perception of a ‘categorical’ rule. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1979. A Functional Approach to Child Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Leonard and Frost, Ram 1992. The reading process is different for different orthographies: the orthographic depth hypothesis. In Frost, Ram and Katz, Leonard (eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawachi, Kazuhiro 2002. Do Korean putting verbs categorize space in terms of the looseness vs. tightness distinction? Unpublished manuscript.
Kayne, Richard 1989 Facets of Romance past participle agreement. In Benica, Paola (ed.), Dialect Variation on the Theory of Grammar (pp. 85–103). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kean, Mary-Louise 1988. The relation between linguistic theory and second language acquisition. In Pankhurst, James, Sharewood-Smith, Mike and Buren, Paul (eds.), Learnability and Second Languages (pp. 61–70). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward and Comrie, Bernard 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.Google Scholar
Keenan, Janice M., Baillet, Susan D. and Brown, Polly 1984. The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal behavior, 23, 115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmerer, David and Tranel, Daniel 2000. Verb retrieval in brain-damaged subjects: 1. analysis of stimulus, lexical, and conceptual factors. Brain and Language, 73, 347–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ken, Loke Kit 1991. A semantic analysis of young children's use of Mandarin shape classifiers. In Kwan-Terry, Anna (ed.), Child Language Development in Singapore and Malaysia (pp. 98–116). Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Ken, Loke Kit and Harrison, Godfrey 1986. Young children's use of Chinese (Cantonese and Mandarin) sortal classifiers. In Kao, Henry S. R. and Hoosain, Rumjahn (eds.), Linguistics, Psychology, and the Chinese Language (pp. 125–46). Hong Kong: Center of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Markus and Spitzer, Manfred 2000. Time course of conscious and unconscious semantic brain activation. Neuroreport, 11, 2401–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Ae-Ryung 2002. Two positions of Korean negation. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10 (pp. 587–600). Stanford, CA: CLSI.Google Scholar
Kim, Bok-Lim 1996. Korean families. In McGoldrick, Monica, Giordano, Joe and Pearce, John W. (eds.), Ethnicity and Family Therapy, 2nd edn. (pp. 281–94). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Chil Kwan 1998. A study on etymology of Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Incheon, Korea: Sungdong School.Google Scholar
Kim, Chil Kwan 1999. Practice and Theories for Instruction of Sign Language [in Korean]. Incheon, Korea: Sungdong School.Google Scholar
Kim, Dae-Jin, Kim, Jung-Bae, Jang, Won and Bien, Zeungnam 2002. Development of Korean Sign Language generation system using TV caption signal [in Korean]. Journal of IEEK (CI), 39 (4), 32–44.Google Scholar
Kim, Eunjoo 1997. The sensitive period for second-language acquisition: a reaction time study of maturational effects on the acquisition of L2 lexico-semantic and syntactic systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Kim, Hee-Seob 1996. Korean signed language as a natural language: a phonological analysis [in Korean]. Journal of Language Science, 3, 25–42.Google Scholar
Kim, Hee-Sun</