Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:11:23.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Chungmin Lee
Affiliation:
Seoul National University
Greg B. Simpson
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Youngjin Kim
Affiliation:
Ajou University, Republic of Korea
Ping Li
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaronson, Doris and Ferres, Steven 1983. Lexical categories and reading tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 675–99.Google Scholar
Abney, Steven 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Adams, Karen and Conklin, N. F. 1973. Toward a theory of natural classification. Paper from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1–10.
Adlard, Alan and Hazan, Valerie 1998. Speech perception abilities in children with specific reading difficulties (dyslexia). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 153–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andréa, Aguiar and Baillargeon, Renée 1998. Eight-and-a-half-month-old infants' reasoning about containment events. Child Development, 16, 636–53.Google Scholar
Ahn, Hee-Don 1991. Light verbs, VP-movement, negation and clausal architecture of Korean and English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Ahn, Hee-Don and Yoon, Hang-Jin 1989. Functional categories in Korean. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III (pp. 79–88). Department of Linguistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ahn, Seong-Woo 1997. Is manually coded Korean language? [in Korean]. Communication Disorders, 20, 49–65.Google Scholar
Ahn, Sung-Ho 1990. Korean quantification and Universal Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Ahn, Tae Sun, Hwang, Mina, Park, Chang Il and Kim, Duk Yong 2002. Production of grammatical morphemes in adults with Broca's aphasia [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Korean Academy of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology in 2002 (pp. 162–9).
Ainsworth-Darnell, Kim, Shulman, Harvey and Boland, Julie 1997. Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 112–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith 2003. Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko (ed.) 1995. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 4. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Akatsuka, Noriko, Hoji, Hajime, Iwasaki, Shoichi, Sohn, Sung-Ock and Strauss, Susan (eds.) 1998. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 7. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Akatsuka, Noriko, Iwasaki, Shoichi and Strauss, Susan (eds.) 1996. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 5. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Akatsuka, Noriko, Strauss, Susan and Comrie, Bernand (eds.) 2002. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Akhtar, Nameera 1999. Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26, 339–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan 1988. The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: the Case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. and Slobin, Dan I. 1985. The acquisition of Turkish. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (vol. II: The Data). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. and Slobin, Dan I. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Chafe, Wallace L. and Nichols, Johanna (eds.) Evidentiality: the Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Allen, Shanley E. M. and Schröder, Heike 2003. Preferred argument structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data. In Du Bois, Kumpf and Ashby, (eds.) Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for function.
Anderson, Steven 1971. On the role of deep structure in semantic interpretation. Foundations of Language, 6, 197–219.Google Scholar
Annett, Marian 1970. Classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 303–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antinucci, Francesco and Miller, Ruth 1976. How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language, 3, 167–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, Renè and Muysken, Peter 1987. Language Contact and Bilingualism. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia and Baltazani, Mary 2005. Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic Typology: the Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. London/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ås, Arvid 1962. The recovery of forgotten language knowledge through hypnotic age regression: a case report. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 5, 24–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asher, James and Garcia, Ramiro 1969. The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 53, 334–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, Agnes and Lovegrove, Bill 2001. Temporal processing ability in above average and average readers. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 148–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Au, Terry Kit-fong 2007. Salvaging heritage languages. In Brinton, Donna and Kagan, Olga (eds.), Heritage Language Acquisition: a New Field Emerging (pp. 337–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Au, Terry Kit-fong, Dapretto, Mirella and Song, You-kyung 1994. Input vs. constraints: early word acquisition in Korean and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, Terry Kit-fong, Knightly, Leah M., Jun, Sun-Ah and Oh, Janet Sae 2002. Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13, 238–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Au, Terry Kit-fong and Romo, Laura 1997. Does childhood language experience help adult learners? In Chen, Hsuan-chih (ed.), The Cognitive Processing of Chinese and Related Asian Languages (pp. 417–41). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter 1984. Bilingual Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter 1992. Introduction: John Gumperz' approach to contextualization. In Auer, Peter and di Luzio, Aldo (eds.), The Contextualization of Language (pp. 1–38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter(ed.) 1998. Code-switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Azuma, Shoji 1996. Speech production units among bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25 (3), 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, Alan D. 1986. Working Memory. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baek, Judy Yoo-Kyung 1997. Negation and object shift in early child Korean. In The Interpretive Tract, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (vol. 25, pp. 73–86). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Baek, Judy Yoo-Kyung 2000. Acquisition of negation in Korean: object constructions in the optional infinitive stage. Language Research, 36, 181–203.Google Scholar
Baek, Judy Yoo-Kyung and Wexler, Kenneth 2000. The role of the unique checking constraint in the syntax and acquisition of Korean negation. Unpublished manuscript.
Bailes, Cynthia N. 2001. Integrative ASL-English language arts: bridging paths to literacy. Sign Language Studies, 1, 147–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillargeon, Renée 1995. A model of physical reasoning in infancy. In Rovee-Collier, Carolyn and Lipsett, Lewis P. (eds.), Advances in Infancy Research (vol. 9, pp. 305–71). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, Renée and Hanko-Summers, Stephanie 1990. Is the top object adequately supported by the bottom object? Young infants' understanding of support relations. Cognitive Development, 5, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Carl 1979. Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Theory, 10, 533–81.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark 1988. Incorporation. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baluch, Bahman and Besner, Derek 1991. Visual word recognition: evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 644–52.Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael 1996. Emotion talk(s): the role of perspective in the construction of emotions. In Niemeier, Susanne and Dirven, René (eds.), The Language of Emotions (pp. 209–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Banaji, Mahzarin R. and Hardin, Curtis D. 1996. Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bang, Hee-Jeong 1990. The contextual effects on reference resolution during text comprehension [in Korean]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Woman's University, Korea.
Barnum, Martha 1984. In support of bilingual/bicultural education for deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 129, 404–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartke, Susanne 2004. Passives in German children with Williams Syndrome. In Bartke, Susanne and Siegmueller, Julia (eds.), Williams Syndrome Across Languages (pp. 345–70). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassano, Dominique, Hickmann, Maya and Champaud, Christian 1992. Epistemic modality in French children's discourse: “to be sure” or “not to be sure”? Journal of Child Language, 19, 389–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastiaanse, Roelien, Jonker, Roel, Quak, Christine and Put, Maria Varela 1996. The production of finite and nonfinite verb forms in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 55, 1–11.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, Dale, Philip S. and Thal, Donna 1994. Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Fletcher, Paul and MacWhinney, Brian (eds.), Handbook of Child Language (pp. 96–151). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, Devescovi, Antonella and Wulfeck, Beverly 2001. Psycholinguistics: a cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 369–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, Elizabeth, Friederici, Angela D. and Wulfeck, Beverly 1987a. Grammatical morphology in aphasia: evidence from three languages. Cortex, 23, 545–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, Elizabeth, Friederici, Angela D. and Wulfeck, Beverly 1987b. Comprehension in aphasia: a crosslinguistic study. Brain and Language, 32, 19–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth and MacWhinney, Brian 1982. Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, Eric and Gleitman, Lia R. (eds.), Language Acquisition: the State of Art. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth and MacWhinney, Brian 1987. Competition, variation, and language learning. In MacWhinney, Brian (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp. 157–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth and MacWhinney, Brian 1989. Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, Brian and Bates, Elizabeth (eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing (pp. 3–73). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, Marchman, Virginia, Thal, Donna, Fenson, Larry, Dale, Philip, Reznick, Steven J., Reilly, Judy and Hartung, Jeff 1994. Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 21 (1), 85–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumgaertner, Annette, Weiller, Cornelius and Christian, Büchel 2002. Event-related fMRI reveals cortical sites involved in contextual sentence integration. Neuroimage, 16, 736–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beale, Ian L., Mathew, Peter J., Oliver, Simon and Corballis, Michael. C. 1987. Performance of disabled and normal readers on the continuous performance test. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 229–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckman, Mary E. and Ayers-Elam, Gayle 1997. Guidelines for ToBI Labelling. Online MS and accompanying files. Available at www.ling.ohio-state.edu/research/phonetics/E_ToBI/.
Beckman, Mary E. and Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–309.Google Scholar
Bedecker, William and Caramazza, Alfonso 1986. A final brief in the case against agrammatism: the role of theory in the selection data. Cognition, 24, 277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belazi, Hedi, Rubin, Edward and Toribio, Jacquiline 1994. Code-switching and X-bar theory: the functional head constraint. Linguistic Inquiry, 25 (2), 221–37.Google Scholar
Bell-Berti, Fredericka, Raphael, Lawrence J., Pisoni, David B. and Sawusch, James R. 1979. Some relationships between articulation and perception. Phonetica, 36 (6), 373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellugi, Ursula 1971. Simplification in children's language. In Huxley, Renira and Ingram, Elisabeth (eds.), Language Acquisition: Models and Methods. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola 1990. The late acquisition of preferred argument structure in Venezuelan spoken Spanish. In Carol, Bernard (ed.), Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Linguists. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Beretta, Alan, Maria, Piñango, Patterson, Janet and Harford, Cardyn 1999. Recruiting comparative crosslinguistic evidence to address competing accounts of agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language, 67, 149–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beretta, Alan, Schmitt, Cristina, Halliwell, John, Munn, Alan, Cuetos, Fernando and Kim, Sujung 2001. The effects of scrambling on Spanish and Korean agrammatic interpretation: why linear models fail and structural models survive. Brain and Language, 79, 407–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berk-Seligson, Susan 1986. Linguistic constraints on intrasentential code-switching: a study of Spanish/Hebrew bilingualism. Language in Society, 15, 313–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent and Kay, Paul 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth 1994. Developmental perspectives on transitivity: a confluence of cues. In Levy, Yonata (ed.), Other Children, Other Languages: Issues in the Theory of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berndt, Rita Sloan and Caramazza, Alfonso 1999. How regular is sentence comprehension in Broca's aphasia? It depends on how you select the patients. Brain and Language, 67, 242–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berndt, Rita Sloan, Mitchum, Charlotte C. and Haendiges, Anne N. 1996. Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: a meta-analysis. Cognition, 58, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berndt, Rita Sloan, Mitchum, Charlotte C., Haendiges, Anne N. and Sandson, Jennifer 1997. Verb retrieval in aphasia: 1. characterizing single word impairments. Brain and Language, 56, 68–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berndt, Rita Sloan, Mitchum, Charlotte C. and Wayland, Sarah 1997. Patterns of sentence comprehension in aphasia: a consideration of three hypotheses. Brain and Language, 60, 197–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berwick, Robert C. 1985. The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas G. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, John, R. (ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language (pp. 274–353). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas G. 1974. The ascent of the specious, or there's a lot we don't know about mirrors. In Cohen, David. (ed.), Explaining Linguistic Phenomena (pp. 173–200). Washington: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen 1997. The structure of age: in search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13, 116–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen and Hakuta, Kenji 1994. In Other Words: the Science and Psychology of Second-Language Acquisition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen and Hakuta, Kenji 1999. Confounded age: linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In Birdsong, David (ed.), Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 161–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen and Miller, Barry 1999. The problem of age in second-language acquisition: influence from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2 (2), 127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek 1989. The child, the bioprogram and the input data: a commentary on Cziko. First Language, 9 (25), 33–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bien, Zeungnam, Jang, Won, Kim, Jung-Bae, Kim, Dae-Jin and Cho, Sung Sik 2000. Development of sign language translation system for the education of hearing impaired people [in Korean]. In A Report of Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST).
Bierwisch, Manfred 1967. Some semantic universals of German adjectivals. Foundations of Language, 5, 153–84.Google Scholar
Birch, Stacy L. and Garnsey, Susan M. 1995. The effect of focus on memory for words in the sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 232–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, David (ed.) 1999. Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bishop, Dorothy V. M., Carlyon, Robert P., Deeks, John M. and Bishop, Sonia J. 1999. Auditory temporal processing impairment: neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 1295–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjork, Elizabeth L. and Bjork, Robert A. 1996. Continuing influences of to-be-forgotten information. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 5, 176–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjork, Robert A. and Bjork, Elizabeth L. 1992. A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In Healy, Alive F., Kosslyn, Stephen M. and Shiffrin, Richard M. (eds.), From Learning Processes to Cognitive Processes: Essays in Honor of William K. Estes (vol. II, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, Robert 1990. The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20 (1–2), 3–49.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, Robert 1996. Conservative pattern accumulation in foreign language learning. Paper presented at the EUROSLA 6 Conference.
Bley-Vroman, Robert 1997. Features and patterns in foreign language learning. Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum, Michigan State University.
Bley-Vroman, Robert, Felix, Sascha and Ioup, Georgia 1988. The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research, 4 (1), 1–32.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, Robert and Kweon, Soo-Ok 2002. Acquisition of the constraints on wanna-contraction by advanced second language learners: Universal Grammar and imperfect knowledge. (www.sls.hawaii.edu/bley-vroman/).
Bloom, Lois 1970. Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Lois 1973. One Word at a Time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bloom, Lois, Lightbrown, Patsy and Hood, Lois 1975. Structure and variation in child language. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40 (Serial No. 160).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Paul 2000, How Children Learn the Meanings of Words, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boeschoten, Hendrik and Verhoeven, Ludo 1987. Language-mixing in children's speech: Dutch language use in Turkish discourse. Language Learning, 37, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight 1980. Language, the Loaded Weapon. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight 1981. Consonance, dissonance, and grammaticality: the case of wanna. Language and Communication, 1, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, Theo, Summeren, Chantal, Planken, Brigitte and Schils, Erik 1997. Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boothroyd, Arthur 1986. Speech Acoustics and Perception. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit and Wexler, Kenneth 1987. The maturation of syntax. In Roeper, Thomas and Williams, Edwin (eds.), Parameter Setting (pp. 123–72). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit and Wexler, Kenneth 1992. Bi-unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10, 147–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsting, Eric, Ridder, William H., Dudeck, Kisten, Kelley, Carol, Matsui, Lisa and Motoyama, Janice 1996. The presence of magnocellular dyslexia depends on the type of dyslexia. Vision Research, 36, 1047–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bortolini, U., Caselli, M. and Leonard, L. 1997. Grammatical deficits in Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 41, 1185–92.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 1973. Early Syntactic Development: a Crosslinguistic Study, With Special Reference to Finnish. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 1982. Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactical development. In Wanner, Eric and Gleitman, Lila R. (eds.), Language Acquisition: the State of the Art (pp. 319–46). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 1990. Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: are children helped by innate linking rules? Linguistics, 28, 1253–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 1996. Learning how to structure space for language: a crosslinguistic perspective. In Bloom, Paul, Peterson, Mary, Nadel, Lynn and Garrett, Merrill F. (eds.), Language and Space (pp. 385–486). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa and Choi, Soonja 1994. Linguistic and nonlinguistic determinants of spatial semantic development: a crosslinguistic study of English, Korean, and Dutch. Presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
Bowerman, Melissa and Choi, Soonja 2001. Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In Bowerman, Melissa and Levinson, Steven C. (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development (pp. 475–511). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa and Choi, Soonja 2003. Space under construction: language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In Gentner, Dedre and Glodin-Meadow, Susan (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (pp. 387–428). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa and Pederson, Eric 1992. Crosslinguistic perspectives on topological spatial relationships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco, CA.
Boysson-Bardies, Benedict 1999. How Language Comes to Children. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, Benedict, Sagart, Laurent and Durand, Catherine 1984. Discernible differences in the babbling of infants according to target language. Journal of Child Language, 11, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, Diane 1980. Lexical representation of derivational relation. In Aronoff, Mark and Kean, Mary-Louise (eds.), Juncture (pp. 37–55). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Braine, Martin D. S. 1976. Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41 (1, Serial No. 164).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, Martin D. S., Brody, Ruth E., Fisch, Shalom M., Weisberger, Mara J. and Blum, Monica 1990. Can children use a verb without exposure to its argument structure? Journal of Child Language, 17, 313–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braine, Martin D. S. and Brooks, Patricia J. 1995. Verb argument structure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar. In Tomasello, Michael and Merriman, William E. (eds.), Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs (pp. 331–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brausse, Ursula 1998. Was ist Asverstivitaet? aber oder und? [in German]. Deutsche Sprache, 26, 138–59. Quoted in Ewald Lang 2000.Google Scholar
Bregman, Alan S. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis: the Perceptual Organization of Sounds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Ursula 1997. The Locative Alternation in German: Its Structure and Acquisition (Language Acquisition and Language Disorder 15). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Patricia J. and Braine, Martin 1996. What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each? Cognition, 60, 235–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Patricia J. and Tomasello, Michael 1999. How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75, 720–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Patricia J. and Zizak, Otto 2002. Does preemption help children learn verb transitivity? Journal of Child Language, 29, 759–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broselow, Ellen and Finer, Daniel 1991. Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research, 7, 35–59.Google Scholar
Brown, H. Douglas 1971. Children's comprehension of relativized English sentences. Child Development, 42, 1923–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope 1994. The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions: the semantics of static descriptions of location. Linguistics, 32, 743–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope 1998. Early Tzeltal verbs: Argument structure and argument representation. In Clark, Eve (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 129–40). Stanford University: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger 1973. A First Language: the Early Stage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger and Bellugi, Ursula 1964. Three processes in the child's acquisition of syntax. In Lenneberg, Eric (ed.), New Directions in the Study of Language (pp. 131–61). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger and Fraser, Colin 1963. The acquisition of syntax. In Cofer, Charles N. and Musgrave, Barbara S. (eds.), Verbal Behavior and Learning: Problems and Processes (pp. 158–97). New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Gösta 1977. Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Bucci, Wilma 1978. The interpretation of universal affirmative propositions: a developmental study. Cognition, 6, 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budwig, Nancy and Narasimhan, Bhuvana 2001. Input variation and the development of argument structure: an examination of Hindi-speaking caregiver-child discourse. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MA.
Burr, David C., Morrone, M. Concetta and Ross, John 1994. Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature, 371, 511–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, Brian 1983. Lexical Representation. In Butterworth, Brian (ed.), Language Production (vol. II, pp. 257–94). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, David 1983. A note on the “word-order problem” in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 20, 155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, David 1985. Syntactic and semantic structures in agrammatism. In Kean, Mary-Louise (ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 125–52). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, David 1991. Agrammatism is a theoretically coherent aphasic category. Brain and Language, 40, 274–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, David 1995. Issues arising in contemporary studies of disorders of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension in agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 50, 325–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, David, Baker, Catherine and Dehaut, François 1985. Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia. Cognition, 21, 117–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, David and Futter, Christine 1986. Assignment of thematic roles to nouns in sentence comprehension by an agrammatic patient. Brain and Language, 27, 117–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, David and Hildebrandt, Nancy 1988. Disorders of Syntactic Comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, David and Waters, Gloria S. 1999. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, Alfonso, Laudanna, Alessandro and Cristina, Romani 1988. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 207–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, Alfonso and Zurif, Edgar B. 1976. Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, Susan 1978. The child as word learner. In Halle, Morris, Bresnan, Joan and Miller, George A. (eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality (pp. 264–93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carey, Susan 1994. Does learning a language require the child to reconceptualize the world? Lingua, 92, 143–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Kathie 1987. How children learn to classify nouns in Thai. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
Carpenter, Kathie 1991. Later rather than sooner: extra-linguistic categories in the acquisition of Thai Classifiers. Journal of Child Language, 18, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, Manuel, Alvarez, Carlos and Vega, Manuel 1993. Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, Manuel, Gernsbacher, Morton A. and Villa, Victor 1995. The advantage of first-mention in Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 124–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casasola, Marianella and Cohen, Leslie 2002. Infant categorization of containment, support and tight-fit spatial relationships. Developmental Science, 5, 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, Maria Cristina, Bates, Elizabeth, Casadio, Paola, Fenson, Judi, Fenson, Larry, Sanderl, Lisa and Weir, Judy 1995. A crosslinguistic study of early lexical development. Cognitive Development, 10, 159–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Anne, Davis, Chris and Letcher, Tessa 1999. Neighbourhood effects in masked form-priming in children and adults. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, Courtney 1968. The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. Child Development, 39, 433–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chafe, Wallace L. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Tomlin, Russell S. (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: the Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Charlene, Morford, Jill P. and Mayberry, Rachel I. (eds.), 2000. Language Acquisition By Eye. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chang, Frederick R. 1980. Active memory process in visual sentence comprehension: clause effects and pronominal reference. Memory and Cognition, 8, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Sok-Chin 1996. Korean (London Oriental and African Language Library vol. 4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chang, Suk-Jin 1977. Korean reflexive pronoun caki and its referential NP's point of view [in Korean]. Language Research, 13 (1), 35–48.Google Scholar
Chang-Song, You-kyung 1997. Early word acquisition in Korean: evidence for constraints View (I) [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Human Development, 4 (1), 76–86.Google Scholar
Chang-Song, You-kyung 2004. Early lexical development of Korean infants: 8~17 months [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Psychology, 23 (1), 77–99.Google Scholar
Chang-Song, You-kyung and Pae, Soyeong 2003. Noun versus verb bias revisited. Korean Journal of Speech Sciences, 10, 131–41.Google Scholar
Charles-Luce, Jan and Luce, Paul A. 1995. An examination of similarity neighbourhoods in young children's receptive vocabularies. Journal of Child Language, 22, 727–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chay, Wan 1990. Functions and meanings of Korean classifiers [in Korean]. Cintanhakpo, 70.Google Scholar
Chen, Chunhui, Zhou, Xinlin, Chen, Chuansheng, Dong, Qi, Zang, Yufeng, Qiao, Sibing, Yang, Tao and Gong, Qiyong 2007. The neural basis of processing anomalous information. Neuroreport, 18, 747–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Hsuan-Chih, d'Arcais, Flores, Giovanni, B. and Cheung, Sim-Ling 1995. Orthographic and phonological activation in recognizing Chinese characters. Psychological Research, 58, 144–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiat, Shulamuth 1981. Context-specificity and generalization in the acquisition of pronominal distinctions. Journal of Child Language, 8, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiba, Tsutomu and Kajiyama, Masato 1941. The Vowel – Its Nature and Structure. Tokyo: Kaiseikan.Google Scholar
Chien, Yu-Chin and Wexler, Kenneth 1987. A comparison between Chinese-speaking and English-speaking children's acquisition of reflexives and pronouns. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
,CHILDES 2005. Jiwon corpus accessible in zip format at http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/data/EastAsian/Korean/.
Cho, Choon-Hak 1975. The scope of negation in Korean. In The Korean Language: Its Structure and Social Projection. The Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Cho, Dong-In 1994. Functional projections and verb movement. In Kim-Renaud, Young-Key (ed.), Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics (pp. 233–54). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Cho, Jeung-Ryeul and Chen, Hsuan-Chih 1998. Phonology and orthography in recognizing Hanja in skilled and less-skilled readers [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 10, 17–35.Google Scholar
Cho, Jeung-Ryeul and Chen, Hsuan-Chih 1999. Orthographic and phonological activation in the semantic processing of Korean Hanja and Hangul. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14 (5/6), 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Jeung-Ryeul and Chen, Hsuan-Chih 2005. Semantic and phonological processing in reading Korean Hangul and Hanja words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 401–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, Kyung-Hee and Lee, Jung-Mo 1992. The processing characteristics of contrast information embedded in different story structures and in different abstraction level [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4, 76–92.Google Scholar
Cho, Kyung-Ja and Han, Kwang-Hee 1996. The effect of syllable type and familiarity on Hangul recognition processing [in Korean]. In Proceedings of Spring Conference of the Korean Society for Cognitive Science (pp. 179–89).Google Scholar
Cho, Kyu-Young and Jin, Young-Sun 1991. The effect of length and visual angle in reading rotated Korean words [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 3, 63–75.Google Scholar
Cho, Sookeun 1999. The acquisition of relative clauses: experimental studies on Korean. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Cho, Sook Whan 1981. The acquisition of word order in Korean. Master's thesis, University of Calgary.
Cho, Sook Whan 1985. Issues in the structure and acquisition of Korean anaphora. An unpublished doctoral dissertation submitted to the University of Alberta. Edmonton, Alberta.
Cho, Sook Whan 1989. Parameter, subset principle, and the acquisition of the Korean reflexive pronoun. In Proceedings for the Cognitive Science Conference (pp. 296–301). Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Cho, Sook Whan 1991. Null subjects in complements and adjuncts in Korean. In Lee, Chungmin and Whitman, John B. (eds.), Korean Syntax and Semantics: ‘91 LSA Linguistic Institute Workshop. Seoul, Korea: Thae-Hak-Sa.Google Scholar
Cho, Sook Whan 1992. The syntax and acquisition of ‘kyay’ (‘s/he’) and ‘caki’(‘self’) [in Korean]. Studies in Generative Grammar, 2, 361–92.Google Scholar
Cho, Sook Whan 1994. Null arguments and mood categories. In Kim-Renaud, Young-Key (ed.), Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics (pp. 443–62). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Cho, Sook Whan 1996. Caki (‘self’) as a nominal anaphor and a free pronoun in Korean. Paper presented at the annual convention organized by the Linguistic Society of America (LSA – 1996).
Cho, Sook Whan 1999. Caki as a Jekyll and Hyde. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VIII (pp. 252–65).
Cho, Sook Whan 2001. Subjectless sentences spoken by young children in Korean. Qualifying paper. Harvard University.
Cho, Sook Whan 2002. Lexical and semantic idiosyncracies of the predicates and caki (‘self’) in Korean. Ene-wa Cengpo Sahoy (Language and Information Society), 1, 1–20.Google Scholar
Cho, Sook Whan 2004. Syntax, Pragmatics, and Acquisition of Korean Reflexive Anaphora. Seoul, Korea: Sogang University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong 1996. Vowel correlates to consonant phonation: an acoustic-perceptual study of Korean obstruents. M.A. thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.
Cho, Taehong and Keating, Patricia 2001. Articulatory strengthening at the onset of prosodic domains in Korean. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 155–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Young-Mee Yu 1987. Phrasal phonology of Korean. In Kuno, Susumu, Lee, Ik-Hwan, Whitman, John, Bak, Sung-Yun and Kang, Young-Se (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-Mee Yu and Hong, Ki-Sun 1988. Evidence for the VP constituent from child Korean. In Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 27. Stanford, CA: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Choe, Hyŏn-bae 1971. Uri Malbon. Seoul, Korea: Chŏngŭm-sa (originally published in 1937).Google Scholar
Choe, Hyun-Sook 1988. Restructuring parameters and complex predicates: a transformational approach. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Choi, Gwon-Jin 1997. Viewpoint shifting in Korean and Bulgarian: the use of kinship terms. Pragmatics, 7 (3), 389–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Jae-Oh 1991. Korean-English code switching: switch-alpha and linguistic constraints. Linguistics, 29, 877–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Kwangill 2001. Ambiguity of relative clause in Korean. Unpublished Master's thesis, Ajou University.
Choi, Kwangill and Kim, Youngjin 2002. Ambiguity of relative clause attachment in Korean. The Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 14, 187–204.Google Scholar
Choi, Sang-bae and Ahn, Seong-Woo 2003. Analysis of relationship between Korean Sign Language ability and reading ability [in Korean]. Journal of Special Education, 10, 151–68.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1988. Caregiver input in English and Korean: use of nouns and verbs in book-reading and toy-play contexts. Journal of Child Language, 27, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1991. Early acquisition of epistemic meanings in Korean: a study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language, 11, 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Soonja (ed.) 1993. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 3. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1995. The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. In Bybee, Joan and Fleischman, Suzanne (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1997. Language-specific input and early semantic development: evidence from children learning Korean. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (vol. 5: Expanding the Contexts, pp. 41–133). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1998a. Acquisition of Korean. In Leonard, Laurence (ed.), Language Acquisition in North America: Cross Cultural and Crosslinguistic perspectives (pp. 281–336). San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1998b. Verbs in early lexical and syntactic development in Korean. Linguistics, 36, 755–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Soonja 1999. Early development of verb structures and caregiver input in Korean: two case studies. International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 241–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Soonja 2000. Caregiver input in English and Korean: use of nouns and verbs in book-reading and toy-play contexts. Journal of Child Language, 27, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, Soonja 2002. Language-specific influences on early semantic and cognitive development. presented at the International Congress for the Study of Child Language (IASCL), Madison, WI.
Choi, Soonja 2006. Acquisition of modality. In Frawley, William (ed.), The Expression of Modality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja and Bowerman, Melissa 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, Soonja and Gopnik, Alison 1995. Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: a crosslinguistic study. Journal of Child Language, 22, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Soonja, McDonough, Laraine, Bowerman, Melissa and Mandler, Jean 1999. Early sensitivity to language-specific spatial categories in English and Korean. Cognitive Development, 14, 241–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Yang-Gyu 1986. The influence of the number of syllables on recognition of Korean words [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Pusan National University.
Choi, Youngon 2003. Preschool aged children's use of prosody in sentence processing: the case of Korean children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke University.
Choi, Youngon and Mazuka, Reiko 2001. Are prosodic units universally important to children in their early language acquisition? Korean children's detection and use of language-specific prosodic units. Journal of Cognitive Science, 2 (2), 171–93.Google Scholar
Choi, Youngon and Mazuka, Reiko 2003. Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 197–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, Young-Sik 1999. Negation, its scope and NPI licensing in Korean. In Daly, Rebecca and Riehl, Anastasia (eds.), Proceedings of ESCOL (pp. 25–36). Cornell University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1977. On Wh-Movement. In Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas and Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal Syntax (pp. 71–132). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1980a. On binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 1–46.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1980b. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986b. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Lasnik, Howard 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 425–504.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Lasnik, Howard 1978. A remark on contraction. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 268–74.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kathee M. 1993. A multicultural approach to education of children who are deaf. In Christensen, Kathee M. and Delgado, Gilbert L. (eds.), Multicultural Issues in Deafness (pp. 17–27). White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kathee M. 2000. Emerging literacy in bilingual/multicultural education of children who are deaf: a communication-based perspective. In Christensen, Kathee M. (ed.), Deaf Plus: a Multicultural Perspective (pp. 41–58). San Diego, CA: Dawn Sign Press.Google Scholar
Chun, Nan-hee 1998. The study for development of literal vocabulary ability in deaf students [in Korean]. M.A. thesis, Kong-Ju National University.
Chung, Daeho and Park, Hong-Keun 1997. NPIs outside of negation scope. In Sohn, Ho-Min and Haig, John (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 6 (pp. 415–35). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Chung, GyeongHee No 1994. Acquisition of Case marking in Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Cinque, Guglielmo 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: a Crosslinguistic Perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1980. Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In Chafe, Wallace L. (ed.), The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production (pp. 127–202). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1984. The acquisition of subjects in Korean. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual University Conference on Language Development. Boston, USA.
Clancy, Patricia M. 1985. The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (vol. I: The Data). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M.(ed.) 1993. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 2. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1993. Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition. In Clark, Eve (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 307–14). Stanford University: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1995. Subject and object in Korean acquisition: surface expression and casemarking. In Kuno, Susumu, Whitman, John, Kang, Young-Se, Lee, Ik-Hwan, Maling, Joan and Kim, Young-Joo (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VI (pp. 3–17). Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1996. Referential strategies and the co-construction of argument structure in Korean acquisition. In Fox, Barbara (ed.), Studies in Anaphora (pp. 33–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1997. Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean acquisition. In Sohn, Ho-min and Haig, John (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 6 (pp. 639–59). Stanford University: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 2000. Transitivity in Korean acquisition: discourse-functional foundations. In Clark, Eve (ed.), The Proceedings of the 13th Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M.(ed.) 2002. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 11. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 2003. The lexicon in interaction: developmental origins of preferred argument structure in Korean. In Du Bois, John W., Kumpf, Lorraine and Ashby, William (eds.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function (pp. 81–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., Lee, Hyeonjin and Zoh, Myeong-Han 1986. Processing strategies in the acquisition of relative clauses: universal principles and language-specific realizations. Cognition, 24, 225–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, Eve V. 1973a. What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, Timothy (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 65–110). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1973b. Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition, 2, 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1977. Universal categories: on the semantics of classifiers and children's early word meaning. In Juilland, Alphonse (ed.), Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg (pp. 449–62). Sarratoga, CA: Anma Libri and Co.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1987. The principle of contrast: a constraint on language acquisition. In MacWhinney, Brian (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition: the 20th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1993. The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1965. Some structural properties of simple active and passive clauses. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 365–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1973. Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Moore, Timothy E. (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, Charles, Jr. 2000. Evaluating models of human sentence processing. In Crocker, Matthew W., Pickering, Martin and Clifton, Charles (eds.), Architecture and Mechanisms for Language Processing (pp. 31–55). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clifton, Charles, Jr., Traxler, Matthew J., Mohamed, Mohamed Taha, Williams, Rihana, S., Morris, Robin, K. and Rayner, Keith, E. 2003. The use of thematic role information in parsing: syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clumeck, Harold 1980. The acquisition of tone. In Yeni-Komshian, Grace H., Kavanagh, James F. and Ferguson, Charles A. (eds.), Child Phonology (vol. I: Production). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer 1988. The acquisition of the meanings of modality in children aged eight and twelve. Journal of Child Language, 15, 425–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, Pascale, Segui, Juan and Taft, Marcus 1997. Words and morphemes as units for lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 312–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella and Sung, Li-May 1990. Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 1–22.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter and Sung, Li-May 1994. Head movement and long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 355–406.Google Scholar
Coltheart, Max 1980. Reading phonological recoding and deep dyslexia. In Coltheart, Max, Patterson, Karalyn and Marshal, John, C. (eds.), Deep Dyslexia (pp. 197–226). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Coltheart, Max, Rastle, Kathleen, Perry, Conrad, Langdon, Robin and Ziegler, Johannes 2001. DRC: a dual route cascade model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard 1984. Form and function in explaining language universals. In Butterworth, Brian, Comrie, Bernard, and Dahl, Osten (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals (pp. 87–103). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Conway, Andrew R. A. and Engle, Randy W. 1994. Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 354–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copland, David, Zubicaray, Greig, McMahon, Katie, Wilson, Stephen, Eastburn, Matt and Chenery, Helen 2003. Brain activity during automatic semantic priming revealed by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage, 20, 302–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbett, Albert T. and Chang, Frederick R. 1983. Pronoun disambiguation: accessing potential antecedent. Memory and Cognition, 16, 283–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortese, Michael, Simpson, Greg and Woolsey, Steph 1997. Effects of association and imageability on phonological mapping. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 226–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosky, Michael J. 1976. The role of letter recognition in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 4, 204–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cossu, Giuseppe, Shankweiler, Donald, Liberman, Isabelle, Katz, Leonard and Tola, Giuseppe 1988. Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children, Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette G. 1986. Jacaltec noun classifiers: a study in language and culture. In Craig, Colette G. (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization: Proceedings of a Symposium on Categorization and Noun Classification (pp. 264–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen and McKee, Cecile 1985. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of NELS 16.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen and Thornton, Rosalind 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: a Guide to Research in Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen, Thornton, Rosalind, Boster, Carole, Conway, Laura, Lillo-Martin, Diane and Woodams, Elaine 1996. Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition, 5 (2), 83–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Matthew W. 1996. Computational Psycholinguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David 1979. Prosodic development. In Fletcher, Paul and Garman, Michael (eds.), Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne and Butterfield, Sally 1992. Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 218–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Anne, Mehler, Jacques, Norris, Dennis and Segui, Juan 1986. The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, Meredyth and Carpenter, Patricia A. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, Meredyth and Green, Ian. 1986. Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In Rescher, Nicholas (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Chris, Castles, Anne, McAnally, Ken and Gray, Jacquie 2001. Lapses of concentration and dyslexic performance on the Ternus Task. Cognition, 81, B21–B31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleser, Ria 1987. From agrammatism to paragrammatism: German aphasiological traditions and grammatical disturbances. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 187–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleser, Ria and Kauschke, Christina 2003. Acquisition and loss of nouns and verbs: parallel or divergent patterns? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 213–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCasper, Anthony J., Lecanuet, Jean-Pierre and Busnel, Marie-Claire 1994. Fetal reactions to recurrent maternal speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 17 (2), 159–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCasper, Anthony J. and Spence, Melanie J. 1986. Prenatal maternal speech influences newborn's perception of speech sounds. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, Greg, Simpson, Greg, Yates, Mark and Locker, Lawrence, Jr. 2003. Flexible use of lexical and phonological information in word recognition. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, Robert 2000. The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–534.Google Scholar
Demb, Jonathan B., Boynton, Geoffrey M., Best, Mary and Heeger, David J. 1998 Psychophysical evidence for a magnocellular pathway deficit in dyslexia. Vision Research, 38, 1555–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demuth, Katherine 1992. Accessing functional categories in Sesotho: interactions at the morpho-syntax interface. In Meisel, Jurgen M. (ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition (pp. 83–107). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, Katherine 1994. On the “underspecification” of functional categories in early grammars. In Lust, Barbara, Suñer, Magarita and Whitman, John (eds.), Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Perspectives (vol. I: Heads, Projections and Learnability, pp. 119–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Demuth, Katherine 1996. Prosodic structure of early words. In Morgan, James L. and Demuth, Katherine (eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition (pp. 171–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
León, Lourdes 1999. Verbs in Tzotzil (Mayan) early syntactic development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 219–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeStefano, Johanna S. 1978. Language, the Learner and the School. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Swart, Henriette 1991. Adverbs of quantification: a generalized quantifier approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
Deutsch, Avital, Frost, Ram and Forster, Kenneth 1998. Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1238–55.Google Scholar
Villiers, Jill G., Tager-Flusberg, Helen B., Hakuta, Kenji and Cohen, Michael 1979. Children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 499–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincenzi, Marica 1991. Syntactic Parsing Strategies in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincenzi, Marica 2000. Crosslinguistic psycholinguistics. In Crocker, Matthew W., Pickering, Martin, and Clifton, Charles (eds.), Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (pp. 282–300). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dick, Frederic, Bates, Elizabeth, Wulfeck, Beverly, Utman, Jennifer, Dronkers, Nina and Gernsbacher, Morton A. 2001. Language deficits, localization, and grammar: evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. Psychological Review, 108, 759–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diehl, Randy L. 1989. Remarks on Stevens' quantal theory of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 71–8.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part I: the Structure of the Clause. Functional Grammar Series 9. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Mari, Muysken, Peter and Singh, Ravendra 1986. Government and code-switching. Journal of Linguistics, 22, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Do, Kyung Soo 1992. Integration process of consonants and vowels in Korean letter perception [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1–15.Google Scholar
Do, Kyung Soo 1994. Representation of causal information in reading: causality, causal field, and multiple cause [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 6, 164–77.Google Scholar
Doctor, Estelle A. and Coltheart, Max 1980. Children's use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Memory and Cognition, 8, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doetjes, Jenny, Neeleman, Ad and Koot, Hans 1998. Degree expressions and the autonomy of syntax. UCL Working Papers, 10, 323–67.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Margaret 1978. Children's Minds. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Margaret and Lloyd, Peter 1974. Sentences and situations: children's judgments of match and mismatch. In Bresson, Francois (ed.), Current Problems in Psycholinguistics. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Dowty, David 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drozd, Kenneth 1998. Children's weak interpretations of universally quantified questions. In Bowerman, Melissa and Levinson, Stephen (eds.), Conceptual Development and Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drozd, Kenneth and Philip, William 1992. Event quantification in preschoolers' comprehension of negation. In Clark, Eve (ed.), Child Language Research Forum (vol. 24). Stanford, CA: CLRF.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63, 805–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2002. Discourse and grammar. In Tomasello, Michael, (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language (vol. II). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2003. Argument structure: grammar in use. In Du Bois, Kumpf and Ashby, (eds.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function (pp. 12–60).
Du Bois, John W., Kumpf, Lorraine and Ashby, William (eds.) 2003. Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Duffy, Susan A., Morris, Robin K. and Rayner, Keith 1988. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Lynne G., Seymour, Philip K. H. and Hill, Shirley 2000. A small-to-large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading?The Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 53a, 1081–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro 1994. From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Western Samoan Village. Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dyke, Julie A. and McElree, Brian 2006. Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 157–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebbinghaus, Hermann 1964. Memory: a Contribution to Experimental Psychology (Ruger, & Bussenius, , translators; original work published 1885), New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Echols, Catharine H. 1996. A role for stress in early speech segmentation. In Morgan, James L. and Demuth, Katherine (eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition (pp. 151–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Echols, Catherine H., Crowhurst, Meagan J. and Childers, Jane B. 1997. The perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 202–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Barbara and Potter, Mary C. 1985. Clause and the semantic representation of words. Memory and Cognition, 13, 371–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, Guinevere, F., Meter, John W., Rumsey, Judith M., Maisog, José M., Woods, Roger P. and Zeffiro, Thomas A. 1996. Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging. Nature, 382, 66–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eimas, Peter, Siqueland, Einar R., Jusczyk, Peter W. and Vigorito, James 1971. Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbourne, Paul 2001. E-type anaphora as NP deletion. Natural Language Semantics, 9, 241–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 355–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph 1978. The verbal complex V'-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 151–75.Google Scholar
Emslie, Hazel C. and Stevenson, Rosemary I. 1981. Pre-school children's use of the articles in definite and indefinite referring expressions. Journal of Child Language, 8, 313–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enç, Mürvet 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 1–25.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel, Flynn, Suzanne and Martohardjono, Gita 1996. Second language acquisition: theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 677–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbaugh, S. Mary 1984. Scissors, paper, stone: perceptual foundations of noun classifier system. In Papers and Reports on Child Language Development (vol. 23, pp. 41–9).
Erbaugh, S. Mary 1986. Taking stock: the development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. In Craig, Colette G. (ed.), Typological Studies in Language: Noun Classes and Categorization (vol. 7, pp. 399–436). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan, Nakamura, Kei and Jiansheng, Guo. 1995. Shifting face from Asia to Europe. In Shibatani, Masayoshi and Thompson, Sandra (eds.), Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore (pp. 43–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eubank, Lynn 1993/1994. On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition, 3, 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Fuxi 1985. An experiment of the use of classifier by 4–6 year olds. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 17 (4), 384–92.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar 1956. On the predictability of formant levels and spectrum envelopes from formant frequencies. In Halle, Morris, Lunt, Horace and MacLean, Hugh (eds.), For Roman Jakobson (pp. 109–20). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar 1968. Analysis and synthesis of speech processes. In Malmberg, Bertil (eds.), Manual of Phonetics (pp. 243–53). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar 1970. Acoustical Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar 1975. Vocal tract wall effects, losses, and resonance bandwidths. STL-QPSR, 2 (3), 1–19.Google Scholar
Farmer, Mary E. and Klein, Raymond M. 1995. The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: a review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 460–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fathman, Ann 1975. The relationship between age and second language learning ability. Language Learning, 25, 245–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigenbaum, E. A. and Simon, H. A. 1984. EPAM-like models of recognition and learning. Cognitive Science, 8, 305–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, Anne 1985. Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 181–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles 1988. The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar.”Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Lily Wong 2000. The loss of family languages by immigrant children: should educators be concerned?Theory into Practice, 39, 203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Daniel 1991. Binding parameters in second language acquisition. In Eubank, Lynn (ed.), Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 351–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Daniel and Broselow, Ellen 1986. Second language acquisition of reflexive-binding. In Berman, Stephen, Choe, Jae-Woong and McDonough, Joyce (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 154–68). Amherst, MA: University Of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistics Student Association.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1987. A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages?Applied Linguistics, 8, 162–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E. 1999. Age of learning and second language speech. In Birdsong, David (ed.), Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 101–32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Flege, James E., Bohn, Ocke-Schwen and Jang, Sunyoung 1997. Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E. and Liu, Serena 2001. Effect of experience in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–52.Google Scholar
Flege, James E., Munro, Murray J. and MacKay, Ian R. A. 1995. Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97 (5), 3125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E., Yeni-Komshian, Grace H. and Liu, Serena 1999. Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Suzanne 1983. A study of the effects of principal branching direction in second language acquisition: the generalization of a parameter of universal grammar from first to second language acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Flynn, Suzanne 1987. A Parameter-setting Model of L2 Acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Suzanne and Foley, Claire 2004. On the developmental primacy of free relatives. In Csirmaz, Aniko, Gualmini, Andrea and Nevins, Andrew (eds.), Plato's Problem: Papers on Language Acquisition, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 48 (pp. 59–69). Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics, MIT.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet and Sag, Ivan 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 355–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 2000. The treatment of contrasts in interaction. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Kortmann, Bernd (eds.). Cause-Condition-Concession-Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Forster, Kenneth I. 1976. Accessing the mental lexicon. In Wales, Roger J. and Walker, Edward (eds.), New Approaches to Language Mechanisms (pp. 257–87). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Forster, Kenneth I. and Chamber, Susan M. 1973. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fougeron, Cecile and Keating, Patricia 1997. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3728–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, Barbara A. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language, 66, 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny and Grodzinsky, Yosef 1998. Children's passive: a view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 311–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Robert A. 1982. Individual variation in the perception of vowels: implications for a perception-production link. Phonetica, 39, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frazier, Lyn 1979. On Comprehending Sentences: Syntactic Parsing Strategies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn 1987. Syntactic processing: evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 519–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, Lyn and Rayner, Keith 1982. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, John R. 1981. Sources of process interaction in reading. In Lesgold, Alan M. and Perfetti, Charles A. (eds.), Interactive Processes in Reading (pp. 361–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Freeman, Norman, Sinha, Chris and Stedmon, Jacqueline 1982. All the cars-which cars? from word meaning to discourse analysis. In Beveridge, Michael (ed.), Children Thinking Through Language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Freeman, Norman and Stedmon, Jacqueline 1986. How children deal with natural language quantification. In Kurez, I., Shugar, G. W. and Danks, J. H. (eds.), Knowledge and Language. North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Friederici, Angela D. 1995. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D. and Frazier, Lyn 1992. Thematic analysis in agrammatic comprehension: syntactic structures and task demands. Brain and Language, 42, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D. and Graetz, Patty A. M. 1987. Processing passive sentences in aphasia: deficits and strategies. Brain and Language, 30, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D. and Mecklinger, Axel 1996. Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: first-pass and second-pass parsing processes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 157–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D., Steinhauer, Karsten and Frisch, Stefan 1999. Lexical integration: sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information. Memory and Cognition, 27, 438–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedmann, Naama 1994. Morphology in agrammatism: a dissociation between tense and agreement. Master's Thesis, Tel Aviv University.
Friedmann, Naama and Grodzinsky, Yosef 1997. Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language, 56, 397–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedmann, Naama and Shapiro, Lewis P. 2003. Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 288–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, Uta 1999. Paradoxes in the definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 5, 192–214.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromm, Erica 1970. Age regression with unexpected reappearance of a repressed childhood language. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 18, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, Ram, Katz, Leonard and Bentin, Shlomo 1987. Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Fruchter, Arlene, Wilbur, Ronnie B. and Fraser, Brian 1984. Comprehension of idioms by hearing-impaired students. Volta Review, 86, 7–18.Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki, Miyagawa, Shigeru and Tenny, Carol 1985. Verb Classes in English and Japanese: a Case Study in the Interaction of Syntax, Morphology and Semantics (Lexicon Project Working Papers vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Gandour, Jack, Petty, Soranee H., Dardarananda, Rochana, Dechongkit, Sumalee and Mukngoen, Sunne 1984. Acquisition of numeral classifiers in Thai. Linguistics, 22, 455–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlock, Victoria M., Walley, Amanda C. and Metsala, Jamie L. 2001. Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 468–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, Wendell R. 1978. Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 287–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnham, Alan, Oakhill, Jane and Reynolds, David 2002. Are inferences from stereotyped role name to characters' gender made elaboratively?Memory and Cognition, 30, 439–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrod, Simon and Sanford, Anthony 1990. Referential processes in reading: focusing on roles and individuals. In Balota, David A., Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B. and Rayner, Keith (eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading (pp. 465–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gee, Julie and Salvasir, Iskender 1985. On the use of ‘will’ and ‘gonna’: toward a description of activity-types for child language. Discourse Processes, 8, 143–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, Fred 1988. Neuropsychology and acquisition of second language learning. In Beebe, Leslie M. (ed.), Issues in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 81–112). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Genneri, Silvia, Sloman, Steven, Malt, Barbara and Fitch, W. Tecumseh 2002. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, Dedre 1978. On relational meaning: the acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development, 49, 988–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, Dedre 1982. Why are nouns learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Kuczaj, Stan A. II (ed.), Language Development (vol. II: Language, Thought and Culture). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Julie 1991. The meanings and use of modals hafta, needta and wanna in children's speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 531–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, LouAnn 1991. The metrical basis for children's subjectless sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, LouAnn 1996. Prosodic structure in young children's language production. Language, 72 (4), 683–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, LouAnn, Landau, Barbara and Remez, Robert E. 1990. Function morphemes in young children's speech perception and production. Developmental Psychology, 26 (2), 204–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton A. 1989. Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gernsbacher, Morton A. 1990. Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton A. 1997. Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gernsbacher, Morton A. and Hargreaves, David 1988. Accessing sentence participants: the advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gernsbacher, Morton A., Hargreaves, David and Beeman, Mark 1989. Building and accessing clausal representations: the advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 735–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gernsbacher, Morton A., Varner, Kathleen R. and Faust, Mark E. 1990. Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Gibson, Edward 1998. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependence. Cognition, 68, 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Eleanor J. and Levin, Harry 1975. The Psychology of Reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giraudo, Hélène and Grainger, Jonathan 2000. Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana 1997. The categorial status of determiners. In Haegeman, Lilian (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax (pp. 95–123). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy 1986. The Pragmatics of Word Order: Predictability, Importance, and Attention. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gleitman, Lila 1990. The structural sources of verb meaning. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Mark 1967. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10, 447–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele 1995. Constructions: a Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele 1998. Patterns of experience in patterns of language. In Tomasello, Michael (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure (pp. 203–19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, Roberta M., Hirsh-Pasek, Kathryn, Cauley, Kathleen and Gordon, Laura 1987. The eyes have it: lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 14, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, Harold 1993. Understanding Aphasia. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodhart, Wendy 1984. Morphological complexity, ASL, and the acquisition of sign language in deaf children. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
Goodluck, Helen 1991. Language Acquisition: a Linguistic Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gopnik, Alison 2001. Theories, language, and culture: Whorf without wincing. In Bowerman, Melissa and Levinson, Stephen C. (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, Alison and Choi, Soonja 1990. Do linguistic differences lead to cognitive differences?: a crosslinguistic study of semantic and cognitive development. First Language, 10, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, Alison and Choi, Soonja 1995. Names, relational words, and cognitive development in English and Korean speakers: nouns are not always learned before verbs. In Tomasello, Michael and Merriman, William E. (eds.), Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs (pp. 63–80). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter C. 1982. The acquisition of syntactic categories: the case of the count/mass distinction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Gordon, Peter C. 1985. Evaluating the semantic categories hypothesis: the case of the count/mass distinction. Cognition, 29, 31–54.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter C. 1988. Count/mass category acquisition: distributional distinction in children's speech. Journal of Child Language, 15, 109–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter C. and Chafetz, Jill 1990. Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children's comprehension of passives. Cognition, 36, 227–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, Peter C. and Hendrick, Randall 2005. Relativization, ergativity, and corpus frequency. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 456–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall and Johnson, Marcus 2001. Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 1411–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall and Johnson, Marcus 2004. Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter, C., Hendrick, Randall, Johnson, Marcus and Lee, Yoonhyoung 2006. Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: evidence from eye tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 1304–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall and Levine, William H. 2002. Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13, 425–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gökmen, Seda and Lee, Chungmin 2002. Aspects of the acquisition of (past) tense and (telic) aspect in Turkish and Korean. Language Research, 38, 1317–47.Google Scholar
Graesser, Arthur C., Singer, Murray and Trabasso, Tom 1994. Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, Georgia H. 1989. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grice, Martine and Benzmüller, Ralf 1995. Transcription of German intonation using ToBI-tones – the Saarbrücken system. Phonus, 1, 33–51.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane 1981. Form, function, and the language acquisition device. In Baker, Carl L. and McCarthy, John J. (eds.), The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef 1986. Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain and Language, 27, 135–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Yosef 1989. Agrammatic comprehension of relative clauses. Brain and Language, 37, 480–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Yosef 1995a. A restrictive theory of trace deletion in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 50, 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef 1995b. Trace deletion, theta-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language, 51, 469–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Yosef 2000. The neurology of syntax: language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Yosef, Piñango, Maria M., Zurif, Edgar and Drai, Dan 1999. The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: comprehension regularities in Broca's aphasia. Brain and Language, 67, 134–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grojean, François 1982. Life with Two Languages: An Introduction to Bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grojean, François 1988. Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 233–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grojean, François 1997. Processing mixed language: issues, findings, and models. In Groot, Annette and Kroll, Judith (eds.), Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives (pp. 225–54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grojean, François and Soares, Carlos 1986. Processing mixed language: some preliminary findings. In Vaid, Jyotsna (ed.), Language Processing in Bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and Neuropsychological Perspective (pp. 123–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gropen, Jess, Pinker, Steven, Hollander, Michelle and Goldberg, Richard 1991a. Syntax and semantics in the acquisition of locative verbs. Journal of Child Language, 18, 115–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gropen, Jess, Pinker, Steven, Hollander, Michelle and Goldberg, Richard 1991b. Affectedness and direct object: the role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure. Cognition, 41, 153–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruber, Jeffrey S. 1967. Topicalization in child language. Foundations of Language, 3, 37–65.Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa 1992. Verb syntax in Italian child grammar. In Geneva Generative Papers (vol. 1, pp. 145–62).Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, Eithne and Noonan, Máire 1992. Functional categories and language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 241–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982a. Conversational code-switching. In Gumperz, John J. (ed.), Discourse Strategies (pp. 59–99). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982b. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1992. Contextualization revisited. In Auer, Peter and di Luzio, Aldo (eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 39–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. and Hernandez-Chavez, Eduardo 1975. Cognitive aspects of bilingual communication. In Hernandez-Chavez, Eduardo, Cohen, Andrew and Beltramo, Anthony (eds.), El lenguaje de los Chicanos. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ha, Eun Jin 2000. The development of comprehension and production of causative and passive sentences of 4–9 year old normal children [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Ewha Womens University, Korea.
Haarmann, Henk J. and Kolk, Herman H. 1991a. A computer model of the temporal course of agrammatic sentence understanding: the effects of variation in severity and sentence complexity. Cognitive Science, 15, 49–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haarmann, Henk J. and Kolk, Herman H. 1991b. Syntactic priming in Broca's aphasics: evidence for slow activation. Aphasiology, 5, 247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haarmann, Henk J. and Kolk, Herman H. 1994. On-line sensitivity to subject-verb agreement violations in Broca's aphasics: the role of syntactic complexity and time. Brain and Language, 46, 493–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberlandt, Karl and Graesser, Arthur C. 1990. Integration and buffering of new information. In Graesser, Arthur C. and Bower, Gordon H. (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (vol. 25, pp. 71–87). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haggerty, Rita and Stamm, John S. 1978. Dichotic auditory fusion levels in children with learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 12, 349–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagiwara, Hiroko 1995. The breakdown of functional categories and the economy of derivation. Brain and Language, 50, 92–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagoort, Peter, Brown, Colin and Groothusen, Jolanda 1993. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrom, Paul 2000. Phrasal movement in Korean negation. In Proceedings of SCIL 9 (pp. 127–42). Cambridge: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Hagstrom, Paul 2002. Implications of child error for the syntax of negation in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11, 211–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Kyung-Ja Park 1981. The development of negation in one Korean child. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii, Manoa.
Hahne, Anja and Friederici, Angela D. 1999. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 194–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahne, Anja and Friederici, Angela D. 2002. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 339–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajime, Hoji 1990. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 1. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hakuta, Kenji 1994. Distinguishing among proficiency, choice, and attitudes in questions about language for bilinguals. In Lamberty, Gontran and Coll, Cynthia G. (eds.), Puerto Rican Women and Children: Issues in Health, Growth, and Development (pp. 191–209). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, Kenji and Daniel, D'Andrea 1992. Some properties of bilingual maintenance and loss in Mexican background high-school students. Applied Linguistics, 13, 72–99.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Hassan, Ruqaiya 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliwell, John F. 2000. Korean agrammatic production. Aphasiology, 14, 1187–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-hye 1998. Asymmetry in the interpretation of –(n)un in Korean. In Akatsuka, Noriko, Hoji, Hajime, Iwasaki, Shoichi, Sohn, Sung-Ock and Strauss, Susan (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 7 (pp. 1–15). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye 2007. In search of evidence for the placement of the verb in Korean and Japanese. In McGloin, Naomi H. (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 15. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye and Lee, Chungmin 2007. On negative imperatives in Korean. Linguistic Inquiry, 38 (2).
Han, Chung-hye, Lidz, Jeffrey and Musolino, Julien 2007. V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Ho 1997. Development of functional categories in child Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Han, Ho and Park, Myung-Kwan 1994. The syntax of negation in Korean and its development in child language. In Proceedings of ESCOL ‘94 (pp. 152–62).Google Scholar
Harada, S. I., Uyeno, Tazuko, Hayashibe, Hideo and Yamada, Hiroshi 1976. On the development of perceptual strategies in children: a case study on the Japanese child's comprehension of the relative clause constructions. Annual Bulletin of the Research Institute Logopedics Phoniatrics, 10, 199–224. University of Tokyo.
Harley, Birgit and Wang, Wenxia 1997. The critical period hypothesis: where are we now? In Groot, Annette M.B. and Kroll, Judith F. (eds.) Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives (pp. 19–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Roger and Yet-hung Chan, Cecilia 1997. The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: the failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research, 13 (3), 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidorn, George E. 2000. Intelligence writing assistance. In Dale, Robert, Moisl, Hermann and Somers, Harold (eds.), A Handbook of Natural Language Processing: Techniques and Applications for the Processing of Language as Text (pp. 181–207). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Heilman, Kenneth M. and Scholes, Robert J. 1976. The nature of comprehension errors in Broca's, conduction and Wernicke's aphasics. Cortex, 12, 258–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heim, Irene 1991. Articles and definiteness, published in German as “Artikel und Definitheit.” In v. Stechow, Arnim and Wunderlich, Dieter (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Helenius, Päivi, Uutela, Kimmo and Hari, Riitta 1999. Auditory stream segregation in dyslexic adults. Brain, 122, 907–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, Monica (ed.) 1988. Codeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef
Henderson, Leslie, Wallis, Julie and Knight, Denise 1984. Morphemic structure and lexical access. In Bouma, Herman and Bouwhuis, Don G. (eds.), Attention and Performance X (pp. 211–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hickok, Gregory S. 1992. Agrammatic Comprehension and the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis. MIT Occasional Paper 45.
Hickok, Gregory S. and Avrutin, Sergey 1995. Comprehension of wh-questions by two agrammatic Broca's aphasics. Brain and Language, 51, 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillert, Dieter 1998. From Alexander to Wilhelm Von Humboldt: a crosslinguistic perspective. In Hillert, Dieter (ed.), Syntax and Semantics (vol. 31, pp. 1–31.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne 1999. Involuntary language loss among immigrants: Asian American linguistic autobiographies. ERIC Digest (www.eric.ed.gov).Google Scholar
Hirose, Hitoshi 1992. An investigation of the recognition process for jukugo by use of priming paradigms [in Japanese]. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 63, 303–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Christopher and Wexler, Kenneth 2004. Children's passives and their resulting interpretation. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA). University of Hawaii at Manoa. December, 2004.
Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy, Nelson, Kemler, Jusczyk, Deborah G., Wright-Cassidy, Peter W., Kimberly, Druss, B. and Kennedy, Lori 1987. Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition, 26, 269–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirst, William and Weil, Joyce 1982. Acquisition of epistemic and deontic meaning of modals. Journal of Child Language, 9, 659–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekstra, Teun and Jordens, Peter 1994. From adjunct to head. In Hoekstra, Teun and Schwartz, Bonnie (eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar (pp. 119–49). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmeister, Robert J. 2000. A piece of the puzzle: ASL and reading comprehension in deaf children. In Chamberlain, Morford and Mayberry, Language Acquisition By Eye (pp. 131–41).
Hogaboam, Thomas W. and Perfetti, Charles A. 1975. Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 265–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Ki-Sun 1987. Consciousness condition on the Korean reflexive. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 161–69). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hong, Sung Eun 2001. An empirical survey on animal classifiers in Korean Sign Language. A paper presented at Conference on Sign Linguistics Deaf Education and Deaf Culture in Asia, Hong Kong, 17th–19th December 2001.
Hong, Yunsook 1985. A quantitative analysis of KA/I and (N)UN as subject markers in spoken and written Korean. In Proceedings of the 1985 Harvard Workshop on Korean Linguistics (pp. 145–53).
Horgan, Dianne 1978. The development of the full passive. Journal of Child Language, 5, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Ellis, Sahni, Sartaj and Anderson-Freed, Susan 1992. Fundamentals of Data Structures in C. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Hsiao, Fanny and Gibson, Edward 2003. Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition, 90, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, Chun-chieh N., Hurewitz, Felicia and Phillips, Colin 2006. Contextual and syntactic cues for head-final relative clauses in Chinese. In Proceedings of CUNY 2006 Conference.
Hu, Quian 1993. The acquisition of Chinese classifiers by young Mandarin speaking children. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
Hudson, Mutsuko Endo, Sells, Peter and Jun, Sun-Ah (eds.) 2008. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 13. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Hurford, James 1975. A child and the English question formation rule. Journal of Child Language, 2, 299–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Do-Soon 1994. The syntactic structure and development of the sign language by Korean deaf students [in Korean]. Doctoral dissertation, Dankook University, Korea.
Hwang, Juck-Ryoon 1990. “Deference” versus “politeness” in Korean speech. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 82, 41–55.Google Scholar
Hwang, Mina 2002. Sentence comprehension of Korean-speaking adults with Broca's aphasia [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Communication Disorders, 7, 64–84.Google Scholar
Hwang, Mina 2003. The production of grammatical morphemes of Korean children with developmental language impairment [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Speech Sciences, 10, 47–64.Google Scholar
Hwang, Mina and Kim, Yoon-Ju 2004. Comprehension of relative clauses in Korean-speaking adults with Broca's aphasia. Poster presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Philadelphia, PA.
Hwang, Yu Mi 2000. Difference between deixis and anaphora shown in aphasics [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
Hwang, Yu Mi, Kim, Dong-Hwee and Nam, Kichun 2003. The structure and processing of the Korean functional category in Aphasics [in Korean]. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 12, 197–216.Google Scholar
Hwang, Yu Mi, Kwon, Youan, Lim, HeuiSeok and Nam, Kichun 2002. A model of Korean morphological passive processing [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the 16th KSCS Annual Spring Conference (pp. 137–41).
Hwang, Yu Mi, Moon, Youngsun, Jung, Jaebum and Nam, Kichun 2000. Characteristics of processing semifinal verbal inflections in Korean [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Winter Conference of the Korean Society of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 29–40).
Hwang, Yu Mi, Moon, Youngsun, Park, Hye-Sung and Nam, Kichun 2000. Characteristics of processing functional categories in Korean [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Spring Conference on Korean Cognitive Science (pp. 273–78).
Hwang, Yu Mi, Nam, Kichun and Kang, Myung-Yoon 2000. The structure and processing of the Korean functional category [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Korean Society of Communication Disorders (pp. 137–42).
Hwang, Yu Mi, Nam, Kichun and Kang, Myung-Yoon 2001. The research of deictic pronoun and anaphoric pronoun in aphasic case [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Communication Disorders, 6 (1), 131–59.Google Scholar
Hyams, Nina 1992. The genesis of clausal structure. In Meisel, Jurgen M. (ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition (pp. 371–400). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, Nina and Sigurjonsdottir, Sigridur 1990. The development of “long distance anaphora”: a crosslinguistic comparison with special reference to Icelandic. Journal of Developmental Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hyun, Jung Moon 2003. Retrieval of nouns and verbs in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Yonsei University, Korea.
Im, Hong-Bin 1991a. On the discrimination standard of Korean classifiers [in Korean]. In Lee Swunhwun Sensayng Hoykap Kinyem Nonchong. Korea: Sekceng Leeswunhwun sensayng hoykap kinyem nonchong kanhayng wiwenhoy.Google Scholar
Im, Hong-Bin 1991b. On the characteristics of Korean classifiers: New understanding and development of Korean studies [in Korean]. In Kim Wancong Sensayng Hoykap Kinyem Nonchong. Seoul National University Tayhakwen Kwuke Yenkwuhoy Phyen.Google Scholar
Imai, Mutsumi and Gentner, Dedre 1997. A crosslinguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62, 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens-Bailey, Alison L. 1996. Ancestral language acquisition: implications for aspects of ethnic identity among Armenian American children and adolescents. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 422–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens-Bailey, Alison L. 2001. Language background and ethnic identity: a study of bilingual and English-only speaking children of Armenian descent. In Olshtain, Elite and Horenczyk, Gabriel (eds.), Language, Identity, and Immigration (pp. 255–69). Hebrew University Magnes Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, David 1989. First Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inhelder, Barbel and Piaget, Jean 1958. The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhelder, Barbel and Piaget, Jean 1964. The Early Growth of Logic in the Child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
,Institute of Language and Information Studies 1998. Frequency Analysis of Korean Usage (Publication No. CLID-WP-98–02–28). Seoul, Korea: Yonsei University.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania 2003. Article semantics in second language acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Ionin, Tania 2006. This is definitely specific: specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics, 14, 175–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Ko, Heejeong and Wexler, Kenneth 2003. Specificity as a grammatical notion: evidence from L2-English use. In Garding, Gina and Tsujimura, Mimu, Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 22 (pp. 245–58). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Ko, Heejeong and Wexler, Kenneth 2004. Article semantics in L2-acquisition: the role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 3–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Ko, Heejeong and Wexler, Kenneth 2007. The role of semantic features in the acquisition of English articles by Russian and Korean speakers. In Liceras, Juana M. et al. (eds.), The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, Second language research acquisition series (Theoretical and Methodological Issues). New York and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa and Maldonado, Salvador Bautista, 2008. Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles. Lingua, 118, 554–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, George 1975. Some universals for quantifier scope. Syntax and Semantics, 4, 37–58.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry, 2, 21–35.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray 1996. The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, 305–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo 1980. Remarks on to contraction. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 239–46.Google Scholar
Jang, Jindeok 1999. Ambiguity resolution processes of Korean datives. Unpublished Master's thesis, Ajou University.
Jang, Jin-Kwon 1995. The etymological meanings of Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Dankook University.
Jared, Debra and Seidenberg, Mark S. 1991. Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Javella, R. and Meijers, G. 1983. Recognizing morphemes in spoken words: some evidence for a stem-organized mental lexicon. In Flores D'Arcais, Giovanni B. and Jarvella, R. (eds.), The Processing of Language Understanding (pp. 81–112). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Jeon, Moongee, Lee, Jung-Mo and Lee, Jae-Ho 2001. Processing of connectives in discourse with causal or additive connections [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 13, 287–306.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 1994. Headed nominalizations in Korean: relative clauses, clefts and comparatives. Doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
Jhang, Se-Eun 1997. Sign language and reduplication [in Korean]. Eoneohag: Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea, 21, 263–87.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 1999a. Study on phonological structure of Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Journal of Language Sciences, 6, 81–109.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 1999b. Wh-questions in American Sign Language and Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Linguistics, 7, 297–319.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 2000. A recent research trend and its linguistic approach to American Sign Language and Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Paykyang Inmun Noncip, 5, 5–47. Korea: Humanities Center, Shilla University.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 2004. The mapping between Korean Sign Language and reading ability: evidence from Korean deaf children. The Linguistic Association of Korean Journal, 12 (3), 225–38.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 2006. An overview of Korean sign language. The New Korean Journal of English Language and Literature, 48, 237–56.Google Scholar
Jhang, Se-Eun 2008. Verb types and numeral classifiers in Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Journal of Language Sciences, 15 (3), 101–35.Google Scholar
Jia, Xiangdong, Brooks, Patricia and Braine, Martin 1995. A study of Chinese children's comprehension of universal quantifiers. In Clark, Eve (ed.), Child Language Research Forum (vol. 27). Stanford, CA: CLRF.Google Scholar
Jo, Hey-young 2001. “Heritage” language learning and ethnic identity: Korean Americans' struggle with language authorities. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 14, 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Jacqueline and Newport, Elissa 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Jacqueline and Newport, Elissa 1991. Critical period effects on universal properties of language: the status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition, 39, 215–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Judith and Slobin, Dan I. 1979. The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian, and Turkish. Journal of Child Language, 16, 531–47.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne and Bobaljik, Jonathan 1996. Subject positions and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry, 27 (2), 195–236.Google Scholar
Joo, Yanghee 1989. A crosslinguistic approach to quantification in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Jordens, Peter 1988. The acquisition of word order in Dutch and German as L1 and L2. Second Language Research, 4, 41–65.Google Scholar
Joshi, Arvind 1985. Processing of sentences with intrasentential code-switching. In Dawty, David, Karttunen, Lauri and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 190–205). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Terry 1999. Lexical access and the mental lexicon for two-kanji compound word: a priming paradigm study. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Science and the 17th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society (pp. 511–14).
Joyce, Terry 2002. Constituent-morpheme priming: implications from the morphology of two-kanji compound words. Japanese Psychological Research, 44, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, Alan 1996. Learnability and the Lexicon: Theories and Second Language Acquisition Research (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 12). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, Jong Sup 2001a. Korean “standard sign language” is not a sign language. Journal of Cognitive Science, 2, 211–30.Google Scholar
Jun, Jong Sup 2001b. The agent-first strategy and the development of language: cases of learning two languages simultaneously. In Kuno, Susumu et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics IX (pp. 46–55). Hanshin Publishing Company, Korea, and Harvard University.Google Scholar
Jun, Jong Sup and Lee, Chungmin 2004. Children's strategic processing of Korean relative clauses. Language Research, 40 (2), 465–88.Google Scholar
Jun, M. G., Lee, J-M. and Lee, J-H. 2001. Processing of connectives in discourse with causal or additive connections. [In Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 13, 287–306.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah 1993. The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University. [Published in 1996 by New York: Garland.]
Jun, Sun-Ah 1995. A phonetic study of stress in Korean. Paper presented at the 130th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, St. Louis, MO.
Jun, Sun-Ah 1998. The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 15 (2), 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah 2000. K-ToBI (Korean ToBI) labelling conventions – Version 3. Journal of Speech Sciences, 7 (1), 143–69. [Version 3.1 in UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 99, 149–73. URL: www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/jun/ktobi/K-tobi.html].Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah 2003a. Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32 (2), 219–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jun, Sun-Ah 2003b. The effect of phrase length and speech rate on prosodic phrasing. In The Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona, Spain.
Jun, Sun-Ah 2004. Intonational phonology of Korean revisited. A talk presented at the Japanese-Korean Linguistics conference, Tucson, AZ [The paper appeared in Japanese–Korean Linguistics 14. Stanford: CSLI. 2006.]
Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) 2005. Prosodic Typology: the Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah 2006. Phonological development of Korean: a case study. In Kuno, Susumu, Lee, Ik-Hhan, Whitman, John, Maling, Joan, Kang, Young-Se., Sells, Peter and Sohn, Hyang-Sook (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics XI (pp.17–33). Korea: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah and Kim, Sahyang 2004. Default phrasing and attachment preference in Korean. In The Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Jeju, Korea.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah and Oh, Mira 1996. A prosodic analysis of three types of wh-phrases in Korean. Language and Speech, 39 (1), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jun, Sun-Ah and Oh, Mira 2000. Acquisition of 2nd language intonation. In Proceedings of International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (vol. 4, pp. 76–9). Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Jung, Jaebum, Kim, Mira, Kim, Taehoon, Chae, Sookyung and Nam, Kichun 1999. Morphological processing in Broca's aphasia [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the 13th KSCS Annual Spring Conference (pp. 15–21).
Jung, Jaebum, Lim, HeuiSeok and Nam, Kichun 2003. Morphological representations of Korean compound nouns [in Korean]. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 12, 77–95.Google Scholar
Jung, Jae-Bum, Pyun, Sung-Bom, Kim, Tae-Hoon and Nam, Kichun 2002. The processing and representations of ambiguous morphemes in Korean words: centered in aphasics [in Korean]. In The Proceedings of Conference of Korean Society of Cognitive Science (pp. 151–6).
Jung, Jingab and Yi, Kwangoh 2004. Morphological representation and processing of Korean words [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Korean Society for Experimental Psychology (pp. 89–95).
Jung, Jongmin and Pae, Soyeong 2004. The fast mapping abilities of Korean hearing impaired children [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Communication Disorders, 9 (2), 49–64.Google Scholar
Jung, Kyung Soon 2002. Effects on the use of case markers, ending markers, and vocabulary of Korean deaf students in the application of standard sign language for signed Korean [in Korean]. In A Report of Research on Field Special Education for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People. General Association of Special Education of Korea.Google Scholar
Jung, Woo Hyun and Park, SooJin 2006. Word and coding-unit superiority effect in the perception of Korean letters [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 139–56.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W. 1993. From general to language-specific capacities: the WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 3–28.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W. 1997. The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W. 1999. How infants begin to extract words from speech. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 323–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, Peter W. and Aslin, Richard N. 1995. Infants' detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, Peter W., Cutler, Anne and Redanz, Nancy J. 1993. Infants' sensitivity to predominant stress patterns in English. Child Development, 64, 675–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W., Friederici, Angela D., Wessels, Jeanine M. I., Svenkerud, Vigdis Y. and Jusczyk, Ann M. 1993. Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 402–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W., Pisoni, David B.. and Mullennix, John 1992. Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants. Cognition, 43 (3), 253–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, Marcel A. and Carpenter, Patricia A. 1992. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, Marcel A. and Varma, Sashank 2002. A hybrid architecture for working memory: reply to MacDonald and Christiansen 2002. Psychological Review, 109, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, Edith 2001. Effects of NP type on the resolution of word-order ambiguities. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 529–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaan, Edith and Vasic, Nada 2004. Cross-serial dependencies in Dutch: testing the influence of NP type on processing load. Memory and Cognition, 32, 175–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamide, Yuki and Mitchell, Don C. 1997. Relative clause attachment: nondeterminism in Japanese parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 247–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampen, Jacqueline 1997. First steps in wh-movement. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.
Kaneko, Yumina 1996. Knowledge of the English article system in second language learning: to ‘the’ or not to ‘the’. Undergraduate thesis, Smith College.
Kaneko, Yumina 1998. Mwunpep-kwa ene sayong (Grammar and language use). Kwukehak (Korean Linguistics), 31, 165–204.Google Scholar
Kaneko, Yumina 2001. The grammar and use of Korean reflexives. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 6, 134–50.Google Scholar
Kang, Hye-Kyung 2000. Aspects of the acquisition of quantification: experimental studies of English and Korean children. Doctoral dissertation, University College London.
Kang, Hye-Kyung 2001. Quantifier spreading: linguistic and pragmatic considerations. Lingua, 111, 591–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Hyewon and Simpson, Greg B. 1996. Development of semantic and phonological priming in a shallow orthography. Developmental Psychology, 32, 860–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Hyewon and Simpson, Greg B. 2001. Local strategic control of information in visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 29, 648–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, Hyun-Seok 1996. Acoustic and intonational correlates of the informational status of referring expressions in Seoul Korean. Language and Speech, 39 (4), 307–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, In Ku and Lee, Hang Sei 1969. A method of Korean character pattern extraction [in Korean]. Journal of Korea Institute of Electronics Engineers, 9 (2), 1–5.Google Scholar
Kang, Soyoung and Speer, Shari R. 2003. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic clause boundaries in Korean. A paper presented at WCCFL XXII. San Diego, CA.
Karins, Krisjanis and Nagy, Naomi 1993. Non-categorical perception of a ‘categorical’ rule. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1979. A Functional Approach to Child Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Leonard and Frost, Ram 1992. The reading process is different for different orthographies: the orthographic depth hypothesis. In Frost, Ram and Katz, Leonard (eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawachi, Kazuhiro 2002. Do Korean putting verbs categorize space in terms of the looseness vs. tightness distinction? Unpublished manuscript.
Kayne, Richard 1989 Facets of Romance past participle agreement. In Benica, Paola (ed.), Dialect Variation on the Theory of Grammar (pp. 85–103). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kean, Mary-Louise 1988. The relation between linguistic theory and second language acquisition. In Pankhurst, James, Sharewood-Smith, Mike and Buren, Paul (eds.), Learnability and Second Languages (pp. 61–70). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward and Comrie, Bernard 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.Google Scholar
Keenan, Janice M., Baillet, Susan D. and Brown, Polly 1984. The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal behavior, 23, 115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmerer, David and Tranel, Daniel 2000. Verb retrieval in brain-damaged subjects: 1. analysis of stimulus, lexical, and conceptual factors. Brain and Language, 73, 347–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ken, Loke Kit 1991. A semantic analysis of young children's use of Mandarin shape classifiers. In Kwan-Terry, Anna (ed.), Child Language Development in Singapore and Malaysia (pp. 98–116). Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Ken, Loke Kit and Harrison, Godfrey 1986. Young children's use of Chinese (Cantonese and Mandarin) sortal classifiers. In Kao, Henry S. R. and Hoosain, Rumjahn (eds.), Linguistics, Psychology, and the Chinese Language (pp. 125–46). Hong Kong: Center of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Markus and Spitzer, Manfred 2000. Time course of conscious and unconscious semantic brain activation. Neuroreport, 11, 2401–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Ae-Ryung 2002. Two positions of Korean negation. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10 (pp. 587–600). Stanford, CA: CLSI.Google Scholar
Kim, Bok-Lim 1996. Korean families. In McGoldrick, Monica, Giordano, Joe and Pearce, John W. (eds.), Ethnicity and Family Therapy, 2nd edn. (pp. 281–94). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Chil Kwan 1998. A study on etymology of Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Incheon, Korea: Sungdong School.Google Scholar
Kim, Chil Kwan 1999. Practice and Theories for Instruction of Sign Language [in Korean]. Incheon, Korea: Sungdong School.Google Scholar
Kim, Dae-Jin, Kim, Jung-Bae, Jang, Won and Bien, Zeungnam 2002. Development of Korean Sign Language generation system using TV caption signal [in Korean]. Journal of IEEK (CI), 39 (4), 32–44.Google Scholar
Kim, Eunjoo 1997. The sensitive period for second-language acquisition: a reaction time study of maturational effects on the acquisition of L2 lexico-semantic and syntactic systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Kim, Hee-Seob 1996. Korean signed language as a natural language: a phonological analysis [in Korean]. Journal of Language Science, 3, 25–42.Google Scholar
Kim, Hee-Sun 2004. The use of multiple sources of information in Korean sentence processing. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, CA.
Kim, Hee-Sun and Lee, Hyuck-Joon 2004. The role of prosody in Korean sentence processing. Paper presented at the Japanese-Korean Linguistics Conference 14, Tucson, Arizona.
Kim, Heung-gyu and Kang, Beom-mo 1997. Frequency Analysis of Hangul Usage [in Korean]. Korean Cultural Research Center, Korea University.Google Scholar
Kim, Hoyoung and Chung, Chan-Sup 1992. The effect of Meungzo and Saemmul fonts on Hangul recognition [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4, 25–35.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyanghee and Na, Duk L. 2001. Paradise Korean Western Aphasia Battery [in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Paradise.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyun-Ja and Cho, Jeung-Ryeul 2001. Phonological awareness, visual perception and reading of Hangul in preschool children [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Psychology: Development, 14, 15–28.Google Scholar
Kim, Jae-Kap 1994. Perception of letters in the context of a Korean Hangul syllable [in Korean], Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea.
Kim, Jae-Kap and Kim, Jung-Oh 1990. Letter perception in two-syllable Korean words: Comparison of an interactive activation model to an elementary perceiver and memorizer model (I) [in Korean]. In Proceedings of Spring Conference of the Korean Society for Cognitive Science (pp. 28–34).
Kim, Jeesun and Davis, Chris 2004. Characteristics of poor readers of Korean Hangul: auditory, visual and phonological processing. Reading and Writing, 17, 153–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok 2000. The Grammar of Negation: a Constraint-based Approach. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Sung, Jang, Won and Bien, Zeungnam 1996. A dynamic gesture recognition system for the Korean Sign Language (KSL). IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, 26, 354–59.Google Scholar
Kim, Jung-Bae 2002. A study on the continuous hand gesture recognitions system for the Korean Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.
Kim, Jung Ha 2002. Effects of canonical word order to Korean sentence comprehension in Broca's aphasic patients [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Yonsei University.
Kim, Jung-Oh 1982. Factors affecting visual information processing of Korean syllables, perceptual grouping of syllables, and perceptual learning [in Korean]. Language Research, 18, 285–302.Google Scholar
Kim, Jung-Oh and Kim, Jae-Kap 1990. Letter perception in two-syllable Korean words: comparison of an interactive activation model to an elementary perceiver and memorizer model (II) [in Korean]. In Proceedings of Conference on Hangul and Korean Language Information Processing (pp. 235–46).
Kim, Jung-Oh and Kim, Jae-Kap 1992. Syllabic processing and letter perception in Korean word recognition [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4, 36–51.Google Scholar
Kim, Karl, Relkin, Norman, Lee, Kyong-Min and Hirsch, Joy 1997. Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 388, 171–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Ka-Young 2006. Verb production and argument structures in aphasics [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Yonsei University.
Kim, Ka-Young, Hwang, Yu Mi, Moon, Young Sun and Nam, Kichun 1999. Anaphoric resolution in anomia and Wernicke aphasia [in Korean]. In The Proceedings of Hangul and Korean information processing (pp. 455–61).
Kim, Ka-Young, Cho, H.-S. and Kim, D.-H. 2000. A study of aphasic processing of verb argument structures and semantic information. Proceedings of the Conference of the Korean Society of Communication Disorders, November, 2000, 366–9.
Kim, Kyung Hwan, Yoon, Hyo Woon and Park, Hyun Wook 2004. Spatiotemporal brain activation pattern during word/picture perception by native Koreans. Neuroreport, 15, 1099–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Meesook 1999. A crosslinguistic perspective on the acquisition of locative verbs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware.
Kim, Meesook and Landau, Barbara 1997. The structure and acquisition of locative verbs in Korean and English. In Kuno, Susumu et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VII (pp. 33–46).
Kim, Meesook, Landau, Barbara and Philips, Colin 1999. Crosslinguistic differences in children's syntax for locative verbs. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 430–41).
Kim, Meesook and Phillips, Colin 1998. Complex verb constructions in child Korean: overt markers of covert functional structure. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 430–41).
Kim, Mi-Hyun and Lee, Mahn-Young 1992. Recognition of global character type in initial phase of Hangul character identification [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4, 16–24.Google Scholar
Kim, Mikyong and Thompson, Cynthia K. 2000. Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: implications for lexical organization. Brain and Language, 74, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Mikyung, McGregor, Karla K. and Thompson, Cynthia K. 2000. Early lexical development in English-and Korean-speaking children: language-general and language-specific patterns. Journal of Child Language, 27, 225–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Min-Joo 2004. Event structure and the internally-headed relative clause construction in Korean and Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Kim, Min-Shik and Chung, Chan-Sup 1989. The effect of letter form and meaningfulness of syllable on Hangul recognition [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 1, 27–75.Google Scholar
Kim, Mi-Ryong, Beddor, Patrice. S. and Horrocks, Julie 2002. The contribution of consonantal and vocalic information to the perception of Korean initial stops. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Mi Sook 2003. The production of grammatical morphemes of Korean children with and without Down's syndrome [in Korean]. Unpublished master's thesis, Dankook University, Seoul, Korea.
Kim, Ryonhee 1995. The effect of Age-of –L2 onset on ultimate L2 production: the English /i-I/ distinction made by Korean speakers. English Teaching, 50 (2), 257–279.Google Scholar
Kim, Sahyang 1997. Case-marking errors in Korean agrammatic speech [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Hong-Ik University, Seoul, Korea.
Kim, Sahyang 2004. The role of prosodic phrasing in Korean word segmentation. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
Kim, Seong-Chan 1995. The acquisition of wh-questions in English and Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii, Manoa.
Kim, Seongchan, O'Grady, William and Cho, Sookeun 1995. The acquisition of case and word order in Korean: a comparative study of monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingual Research, 12 (1), 127–39.Google Scholar
Kim, Seung Kuk 1983. A psychological study of Korean sign language [in Korean]. Doctoral dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea.
Kim, Seung Kuk 1991. Hangul-Style Standard Sign Language [in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Department of Education.Google Scholar
Kim, Seung Kuk 1993. Korean Standard Sign Language [in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Ohsung Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kim, Seung Kuk 1994. A Study of Korean Sign Language [in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Ohsung Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kim, Soojung 2000. Accentual effects on phonological rules in Korean. Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel-Hill.
Kim, Soo-Ryun 2002. Comparison between noun and verb production of Broca's aphasic patients in a naming task and a narrative task [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Yonsei University, Korea.
Kim, Soo Young 1990. The acquisition of Korean morphology: a case study. Ms, Purdue University.
Kim, Soyoung 1998. The effects of causal relationship on recall of discourse. Psychological Science, 7, 47–63.Google Scholar
Kim, Soyoung 2000. The effects of causal relationship and predictability on recall [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 12, 57–76.Google Scholar
Kim, Sue Young 1997. The early acquisition of Korean morphology: a case study. Korean Journal of Communication Disorders, 2, 89–118.Google Scholar
Kim, Sung-il and Lee, Jae-Ho 1995. The effect of syntactic and pragmatic constraints on sentential representation and memory accessibility [In Korean]. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 6, 97–116.Google Scholar
Kim, Sung-il and Lee, Jae-Ho 1997. The time course of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic effects on the memory accessibility in sentence comprehension. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 970).
Kim, Sung-il, Lee, Jae-Ho and Gernsbacher, Morton A. 2004. The advantage of first mention in Korean: the temporal contributions of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic factors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33, 475–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Sung-il, Lee, Jae-Ho, Lee, Jung-Mo and Lee, Kun-Hyo 1998. Does instrument inference occur on-line during reading? In Proceedings of Eighth Society for Text and Discourse. Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Kim, Sun-Ok and Jo, Hea-Soog 2003. The relationship between phonological awareness and reading ability in young children [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Psychology, 22, 19–43.Google Scholar
Kim, Wha-Chun 1976. The theory of anaphora in Korean syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Kim, Won-Ho 1994. Grammatical Relations and Anaphora in Korean. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kim, Yeonhee and Lee, Chang Hwan 2004. The role of phonological information in Korean monosyllabic word processing [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 15, 35–41.Google Scholar
Kim, Yong-Suk 1999. On the long-distance anaphora of reflexives: a minimalist approach. In A Festschrift for Hong-Bae Lee (pp. 145–88). Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kim, Yoon-Joo 2002. Relative clause sentence comprehension of Broca's aphasics [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Yonsei University, Korea.
Kim, Yoon-Shin 2001. The lexical-semantic structure of derived predicates: with reference to causativization and passivization [in Korean]. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea.
Kim, Young Gon 1992. The role of attitudes and motivation in learning a heritage language: a study of Korean language maintenance in Toronto. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
Kim, Youngjin 1985. Local processing loads in relative-clause sentence comprehension process [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Psychology, 5, 8–26.Google Scholar
Kim, Youngjin 1999. The effects of case marking information on Korean sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 687–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Youngjin 2004. Resolving grammatical marking ambiguities of Korean: an eye-tracking study. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 15, 49–59.Google Scholar
Kim, Youngjin and Youn, Yim 2004. Comprehension processes of Korean topic-marked noun phrases. The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 483–99.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Joo 1987. The acquisition of relative clauses in English and Korean: development in spontaneous production. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
Kim, Young-Joo 1989. Theoretical implications of complement structure acquisition in Korean. Journal of Child Language, 573–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Young-Joo 1990. The syntax and semantics of Korean case: the interaction between lexical and syntactic levels of representation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
Kim, Young-Joo 1993. Developmental errors in the production of Korean and Japanese complex NPs and their implications for the theory of language acquisition. In Kuno, Susumu et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics V (pp. 26–40). Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Joo 1997. The acquisition of Korean. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (vol. 4: the Data, pp. 335–443). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Joo 1999. Production of verbal inflections in Broca's aphasia [in Korean]. In A Festschrift in Honor of Professor Seunghwan Lee (pp. 455–75). Seoul, Korea: Hankuk Muwnwhasa.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Joo 2000. Subject/object drop in the acquisition of Korean: a crosslinguistic comparison. Journal of East Asian Languages, 9, 325–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Youngju 1995. Verb lexicalization patterns in Korean and some issues of language acquisition. Language Research, 31, 501–43.Google Scholar
Kim, Yunjeong, Kim, Soo-Jung, Jung, Jae-Bum, Pyun, Sung-Bom and Nam, Kichun 2000. Characteristics of resolving syntactic ambiguity in normal and aphasics [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Communication Disorders, 5 (1), 102–18.Google Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key (ed.) 1997. The Korean Alphabet: Its History and Structure. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
King, Jonathan and Just, Marcel A. 1991. Individual differences in syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinoshita, Sachiko and Lupker, Stephen 2002. Effects of filler type in naming: change in time criterion or attentional control of pathways?Memory and Cognition, 30, 1277–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintsch, Walter 1988. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintsch, Walter 1998. Comprehension: a Paradigm for Cognition. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, Lorraine 1973. An analysis of speech imitations by Ga children. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 267–75.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin 2000. Effects of verb complexity on agrammatic aphasics' sentence production. In Bastiaanse, Roelien and Grodzinsky, Yosef (eds.), Grammatical Disorders in Aphasia: a Neurolinguistic Perspective (pp. 123–51). London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Kjelgaard, Margaret M. and Speer, Shari R. 1999. Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 153–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, Heejeong, Ionin, Tania and Wexler, Kenneth 2006. Adult L2-learners lack the Maximality presupposition, too! In Deen, K. U. et al. (eds.), The Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, Honolulu, HI (pp. 171–82). University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4.Google Scholar
Ko, Heejeong, Ionin, Tania and Wexler, Kenneth 2009. Parallels between L1 and L2 acquisition in article semantics: the role of presuppositionality. Manuscript, Seoul National University, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and MIT.Google Scholar
Ko, Heejeong, Perovic, Alex, Ionin, Tania and Wexler, Kenneth 2008. Semantic universals and variation in L2 article choice. In Proceedings of GASLA 9 (pp. 118–29). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Koh, Sungryong 1997. The resolution of the dative NP ambiguity in Korean. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 265–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koh, Sungryongin press. Grammatical constraints and processing strategy of topic noun phrases in Korean. The Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.
Koizumi, Masatoshi 2000. String vacuous overt verb-raising. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 9, 227–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolk, Herman H. and Heeschen, Claus 1992. Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language. Language and Cognitive Process, 7, 89–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolk, Herman H. and Grunsven, Marianne J. F. 1985. Agrammatism as variable phenomenon. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 347–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolk, Herman H., Grunsven, Marianne J. F. and Keyser, Antoine 1985. On parallelism between production and comprehension in agrammatism. In Kean, Mary-Louise (ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 165–206). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolk, Herman H. and Weijts, Marion 1996. Judgments of semantic anomaly in agrammatic patients: argument movement, syntactic complexity, and the use of heuristics. Brain and Language, 54, 86–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koo, John 1992. The term of address ‘you’ in South Korea today. Korea Journal, 32(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen D. 1996. Under Attack: the Case Against Bilingual Education. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika 2000. Building statives. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (pp. 385–99). Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change, 1, 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K., Williams, Karen A., Lacerda, Francisco, Stevens, Kenneth N. and Lindblom, Björn 1992. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuno, Susumu 1986. Functional Syntax. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuntze, Marlon 1998. Literacy and deaf children: the language question. Topics in Language Disorders, 18 (4), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, Gina, Sitnikova, Tatiana, Caplan, David and Holcomb, Phillip 2003. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 117–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutas, Marta and Federmeier, Kara 2000. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutas, Marta and Hillyard, Steven 1980. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutas, Marta and Petten, Cyma 1994. Psycholinguistics electrified: event-related brain potential investigations. In Gernsbacher, Morton A. (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 83–143). San Diego, CA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Kwak, Ho-Wan, Kim, Jung-Oh and Park, Min-Kyu 1993. Time courses of the negative and positive repetition effects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 814–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Kweon, Soo-Ok 2000. The acquisition of English contraction phenomena by advanced Korean learners of English: experimental studies on wanna-contraction and auxiliary contraction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Kweon, Soo-Ok 2001. The acquisition of contraction constraint by non-native speakers of English. English Teaching, 56 (3), 89–109.Google Scholar
Kwon, Hyukchan, Kuriki, Shinya, Kim, Jin Mok, Lee, Yong Ho, Kim, Kiwoong and Nam, Kichun 2005. MEG study on neural activities associated with syntactic and semantic violations in spoken Korean sentences. Neuroscience Research, 51, 349–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwon, Kyung-Hyuk, Woo, Yo-Seop and Min, Hong-Ki 2000. Design and implementation of a Korean text to sign language translation system. Journal of Information Processing System, 7, 756–65.Google Scholar
Kwon, Nayoung, Polinsky, Maria and Kluender, Robert 2004. Processing of relative clause sentences in Korean. In Proceedings of AMLaP 2004 Conference.
Kwon, Oh-Seek, Yoon, Hye-kyung and Lee, Do-Hun 2001. The theory of Hangul acquisition and its application [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Psychology, 20, 211–27.Google Scholar
Kwon, Soon-Woo 2001. The qualitative research on processing in the sign language acquisition for hearing impaired students [in Korean]. MA thesis, Taegu University, Korea.
Kwon, Youan, Hwang, Yumi, Lim, HeuiSeok and Nam, Kichun 2002. A model of Korean connective ending processing [in Korean]. In Proceedings of Korea Brain Society Conference (pp. 87–8).Google Scholar
Kwon, Youan, Park, Kinam, Lim, Heuiseok and Nam, Kichun 2007. The phonological syllable plays a role in lexical access in Korean visual word recognition, In Third International Conference on Natural Computation (vol. V, IEEE, pp. 536–44).Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter 1993. A Course in Phonetics, 3rd edn. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George 1970. Global rules. Language, 46, 627–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud 1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Barbara and Gleitman, Lila 1985. Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Landau, Barbara and Jackendoff, Ray 1993. “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Barbara, Smith, Linda B. and Jones, Susan S. 1988. The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Ewald 2000. Adversative connectors on distinct levels of discourse: a re-examination of Eve Sweeter's three-level approach. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Kortmann, Bernd (eds.), Cause-Condition-Concession-Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. Raising and transparency. Language, 71, 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard and Saito, Mamoru 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 235–89.Google Scholar
Lebeaux, David 1988. Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lecanuet, Jean-Pierre and Garanier-Deferre, Carolyn. 1993. Speech stimuli in the fetal environment. In Boysson-Bardies, Benedicte et al. (eds.), Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life (pp. 237–48). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Leck, K. J., Weekes, B. S. and Chen, M.-J. 1995. Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: evidence from Chinese readers. Memory and Cognition, 23, 468–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Byeong-Taek 1995. Individual differences in working memory capacity and comprehension [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Seoul National University, Korea.
Lee, Byeong-Taek 2002a. Individual differences in lexical ambiguity resolution: context-dependent processing of skilled readers [in Korean]. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea.
Lee, Byeong-Taek 2002b. Reliability of the reading span test [in Korean]. Psychological Science, 11, 15–33.Google Scholar
Lee, Byeong-Taek, Kim, Kyong-Joong and Zoh, Myeong-han 1996. Working memory and language: comprehension individual differences in reading span and language processing [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 8, 59–85.Google Scholar
Lee, Byeong-Taek, Lee, Kyoung-Min, Kim, Jung-Oh and Hong, Chai-Song 2002. Suppression and recognition reading span test [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 13, 91–102.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin 1973. Abstract syntax of Korean with reference to English. Doctoral dissertation submitted to Indiana University.
Lee, Chungmin 1982–1990. Children's (SK and CK) acquisition diary [in Korean]. Unpublished manuscript.
Lee, Chungmin 1989. Syntactic ambiguities in Korean [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Conference of Hangul and Korean Processing (pp. 282–97).Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin 1990. Pragmatic and metapragmatic aspect of language acquisition in Korean. Paper presented at the Fifth International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Budapest.
Lee, Chungmin 1991. Speech act terms and mood indicators [in Korean]. Acta Linguistica, 39, 127–41.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin 1993. The acquisition of mood indicators in Korean. In Kuno, Susumu et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics V (pp. 41–61). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin 1995. The development of mood and modality in Korean. In Fava, Elisabetta (ed.), Speech Acts and Linguistic Research (pp. 71–88). Papers of the 1994 LSA Workshop July 1994, Padova.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin 1996. Generic sentences are topic constructions. In Fretheim, Thorstein and Gundel, Jeannette K. (eds.), Reference and Referent Accessibility. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin 1997. The acquisition of tense-aspect-modality in Korean. Presented at the Workshop on First Language Acquisition of East Asian Languages, Linguistic Society of America Linguistic Institute, Cornell University.
Lee, Chungmin 1999. Aspects of aspect in Korean psych-predicates: implications for psyche-predicates in general. In Abraham, Werner and Kulikov, Leonid (eds.), Tense-aspect, Transitivity and Causativity (pp. 223–52). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin 2000. Numeral classifiers, (in-)definites and incremental theme in Korean. In Lee, Chungmin and Whitman, John (eds.), Korean Syntax and Semantics: LSA Institute Workshop, Santa Cruz, '91. Seoul, Korea: Thaehaksa.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin 2001. Acquisition of topic and subject markers in Korean. In Nakayama, Mineharu (ed.), Issues in East Asian Language Acquisition (Kurosio Linguistics Workshop Series vol. 7, pp. 41–66). Tokyo, Japan: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin 2003. Contrastive topic and/or contrastive focus. In McClure, William (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12 (pp. 352–64). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin 2006. Contrastive topic/focus and polarity in discourse. In Turner, Ken and Heusinger, Klaus (eds.), Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics: CRiSPI 15. (pp. 381–420). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin, Chae, Hee-Rahk and Yoon, James Hye-Suk in preparation. A Reference Grammar of Korean. Cambridge University Press.
Lee, Chungmin, Nam, Seungho and Kang, Beom-Mo 1998. Lexical semantic structure for predicates in Korean. In Boas, Johan and Buitelaar, Paul (eds.), Proceedings of ESSLLI-98 (pp. 1–15).
Lee, Dami 1996. The critical period hypothesis and the acquisition of English pronouns by Korean speakers. English Teaching, 51, 83–96.Google Scholar
Lee, Dami and Lee, Kwee-Ock 2002. The acquisition of Korean numeral classifiers by English/Korean bilingual children. Korean Education, 13 (1), 265–78.Google Scholar
Lee, Dami and Schachter, Jacqueline 1997. Sensitive period effects in binding theory. Language Acquisition, 6, 333–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Euichol and Zoh, Myeong-han 1968. Analysis of factors operative in organization of a word [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Psychology, 1, 5–13.Google Scholar
Lee, Eun-Kyung 1999. A study on the development of case morphemes in normal children aged from two to four years who live in Taegu. Master's thesis, Taegu University, Korea.
Lee, H.-W. 1999. A study of inflectional errors in Broca's aphasia. M.A. thesis, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.
Lee, Ha-Won 1999. Errors in Broca's aphasiacs' use of inflections: with reference to Korean and English [in Korean]. MA thesis, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.
Lee, Hae-Wook and Pae, Soyeong 2003. Korean children's noun and verb naming abilities [in Korean]. Dutch as a Second Language, 13, 257–79.Google Scholar
Lee, Heung-Cheol 1984. The effect of the functional role and the presentation order in causal related sentences on causal reading time and primed reaction time [in Korean]. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Korea.
Lee, Hyeonjin 1990. Logical relations in the child's grammar: relative scope, bound variables, and long distance binding in Korean. A dissertation submitted to the University of California at Irvine.
Lee, Hyeonjin 1993. Syntax and semantics of locative verbs and language acquisition. In Kuno, Susumu et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics V (pp. 62–75).
Lee, Hyeonjin 1995. The role of ontological categories and syntactic cues in inferences about word meanings. Korean Journal of Psychology: Developmental, 8 (1), 95–106.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyeonjin 2000. The meaning of locative verbs in Korean and language acquisition. In Cho, S. et al. (eds.), How do Human Acquire Language? (pp. 71–94). Daewoohaksulchongseo (Daewoo Academic Series): Acanet.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyeonjin 2002. Korean word learning: ontological concept, whole object constraint, shape similarity, and shape complexity [in Korean]. The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15 (4), 77–92.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyeonjin and Lee, Kyung-Hwa 1999. Ontological concept, intention, and stimulus complexity in Korean word learning. Poster presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Lee, Hyeonjin and Wexler, Kenneth 1987. The acquisition of reflexives and pronouns in Korean: from a crosslinguistic perspective. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
Lee, Hyo Sang 1985. Consciously known but unassimilated information: a pragmatic analysis of the epistemic modal suffix “-kun” in Korean. Paper Presented at the First Pacific Linguistics Conference at the University of Oregon.
Lee, Hyo Sang 1991. Tense, aspect and modality: a discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
Lee, Hyuck-Joon 1999. Tonal realization and implementation of the accentual phrase in Seoul Korean. Master's thesis, UCLA.
Lee, Ik-Hwan 1978. Pronominal anaphora in Korean. Language Research, 14 (1), 63–98.Google Scholar
Lee, Iksop and Ramsey, S. Robert 2000. The Korean Language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Insup 1986. Language Development in Children [in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Keymoonsa.Google Scholar
Lee, Jae-Ho & Lee, M-Y. 1990. Pronoun type and referential resolution [in Korean]. Proceedings of the second Hangul and Korean Information Processing. Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Lee, Jae-Ho 1993. On-line processing of pronoun resolution in reading [in Korean]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea University, Korea.
Lee, Jae-Ho 2004. The role of syntactic cues in pronoun referential resolution: the effects of number cue and gender cue [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 15, 25–33.Google Scholar
Lee, Jae-Ho and Bang, Hee-Jeong 2003. Implicit representation of gender stereotype: priming effects of attribute typicality and gender congruency [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 14, 37–48.Google Scholar
Lee, Jae-Ho and Lee, Jung-Mo 1999. On-line generation of elaborative inference: predictive inference [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11, 261–76.Google Scholar
Lee, Jae-Ho, Lee, Jung-Mo, Kim, Sung-il and Park, Tae-Jin 2002. Memory representation of mention order in Korean: interactive effects for first-mention, recency, and semantic-bias [in Korean]. The Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 14, 409–27.Google Scholar
Lee, Jeong Mee and Hwang, Mina 2001. The production of grammatical morphemes of children with SLI in sentence repetition [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Korean Academy of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology in 2001 (pp. 225–31).Google Scholar
Lee, Jong-Goo and Lee, Jung-Mo 1989. Effects of script hierarchy, presence of unexpected information, and its resolution on comprehension and memory [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 1, 97–105.Google Scholar
Lee, Joo Keun, Namkung, Jae Chan and Kim, Young Kun 1981. A study on the partial separation for subpatterns and recognition of the Hangeul patterns [in Korean]. Journal of Korea Institute of Electronics Engineers, 18, 1–8.Google Scholar
Lee, Joon-Suk and Kim, Kyung-Lin 1989. The processing unit in Korean words [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 1, 221–39.Google Scholar
Lee, Ju-Eun 2003. A sketch of the structure of passive constructions in Korean: a light predicate-based analysis. In Iverson, Gregory K. and Ahn, Sang-Cheol (eds.), Explorations in Korean Language and Linguistics (pp. 347–59). Seoul, Korea: Hankook.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung-Mo 1979. Deeper processing: spreading elaboration and integrative elaboration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen's University, Canada.
Lee, Jung-Mo 1981. Coreference, coherence and memory of discourse [in Korean]. Paper presented at SICOL-81 (Seoul International Conference on Linguistics).
Lee, Jung-Mo and Choi, Sang-Sup 1986. Processing of causally related sentences: primed recognition and deeper processing [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Psychology, 5, 116–27.Google Scholar
Lee, J-M., Choi, S. S., Lee, J-G. & Cho, K. H. 2000. Representation and processing of contrast information in discourse comprehension. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse. Lyon, France.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung-Mo and Lee, Jae-Ho 2004. Discourse comprehension: the effects of antecedent's lexical property on pronoun referential resolution [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 151–68.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung-Mo and Lee, Jae-Ho 2005. Contrastive information processing in discourse comprehension. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 16, 1–24.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung-Mo, Lee, Jae-Ho, Kim, Sung-il and Lee, Kun-Hyo 1997. Does instrument inference occur on-line during reading? [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9, 75–97.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung-Mo and Lee, Kun-Hyo 1993. Anaphoric resolution for general-term antecedents [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 5, 188–204.Google Scholar
Lee, Kwee-Ock 1990. On the first language acquisition of relative clauses in Korean: The universal structure of COMP. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Lee, Kwee-Ock 1991. On The First Language Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Korean: the Universal Structure of Comp. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Lee, Kwee-Ock 1997a. The role of semantic and syntax knowledge on children's language development: a study of acquisition of Korean classifiers [in Korean]. Adonghakhoyci (Korean Journal of Child Studies), 18 (1), 73–85.Google Scholar
Lee, Kwee-Ock 1997b. Overextension of Korean classifiers in children's language acquisition: a naturalistic data analysis [in Korean]. Kyungsungtay Nonmwuncip, 18 (1), 33–47.Google Scholar
Lee, Kwee-Ock, Jun, Jong Sup and Park, Hye-Won 2004. Quantitative differences in the processing of relative clauses between monolingual and bilingual speakers. Discourse and Cognition, 11 (1), 215–35.Google Scholar
Lee, Kwee-Ock, Lust, Barbara C. and Whitman, John 1990. On functional categories in Korean: a study of the first language acquisition of Korean relative clauses. International Conference of Korean Linguistics, 7, 312–33.Google Scholar
Lee, Kwee-Ock, Lust, Barbara C. and Whitman, John 1991. On the acquisition of functional categories in Korean: a study of the first language acquisition of Korean relative clauses. In Baek, Eun-Jin (ed.) Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Korean Linguistics. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Lee, Miseon 2000. On agrammatic deficits in English and Korean. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii.
Lee, Miseon 2003. Dissociation among functional categories in Korean agrammatism. Brain and Language, 84, 170–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Seok-Joo and Lee, Joo-Haeng 1994. Introduction to Korean Language [In Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Taehan Textbook Publisher.Google Scholar
Lee, Seungbok and Chang-Song, You-kyung 1999. Linguistic input and cognitive constraints in the lexical acquisition [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Psychology: Developmental, 12 (2), 49–65.Google Scholar
Lee, Sunhwa 2001. Individual differences in predictive inferences during discourse comprehension: active process and passive process [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Seoul National University, Korea.
Lee, Thomas 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of California.
Lee, Thomas 1991. Linearity as a scope principle for Chinese: the evidence from first language acquisition. In Napoli, Donna J. and Kegl, Judy A. (eds.), Bridges between Psychology and Linguistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lee, Yang 1995. A test of the orthographic depth hypothesis in recognition of Korean written words [in Korean]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea.
Lee, Yang 1998. The influences of orthographic depth and processing resource in word recognition [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1–16.Google Scholar
Lee, Yoonhyoung, Lee, Hanjung and Gordon, Peter C. 2007. Linguistic complexity and information structure in Korean: evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Cognition, 104, 495–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Young-Ai 1984. Visual organization of Korean letters [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Psychology, 4, 153–70.Google Scholar
Lee, Young-Ai 1990. Effects of visual transformations on the processing of Korean letters [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 2, 221–59.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse 1973. Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa, 7, 107–22.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth and Rappaport, Malka 1986. The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 623–61.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1996. Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: crosslinguistic evidence. In Bloom, Paul, Peterson, Mary, Nadel, Lynn and Garrett, Merrill F. (eds.), Language and Space (pp. 109–69). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David 1975. Adverbs of quantification. In Keenan, Edward L. (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Morris M. 1951. Infant Speech, a Study of the Beginning of Language. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandar A. 1977. The acquisition of tone in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 4, 185–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Peggy and Gleitman, Lila 2002. Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 83, 265–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Ping 1996. Spoken word recognition of code-switched words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 757–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Ping and Bowerman, Melissa 1998. The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect in Chinese. First Language, 18, 311–50.Google Scholar
Li, Wei 1995. Code-switching, preference marking and politeness in bilingual cross-generational talk: examples from a Chinese community in Britain. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 16 (3), 197–214.Google Scholar
Li, Wei and Milroy, Lesley 1995. Conversational code-switching in a Chinese community in Britain: a sequential analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 281–99.Google Scholar
Li, Yafei 1990. On V-V compounds in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8, 177–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Alvin M. 1996. Speech: a Special Code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, Alvin M. and Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1986. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In Aronoff, Mark and Oehrle, Richard (eds.), Language Sound Structure (pp. 157–233).
Liddell, Scott K. and Johnson, Robert E. 1992. Toward theoretically sound practices in deaf education. In Bilingual Considerations in the Education of Deaf Students: ASL and English (pp. 8–34). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Lidz, Jeffrey 2000. The morphosemantics of object case in Kannada. In Proceedings of WCCFL 18. Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lidz, Jeffrey 2001. Condition R. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, Jeffrey 2006. The grammar of accusative case in Kannada. Language, 82, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, Jeffrey and Musolino, Julien 2002. Children's command of quantification. Cognition, 84, 113–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieven, Elena, Pine, Julian M. and Baldwin, Gillian 1997. Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lightfoot, David 1976. Trace theory and twice-moved NPs. Linguistic Inquiry, 7, 559–82.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David 1977. On traces and conditions on rules. In Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas and Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal Syntax (pp. 207–37). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David 1980. Trace theory and explanation. In Moravsik, Edith A. and Wirth, Jessica R. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 13 (pp. 137–66). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H-H theory. In Hardcastle, William J. and Marchal, Alain (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modeling (pp. 403–39). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn and Engstrand, Olle 1989. In what sense is speech quantal?Journal of Phonetics, 17, 107–21.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn and Maddieson, Ian 1984. Phonetic universals in consonant systems. In Hyman, Larry M. and Li, Charles N. (eds.), Language, Speech and Mind (pp. 62–78). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lindholm, Kathryn and Padilla, Amado M. 1978. Child bilingualism: report on language mixing switching and translation. Linguistics, 211, 23–44.Google Scholar
Linebarger, Marcia C. 1995. Agrammatism as evidence about grammar. Brain and Language, 50, 52–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linebarger, Marcia C., Schwartz, Myrna F. and Saffran, Eleanor M. 1983. Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13, 361–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litchfield, Sharon K. 2002. The relationship of ASL proficiency to the written literacy skills of children who are deaf. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Liu, Ying and Peng, Dan-ling 1997. Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Chen, Hsuan-Chih (ed.), Cognitive Processing of Chinese and Related Asian Languages (pp. 219–32). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Long, Debra L., Seely, Mark R. and Oppy, Brian J. 1999. The strategic nature of less skilled readers' suppression problems. Discourse Processes, 27, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Michael H. 1990. Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, David 1990. Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11–28.Google Scholar
Lopez, David 1996. Language: diversity and assimilation. In Waldinger, Roger and Bozorgmehr, Mehdi (eds.), Ethnic Los Angeles (pp. 139–63). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lovegrove, William J. 1996. Dyslexia and a transient/magnocellular pathway deficit: the current situation and future directions. Australian Journal of Psychology, 48, 167–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Margery M., Tanenhaus, Michael K. and Carlson, Greg N. 1990. Levels of representation in the interpretation of anaphoric reference and instrument inference. Memory and Cognition, 18, 611–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucy, John A. 1992. Grammatical Categories and Cognition: a Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luetke-Stahlman, Barbara 1998. Language Issues in Deaf Education. Hillsboro, OR: Butte.Google Scholar
Lukatela, Katarina, Shankweiler, Donald and Crain, Stephen 1995. Syntactic processing in agrammatic aphasia by speakers of a Slavic language. Brain and Language, 49, 50–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundberg, Ingvar 1989. Lack of phonological awareness: a critical factor in developmental dyslexia. In Euler, Curt, Lundberg, Ingvar and Lennerstrand, Gunnar (eds.), Brain and Reading (pp. 221–32). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Luzzatti, Claudio, Raggi, Rossella, Zonca, Giusy, Pistarini, Caterina, Contardi, Antonella and Pinna, Gian-Domenico 2002. Verb-noun double dissociation in aphasic lexical impairments: the role of word frequency and imageability. Brain and Language, 81, 432–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, Maryellen C., Just, Marcel A. and Carpenter, Patricia A. 1992. Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 56–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, Maryellen C. and MacWhinney, Brian 1990. Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 469–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Maryellen C., Perlmutter, Neal J. and Seidenberg, Mark S. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, Brian 1977. Starting points. Language, 53, 152–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian 1982. Basic syntactic processes. In Kuczaj, Stan (ed.), Language Acquisition: Syntax and Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian 1995. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian, Osmán-Sági, Judit and Slobin, Dan I. 1991. Sentence comprehension in aphasia in two clear case-marking languages. Brain and Language, 41, 234–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, Brian, Pleh, Csaba and Bates, Elizabeth 1985. Case-marking and the development of sentence comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 178–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maess, Burkhard, Hermann, Christoph, Hahne, Anja, Nakamura, Akinori and Friederici, Angela D. 2006. Localizing the distributed language network responsible for the N400 measured by MEG during auditory sentence processing. Brain Research, 22, 163–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahootian, Shahrzad and Santorini, Beatrice 1996. Code-switching and the complement/adjunct distinction. Linguistic Inquiry, 27 (3), 464–79.Google Scholar
Malakoff, Marguerite and Hakuta, Kenji 1991. Translation skill and metalinguistic awareness in bilinguals. In Bialystok, Ellen (ed.), Language Processing in Bilingual Children (pp. 141–66). Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara, Sloman, Steven, Genneri, Silvia, Shi, Meiyi and Wang, Yuan 1999. Knowing versus naming: similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 230–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, Denise R., Jusczyk, Peter W., and KemlerNelson, D. Nelson, D. 1994. Does sentential prosody help infants organize and remember speech information?Cognition, 53, 155–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandler, Jean 1992. How to build a baby: II. conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandler, Jean 1996. Preverbal representation and language. In Bloom, Paul, Peterson, Mary, Nadel, Lynn and Garrett, Merrill F. (eds.), Language and Space (pp. 365–84). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Manis, Franklin R., McBride-Chang, Catherine, Seidenberg, Mark S., Keating, Patricia, Doi, Lisa M., Munson, Benjamin and Peterson, Alan 1997. Are speech perception deficits associated with developmental dyslexia?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 211–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manzini, Maria R. 1983. On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 421–46.Google Scholar
Maratsos, Michael P. 1974. Preschool children's use of definite and indefinite articles. Child Development, 45 (2), 446–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, Michael P. 1976. The Use of Definite and Indefinite Reference in Young Children. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maratsos, Michael P., Fox, Danny, Becker, Judith and Chalkey, Mary 1985. Semantic restrictions on children's passives. Cognition, 19, 167–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maratsos, Michael P. and Kuczaj, Stan 1978. Against the transformationalist account: a simpler analysis of auxiliary overmarkings. Journal of Child Language, 5, 337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, Ellen M. 1989. Categorization and Naming in Children. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Markman, Ellen M. 1994. Constraints of word meaning in early language acquisition. In Gleitman, Lila and Landau, Barbara (eds.), The Acquisition of the Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Markman, Ellen M. and Hutchinson, Jean E. 1984. Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: taxonomic vs. thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschark, Marc, Lang, Harry G. and Albertini, John A. 2002. Educating Deaf Students: From Research to Practice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Catherine M., Snowling, Margaret J. and Bailey, Peter J. 2001. Rapid auditory processing and phonological ability in normal readers and readers with dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 925–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, William 1989. Access and integration: projecting sound onto meaning. In Marslen-Wilson, William (ed.), Lexical Representation and Process (pp. 3–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, William, Tyler, L. Komisarjevsky, Waksler, Rachel and Older, Lianne 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101 (1), 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, David S. 2001. The English-only movement and sign language for deaf learners: an instructive parallel. Sign Language Studies, 1, 115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. and Lee, Young Sook C. 1969. Beginning Korean. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E., Lee, Yang-Ha and Chang, Sung-Un. 1967. A Korean-English Dictionary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Massaro, Dominic W. 1979. Letter information and orthographic context in word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 595–609.Google ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, Yo 1985a. Japanese numeral classifiers: their structure and acquisition. Master's thesis. Sophia University.
Matsumoto, Yo 1985b. Acquisition of some Japanese numeral classifiers: the search for convention. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development, 24, 79–86.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo 1987. Order of acquisition in the lexicon: implications from Japanese numeral classifiers. In Nelson, Keith E. and Kleek, Anne (eds.), Children's Language (vol. 6, pp. 229–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa, Bryant, Timothy and Roeper, Thomas 2001. A Salish stage in the acquisition of English determiners: unfamiliar “definites.” In The Proceedings of SULA: the Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas. University Of Massachusetts Occasional Papers In Linguistics 25.Google Scholar
Mauner, Gail, Fromkin, Victoria A. and Cornell, Thomas L. 1993. Comprehension and acceptability judgments in agrammatism: disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain and Language, 45, 340–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxfield, Thomas and Plunkett, Bernadette 1991. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers: Papers on the Acquisition of WH. Amherst: GLSA.
Mayer, Judith, Erreich, Anne and Valian, Virginia 1978. Transformations, basic operations, and language acquisition. Cognition, 6, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazuka, Reiko 1998. The Development of Language Processing Strategies: a Crosslinguistic Study Between Japanese and English. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McClelland, James L. and Rumelhart, David E. 1981. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1. an account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, William (ed.) 2003. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
McCroskey, Robert L. and Kidder, Herman C. 1980. Auditory fusion among learning disabled, reading disabled, and normal children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, Janet 1984. Semantic and syntactic processing cues used by first and second language learners of English, Dutch, and German. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University.
McDonald, Janet L. and MacWhinney, Brian 1995. The time course of anaphoric resolution: effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 543–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Laraine, Choi, Soonja and Mandler, Jean 2003. Understanding spatial relations: flexible infants, lexical adults. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 229–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGloin, Naomi and Mori, Junki (eds.) 2006. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 15. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
McKoon, Gail, Ratcliff, Roger, Ward, Gregory and Sproat, Richard 1993. Syntactic prominence on discourse processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 593–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKoon, Gail, Ward, Gregory, Ratcliff, Roger and Sproat, Richard 1993. Morphosyntactic and pragmatic factors affecting the accessibility of discourse entity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Erin Leddon, Lidz, Jeffrey and Pierrehumbert, Janet 2004. Suprasegmental cues to meaning in child-directed speech. Talk given at 17th CUNY Sentence Processing Conference.
McNeill, David 1970. The Acquisition of Language: the Study of Developmental Psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mehler, Jaques, Jusczyk, Peter, W. Lambertz, Ghislane, Halsted, Nilofar, Bertoncini, Josiane and Amiel-Tison, Claudine 1988. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 143–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meisel, Jurgen M. and Müller, Natascha 1992. Finiteness and verb placement in early child grammars: evidence from simultaneous acquisition of French and German in bilinguals. In Meisel, Jurgen M. (ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition (pp. 109–38). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Lise and Obler, Loraine K. 1990. Methodology: data collection, presentation, and guide to interpretation. In Menn, Lise and Obler, Loraine K. (eds.), Agrammatic Aphasia: a Cross-language Narrative Sourcebook (pp. 13–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Merrill, Edward C., Sperber, Richard D. and McCauley, Charley 1981. Differences in semantic encoding as a function of reading comprehension skill. Memory and Cognition, 9, 618–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meuter, Renata F. I. and Allport, Alan 1999. Bilingual language switching in naming: asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, Gabriele, Mazzuchi, Anna, Menn, Lise and Goodglass, Harold 1983. Contrasting cases of Italian agrammatic aphasia without comprehension disorder. Brain and Language, 19, 65–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miceli, Gabriele, Silveri, Maria Caterina, Romani, Cristina and Caramazza, Alfonso 1989. Variation in the pattern of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of so-called agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 36, 447–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miceli, Gabriele, Silveri, Maria Caterina, Villa, Giampiero and Caramazza, Alfonso 1984. On the basis for the agrammatic's difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex, 20, 207–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, George A. and Chomsky, Noam 1963. Finitary models of language users. In Luce, R. Duncan, Bush, Robert R. and Galanter, Eugene (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology (vol. II). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. and Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1976, Language and Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, James D. 1989. Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. JASA, 85 (5), 2114–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, James D., Engebretson, A. Maynard and Vemula, N. Rao 1980. Vowel normalization: differences between vowels spoken by children, women, and men. JASA Supplement, 1 (68), S33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jon F. and Chapman, Robin 1981. The relation between age and mean length of utterances in morphemes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24, 154–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley and Muysken, Pieter 1995. One Speaker, Two Languages: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Code-switching. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, Akira, Carpenter, Patricia A. and Just, Marcel Adam 1994. A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, Akira, Just, Marcel A. and Carpenter, Patricia A. 1994. Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 176–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsell, Stephen, Patterson, Karalyn, Graham, Andrew, Hughes, Claire and Milroy, Robert 1992. Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 452–67.Google Scholar
Moon, Christine, Panneton-Cooper, Robin and Fifer, William P. 1993. Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behavior and Development, 16, 495–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Brian C. J. 1982. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morikawa, Hiromi 1989. Acquisition of case-marking and predicate-argument structures in Japanese: a longitudinal study of language acquisition mechanisms. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.
Mosel, Ulrike and Hovdhaugen, Even 1992. Samoan Reference Grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Munich, Edward, Flynn, Suzanne and Martohardjono, Gita 1994. Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks: what they measure and how they relate to each other. In Tarone, Elaine E., Gass, Susan M. and Cohen, Andrew D. (eds.), Research Methodology in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 227–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Munoz, Maria, Marquardt, Thomas P. and Copeland, Gary 1999. A comparison of code-switching patterns of aphasic and neurologically damaged normal bilingual speakers of English and Spanish. Brain and Language, 66 (2), 249–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murasugi, Keiko 1991. Noun phrases in Japanese and English: a study in syntax, learnability and acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Musolino, Julien, Crain, Stephen and Thornton, Rosalind 2000. Navigating negative quantificational space. Linguistics, 38, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münte, Thomas, Heinze, Hans-Jochen and Mangun, George 1993. Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 335–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, Jerome L., O'Brien, Edward J., Albrecht, Jason E. and Mason, Robert A. 1994. Maintaining global coherence during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 876–86.Google Scholar
Myers, Jerome L., Shinjo, Makiko and Duffy, Susan A. 1987. Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 253–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol 1993. Social Motivations for Code-switching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Na, Woon Hwan and Kang, Yun Ju 2001. Effects of sign language on the linguistic acquisition of deaf children [in Korean]. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation Science, 40, 95–107.Google Scholar
Nagai, Noriko 1995. Constraints on topics and their gaps: from a parsing perspective. In Mazuka, Reiko and Nagai, Noriko (eds.), Japanese Sentence Processing (pp. 77–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Naigles, Letitia 1990. Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17, 357–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakayama, Mineharu and Lewis, Richard L. 2001. Similarity inference and scrambling in Japanese. Journal of Cognitive Science, 1, 39–53.Google Scholar
Nakayama, Mineharu and Quinn, Charles J., Jr. (eds.) 2001. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 9. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Nam, Kichun 1995a. Korean word recognition: comparison of Hangul and Hanja word recognition [in Korean]. Paper presented at the Conference on the Korean Experimental and Cognitive Psychological Association.
Nam, Kichun 1995b. Korean word recognition: are different orthographies recognized differently? Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on the Cognitive Processing of Chinese and other Asian Languages, Hong Kong.
Nam, Kichun, Kim, Taehoon, Moon, Seongsil and Seo, Changwon 1998. Processing of the syntactic ambiguous resolution in Korean [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Language and Information, 2, 5–25.Google Scholar
Nam, Kichun, Seo, Kwangjun and Choi, Keysun 1997. The word length effect on Hangul word recognition. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1–18.Google Scholar
Nam, Kichun, Seo, Kwangjun, Choi, Keysun, Lee, Kyungin, Kim, Taehoon and Lee, Mahn-Young 1997. The word length effect on Hangul word recognition [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1–18.Google Scholar
Nam, Kichun, Yim, Changguk, Jung, Jaebum, Kim, Donghuy and Pyun, Sungbum 1999. Agrammatism in Broca's aphasia: dissociation of sentence production and comprehension [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Psychology, 18, 49–64.Google Scholar
Nam, Seungho 2004. Event structure and aspectual character of Korean predicates [in Korean]. The Journal of Humanities, 52, 75–124. Seoul National University.Google Scholar
Nazzi, Tierry, Bertoncini, Joisane and Mehler, Jacques 1998. Language discrimination by newborns: towards an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 756–66.Google Scholar
Nazzi, Tierry, Jusczyk, Peter W. and Johnson, Elizabeth K. 2000. Language discrimination by English-learning 5-month-olds: effects of rhythm and familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, Amy and Baillargeon, Renée 1993. Intuitions about support in 4.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 47, 121–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nespoulous, Jean-Luc, Dordain, Monique, Perron, Cécile, Ska, Bernadette, Bub, Daniel N., Mehler, Jacques, Caplan, David and Lecours, Andre R. 1988. Agrammatism in sentence production without comprehension deficits: reduced availability of syntactic structures and/or of grammatical morphemes? a case study. Brain and Language, 33, 273–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neville, Helen, Nicol, Janet, Barss, Andrew, Forster, Kenneth and Garrett, Merrill 1991. Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newport, Elissa L. 1990. Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newsome, Mary R. and Jusczyk, Peter W. 1994. Do infants use stress as a cue in segmenting fluent speech? In Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (vol. 19 (2), pp. 415–26). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ninio, Anat 1999. Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26, 619–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishimura, Miwa 1986. Intrasentential code-switching: the case of language assignment. In Vaid, Jyotnsa, (ed.) Language Processing in Bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and Neuropsychological Perspective (pp. 123–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nishimura, Miwa and Yoon, Keumsil Kim 1998. Head directionality and intrasentential code-switching: a study of Japanese Canadian and Korean Americans' bilingual speech. In Silva, David (ed.). Japanese/Korean Linguistics 8 (pp. 121–30). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Nittrouer, Susan 1999. Do temporal processing deficits cause phonological processing problems?Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 925–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nooteboom, Sieb G. 1983. Is speech production controlled by speech perception? In Broecke, Marcel, Heuven, Vincent and Zonneveld, Wim (eds.), Sound Structures: Studies for Antonie Cohen (pp. 183–94). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Nordstroem, P. E. and Lindblom, Björn 1975. A normalization procedure for vowel formant data. Paper 212 at the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences in Leeds.
Notier, Jacomine 1989. Dutch and Moroccan Arabic in Contact: Code-switching among Moroccans in the Netherlands. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
O'Grady, William 1980. Interpretative rules and to adjunction. In Jensen, John T. (ed.), NELS X, Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa. University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
O'Grady, William 1993. Functional categories and maturation: data from Korean. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics V (pp. 96–111).
O'Grady, William 1997. Syntactic Development. The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, William, Cho, Sookeun, Song, Min Sun and Lee, Miseon 1996. The acquisition of relative clauses by Korean-English bilinguals. Unpublished manuscript, Linguistics Department, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
O'Grady, William and Lee, Miseon 2001. The isomorphic mapping hypothesis: evidence from Korean. Brain and Cognition, 46, 226–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Grady, William and Lee, Miseon 2005. A mapping theory of agrammatic comprehension deficits. Brain and Language, 92, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Grady, William, Nakamura, Michiko and Ito, Yasuko (2008). Want-to contraction in second language acquisition: an emergentist approach. Lingua, 118 (4), 478–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, Janet Sae, Au, Terry Kit-fong and Jun, Sun-Ah 2002. Benefits of childhood language experience for adult L2-learners' phonology. In Skarabela, Barbora, Fish, Sarah and Do, Anna H.-J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (vol. 2, pp. 464–72). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Oh, Janet Sae, Jun, Sun-Ah, Knightly, Leah M. and Au, Terry Kit-fong 2003. Holding on to childhood language memory. Cognition, 86, B53–B64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orden, Guy C. 1987. A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound and reading. Memory and Cognition, 15, 181–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orden, Guy C., Johnston, James C. and Hale, Benita L. 1988. Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sounds to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371–85.Google Scholar
Osaka, Mariko and Osaka, Naoyuki 1994. Capacity related to reading measurement with the Japanese version of reading span test. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 65, 339–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osterhout, Lee 1994. Event-related brain potentials as tools for comprehending language comprehension. In Clifton, Charles, Frazier, Lyn and Rayner, Keith (eds.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing (pp. 15–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Osterhout, Lee and Holcomb, Phillip 1995. Event-related potentials and language comprehension. In Rugg, Michael D. and Coles, Michael G. H. (eds.) Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-related Brain Potentials and Cognition (pp. 175–215). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osterhout, Lee, McLaughlin, Judith and Bersick, Michael 1997. Event-related brain potentials and human language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 203–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osterhout, Lee and Nicol, Janet 1999. On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 283–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otani, Kazuyo and Whitman, John 1991. V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 345–58.Google Scholar
Otsu, Yukio 1981. Universal grammar and syntactic development in children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. MIT.
Owens, Robert E. 2005. Language Development: an Introduction. 6th edn. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Oyama, Susan 1976. A sensitive period for the acquisition of a non-native phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, Susan 1978. The sensitive period and comprehension of speech. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 16, 1–16.Google Scholar
Oyama, Susan 1979. The concept of the sensitive period in developmental studies. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 25, 83–103.Google Scholar
Paap, Kenneth R., Newsome, Sandra L., McDonald, James E. and Schvaneveldt, Roger W. 1982. An activation and verification model for letter and word recognition. Psychological Review, 89, 573–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padden, Carol and Ramsey, Claire 2000. American Sign Language and reading ability in deaf children. In Chamberlain, Morford and Mayberry, Language Acquisition By Eye (pp. 165–89).
Pae, Soyeong 1993. Early vocabulary in Korean: are nouns easier to learn than verbs? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.
Pae, Soyeong 1997. A study on the acquisition of grammatical morphemes by Korean children. Korean Journal of Communication Disorders, 2, 27–42.Google Scholar
Pak, Young-soo 1998. English sounds and the degree of their acquiring difficulty. Studies in Modern Grammar, 13, 79–106.Google Scholar
Paliwal, Kuldip K., Lindsay, D. and Ainsworth, W. A. 1983. Correlation between production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 77–83.Google Scholar
Pallier, Christophe, Dehaene, Stanislas, Poline, Jean-Baptiste, LeBihan, Denis, Argenti, Anne-Marie, Dupoux, Emmanuel and Mehler, Jacques 2003. Brain imaging of language plasticity in adopted adults: can a second language replace the first?Cerebral Cortex, 13, 155–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pammer, Kristen and Wheatley, Christopher 2001. Isolating the M(y)-cell response in dyslexia using the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vision Research, 41, 2139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna and Musolino, Julien 2003. Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86, 253–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, Johanne, Nicoladis, Elena and Genesee, Fred 2000. Early emergence of structural constraints on code-mixing: evidence from French-English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition (Special Issue: Syntactic Aspects of Bilingual Acquisition), 3 (3), 245–61.Google Scholar
Park, ChangHo 1996. Processing unit of Hangul syllable: a repetition effect study [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 8, 189–206.Google Scholar
Park, ChangHo 2001. A study of processing unit of Hangul syllable using attention tasks [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 13, 213–33.Google Scholar
Park, ChangHo 2006. The influence of perceptual grouping of letters on the perception of Hangul syllable blocks: using syllable usableness judgment task [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 173–85.Google Scholar
Park, Hee-Heon 1998. Acquisition of negation in Korean. Korean Linguistics: Journal of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics, 9, 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, HyeJin and Pae, Soyeong 2003. Early expressive vocabulary development of Korean children with hearing impairment [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Communicative Disorders, 8 (1), 66–81.Google Scholar
Park, Jun and Lee, Dae-hyun 2005. Vision-based finger recognition for Korean Sign Language. Journal of Korea Multimedia Society, 8, 768–75.Google Scholar
Park, Jun and Lee, Dae-hyun 1990. Korean/English intrasentential code-switching: matrix language assignment and linguistic constraints. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Park, Jun-Eon 1990. Korean/English intrasentential code-switching: matrix language assignment and linguistic constraints. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (6), 2004A. [International Standard Serial No.: 0419–4209 (Part A); 0419–4217 (Part B); 1042–7279 (Part C)].Google Scholar
Park, Ju Yeol 1989. A study on reading ability of hearing-impaired children [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Dankook University, Korea.
Park, Kabyong 1990. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Baek, Eung-J. (ed.), Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Korean Linguistics (pp. 387–98). Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Park, Kabyong 1992. Light verb constructions in Korean and Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Park, Kwonsaeng 1993. Mental code involved in Hangul word processing [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 5, 40–55.Google Scholar
Park, Kwonsaeng 1995. Visual processes involved in Hangul word recognition [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 7, 61–78.Google Scholar
Park, Kwonsaeng 1997. The role of phonology in access to semantic information [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 9, 131–52.Google Scholar
Park, Kwonsaeng 2001. Perception, knowledge, and young Korean children's word-learning. Journal of Cognitive Science, 2, 13–22.Google Scholar
Park, Mae-Ran 1990. Conflict avoidance in social interaction: a sociolinguistic comparison of the Korean and Japanese honorific systems. In Hoji, Hajime (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 1 (pp. 111–28). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Park, Mee-Jeong 2003. The meaning of Korean prosodic boundary tones. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
Park, Myung-Kwan 1998. Negation and the placement of verb in Korean. Language Research, 34, 709–36.Google Scholar
Park, Sang Doh 2005. Parameters of passive constructions in English and Korean. Doctoral dissertation, Ithaca: Cornell University.
Park, SooJin and Jung, Woo Hyun 2007. Word superiority effect based on the Hangul font types [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 18, 15–34.Google Scholar
Park, Tae-Jin 1990. Phonological encoding when reading Chinese-character-words in Korean [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 2, 90–102.Google Scholar
Park, Tae-Jin 1997. Form-specific representation: hemispheric asymmetry in Korean orthographic priming [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 9, 153–65.Google Scholar
Park, Tae-Jin, Lee, Jae-Ho and Kim, Soyoung 2003. The effect of predictability for on-line causal inference [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15. 39–58.Google Scholar
Patkowski, Mark S. 1980. The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30, 449–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patkowski, Mark S. 1990. Age and accent in a second language: a reply to James Emil Flege. Applied Linguistics, 11, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patkowski, Mark S. 1994. The critical age hypothesis and interlanguage phonology. In Yavas, Mehmet (ed.) First and Second Language Phonology (pp. 205–21). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Paul, Peter V. and Quigley, Stephen P. 1990. Education and Deafness. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Penfield, Wilder 1959. Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Penfield, Wilder 1963. The Second Career, with Other Essays and Addresses. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Jennifer 1988. Word-internal code-switching constraints in a bilingual child's grammar. Linguistics, 26, 479–93.Google Scholar
Petronio, Karen and Lillo-Martin, Diane 1997. Wh-movement and the position of the Spec-CP: evidence from American Sign Language. Language, 73, 18–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petten, Cyma 1995. Words and sentences: Event-related brain potential measures. Psychophysiology, 32, 511–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petten, Cyma and Luka, Barbara 2006. Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies. Brain and Language, 97, 279–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaff, Carol 1979. Constraint on language mixing: intrasentential code-switching and borrowing in Spanish/English. Language, 55, 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, William 1991. Quantification over events in early universal quantification. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
Philip, William 1992. Event quantification and the symmetrical interpretation of universal quantifiers in child language. In Fintel, Kai and Rullman, Hotze. (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics: Semantics Issues. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Philip, William 1995. Event quantification in the acquisition of universal quantification. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Philip, William and Aurelio, Sabina 1991. Quantifier spreading: pilot study of preschoolers' every. In Maxfield, Thomas and Plunkett, Bernadette (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers: Papers in the Acquisition of WH (pp. 267–82). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Philip, William and Takahashi, Mari 1991. Quantifier spreading in the acquisition of every. In Maxfield, Thomas and Plunkett, Bernadette (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers: Papers in the Acquisition of WH (pp. 283–301). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Philip, William and Verrips, Maaike 1994. Dutch preschoolers' elke. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.
Phinney, Jean S., Romero, Irma, Nava, Monica and Huang, Dan 2001. The role of language, parents, and peers in ethnic identity among adolescents in immigrant families. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean 1954. The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean 1955. The Language and Thought of the Child. Cleveland, OH: Meridian Books, The World Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean and Inhelder, Barbara 1967. The Child's Conception of Space. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Pierce, Amy E. 1992. The acquisition of passives in Spanish and the question of A-chain maturation. Language Acquisition, 2, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. The phonetics and phonology of English intonation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. and Beckman, Mary E. 1988. Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. and Hirschberg, Julia 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, Philip, Morgan, Jerry and Pollack, Martha (eds.), Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pine, Julian M. and Lieven, Elena 1993. Reanalyzing rote-learned phrases: individual differences in the transition to multiword speech. Journal of Child Language, 20, 551–71.Google Scholar
Pine, Julian M., Lieven, Elena and Rowland, Caroline 1998. Comparing different models of the English verb category. Linguistics, 36, 807–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven 1984. Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven 1987. The bootstrapping problem in language acquisition. In MacWhinney, Brian (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp. 399–441). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven 1989. Learnability and Cognition: the Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven 1994. How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics? In Gleitman, Lila and Landau, Barbara (eds.), The Acquisition of the Lexicon (pp. 377–410). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer 1990. A grammar without functional categories: a syntactic study of early Swedish child language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 13, 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer 1992. Functional categories and early Swedish. In Meisel, Jurgen M. (ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition (pp. 63–82). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves 1989. Verb-movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, James R. 1983. Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 516–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poplack, Shana 1980. Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en espanol: toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics, 18, 581–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana 1988. Contrasting patterns in code-switching in two communities. In Heller, Monica (ed.), Codeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp. 215–44). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul 1969. On so-called pronouns in English. In Reibel, David and Schane, Stanford (eds.) Modern Studies in English (pp. 201–23). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul and Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1978. Traces and the description of English complementizer contraction. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 1–29.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul and Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1982. The contraction debate. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 122–38.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul and Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1986. Misgovernment. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 104–10.Google Scholar
Pratt, Anne C. and Brady, Susan 1988. Relation of phonological awareness to reading disability in children and adults. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 319–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinzmetal, William, Treiman, Rebecca and Rho, Susan 1986. How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 461–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, Bradley Lo 1991. Head position and parsing ambiguity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana 1993. Long-distance reflexives: movement-to-Infl versus relativized SUBJECT. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 755–72.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1997. The morphological nature of English to-contraction. Language, 73, 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Postal, Paul 1979. On an inadequate defense of trace theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 689–706.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pye, Clifton 1990. The acquisition of ergative languages. Linguistics, 28, 1291–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, Paul C. 1994. The categorization of above and below spatial relations by young infants. Child Development, 65, 58–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rack, John P., Snowling, Margaret J. and Olson, Richard 1992. The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: a review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew 1990. Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rakic, Pasko, Bourgeois, Jean-Pierre, Eckenhoff, Maryellen F., Zecevic, Nada and Goldman-Rakic, Patricia S. 1986. Isochronic overproduction of synapses in diverse regions of the primate cerebral cortex. Science, 232, 232–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramus, Franck, Nespor, Marina and Mehler, Jacques 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, Janet 1987. Indirect Positive Evidence: Overturning Overgeneralizations in Language Acquisition. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Randall, Janet 1992. The catapult hypothesis: an approach to unlearning. In Weissenborn, Jürgen, Goodluck, Helen and Roeper, Thomas (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition: Continuity and Change in Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rappaport, Malka and Levin, Beth 1985. A case study in lexical analysis: the locative alternation. Unpublished manuscript, MIT Center for Cognitive Science.
Rappaport, Malka and Levin, Beth 1988. What to do with theta-roles. In Winkins, Wendy (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 21: Thematic Relations (pp. 7–36). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Mark A. 1989. Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 270–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reicher, Gerald M. 1969. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispoli, Matthew 1987. The acquisition of the transitive and intransitive action verb categories in Japanese. First Language, 8, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispoli, Matthew 1989. Encounters with Japanese verbs: caregiver sentences and the categorization of transitive and intransitive action verbs. First Language, 9, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispoli, Matthew 1991a. The mosaic acquisition of grammatical relations. Journal of Child Language, 18, 517–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rispoli, Matthew 1991b. The acquisition of verb subcategorization in a functionalist framework. First Language, 11, 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispoli, Matthew 1994. Pronoun case overextentions and paradigm building. Journal of Child Language, 21, 157–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rispoli, Matthew 1995. Missing arguments and the acquisition of predicate meanings. In Tomasello, Michael and Merriman, William E. (eds.), Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs (pp. 331–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth and Rosen, Sara T. 2004. Delimiting events in syntax. In Butt, Miriam and Geuder, Wilhelm (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Syntactic Constraints (pp. 135–64). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi 2000. Remarks on early null subjects. In Friedemann, Marc-Ariel and Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), The Acquisition of Syntax. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas 1999. Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeper, Thomas 2002. Multiple grammars, feature-attraction, pied-piping, and the question: is AGR inside TP? Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Roeper, Thomas and Villiers, Jill 1991. The emergence of bound variable structures. In Maxfield, Thomas and Plunkett, Bernadette (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers: Papers in the Acquisition of WH (pp. 225–65). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas and Matthei, Edward 1974. On the acquisition of all and some. In Proceedings of the Stanford Child Language Conference.
Rosen, S. and Manganari, E. 2001. Is there a relationship between speech and nonspeech auditory processing in children with dyslexia?Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 720–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, Joel 1978. The syntax of phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Rösler, Frank, Pütz, Peter, Friederici, Angela D. and Hahne, Anja 1993. Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 345–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusted, Jennifer 1989. Developmental differences in the influence of orthographic and phonological information in visual word recognition. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. John, Mark F. and Gernsbacher, Morton Ann 1998. Learning and losing syntax: practice makes perfect and frequency builds fortitude. In Healy, Alice F. and Bourne, Lyle E. (eds.), Foreign Language Learning: Psycholinguistic Studies on Training and Retention (pp. 231–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru and Murasugi, Keiko 1990. N'-deletion in Japanese: a preliminary study. In Hoji, Hajime (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 1. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sakuma, Naoko, Sasanuma, Sumiko, Tatsumi, Itaru F. and Masaki, Shinobu 1998. Orthography and phonology in reading Japanese Kanji words: evidence from the semantic decision task with homophones. Memory and Cognition, 26, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, Geoffrey 1985. Writing systems: a linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Sanches, Mary 1977. Language acquisition and language change: Japanese numeral classifiers. In Sanches, Mary and Blount, Ben (eds.), Socio-cultural Dimensions of Language Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J. and Garrod, Simon C. 1981. Understanding Written Language: Explorations of Comprehension Beyond the Sentence. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J. and Garrod, Simon C. 1994. Selective processing in text understanding. In Gernsbacher, Morton A. (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 699–720). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David and Poplack, Shana 1981. A formal grammar of code-switching. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication, 14 (1), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sano, Tetsuya 2000. Issues on the unaccusatives and passives in the acquisition of Japanese. In Proceedings of the Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (vol. 1, pp. 1–21).Google Scholar
Schachter, Jacqueline 1990. On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 6, 94–124.Google Scholar
Schachter, Jacqueline 1996. Maturation and universal grammar. In Ritchie, William C. and Bhatia, Tej K. (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 159–93). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Jeannette and Matthewson, Lisa 2005. Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article system. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23 (1), 53–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Amy J. 1997. Prosodic parsing: the role of prosody in sentence comprehension. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Schafer, Amy J., Carlson, Katy, Clifton, Charles, and Frazier, Lyn 2000. Focus and the interpretation of pitch accent: disambiguating embedded questions. Language and Speech, 43 (1), 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Amy J. and Jun, Sun-Ah 2000. Prosody in spoken language processing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Korea, 19, No.1(s), 7–10.Google Scholar
Schafer, Amy J. and Jun, Sun-Ah 2002. Effects of accentual phrasing on adjective interpretation in Korean. In Nakayama, Mineharu (ed.), East Asian Language Processing (pp. 223–55). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Schafer, Amy J., Speer, Shari R., Warren, Paul and White, S. David 2000. Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 169–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schafer, Robin and Villiers, Jill 2000. Imagining articles: what a and the can tell us about the emergence of DP. In Howell, S. Catherine, Fish, Sarah A. and Keith-Lucas, Thea (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th BUCLD. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C. and Abelson, Robert P. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scharf, Bertram 1970. Critical bands, In Tobias, Jerry V. (ed.), Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory (vol. I, pp. 157–202). New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi 1985. The acquisition of Kaluli. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (pp. 525–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Itzchak N. 1982. Steps to Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schulte-Korne, Gerd, Deimel, Wolfgang, Bartling, Jürgen and Remschmidt, Helmut 1998. Auditory processing and dyslexia: evidence for a specific speech processing deficit. Neuroreport, 9, 337–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, Bonnie D. 2003. Child L2-acquisition: paving the way. In Beachley, Barbara, Brown, Amanda and Conlin, Frances (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th BUCLD (pp. 26–50). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bonnie D. and Sprouse, Rex A. 1994. Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: a longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In Hoekstra, Teun and Schwartz, Bonnie D. (eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar: Papers in Honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW Workshops (pp. 317–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bonnie D. and Sprouse, Rex A. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Myrna F., Linebarger, Marcia C., Saffran, Eleanor M. and Pate, Debra S. 1987. Syntactic transparency and sentence interpretation in aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Myrna F., Saffran, Eleanor M. and Marin, Oscar S. 1980. The word order problem in agrammatism: comprehension. Brain and Language, 10, 249–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scotton, Carol Myers and Ury, William 1977. Bilingual strategies: the social function of code-switching. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 13, 5–20.Google Scholar
Scovel, Thomas 1988. A Time to Speak: a Psycholinguistic Inquiry into the Critical Period for Human Speech. New York: Newbury House/Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, Mark S. 1985. The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seliger, Herbert 1978. Implications of a multiple critical periods hypothesis for second language learning. In Ritchie, William C. (ed.), Second Language Acquisition Research (pp. 11–20). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth 1984. Phonology and Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371–405.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 445–79.Google Scholar
Shafiullah, Mohammed and Monsell, Stephen 1999. The cost of switching between Kanji and Kana while reading Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14 (5/6), 567–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, David 1995. Phonological reading and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shatz, Marilyn and Wilcox, Sharon 1991. Constraints on the acquisition of English modals. In Gelman, Susan and Byrnes, James (eds.), Perspectives on Language and Thought: Interrelations in Development (pp. 319–53). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Andrew 1974. On the role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Di and Forster, Kenneth I. 1999. Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14 (5/6), 429–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shim, Jinyoung 1994. The sensitive period for second-language acquisition: an experimental study of age-effects on Universal Grammar and language transfer. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Shimoyama, Junko 1999. Internally headed relative clauses in Japanese and E-type anaphora. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, 147–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Sarah 2002. Differentiating language contact phenomena: evidence from Korean-English bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Sarah 2003. The role of parents' knowledge about bilingualism in the transmission of heritage languages. Heritage Language Journal, 1, 17–19.Google Scholar
Shin, Sarah and Milroy, Lesley 1999. Bilingual language acquisition by Korean school children in New York City. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Yasuhiro and Andersen, Roger W. 1995. The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: a prototype account. Language, 71, 743–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, David James (ed.) 1998. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 8. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Simpson, Greg B. 1994. Context and the processing of ambiguous words. In Gernsbacher, Morton A. (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 359–74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Greg B. and Kang, Hyewon 1994. The flexible use of phonological information in word recognition in Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 319–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Greg B. and Kang, Hyewon 2004. Syllable processing in alphabetic Korean. Reading and Writing: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 137–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1966. The acquisition of Russian as a native language. In Smith, Frank and Miller, George (eds.), The Genesis of Language: a Psycholinguistic Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, Charles A. and Slobin, Dan I. (eds.), Studies of Child Language Development (pp. 175–208). New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1977. Language change in childhood and history. In McNamara, John T. (ed.), Language Learning and Thought. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1981. The origins of grammatical encodings of events. In Deutsch, Werner (ed.), The Child's Construction of Language (pp. 185–200). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1985. Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Vol. II: Theoretical Issues. (pp. 1157–6). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1991. Aphasia in Turkish: speech production in Broca's and Wernicke's patients. Brain and Language, 41, 149–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slobin, Dan I. 1997. The origins of grammaticizable notions: beyond the individual mind. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Vol. V: Expanding the Contexts (pp. 265–323). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 2001. Form-function relations: how do children find out what they are? In Bowerman, Melissa and Levinson, Stephen C. (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development (pp. 406–49). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 2003. Language and thought online: consequences of linguistic relativity. In Gentner, Dedre and Glodin-Meadow, Susan (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (pp. 157–92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. and Bever, Thomas G. 1982. Children use canonical sentence schemas: a crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, Neil 2004. Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neil 2005. Language, Frogs and Savants: More Linguistic Problems, Puzzles and Polemics. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Stanley D. and Mimica, Ivo 1984. Agrammatism in a case-inflected language: comprehension of agent-object relations. Brain and Language, 21, 274–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, Catherine 1999. Social perspectives on the emergence of language. In MacWhinney, Brian (ed.), The Emergence of Language (pp. 250–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Snow, Catherine and Hoefnagel-Hohle, Marian 1978. The critical period for language acquisition: evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49, 1114–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowling, Margaret, J. 2000. Dyslexia. Oxford: Blackwell.Google ScholarPubMed
Snyder, William 2002. Parameters: the view from child language. In Otsu, Yukio (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Google Scholar
Snyder, William, Hyams, Nina and Crisma, Paola 1995. Romance auxiliary selection with reflexive clitics: evidence for early knowledge of unaccusativity. In Clark, Eve (ed.) The Proceedings of the 26th Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min 1981. Power and solidarity in the Korean language. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication, 14 (3), 431–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min 1996. The Korean Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min (ed.) 1997. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 6. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min 1999. The Korean Language, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Keun-Won 1995. Negative polarity items, scope and economy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Soja, Nancy N., Carey, Susan and Spelke, Elizabeth 1991. Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Son, Hye Min 2004. Comprehension of reversible passive sentences in Korean-speaking adults with Broca's aphasia [in Korean]. Master's thesis, Dankook University, Korea.
Son, Hye Min and Hwang, Mina 2005. Comprehension of passive sentences in Korean-speaking adults with Broca's aphasia. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Diego, CA.
Son, Minjeong 2005. Atypical argument structure of HI passive in Korean. In Proceedings of 29th Penn Linguistic Colloquium.
Song, Seok Choong 1982. On interpreting the scope of negation in Korean. Language Research, 18 (1), 197–215.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret 2003. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua, 114 (3), 255–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speer, Shari R., Warren, Paul, Schafer, Amy J., White, S. David, and Kneale, Jenny 1999. Situational constraints on the prosodic resolution of syntactic ambiguity. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1301–4). San Francisco, August 1–7, 1999.Google Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth 1990. Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14, 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth and Hespos, Susan 2002. Conceptual development in infancy: the case of containment. In Stein, Nancy, Bauer, Patricia and Rabinowitz, Mitchell (eds.), Representation, Memory, and Development: Essays in Honor of Jean Mandler (pp. 223–46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stanners, Robert F., Neiser, James J., Hernon, William P. and Hall, Roger 1979. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E. and West, Richard F. 1981. The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition: tests of a two-process theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 658–72.Google Scholar
Stein, John 2001. The sensory basis of reading problems. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 509–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, John and Fowler, Sarah 1981. Visual dyslexia. Trends in Neurosciences, 4, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, John and Walsh, Vincent 1997. To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 147–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph and MacWhinney, Brian 1986. Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition, 14, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stepany, Ursula 1986. Modality. In Fletcher, Paul and Garman, Michael (eds.), Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1989. On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 3–45.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1998. Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stoll, Sabine 1998. The role of Aktionsart in the acquisition of Russian aspect. First Language, 18, 351–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Jennifer A. and Feldman, Laurie B. 1995. The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In Feldman, Laurie B. (ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing (pp. 183–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Strong, Michael and Prinz, Philip 2000. Is American Sign Language skill related to English literacy? In Chamberlain, Morford and Mayberry, Language Acquisition By Eye (pp. 131–41).Google Scholar
Suh, Chang-Won, Lee, Jae-Ho and Jang, Yoon-Hee. 1997. Integrative inference processing between explicit text information and implicit knowledge: pronoun resolution and script knowledge [in Korean]. The Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 9, 139–65.Google Scholar
Suk, Dong Il 1989. Linguistic analysis of Korean sign language [in Korean]. Doctoral dissertation, Taegu University, Korea.
Suh, Jin-Hee 1989. Scope interaction in negation. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III (pp. 527–36). Department of Linguistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Suh, Sungki 1994. The syntax of Korean and its implications for parsing theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
Supalla, Samuel J. 1990. Segmentation of manually coded English: problems in the mapping of English in the visual/gestual mode. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Supalla, Samuel J. 1991. Manually coded English: the modality question in signed language development. In Siple, Patricia and Fischer, Susan D. (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (pp. 85–109). The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Yoshiko 1985. The acquisition of Japanese pronouns. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Calgary.
Swinney, David A. 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, David A. 1991. The resolution of indeterminacy during language comprehension: perspectives on modularity in lexical, structural and pragmatic processing. In Simpson, Greg (ed.), Understanding Word and Sentence (pp. 367–86). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Press.Google Scholar
Syrdal, Ann K. and Gopal, H. S. 1986. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. JASA, 79 (4), 1086–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabossi, Patrizia 1988. Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 324–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabossi, Patrizia and Laghi, Linda 1992. Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English. Memory and Cognition, 20, 303–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taft, Marcus 1981. Prefixed stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 289–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, Marcus 1991. Reading and the Mental Lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Taft, Marcus 1992. The body of the boss: subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1004–14.Google Scholar
Taft, Marcus 1994. Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, Marcus and Forster, Kenneth I. 1975. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, Marcus and Forster, Kenneth I. 1976. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, Marcus and Zhu, X. 1995. The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: a Chinese study. In Feldman, Laurie (ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tahta, S., Wood, M. and Lowenthal, K. 1981a. Age changes in the ability to replicate foreign pronunciation and intonation. Language and Speech, 24 (4), 363–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahta, S., Wood, M. and Lowenthal, K. 1981b. Foreign accents: Factors relating to transfer of accent from the first language to a second language. Language and Speech, 24 (3) 265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takano, Yuji 1998. Object shift and scrambling. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 817–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takazawa, Satoru, Takahashi, Nobuaki, Nakagome, Kazayuki, Kanno, Osamu, Hagiwara, Hiroko, Nakajima, Heizo, Itoh, Kenji and Koshida, Ichiro 2002. Early components of event-related potentials related to semantic and syntactic processes in the Japanese language. Brain Topography, 14, 169–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talcott, Joel, B. and Witton, Caroline 2002. A sensory to linguistic approach to the development of normal and dysfunctional reading skills. In Witruk, Evelin, Friederici, Angela D. and Lachmann, Thomas (eds.), Basic Functions of Language, Reading, and Reading Disability (pp. 213–40). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Tallal, Paula 1980. Auditory temporal perception, phonics and the reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9, 182–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tallal, Paula 2000. Experimental studies of language learning impairments: from research to remediation. In Bishop, Dorothy V. M. and Leonard, Lawrence B. (eds.), Speech and Language Impairments in Children: Causes, Characteristics, Intervention and Outcome (pp. 131–55). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description (vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, pp. 57–149). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, Michael K. and Trueswell, John C. 1995. Sentence comprehension. In Miller, Joanne L. and Eimas, Peter D. (eds.) Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Speech, Language, and Communication (vol. XI, pp. 217–62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tanz, Christine 1974. Cognitive principles underlying children's errors in pronominal case-marking. Journal of Child Language, 1, 271–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardif, Twila, Gelman, Susan A. and Xu, Fan 1999. Putting the ‘Noun Bias’ in context: a comparison of English and Mandarin. Child Development, 70, 620–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavakolian, Susan 1981. The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses. In Tavakolian, Susan, (ed.), Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Donald M. 1987. Social psychological barriers to effective childhood bilingualism. In Homel, Peter, Palij, Michael and Aaronson, Doris (eds.), Childhood Bilingualism: Aspects of Linguistic, Cognitive, and Social Development (pp. 183–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Taylor, Insup 1980. The Korean writing system: an alphabet? A syllabary? A logography? In Kolers, Paul, Wrolstad, Merald E. and Bouma, Herman (eds.), Processing of Visual Language (vol. II, pp. 67–82). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Insup and Taylor, M. Martin 1983. Alphabetic syllabary: Korean Hangul. In Taylor, Insup and Taylor, M. Martin (eds.), The Psychology of Reading (pp. 77–91). New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Insup and Taylor, M. Martin 1995. Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean, and Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tees, Richard C. and Werker, Janet F. 1984. Perceptual flexibility: maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 579–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terzi, Arhonto and Wexler, Kenneth 2002. A-chains and S-homophones in children's grammar: evidence from Greek passives. In Proceedings of NELS 32.
Theakston, Anna, Lieven, Elena, Pine, Julian and Rowland, Caroline 1992. The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. Journal of Child Language, 28, 127–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Margaret 1989. The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 335–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Cynthia K., Lange, K. L., Schneider, Sandra L. and Shapiro, Lewis P. 1997. Agrammatic and non-brain-damaged subjects' verb and verb argument structure production. Aphasiology, 11, 473–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael 1992. First Verbs: a Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael 1998. The return of constructions. Journal of Child Language, 25, 431–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael and Brooks, Patricia 1998. Young children's earliest transitive and intransitive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 379–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael and Brooks, Patricia 1999. Early syntactic development. In Barrett, Martyn (ed.), The Development of Language. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Traunmüller, Hartmut 1988. Paralinguistic variation and invariance in the characteristic frequencies of vowels. Phonetica, 45, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treiman, Rebecca, Mullennix, John, Bijeljac-Babic, Ranka and Richmond-Welty, Ellen D. 1995. The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tse, Lucy 2001. Heritage language literacy: a study of US biliterates. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 14, 256–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, Vivian and Fuligni, Andrew J. 2000. Parent-adolescent language use and relationships among immigrant families with East Asian, Filipino, and Latin American backgrounds. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuaycharoen, Pintip 1984. Developmental strategies in the acquisition of numeral classifiers in Thai. In Selected Papers from the International Symposium on Language and Linguistics at Chiang Mai University (pp. 203–22). Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar
Turner, Marilyn L. and Engle, Randall W. 1989. Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, Nobuko and Imai, Mutsumi 1996. A study on the acquisition of numeral classifiers among young children: the development of human-animal categories and generation of the rule of classifiers applying. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 44 (2), 126–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, Sharon 2004. Child L1, child L2, and adult L2 acquisition: differences and similarities. In Brugos, Alejna, Micciulla, Linnea and Smith, Christine E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th BUCLD (pp. 633–44). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Unsworth, Sharon 2005. Child L2, adult L2, child L1: differences and similarities: a study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.
Uriagereka, Juan 1998. Rhyme and Reason: an Introduction to Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Urushibara, Saeko 1991. Ey/eykey: a postposition or a case marker. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics IV (pp. 421–32).
,US Bureau of the Census 2000. URL: www.census.gov.
Vainikka, Anne and Young-Scholten, Martha 1996. Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 12 (1), 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valian, Virginia 1991. Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition, 40, 21–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1992. An overview of ergative phenomena and their implications for language acquisition. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (vol. III, pp. 15–38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. and Jones, Kimberly (eds.) 2006. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 14. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Vellutino, Frank. R. and Scanlon, Donna M. 1987. Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321–63.Google Scholar
Veltman, Calvin 1983. Language Shift in the United States. New York: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venditti, Jeniffer J., Jun, Sun-Ah and Beckman, Mary E. 1996. Prosodic cues to syntactic and other linguistic structures in Japanese, Korean, and English. In Morgan, James L. and Demuth, Katherine (eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition, (pp. 287–311). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vihman, Marilyn M. 1996. Phonological Development: the Origins of Language in the Child. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vihman, Marilyn M., DePaolis, Rory A. and Davis, Barbara L. 1998. Is there a ‘Trochaic Bias’ in early word learning? Evidence from infant production in English and French. Child Development, 69 (4), 935–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voorst, Jan 1988. Event Structure. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldman, Fern Rogow, Singh, Sadanand and Hayden, Mary Ellen 1978. A comparison of speech-sound production and discrimination in children with functional articulation disorders. Language and Speech, 21, 205–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walley, Amanda C., Metsala, Jamie L. and Garlock, Victoria M. 2003. Spoken vocabulary growth: its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing, 16, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Hahn-Sok 1990. Toward a description of the organization of Korean speech levels. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 82, 25–39.Google Scholar
Warden, David A. 1974. An experimental investigation into the child's developing use of definite and indefinite referential speech. Doctoral dissertation, University of London.
Warden, David A. 1976. The influence of contexts on children's use of identifying expressions and references. British Journal of Psychology, 67 (1), 101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Paul, Grabe, Esther and Nolan, Francis 1995. Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 457–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Tessa and Gibson, Edward 2002. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition, 85, 79–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, Tessa and Gibson, Edward 2005. Effects of NP type in reading cleft sentences in English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 751–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Akira 1992. Subjacency and s-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, 255–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Betty U., Sullivan, Patricia M., Moeller, Mary P. and Jensen, Janet K. 1982. Nonverbal intelligence and English language ability in deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, Li 1994. Three Generations, Two Languages, One Family. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Weinrich, Uriel 1953. Languages in Contact. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wells, Gordon 1979. Learning and using the auxiliary verb in English. In Lee, V. (ed.), Language Development (pp. 250–70). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wells, Gordon 1985. Language Development in the Pre-School Years. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werker, Janet and Lalonde, Chris E. 1988. Cross-language speech perception: initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 24, 672–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth 1992. Optional infinitives, head movement and the theory of derivation in child grammar. In Occasional Papers (vol. 45). Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth 1994. Optional infinitives, head movement, and the economy of derivations. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.), Verb Movement (pp. 305–50). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth 1995. Feature-interpretability and optionality in early child grammar. Paper presented at the Workshop on Optionality. University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wexler, Kenneth 1996. The development of inflection in biologically based theory of language acquisition. In Rice, Mabel L. (ed.), Toward a Genetics of Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth 1998. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth 2003. Maximal trouble. Paper presented at the CUNY Human Sentence Processing Conference, MIT. [Published as ‘Maximal trouble: cues don't explain learning’, in Gibson, Edward and Perlmutter, Neal (eds.), The Processing and Acquisition of Reference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth and Manzini, Rita M. 1987. Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In Roeper, Thomas and Williams, Edwin (eds.), Parameter Setting. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Whaley, C. P. 1978. Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 143–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia and Genesee, Fred 1996. How native is near native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 233–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, John B. 2000. Right dislocation in English and Japanese. In Takami, Ken-ichi, Kamio, Akio, and Whitman, John (eds.), Syntactic and Functional Explorations: A Festschrift for Susumu Kuno (pp. 445–70). Tokyo: Kuroshio Press.Google Scholar
Whitman, John B., Lee, Kwee-Ock and Lust, Barbara 1991. Continuity of the principles of universal grammar in first language acquisition: the issue of functional categories. In NELS 21 (pp. 383–97). Amherst: GSLA.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (edited by Carroll, John B.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2000. The use of ASL to support the development of English and literacy. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 81–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, Lee 1980. Phonetic variation as a function of second-language learning. In Yeni-Komshian, Grace H., Kavanagh, James F. and Ferguson, Charles A. (eds.), Child Phonology (vol. II: Perception, pp. 185–215). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Winsler, Adam, Díaz, Rafael, Espinosa, Linda and Rodríguez, James 1999. When learning a second language does not mean losing the first: bilingual language development in low-income, Spanish-speaking children attending bilingual preschool. Child Development, 70, 349–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Won, Seong-Ok 2002. Sign language acquisition and language education in deaf children [in Korean]. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation Science, 41, 77–100.Google Scholar
Wright, Beverley A., Lombardino, Linda J., King, Wayne M., Puranik, Cyncia S., Leonard, Christina M. and Merzenich, Michael M. 1997. Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children. Nature, 387, 176–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, J. T., Chou, T. L. and Liu, I. M. 1994. The locus of the character/word frequency effect. In Chang, H. W., Huang, J. T., Hue, C. W. and Tzeng, O. J. L. (eds.), Advances in the Study of Chinese Language Processing, Vol. I, pp. 31–58. Teipei: Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University.Google Scholar
Wydell, Taeko N., Patterson, Karalyn E. and Humphreys, Glyn W. 1993. Phonologically mediated access to meaning for Kanji: is a rows still a rose in Japanese Kanji?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 491–514.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Kasumi 2000. The acquisition of Japanese numeral classifiers. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Yamamoto, Kasumi and Keil, Frank 1996. The acquisition of Japanese numeral classifiers. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development V2.
Yang, Byunggon 1996. A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 245–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Byunggon 2002. Perception of English vowels by American and Korean speakers. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Sciences (pp. 306–9), Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles 2002. Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Chinlung L., Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randal and Wu, J. T. 2001. Crosslinguistic evidence on the processing of sentences with relative clauses. In Proceedings of CUNY 2001 Conference.
Yang, Dong-Whee 1973. Topicalization and relativization in Korean. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
Yang, Dong-Whee 1989. Korean Anaphora [in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Hankwuk Yenkwuwon.Google Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, Grace H., Flege, James E. and Liu, Serena 2000. Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3 (2), 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, Grace H., Robbins, Medina and Flege, James E. 2001. Effects of word class differences on L2 pronunciation accuracy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, Eun-Young 1994. NegP in Korean. In Grabois, Howard, Parkinson, David and Yeager, Debora (eds.), Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 12 (pp. 193–208). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Yi, Joonsuk and Jin, Youngsun 1998. Relative importance of factors affecting text preference (I) [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 9, 63–70.Google Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh 1993. On the role of frequency and internal structure in the processing kulca (syllable) [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 5, 26–39.Google Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh 1995. The internal structure of Kulca and its relation to syllable in Korean [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 7, 57–69.Google Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh 1998. The internal structure of Korean syllables: rhyme or body? [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 10, 67–83.Google Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh 1999a. Representation and processing of Hanja compound words [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Korean Society for Cognitive Science (pp. 73–9).
Yi, Kwangoh 1999b. Morphological processing in Korean word recognition [in Korean]. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Korean Society for Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 35–42).
Yi, Kwangoh 2003a. The effects of word type on word recognition in Korean [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 15, 479–98.Google Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh 2003b. The effect of Hanja proficiency on lexical processing of Korean [in Korean]. Journal of the Sungkok Academic and Cultural Foundation, 34, 459–508.Google Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh and Yi, Insen 1999. Morphological processing in Korean word recognition [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11, 77–91.Google Scholar
Yoo, Chang-Hwa and Lee, Jung-Mo 1989. Effects of the specific and general term referencing on instrument inference [in Korean]. The Korean Journal of Psychology, 8, 1–16.Google Scholar
Yoon, James Hye-Suk 1994. Korean verbal inflection and checking theory. In The Morphology-Syntax Connection, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (vol. 22, pp. 251–70). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Yoon, Jong-Yurl 1990. Korean syntax and generalized X'-theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Yoon, Keumsil Kim 1992. New perspective in intrasentential code-switching: a study of Korean-English switching. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 433–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Keumsil Kim 1996. A case study of fluent Korean-English bilingual speakers: group membership and code choices. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 396–405.Google Scholar
Yu, Dong-Jun 1989. Korean classifiers and numeralization [in Korean]. Kwuke-Kwukmwunhak (The Korean Language and Literature), 89. Kwuke-kwukmwunhakhoy (The Society of Korean Language and Literature).Google Scholar
Yum, June-Ock 1987. Korean philosophy and communication. In Kincaid, Larry D. (ed.), Communication Theory: Eastern and Western Perspectives (pp. 71–86). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zentella, Ana Celia 1997. Growing Up Bilingual. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zheler, Annette M. and Brewer, William F. 1982. Sequence and principles in article system use: an examination of a, the, and null acquisition. Child Development, 53, 1268–74.Google Scholar
Zhou, Xiaolin, Marslen-Wilson, William, Taft, Marcus and Shu, Hwa 1999. Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 525–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zingeser, Louise B. and Berndt, Rita S. 1990. Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain and Language, 39, 14–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zoh, Myeong-han 1982a. A Study on Language Acquisition by Korean Children: Acquisition Model [in Korean]. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar
Zoh, Myeong-han 1982b. Language Acquisition of Korean Children: a Strategy Model [in Korean]. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar
Zoh, Myeong-han 1982c. Research on Korean Children's Language Strategies: Strategy Patterns [in Korean]. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar
Zoh, Myeong-han and Ahn, Jeung-Chan 2006. Active inferential processing during comprehension in less skilled readers. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 17, 75–102.Google Scholar
Zubin, David A. 1979. Discourse function of morphology: the focus system in German. In Givón, Talmy, (ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax (vol. 12, pp. 469–504). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf A., Langston, Mark C., and Graesser, Arthur C. 1995. The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicker, Eberhard and Terhardt, Ernst 1980. Analytical expressions for critical-band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency. JASA, 68, 1523–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold and Pullum, Geoffrey 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English N'T. Language, 59, 502–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Chungmin Lee, Seoul National University, Greg B. Simpson, University of Kansas, Youngjin Kim, Ajou University, Republic of Korea
  • General editor Ping Li, Pennsylvania State University
  • Book: The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596865.047
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Chungmin Lee, Seoul National University, Greg B. Simpson, University of Kansas, Youngjin Kim, Ajou University, Republic of Korea
  • General editor Ping Li, Pennsylvania State University
  • Book: The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596865.047
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Chungmin Lee, Seoul National University, Greg B. Simpson, University of Kansas, Youngjin Kim, Ajou University, Republic of Korea
  • General editor Ping Li, Pennsylvania State University
  • Book: The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596865.047
Available formats
×