Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:37:27.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - TP53: A master gene in normal and tumor suppression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

Alan Wright
Affiliation:
MRC Human Genetics Unit, Edinburgh
Nicholas Hastie
Affiliation:
MRC Human Genetics Unit, Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Since its discovery over 25 years ago, the TP53 gene is one of the “stars” of molecular cancer research. The p53 protein acts as an all-round regulator of many interconnected functions associated with cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, DNA repair, differentiation, senescence and development. Activation of p53 prevents DNA replication and cell proliferation when cells are subjected to stress that may perturb genetic or genomic integrity. Thus, TP53 acts as a “master suppressor gene” by exerting simultaneous, many-fingered control of several components of the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Mutations in TP53 result in loss of these suppressor functions. In some instances, it has been suggested that mutations may also exert gain-of-function effects that may explain the persistence of p53 mutant protein in cancer cells. TP53 is emerging as an important target for improving cancer detection, prognosis and treatment. However, forms of mutant p53 differ from each other and this may affect cancer development in an organ, tissue and context-specific manner. Addressing this diversity is essential for developing cancer management strategies using p53 as a target.

Cancer progression is characterized by acquisition of multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations in genes involved in interrelated processes controlling cell cycle, apoptosis, differentiation, replicative senescence, cell motility and migratory capacity (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2000). There are many ways in which cells develop defects in these processes, often in a cell-type, tissue- and context-specific manner. However, a small number of genes are commonly altered in many different cancers, irrespective of their histology or site.

Type
Chapter
Information
Genes and Common Diseases
Genetics in Modern Medicine
, pp. 233 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardos, J. I. and Ashcroft, M. (2004). Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 and oncogenic signalling. Bioessays, 26, 262–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckman, G., Birgander, R., Sjalander, A.et al. (1994). Is p53 polymorphism maintained by natural selection?Hum Hered, 44, 266–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergamaschi, D., Gasco, M. and Hiller, L. (2003). p53 polymorphism influences response in cancer chemotherapy via modulation of p73-dependent apoptosis. Cancer Cell, 3, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blandino, G. and Dobbelstein, M. (2004). p73 and p63: why do we still need them?Cell Cycle, 3, 886–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykov, V. J., Issaeva, N., Selivanova, G. and Wiman, K. G. (2002 a). Mutant p53-dependent growth suppression distinguishes PRIMA-1 from known anticancer drugs: a statistical analysis of information in the National Cancer Institute database. Carcinogenesis, 23, 2011–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bykov, V. J., Issaeva, N., Shilov, A.et al. (2002 b). Restoration of the tumor suppressor function to mutant p53 by a low-molecular-weight compound. Nat Med, 8, 282–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaturvedi, V., Qin, J. Z., Stennett, L., Choubey, D. and Nickoloff, B. J. (2004). Resistance to UV-induced apoptosis in human keratinocytes during accelerated senescence is associated with functional inactivation of p53. J Cell Physiol, 198, 100–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, Y., Gorina, S., Jeffrey, P. D. and Pavletich, N. P. (1994). Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigenic mutations see comments. Science, 265, 346–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtois, S., Fromentel, C. C. and Hainaut, P. (2004). p53 protein variants: structural and functional similarities with p63 and p73 isoforms. Oncogene, 23, 631–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courtois, S., Verhaegh, G., North, S.et al. (2002). DeltaN-p53, a natural isoform of p53 lacking the first transactivation domain, counteracts growth suppression by wild-type p53. Oncogene, 21, 6722–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vries, A., Flores, E. R., Miranda, B.et al. (2002). Targeted point mutations of p53 lead to dominant-negative inhibition of wild-type p53 function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99, 2948–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumble, M. L., Donehower, L. A. and Lu, X. (2003). Generation and characterization of p53 mutant mice. Methods Mol Biol, 234, 29–49.Google ScholarPubMed
Fridman, J. S. and Lowe, S. W. (2003). Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene, 22, 9030–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, A., Stewart, D. and Matlashewski, G. (2004). Regulation of human p53 activity and cell localization by alternative splicing. Mol Cell Biol, 24, 7987–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gronroos, E., Terentiev, A. A., Punga, T. and Ericsson, J. (2004). YY1 inhibits the activation of the p53 tumor suppressor in response to genotoxic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101, 12165–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guimaraes, D. P. and Hainaut, P. (2002). TP53: a key gene in human cancer. Biochimie, 84, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hainaut, P. and Hollstein, M. (2000). p53 and human cancer: the first ten thousand mutations. Adv Cancer Res, 77, 81–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanahan, D. and Weinberg, R. A. (2000). The hallmarks of cancer. Cell, 100, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussain, S. P., Amstad, P., Raja, K.et al. (2000). Increased p53 mutation load in noncancerous colon tissue from ulcerative colitis: a cancer-prone chronic inflammatory disease. Cancer Res, 60, 3333–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Hussain, S. P., Amstad, P., Raja, K.et al. (2001). Mutability of p53 hotspot codons to benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE) and the frequency of p53 mutations in nontumorous human lung. Cancer Res, 61, 6350–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Kastan, M. B., Lim, D. S., Kim, S. T. and Yang, D. (2001). ATM – a key determinant of multiple cellular responses to irradiation. Acta Oncol, 40, 686–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Koster, M. I. and Roop, D. R. (2004). Transgenic mouse models provide new insights into the role of p63 in epidermal development. Cell Cycle, 3, 411–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linke, S. P., Clarkin, K. C. and Wahl, G. M. (1997). p53 mediates permanent arrest over multiple cell cycles in response to gamma-irradiation. Cancer Res, 57, 1171–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Lomazzi, M., Moroni, M. C., Jensen, M. R., Frittoli, E. and Helin, K. (2002). Suppression of the p53- or pRB-mediated G1 checkpoint is required for E2F-induced S-phase entry. Nat Genet, 31, 190–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marin, M. C., Jost, C. A., Brooks, L. A.et al. (2000). A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour. Nat Genet, 25, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, A. C., Facchiano, A. M., Cuff, A. L.et al. (2002). Integrating mutation data and structural analysis of the TP53 tumor-suppressor protein. Hum Mutat, 19, 149–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massion, P. P., Taflan, P. M., Jamshedur Rahman, S. M.et al. (2003). Significance of p63 amplification and overexpression in lung cancer development and prognosis. Cancer Res, 63, 7113–21.Google ScholarPubMed
May, P. and May, E. (1999). Twenty years of p53 research: structural and functional aspects of the p53 protein. Oncogene, 18, 7621–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCormick, F. (2003). Cancer-specific viruses and the development of ONYX-015. Cancer Biol Ther, 2, S157–S160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLure, K. G. and Lee, P. W. (1998). How p53 binds DNA as a tetramer. EMBO J, 17, 3342–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moll, U. M. and Petrenko, O. (2003). The MDM2–p53 interaction. Mol Cancer Res, 1, 1001–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Montes, d. O. L., Wagner, D. S. and Lozano, G. (1995). Rescue of early embryonic lethality in Mdm2-deficient mice by deletion of p53. Nature, 378, 203–6.Google Scholar
Moore, L., Venkatachalam, S., Vogel, H.et al. (2003). Cooperativity of p19ARF, Mdm2, and p53 in murine tumorigenesis. Oncogene, 22, 7831–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray-Zmijewski, F., Lane, D. P and Bourdon, J. C. (2006). p53/p63/p73 isoforms: an orchestra of isoforms to harmonise cell differentiation and response to stress. Cell Death Differ, 13, 962–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivier, M., Eeles, R., Hollstein, M.et al. (2002). The IARC TP53 database: new online mutation analysis and recommendations to users. Hum Mutat, 19, 607–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivier, M., Hussain, S. P., Caron, d. F., Hainaut, P. and Harris, C. C. (2004). TP53 mutation spectra and load: a tool for generating hypotheses on the etiology of cancer. IARC Sci Publ, 247–70.Google Scholar
Olivier, M., Langerod, A., Carrieri, P.et al. (2006). The clinical value of somatic TP53 gene mutations in 1,794 patients with breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res, 15, 1157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, G. P., Denissenko, M. F., Olivier, M.et al. (2002). Tobacco smoke carcinogens, DNA damage and p53 mutations in smoking-associated cancers. Oncogene, 21, 7435–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluquet, O. and Hainaut, P. (2001). Genotoxic and non-genotoxic pathways of p53 induction. Cancer Lett, 174, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreiber, M., Kolbus, A., Piu, F.et al. (1999). Control of cell cycle progression by c-Jun is p53 dependent. Genes Dev, 13, 607–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seemann, S., Maurici, D., Olivier, M., Caron de Fromentel, C. and Hainaut, P. (2004). The tumor suppressor gene TP53: implications for cancer management and therapy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci, 41, 551–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szymanska, K., Lesi, O. A., Kirk, G. D.et al. (2004). Ser-249TP53 mutation in tumour and plasma DNA of hepatocellular carcinoma patients from a high incidence area in the Gambia, West Africa. Int J Cancer, 110, 374–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taniere, P., Martel-Planche, G., Saurin, J. C.et al. (2001). TP53 mutations, amplification of P63 and expression of cell cycle proteins in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus from a low incidence area in Western Europe. Br J Cancer, 85, 721–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tonisson, N., Zernant, J., Kurg, A.et al. (2002). Evaluating the arrayed primer extension resequencing assay of TP53 tumor suppressor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99, 5503–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venot, C., Maratrat, M., Dureuil, C.et al. (1998). The requirement for the p53 proline-rich functional domain for mediation of apoptosis is correlated with specific PIG3 gene transactivation and with transcriptional repression. EMBO J, 17, 4668–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, L., Wu, Q., Qiu, P.et al. (2001). Analyses of p53 target genes in the human genome by bioinformatic and microarray approaches. J Biol Chem, 276, 43604–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiederschain, D., Kawai, H., Gu, J., Shilatifard, A. and Yuan, Z. M. (2003). Molecular basis of p53 functional inactivation by the leukemic protein MLL-ELL. Mol Cell Biol, 23, 4230–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wikman, F. P., Lu, M. L., Thykjaer, T.et al. (2000). Evaluation of the performance of a p53 sequencing microarray chip using 140 previously sequenced bladder tumor samples. Clin Chem, 46, 1555–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J. W., Pritchard, D. M., Hickman, J. A. and Potten, C. S. (1998). Radiation-induced p53 and p21WAF-1/CIP1 expression in the murine intestinal epithelium: apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Am J Pathol, 153, 899–909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, A. and McKeon, F. (2000). P63 and P73: P53 mimics, menaces and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 1, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×