Optical coherence tomography and electrophysiology of the optic nerve head

Shin C. Beh; Zane Schnurman; Darrel Conger; Amy Conger; Benjamin M. Greenberg; Elliot M. Frohman; Teresa C. Frohman

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139649506.009

Chapter 8 - Optical coherence tomography and electrophysiology of the optic nerve head

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015

Shin C. Beh ,

Zane Schnurman ,

Darrel Conger ,

Amy Conger ,

Benjamin M. Greenberg ,

Elliot M. Frohman and

Edited by

Laura J. Balcer and

Peter A. Calabresi: Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore
Laura J. Balcer: Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York
Elliot M. Frohman: Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Optical Coherence Tomography in Neurologic Diseases , pp. 89 - 102

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649506.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Quigley, HA, Kerrigan–Baumrind, LA, Pease, ME, Kerrigan, DF, Mitchell, RS. The number of retinal ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared to threshold visual field data in the same eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:S582Google Scholar

Kerrigan-Baumrind, LA, Quigley, HA, Pease, ME, Kerrigan, DF, Mitchell, RS. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:741–748Google Scholar PubMed

Barkhof, F. The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited. Curr Opin Neurol 2002;15:239–245CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Naismith, RT, et al. Optical coherence tomography is less sensitive than visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis. Neurology 2009;73:46–52CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Halliday, AM, McDonald, WI, Mushin, J. Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet 1972;1:982–985CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Halliday, AM, McDonald, WI, Mushin, J. Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br Med J 1973;1:661–664CrossRef Google Scholar

Hood, DC, Odel, JG, Winn, BJ. The multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neuro-Ophthalmol 2003;23:279–289CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Weinstein, GW, Odom, JV, Cavender, S. Visually evoked potentials and electroretinography in neurologic evaluation. Rev Neurol Clin 1991;9:225–242CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fortune, B, Hood, DC. Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1364–1375CrossRef Google Scholar

Halliday, AM, Michael, WF. Changes in pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field. J Physiol 1970;208:499–513CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brindley, GS. The variability of the human striate cortex J Physiol 1972;225:1P-3PGoogle Scholar PubMed

Stensaas, SS, Eddington, DK, Dobelle, WH. The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man. J Neurosurg 1974;40:747–755CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Victor, JD. Isolation of components due to intracortical processing in the visual evoked potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986;83:7984–7988CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Srebro, R. The topography of scalp potentials evoked by pattern pulse stimuli. Vision Res 1987;27:901–914CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schroeder, CE, Tenke, CE, Givre, SJ, et al. Striate cortical contribution to the surface-recorded pattern-reversal VEP in the alert monkey. Vision Res 1991;31:1143–1157CrossRef Google Scholar

Rademacher, J, Caviness, VS Jr, Steinmetz, H, Galaburda, AM. Topographical variation of the human primary cortices: implications for neuroimaging, brain mapping, and neurobiology. Cereb Cortex 1993;3:313–329CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Givre, SJ, Schroeder, CE, Arezzo, JC. Contribution of extrastriate area v4 to the surface-recorded flash VEP in the awake macaque. Vision Res 1994;34:415–428CrossRef Google Scholar

Aine, CJ, Supek, S, George, JS, et al. Retinotopic organization of human visual cortex: departures from the classical model. Cereb Cortex 1996;6,354–361CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fortune, B, Hood, DC. Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1364–1375CrossRef Google Scholar

Sutter, EE. The fast m-transform: a fast computation of cross correlations with binary m-sequences. Soc Ind Appl Math 1991;20:686–694Google Scholar

Baseler, HA, Sutter, EE, Klein, SA, et al. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;90:65–81CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baseler, HA, Sutter, EE. M and P components of the VEP and their visual field distribution. Vision Res. 1997;37:675–90CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Slotnick, SD, Klein, SA, Carney, T, Sutter, E, Dastmalchi, S. Using multi-stimulus VEP source localization to obtain a retinotopic map of human primary visual cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;110:1793–1800CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Grover, LK, Hood, DC, Ghadiali, Q, et al. A comparison of multifocal and conventional visual evoked potential techniques in patients with optic neuritis/multiple sclerosis. Doc Ophthalmol 2008;117:121–128CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hood, DC, Greenstein, VC. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2003;22:201–251CrossRef Google Scholar

Hood, DC, Greenstein, VC, Odel, JG, et al. Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence of a linear relationship. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1672–1681CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hood, DC, Zhang, X, Greenstein, VC, et al. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;411:580–1587Google Scholar

Frishman, LJ. Origins of the electroretinogram. In: Heckenlively, John R. and Arden, Geoffrey B., editors. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); 2006.Google Scholar

Hood, DC, Odel, JG, Chen, CS, Winn, BJ. The multifocal electroretinogram. J Neuroophthalmol 2003;23:225–235CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Young, B, Eggenberger, E, Kaufman, D. Current electrophysiology in ophthalmology: a review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012;23:497–505CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marmor, M, Fulton, A, Holder, G, et al. ISCEV standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update). Doc Ophthalmol 2008;118:69–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Hood, DC, Greenstein, V, Frishman, L, et al. Identifying inner retinal contributions to the human multifocal ERG. Vision Res 1999;39:2285–2291CrossRef Google Scholar

Hare, WA, Ton, H, Ruiz, G, et al. Characterization of retinal injury using ERG measures obtained with both conventional and multifocal methods in chronic ocular hypertensive primates. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:127–136Google Scholar PubMed

Graham, SL, Klistorner, A. Electrophysiology: a review of signal origins and applications to investigating glaucoma. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1998;26:71–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Holder, GE. Electrophysiological assessment of optic nerve disease. Eye 2004;18:1133–1143CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maffei, L, Fiorentini, A. Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings in the cat. Exp Brain Res 1982;48:327–334CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maffei, L, Fiorentini, A, Bisti, S, Hollander, H. Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve. Exp Brain Res 1985;59:423–425CrossRef Google Scholar

Sieving, PA, Steinberg, RH. Proximal retinal contribution to the intraretinal 8-Hz pattern ERG of cats. J Neurophysiol 1987;57:104–120CrossRef Google Scholar

Baker, CL, Hess, RR, Olsen, BT, Zrenner, E. Current source density analysis of linear and non-linear components of the primate electroretinogram. J Physiol 1988;407:155–176CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wang, J, Cheng, H, Hu, Y, et al. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;53:1315–1323CrossRef Google Scholar

Froehlich, J, Kaufman, DI. The pattern electroretinogram: N95 amplitudes in normal subjects and optic neuritis patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993;88:83–91CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Holder, GE. The incidence of abnormal pattern electroretinography in optic nerve demyelination. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991;78:18–26CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vaegan, Sutter EE. Fundamental differences between the nonlinearities of pattern and focal electroretinograms. Doc Ophthalmol 1990;76:13–25CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lawwill, T. The bar-pattern electroretinogram for clinical evaluation of the central retina. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;78:121–126CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Arden, GB, Carter, RM, Macfarlan, A. Pattern and Ganzfeld electroretinograms in macular disease. Br J Ophthalmol 1984;68:878–884CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Viswanathan, S, Frishman, LJ, Robson, JG, Harwerth, RS, Smith, EL, III The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:1124–1136Google Scholar

Thompson, DA, Feather, S, Stanescu, HC, et al. Altered electroretinograms in patients with KCNJ10 mutations and EAST syndrome. J Physiol 2011;589:1681–1689CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Viswanathan, S, Frishman, LJ, Robson, JG, Walters, JW. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:514–522Google Scholar PubMed

Rangaswamy, NV, Frishman, LJ, Dorotheo, EU, et al. Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacologic blockade of inner retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3827–3837CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gotoh, Y, Machida, S, Tazawa, Y. Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:341–346CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miyata, K, Nakamura, M, Kondo, M, et al. Reduction of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with autosomal dominant optic atrophy with OPA1 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:820–824CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Machida, S, Gotoh, Y, Tanaka, M, Tazawa, Y. Predominant loss of the photopic negative response in central retinal artery occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:938–940CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shinoda, K, Yamada, K, Matsumoto, CS, Kimoto, K, Nakatsuka, K. Changes in retinal thickness are correlated with alterations of electroretinogram in eyes with central retinal artery occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:949–954CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sutter, EE, Tran, D. The field topography of ERG components in man – I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 1992;32:433–446CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bearse, MA, Sutter, EE. Imaging localized retinal dysfunction with the multifocal electroretinogram. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1996;13:634–640CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sutter, EE, Bearse, MA The optic nerve head component of the human ERG. Vision Res 1999;39:419–436CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shimada, Y, Bearse, MA, Sutter, EE. Multifocal electroretinograms combined with periodic flashes: direct responses and induced components. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;243:132–141CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Luo, X, Patel, NB, Harwerth, RS, Frishman, LJ. Loss of the low-frequency component of the global-flash multifocal electroretinogram in primate eyes with experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:3792–3804CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lalonde, MR, Chauhan, BC, Tremblay, F. Retinal ganglion cell activity from the multifocal electroretinogram in pig: optic nerve section, anesthesia and intravitreal tetrodotoxin. J Physiol 2006;570:325–338CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ng, YF, Chan, HH, Chu, PH, et al. Pharmacologically defined components of the normal porcine multifocal ERG. Doc Ophthalmol 2008;116:165–176CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hood, DC, Bearse, MA, Sutter, EE, Viswanathan, S, Frishman, LJ. The optic nerve head component of the monkey’s (Macaca mulatta) multifocal electroretinogram (mERG). Vision Res 2001;41:2029–2041CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hood, DC, Frishman, LJ, Viswanathan, S, et al. Evidence for a ganglion cell contribution to the primate electroretinogram (ERG): effects of TTX on the multifocal ERG in macaque. Vis Neurosci 1999;16:411–416CrossRef Google Scholar

Frishman, LJ, Saszik, S, Harwerth, RS, et al. Effects of experimental glaucoma in macaques on the multifocal ERG. Multifocal ERG in laser-induced glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 2000;100:231–251Google Scholar PubMed

Fortune, B, Cull, G, Wang, L, Van Buskirk, EM, Cioffi, GA. Factors affecting the use of multifocal electroretinography to monitor function in a primate model of glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 2002;105:151–178CrossRef Google Scholar

Frohman, TC, Beh, SC, Saidha, S, et al. Optic nerve head component responses of the multifocal electroretinogram in MS. Neurology 2013;81:545–551CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stanford, LR. Conduction velocity variations minimize conduction time differences among retinal ganglion cell axons. Science 1987;25:225–231Google Scholar

Fukuda, Y, Watanabe, M, Wakakuwa, K, Sawai, H, Morigawa, K. Intraretinal axons of ganglion cells in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata): conduction velocity and diameter distribution. Neuroscience Research 1988;6:53–71CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ogden, TE, Miller, RF. Studies of the optic nerve of the rhesus monkey: nerve fiber spectrum and physiological properties. Vision Res 1966;6:485–506CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ogden, TE. Nerve fiber layer of the primate retina: morphometric analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984;25:19–29Google Scholar PubMed

Hebel, R, Hollander, H. Size and distribution of ganglion cells in the human retina. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1983;168:125–136CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Roedick, RW, Binmoeller, KF, Dineen, J. Parsaol and midget ganglion cells of the human retina. J Comp Neurol 1985;233:115–132CrossRef Google Scholar

Fitzgibbon, T, Taylor, SF. Mean retinal ganglion cell axon diameter varies with location in the human retina. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2012;56:631–637CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Curcio, CA, Allen, KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol 1990;300:5–25CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wali, N, Leguire, LE. Fundus pigmentation and the dark-adapted electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 1992;80:1–11CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Westall, CA, Dhaliwal, HS, Panton, CM, et al. Values of electroretinogram responses according to axial length. Doc Ophthalmol 2001;102:115–130CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fortune, B, Johnson, CA, Cioffi, GA. The topographic relationship between multifocal electroretinographic and behavioral perimetric measures of function in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:206–214CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sadun, AA, Salomao, SR, Berezovsky, A, et al. Subclinical carriers and conversions in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: a prospective psychophysical study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2006;104:51–61Google Scholar PubMed

Klopstock, T, Yu-Wai-Man, P, Dimitriadis, K, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of idebenone in Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. Brain 2011;134:2677–2686CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Book contents

Chapter 8 - Optical coherence tomography and electrophysiology of the optic nerve head

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive