Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T19:52:07.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Translocation of Nicosulfuron and Dicamba in Hemp Dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Pablo A. Kalnay  and
Scott Glenn
Pablo A. Kalnay
Affiliation:
Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Scott Glenn
Affiliation:
Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Absorption and translocation of nicosulfuron and dicamba applied alone and combined was studied in 25-cm-high hemp dogbane originating from lateral roots that had overwintered. Absorption of 14C-nicosulfuron by hemp dogbane was not affected by applications of 70 g ai/ha unlabeled dicamba. Upward translocation of 14C-nicosulfuron in hemp dogbane was 86% greater 6 d after treatment (DAT) when dicamba was tank mixed with nicosulfuron, compared to nicosulfuron applied alone. Combinations of nicosulfuron plus dicamba increased translocation of nicosulfuron to hemp dogbane crown and roots 237 and 130%, 1 and 6 DAT, respectively, compared to nicosulfuron applied alone. Absorption of 14C-dicamba by hemp dogbane was not affected by the addition of 31 g ai/ha nicosulfuron. Upward translocation of dicamba in hemp dogbane was 42% greater 6 DAT for nicosulfuron plus dicamba compared to dicamba applied alone. Increased hemp dogbane control with nicosulfuron plus dicamba compared to either herbicide applied alone can be explained by enhanced translocation of both herbicides.

Keywords

Dicambahemp dogbane, Apocynum cannabinum L.#3 APCCAAbsorptioninteractiontank mixtureAPCCADATdays after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 476 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1994. Accent herbicide specimen label. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and Co., Agricultural Products, Wilmington, DE 19898.Google Scholar
Becker, R. 1981. Hemp dogbane. Weeds Today, Winter 1981. pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
Becker, R. L. and Fawcett, R. S. 1998. Seasonal carbohydrate fluctuations in hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannaninum) crown roots. Weed Technol. 46: 358–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camacho, R. F. and Moshier, L. J. 1991. Absorption, translocation, and activity of CGA-136872, DPX-V9360, and glyphosate in rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 39: 354–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbels, A. F. and Kapusta, G. 1993. Postemergence weed control in corn (Zea mays) with nicosulfuron combinations. Weed Technol. 7: 844–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, S. and Anderson, N. G. 1993. Hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) and wild blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis) control in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7: 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, S., Phillips, W. H. II, and Kalnay, P. A. 1997. Long-term control of perennial broadleaf weeds and triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11: 436–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. D. and Glenn, S. 1995. Weed management. In Blevins, R. L. and Moldenhauer, W. C., eds. Crop Residue Management to Reduce Erosion and Improve Soil Quality—Appalachia and Northeast. Chapter 11. Washington, DC: USDA-ARS. pp. 54–59.Google Scholar
Obrigawitch, T. T., Kenyon, W. H., and Kuratle, H. 1990. Effect of application timing on rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with DPX-V9360. Weed Sci. 38: 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orfanedes, M. S. and Wax, L. M. 1991. Differential response of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) to clopyralid, DOWCO 433, and 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 5: 782–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransom, C. V. and Kells, J. J. 1998. Hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) control in corn with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 12: 631–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, L. R. and Jeffery, L. S. 1972. Hemp dogbane growth and control. Weed Sci. 20: 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/Stat User's Guide Release 6.0. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1979a. Distribution, competition and phenology of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) in Nebraska. Weed Sci. 27: 565–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1979b. Control of hemp dogbane with foliar and soil applied herbicides. Agron. J. 71: 723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr. 1985. Principles of weed control for reduced-tillage corn production. In Weise, A. F., ed. Weed Control in Limited Tillage Systems. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America Monograph 2. pp. 26–40.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. P., Swann, C. W., Hines, T. E., Fortner, L. D., and Horton, D. N. 1991. Annual grass control with DPXV-9360 combinations. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 31:41.Google Scholar
Wyrill, J. B. III and Burnside, O. C. 1977. Glyphosate toxicity to common milkweed and hemp dogbane as influenced by surfactants. Weed Sci. 25: 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar