Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T16:15:42.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of Application Time and Clopyralid Rate on Strawberry Growth and Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nathan S. Boyd*
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Research & Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 14625 County Road 672, Wimauma, FL 33598
Peter Dittmar
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, 1233 Fifield Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: nsboyd@ufl.edu.

Abstract

Hard-seeded, broadleaf, winter annual weeds in strawberry plasticulture production in Florida emerge in the crop holes in the plastic mulch and reduce berry yield and quality. Clopyralid is registered for POST control of broadleaf weeds, but herbicide damage has been observed in commercial fields, and preliminary observations suggest that effects vary with time of application. To address this issue, an experiment was conducted in 2012 to 2013 and 2013 to 2014 to evaluate clopyralid rate (0, 140, 280, and 560 g ae ha−1) and application time on strawberry vegetative and reproductive growth. Clopyralid applications at 280 and 560 g ae ha−1 on January 2 and 16, 2013 (yr 1) reduced leaf number per plant by 33 to 44% and increased the number of deformed leaves per plant compared with the nontreated control. This pattern was not observed in yr 2. In yr 1 and 2, two times the label rate of clopyralid (560 g ae ha−1) tended to reduce the total number of floral buds compared with the nontreated control by 12 to 17%. None of the herbicide rates or application times reduced the number of flowers per plant, marketable berries per plant, yield over time, or total yield. We conclude that clopyralid applications at the rates and application times tested in this study may cause leaf damage and may reduce leaf number in some situations but does not affect yield.

Malezas de hoja ancha anuales de invierno con semillas con testa dura emergen en los orificios del cultivo en la producción de fresa con coberturas plásticas en Florida, y reducen el rendimiento y la calidad de la fruta. Clopyralid está registrado para el control POST de malezas de hoja ancha, pero el daño del herbicida has sido observado en campos de producción comercial, y observaciones preliminares sugieren que los efectos varían dependiendo del momento de aplicación. Para analizar este problema, se realizó un experimento del 2012 al 2013 y del 2013 al 2014 para evaluar la dosis de clopyralid (0, 140, 280, y 560 g ae ha−1) y el momento de aplicación sobre el crecimiento vegetativo y reproductivo de la fresa. Las aplicaciones de clopyralid a 280 y 560 g ae ha−1, hechas el 2 y el 16 de Enero (primer año) redujeron el número de hojas por planta en 33 y 44% e incrementaron el número de hojas deformadas por planta al compararse con el testigo sin tratamiento. Este patrón no fue observado en el segundo año. Tanto en el primer como en el segundo año, el doble de la dosis de etiqueta de clopyralid (560 g ae ha−1) tendió a reducir el número total de brotes florales en comparación con el testigo sin tratamiento en 12 y 17%. Ninguno de las dosis del herbicida o los momentos de aplicación redujeron el número de flores por planta, las frutas comercializables por planta, el rendimiento a lo largo del tiempo, o el rendimiento total. Nosotros concluimos que las aplicaciones de clopyralid a las dosis y momentos de aplicación evaluados en este estudio podría causar daño foliar y podría reducir el número de hojas en algunas situaciones sin afectar el rendimiento.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Steven A. Fennimore, University of California Davis.

References

Literature Cited

Boyd, NS, MacRae, AW (2014) Managing yellow and purple nutsedge in Florida strawberry fields. Wimauma, FL: Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/HS/HS117500.pdf. Accessed April 01, 2015Google Scholar
Clay, DV, Andrews, L (1984) The tolerance of strawberries to clopyralid: effect of crop age, herbicide dose, and application date. Asp Appl Biol 8:151158 Google Scholar
Darrow, GM (1930) Experimental studies on the growth and development of strawberry plants. J Agric Res 41:307325 Google Scholar
Figueroa, RA, Doohan, DJ (2006) Selectivity and efficacy of clopyralid on strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Weed Technol 20:101103 Google Scholar
Gilreath, JP, Santos, BM, Motis, TN (2003) Herbicide and mulch evaluations for weed management in west central Florida Strawberries. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc 116:159160 Google Scholar
Hunnicutt, CJ, MacRae, AW, Dittmar, PJ, Noling, JW, Ferrell, JA, Alves, C, Jacoby, TP (2013a) Annual strawberry response to clopyralid applied during fruiting. Weed Technol 27:573579 Google Scholar
Hunnicutt, CJ, MacRae, AW, Whitaker, VM (2013b) Response of four strawberry cultivars to clopyralid applied during the fruiting stage. Horttechnology 23:301305 Google Scholar
Jamwal, K, Wali, VK (2014) Impact of integrated weed management practices on physico-chemical attributes of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Chandler. Prog Hortic 46:3133 Google Scholar
McMurray, GL, Monks, DW, Leidy, RB (1996) Clopyralid use in strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) grown on plastic mulch. Weed Sci 44:350354 Google Scholar
Samtani, JB, Weber, B, Fennimore, SA (2012) Tolerance of strawberry cultivars to oxyfluorfen and flumioxazin herbicides. Hortscience 47:848851 Google Scholar
Whitaker, VM, Boyd, NS, Peres, NA, Smith, HA (2014) Strawberry Production. Pages 189199 in Vallad, GE, Freeman, JH, Dittmar, PJ, eds. Vegetable & Small Fruit Production Handbook of Florida. Quincy, FL: UF IFAS North Florida Research and Education Center Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2005) Patch expansion of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with and without polyethylene mulch. Weed Sci. 53:839845 Google Scholar