Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:57:09.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solar Differential Rotation Revealed by Helioseismology and Simulations of Deep Shells of Turbulent Convection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Juri Toomre
Affiliation:
JILA, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0440, USA
Allan Sacha Brun*
Affiliation:
JILA, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0440, USA
*
New permanent address: DSM/DAPNIA/SAp, CE Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The sun is supposedly a very simple star, halfway along its long and possibly boring life on the main sequence. Yet it has some distinguishing features. Since we live close to it, our existence is probably blessed by this star having only modest cycles of magnetic activity and weak winds. By being so close, we can observe many aspects of the diverse range of motions and magnetic fields linked to turbulent convection in its convection zone. And this turns out to be anything but simple as we consider the dynamical coupling of convection, rotation and magnetism within this modest star. The lessons that have emerged from recent helioseismic probing of the solar interior and from 3–D numerical simulations of turbulent convection have bearing on differential rotation and magnetic dynamo action also occurring within more complex stars. We consider recent findings from both helioseismology and theoretical modelling on the operation of the deep shell of vigorous convection within our nearest star.

Type
Session 3 Rotation, Solar and Stellar Physics
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Brun, A.S., & Toomre, J., 2001, in Helio- and Asteroseismology at the Dawn of the Millennium, (eds. Eff-Darwich, A. & Wilson, A.), ESA SP–464, 619.Google Scholar
Brun, A.S., & Toomre, J., 2002, ApJ, 570, 865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., 2003, these proceedings.Google Scholar
DeRosa, M.L., Gilman, P.A., & Toomre, J., 2002, ApJ, 581, 1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J.R., Miesch, M.S., & Toomre, J., 2000, ApJ, 533, 546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, D.A., Hindman, B.W., Toomre, J., Bogart, R.S., Thompson, M.J., & Hill, F., 2000, Solar Phys., 192, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, D.A., Hindman, B.W., Toomre, J., Bogart, R.S., Larsen, R.M., & Hill, F., 2002, ApJ, 570, 855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Hill, F., Komm, R.W., Larsen, R.M., Schou, J., Thompson, M.J., & Toomre, J., 2000, Science, 287, 2456.,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosovichev, A.G., Duvall, T.L. Jr., & Scherrer, P.H., 2000, Solar Phys., 192, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miesch, M.S., 2000, Solar Phys., 192, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miesch, M.S., Elliott, J.R., Toomre, J., Clune, T.L., Glatzmaier, G.A., & Gilman, P.A., 2000, ApJ, 532, 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, E.A., & Zahn, J.-P., 1992, A&A, 265, 106.Google Scholar
Toomre, J., 2002, Science, 296, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar