Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:17:27.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neighborhood and Community Factors: Effects on Deviant Behavior and Social Competence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Francisca Fariña ,
Ramón Arce  and
Mercedes Novo
Francisca Fariña*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Vigo
Ramón Arce
Affiliation:
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Mercedes Novo
Affiliation:
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Francisca Fariña, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Avda. de Buenos Aires, s/n, 36002 Pontevedra(Spain). Phone: +34-986-801708. E-mail: francisca@uvigo.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Socialization in a neighborhood and community at risk, defined in terms of violence, social alienation, school failure, and disruptive behavior, is a risk factor for the acquisition of antisocial and delinquent behavior. In order to test this hypothesis and examine the underlying mechanisms involved, 346 participants, 155 high-risk and 191 low-risk, aged 11 to 13, that is, under the age of criminal responsibility as established by the Spanish Law 5/2000 were selected. The results reveal that high-risk youngsters had higher rates of antisocial behavior and lower levels of social skills (i.e., greater tendency to externalize attribution of responsibility, fewer conflict resolution strategies, lower self esteem, and a lower degrees of emotional intelligence) in comparison to the lower-risk group. Finally, the results and implications of the study are discussed in the light of designing prevention programs.

La socialización en un vecindario y comunidad de riesgo, definido por la violencia, exclusión social, fracaso escolar y comportamientos disruptivos, es un factor de riesgo para la adquisición de comportamientos antisociales y delictivos (p.e., Farrington, 1996; Lösell y Bender, 2003). Para contrastar esta hipótesis así como los mecanismos subyacentes a la misma, tomamos una muestra de 346, 155 de alto riesgo y 191 de bajo riesgo, participantes de entre 11 y 13 años, es decir, sin responsabilidad penal según la Ley 5/2000. Los resultados mostraron que los jóvenes de un ambiente social de riesgo presentaban mayores tasas de comportamiento antisocial así como una menor competencia social (vs. gr., mayor tendencia a la atribución externa de responsabilidad, menos estrategias de afrontamiento, un autoconcepto más bajo y un menor desarrollo de la inteligencia emocional) en comparación con menores de bajo riesgo social. Finalmente, se discuten los resultados e implicaciones para el diseño e implementación de programas preventivos.

Keywords

juvenile delinquencydeviant behaviorrisk factorsprotective factorsresiliencedelincuencia juvenilcomportamiento antisocialfactores de riesgofactores protectoresprevenciónresiliencia
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , May 2008 , pp. 78 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Google Scholar
Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (1996). From jurors to jury decision making. A non-model approach. In Davis, G., McMurran, M., Wilson, C., & Lloyd-Bostock, S. (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice. International developments in research and practice (pp. 337–343). Berlin: Walter de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (2005). Modelos explicativos robustos del comportamiento delictivo e implicaciones para la intervención. Temas Penitenciarios, III, 17–22.Google Scholar
D'Zurilla, T.J. (1986). Problem-solving therapy. A social competence approach to clinical interventions. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Fariña, F., Arce, R., Novo, M., Seijo, D., & Vázquez, M.J. (2005). Estudio de la incidencia de las variables psicosociales y cognitivas en el comportamiento antisocial dentro del contexto escolar. In Centro de Investigación y Documentación Educativa (Ed.), Premios nacionales de investigación educativa 2003 (pp. 127–155). Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.Google Scholar
Farrington, D.P. (1996). Understanding and preventing youth crime. New York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Farrington, D.P. (2003). Advancing knowledge about the early prevention of adult antisocial behavior. In Farrington, D.P. & Coid, J.W. (Eds.), Early prevention of antisocial behavior (pp. 1–31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Berrocal, P., Alcaide, R., Domínguez, E., Fernández-McNally, C., Ramos, N. S., & Ravira, M.(1998, April-May). Adaptación al castellano de la escala Rasgo de Metaconocimiento sobre Estados Emocionales de Salovey et al.: datos preliminares. VCongreso de Evaluación Psicológica, Málaga (Spain).Google Scholar
Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (1996). The Adolescent Coping Scale: Multiple forms and applications of a self report inventory in a counselling and research context. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(Spanish translation: Escalas de afrontamiento para adolescentes [ACS]. Madrid: TEA, 2000).Google Scholar
Loeber, R., & Farrington, D.P. (Eds.). (1998). Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., Green, S., & Lahey, B. (2003). Risk factors for adult personality. In Farrington, D.P. & Coid, J.W. (Eds.), Early prevention of antisocial behavior (pp. 79–108). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, M.J., Garrido, VS., & Ross, R.R. (2001). El programa del pensamiento prosocial: Avances recientes. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Bender, D. (2003). Protective factors and resilience. In Farrington, D.P. & Coid, J.W. (Eds.), Early prevention of antisocial behavior (pp. 130–204). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lösel, F., Kolip, P., & Bender, D. (1992). Stress-resistance in a multiproblem milieu: Are resilient juveniles “Superkids”? Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 21, 48–63.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. (2000). Explanations of criminal behavior. In McGuire, J., Mason, T., & O'Kane, A. (Eds.), Behavior, crime and legal processes. A guide for forensic practitioners (pp. 135–159). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T.E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musitu, G., Gracía, F., & Gutiérrez, M. (1997). AFA. Autoconcepto. Forma A: Autoconcepto académico, social, emocional y familiar. Madrid: TEA.Google Scholar
Peterson, G.W., & Leigh, G.K. (1990). The family and social competence in adolescence. In Gullotta, T.P., Adams, G.R.,& Montemayor, R. (Eds.), Developing social competence in adolescence. Advances in adolescent development (Vol. 3, pp. 97–139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Robins, L.N., Tipp, J., & Pryzbeck, T. (1991). Antisocial personality. In Robins, L.N. & Regier, D.A. (Eds.), Psychiatric disorders in America (pp. 224–271). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, F.J., & Paíno, S.G. (1994). Violencia y desviación social: bases y análisis para la intervención. Psicothema, 6, 229–244.Google Scholar
Ross, R.R., & Fabiano, E.A. (1985). Time to think: A cognitive model of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Johnson City, TN: Institute of Social Sciences and Arts Inc.Google Scholar
Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (Whole Hr. 609).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salovey, P., Mayer, J.D., Goldman, S.L., Turkey, C., & Palfai, T.P. (2002). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In Pennebaker, J.W. (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (3rd ed., pp. 125–154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Seisdedos, N. (1995). Cuestionario A-D (conductas antisociales-delictivas). Madrid: TEA.Google Scholar
Wallston, K.A. (1992). Hocus-pocus, the focus isn't strictly on locus: Rotter's social learning theory modified for health. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E.E. (1986). The concept of risk from a developmental perspective. Advances in Special Education, 5, 1–23.Google Scholar
Zubin, J. (1989). Suiting therapeutic intervention to the scientific models of aetiology. British Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar