Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:25:41.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dectection of Thermal Emission from WASP-3b

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2014

J. W. Rostron
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK email:j.w.rostron@warwick.ac.uk
P. J. Wheatley
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK email:j.w.rostron@warwick.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We report secondary eclipse detections of the transiting hot Jupiter WASP-3b at 3.6, 4.5 and 8.0μm using the Spitzer Space Telescope's Infrared Array Camera. We find planet-to-star flux ratios of 0.210+0.043−0.029, 0.281+0.012−0.011 and 0.332+0.050−0.034% in the three bands respectively. Comparisons with 1D atmospheric models show these values strongly favour inefficient redistribution of heat around the planet and also favour the presence of a temperature inversion. In addition, WASP-3 probes the cut-off region of a proposed activity-inversion correlation and we find evidence of atmospheric differences between this system and a similarly active system, WASP-4.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Gillon, M., Demory, B.-O., Barman, T., Bonfils, X., Mazeh, T., Pont, F., Udry, S., Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. 2007, A&A, 471, L51Google Scholar
Fortney, J. J., Lodders, K., Marley, M. S., & Freedman, R. S. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutson, H. A., Howard, A. W., & Isaacson, H. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M., Milburn, J., Barman, T., Hinkley, S., Swain, M. R., Wright, J., & Monnier, J. D. 2012, ApJ, 748, L8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Mooij, E. J. W., de Kok, R. J., Nefs, S. V., & Snellen, I. A. G. 2011, A&A, 528, A49Google Scholar