Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:50:31.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behaviour of Pulsations in Hydrodynamic Models of Massive Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

C. C. Lovekin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB, Canada email: clovekin@mta.ca
J. A. Guzik
Affiliation:
XTD-NTA, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have calculated the pulsations of massive stars using a nonlinear hydrodynamic code including time-dependent convection. The basic structure models are based on a standard grid published by Meynet et al. (1994). Using the basic structure, we calculated envelope models, which include the outer few percent of the star. These models go down to depths of at least 2 million K. These models, which range from 40 to 85 solar masses, show a range of pulsation behaviours. We find models with very long period pulsations (> 100 d), resulting in high amplitude changes in the surface properties. We also find a few models that show outburst-like behaviour. The details of this behaviour are discussed, including calculations of the resulting wind mass-loss rates.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Guzik, J. A. & Lovekin, C. C. 2012, The Astronomical Review 7 (3), 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R. M. & Davidson, K. 1994, PASP 106, 1025Google Scholar
Lovekin, C. & Guzik, J. 2014a, MNRAS, submittedGoogle Scholar
Lovekin, C. & Guzik, J. 2014b, MNRAS, in pressGoogle Scholar
Meynet, G., Maeder, A., Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., & Charbonnel, C. 1994, A&AS 103, 97Google Scholar
Ostlie, D. A. 1990, in Buchler, J. R. (ed.), Numerical Modelling of Nonlinear Stellar Pulsations Problems and Prospects, p. 89Google Scholar
Smith, N., Gehrz, R. D., Hinz, P. M., et al. 2003, AJ 125, 1458Google Scholar
van Genderen, A. M., Sterken, C., & de Groot, M. 1998, A&A 337, 393Google Scholar
Vink, J. S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 2001, A&A 369, 574Google Scholar