Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:59:48.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Excess of Dusty Starbursts at z = 2.2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

Helmut Dannerbauer
Helmut Dannerbauer*
Affiliation:
Department for Astrophysics, University of Vienna, Türkenschanzstr. 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Searching for massive, dusty starbursts offers the great opportunity to trace galaxy overdensities and thus the cosmic web in the distant universe. I will present our APEX-LABOCA 870 μm imaging of the protocluster field of the radio galaxy MRC1138–262 — the so-called Spiderweb Galaxy — at z = 2.16, uncovering a large number of so-called submm galaxies (SMGs). The number counts already indicate an excess of SMGs compared to blank fields. Based on an exquisite multi-wavelength dataset, I will show that a large fraction of these massive, dusty starbursts are physically associated with the protocluster at z = 2.16. Finally, I will discuss both the properties of this starburst overdensity and their individual members.

Keywords

galaxies: individual: MRC1138–262 — galaxies: clusters: individual: MRC1138–262 — galaxies: high redshift — cosmology: observations — Infrared: galaxies — submillimeter: galaxies
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Issue S309: Galaxies in 3D across the Universe , July 2014 , pp. 259 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Blain, A. W., Smail, I., Ivison, R. J., Kneib, J.-P., & Frayer, D. T. 2002, Phys. Rep., 369, 111Google Scholar
Blain, A. W., Chapman, S. C., Smail, I., & Ivison, R. 2004, ApJ, 611, 725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capak, P. L., Riechers, D., Scoville, N. Z., et al. 2011, Nature, 470, 233Google Scholar
Chapman, S. C., Blain, A., Ibata, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 691, 560Google Scholar
Clements, D., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 439, 1139Google Scholar
Daddi, E., Dannerbauer, H., Stern, D., et al. 2009a, ApJ, 694, 1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emonts, B. H. C., Feain, I., Röttgering, H. J. A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 3465Google Scholar
Dannerbauer, H., Kurk, J. D., De Breuck, C., et al. 2014, A&A, in pressGoogle Scholar
De Breuck, C., Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C., et al. 2004, A&A, 424, 1Google Scholar
De Lucia, G., Poggianti, B. M., Aragón-Salamanca, A., et al. 2004, ApJ, 610, L77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dole, H., Lagache, G., Puget, J.-L., et al. 2006, A&A, 451, 417Google Scholar
Greve, T. R., Bertoldi, F., Smail, I., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1165Google Scholar
Greve, T. R., Stern, D., Ivison, R. J., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 48Google Scholar
Hatch, N. A., Kurk, J. D., Pentericci, L., et al. 2011b, MNRAS, 415, 2993Google Scholar
Hilton, M., Lloyd-Davies, E., Stanford, S. A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 718, 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivison, R. J., Swinbank, A. M., Smail, I., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyama, Y., Kodama, T., Shimasaku, K., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1611Google Scholar
Kurk, J. D., Röttgering, H. J. A., Pentericci, L., et al. 2000, A&A, 358, L1Google Scholar
Kurk, J. D., Pentericci, L., Röttgering, H. J. A., & Miley, G. K. 2004a, A&A, 428, 793Google Scholar
Kurk, J. D., Pentericci, L., Overzier, R. A., Röttgering, H. J. A., & Miley, G. K. 2004b, A&A, 428, 817Google Scholar
Miley, G. K., Overzier, R. A., Zirm, A. W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 650, L29Google Scholar
Miley, G. & De Breuck, C. 2008, A&A Rev., 15, 67Google Scholar
Overzier, R. A., Miley, G. K., Bouwens, R. J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 637, 58Google Scholar
Pentericci, L., Kurk, J. D., Röttgering, H. J. A., et al. 2000, A&A, 361, L25Google Scholar
Rigby, E., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 437, 1882Google Scholar
Riechers, D. A., Capak, P. L., Carilli, C. L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, L131Google Scholar
Rosati, P., Tozzi, P., Gobat, R., et al. 2009, A&A, 508, 583Google Scholar
Santos, J. S., Fassbender, R., Nastasi, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 531, L15Google Scholar
Smail, I., Ivison, R. J., & Blain, A. W. 1997, ApJ, 490, L5Google Scholar
Stevens, J. A., Ivison, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2003, Nature, 425, 264Google Scholar
Stevens, J. A., Jarvis, M. J., Coppin, K. E. K., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2623Google Scholar
Tran, K.-V. H., Papovich, C., Saintonge, A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, L126Google Scholar
Valtchanov, I., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2505Google Scholar
Venemans, B. P., Röttgering, H. J. A., Miley, G. K., et al. 2007, A&A, 461, 823Google Scholar
Walter, F., Decarli, R., Carilli, C., et al. 2012, Nature, 486, 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiß, A., Kovács, A., Coppin, K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 707, 1201Google Scholar