No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Liquid, concentrate and forage total tract mean retention times estimated using two algebraic methods in ponies given either oat straw or grass haylage as a basal forage
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 November 2017
Extract
Previous work (Hyslop, 2005) has shown that alternative algebraic calculation methods give similar estimates of total tract mean retention times (TMRT) in ponies given complete pelleted diets. This similarity in TMRT estimates across calculation methods remains to be confirmed with other dietary constituents. This study's objective was to compare liquid, concentrate and forage TMRT estimates using alternative algebraic calculation methods.
- Type
- Poster presentations
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The American Society of International Law 2016
References
Hyslop, J. J. (2005). Algebraic methods to determine total tract mean retention time of digesta in ponies given ad libitum access to pelleted diets containing different levels of unmolassed sugar beet pulp. Annual Proceedings of the BSAS. p 48.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). The use of markers to partition digestion within the gastro-intestinal tract of ruminants. In: Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (Ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C). University of New England Publications Unit, Sydney, Australia. pp 277-291.Google Scholar
Theilmans, M. F., François, E., Bodart, C. and Thewis, A. (1978). Mesure du transit gastrointestinal chez le porc a l’aide de radiolanthanides. Comparison avec le mouton. Annals of Biology, Animal Biochemistry and Biophysics. 18: 237-247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar