Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:22:45.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Arctic governance research in crisis? A pathological diagnosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2020

Sebastian Knecht Open the ORCID record for Sebastian Knecht [Opens in a new window]  and
Paula Laubenstein
Sebastian Knecht*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
Paula Laubenstein
Affiliation:
Faculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: Sebastian Knecht, Email: sebastian.knecht@uni-bielefeld.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The governance of the Arctic as a frontier for international environmental and climate cooperation, resource politics and security governance holds the promise to provide important insights into some of the 21st century’s most enduring and pressing global challenges. This article reviews the state of the art of Arctic governance research (AGR) to assess the potential and limitations of a regional studies community for making sense of Northern politics and contributing to the broader discipline of international relations (IR) research. A bibliometric analysis of 398 articles published in 10 outlets between 2008 and 2019 reveals that AGR faces at least four limitations that undermine understanding and explaining the processes and outcomes of regional politics and inhibit generalisable observations applicable to questions of global governance: academic immaturity, methodological monoculturalism, state-centrism and analytical parochialism. The lack particularly of theoretically driven and comparative research is indicative of a deeper crisis in AGR which, if unaddressed, could further solidify the community’s unjustified reputation as quixotic in orientation and negligible in its contributions to IR research.

Keywords

Arctic governanceInternational relationsReview articleAcademic developmentBibliometric analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 56 , 2020 , e35
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, A. (2014). Global international relations (IR) and regional worlds: A new agenda for international studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 647–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, M., & Vasilache, A. (2018). Governmentality of the Arctic as an international region. Cooperation and Conflict, 53(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydinli, E., & Biltekin, G. (2018). Widening the World of International Relations: Homegrown Theorizing. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartenstein, K. (2015). The ‘common Arctic’: Legal analysis of Arctic & non-Arctic political discourses. In Heininen, L., Exner-Pirot, H., & Plouffe, J. (Eds.), Arctic yearbook 2015 (pp. 264–280). Akureyri: Northern Research Forum.Google Scholar
Bates, R. H. (1997). Area studies and the discipline: A useful controversy? PS: Political Science and Politics, 30(2), 166–169.Google Scholar
Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beier, J. M. (2009). Forgetting, remembering, and finding indigenous peoples in international relations. In Beier, J. M. (Ed.), Indigenous diplomacies (pp. 11–27). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biersteker, T. J. (2009). The parochialism of hegemony: Challenges for “American” international relations. In Tickner, A. B. & Wæver, O. (Eds.), International relations scholarship around the world (pp. 308–327). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blunden, M. (2009). The new problem of Arctic stability. Survival, 51(5), 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bognar, D. (2018). The elephant in the room: Article 234 of the Law of the Sea Convention and the Polar Code as an incompletely theorised agreement. The Polar Journal, 8(1), 182–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgerson, S. G. (2008). Arctic meltdown: The economic and security implications of global warming. Foreign Affairs, 87(2), 63–77.Google Scholar
Brady, A.-M. (2017). China as a Polar Great Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, D. C. (2020). Diplomacy and the Arctic Council. Montréal: McGill-Queens University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhart, K., McGrath-Horn, M. C., & Unterstell, N. (2017). Comparison of Arctic and Amazon regional governance mechanisms. Polar Geography, 40(2), 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, M. (2013). International Law and the Arctic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, M. (2014). Squeeze Putin, yes, but the Arctic is not Ukraine. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/squeeze-putin-but-the-arctic-is-not-ukraine/article18348971/ Google Scholar
Byers, M. (2017). Crises and international cooperation: An Arctic case study. International Relations, 31(4), 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2006). Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 12(2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmer, J., Moisio, S., Ingram, A., & Dodds, K. (2011). Have you heard the one about the disappearing ice? Recasting Arctic geopolitics. Political Geography, 30(4), 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, K. (2018). Global Arctic. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 33(2), 191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, K. (2019). Geopolitics and ice humanities: Elemental, metaphorical and volumetric reverberations. Geopolitics, OnlineFirst, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, K., & Nuttall, M. (2015). The Scramble for the Poles: The Geopolitics of the Arctic and Antarctic. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dodds, K., & Woon, C. Y. (2019). Triumphant geopolitics? Making space of and for Arctic geopolitics in the Arctic Ocean. In Sellheim, N., Zaika, Y. V, & Kelman, I. (Eds.), Arctic triumph: Northern innovation and persistence (pp. 163–180). Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durfee, M., & Johnstone, R. L. (2019). Arctic Governance in a Changing World. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Eriksen, T. H., Valkonen, S., & Valkonen, J. (2019). Knowing from the Indigenous North: Sámi Approaches to History, Politics and Belonging. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evengård, B., Larsen, J. N., & Paasche, Ø. (Eds.). (2015). The New Arctic. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exner-Pirot, H., & Murray, R. W. (2017). Regional order in the Arctic: Negotiated exceptionalism. Politik, 20(3), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbis, R. Jr., & Hayhoe, K. (2017). Does Arctic governance hold the key to achieving climate policy targets? Environmental Research Letters, 13(2), 1–4.Google Scholar
George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2012). Mere description. British Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, G., & Mahoney, J. (2012). A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, S. D. (2010). Polar Imperative: A History of Arctic Sovereignty in North America. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.Google Scholar
Grydehøj, A. (2014). Constructing a centre on the periphery: Urbanization and urban design in the island city of Nuuk, Greenland. Island Studies Journal, 9(2), 205–222.Google Scholar
Hansen-Magnusson, H. (2019). Arctic geopoetics: Russian politics at the North Pole. Cooperation and Conflict, 54(4), 466–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heininen, L. (2011). Arctic Strategies and Policies: Inventory and Comparative Study. Akureyri: The Northern Research Forum.Google Scholar
Heininen, L., & Southcott, C. (Eds.). (2010). Globalization and the Circumpolar North. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, T. M., & Martin, T. (Eds.). (2016). Indigenous Peoples’ Governance of Land and Protected Territories in the Arctic. Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hønneland, G. (2016). Russia and the Arctic: Environment, Identity and Foreign Policy. London: I.B.Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, W., Yuan, S., Yan, M., & Li, Y. (2012). A quantitative analysis of Arctic related articles in the humanities and social sciences appearing in the world core journals. Scientometrics, 91(3), 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humrich, C. (2020). Norway’s High North geopolitics: Continuities and changes through three decades. In Weber, J. (Ed.), Handbook on geopolitics and security in the Arctic: The high north between cooperation and confrontation (pp. 57–75). Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, T. (2014). International institutions and state sovereignty. In Murray, R. W. & Nuttall, A. D. (Eds.), International Relations and the Arctic: Understanding policy and governance (pp. 51–78). Amherst: Cambria.Google Scholar
Keil, K. (2015). Spreading oil, spreading conflict? Institutions regulating Arctic oil and gas activities. The International Spectator, 50(1), 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, K., & Knecht, S. (Eds.). (2017a). Governing Arctic Change: Global Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, K., & Knecht, S. (2017b). Introduction: The Arctic as a globally embedded space. In Keil, K. & Knecht, S. (Eds.), Governing Arctic change: Global perspectives (pp. 1–18). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O. (2009). Political science as a vocation. PS: Political Science and Politics, 42(2), 359–363.Google Scholar
Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2004). Negotiating the Arctic: The Construction of an International Region. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keuleers, F., Fonck, D., & Keukeleire, S. (2016). Beyond EU navel-gazing: Taking stock of EU-centrism in the analysis of EU foreign policy. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(3), 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knecht, S. (2017a). Exploring different levels of stakeholder activity in international institutions: Late bloomers, regular visitors, and overachievers in Arctic Council working groups. In Keil, K. & Knecht, S. (Eds.), Governing Arctic change: global perspectives (pp. 163–185). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knecht, S. (2017b). The politics of Arctic international cooperation: Introducing a dataset on stakeholder participation in Arctic Council meetings, 1998–2015. Cooperation and Conflict, 52(2), 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knecht, S., & Keil, K. (2013). Arctic geopolitics revisited: Spatialising governance in the circumpolar North. The Polar Journal, 3(1), 178–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koivurova, T. (2012). The Arctic Council: A testing ground for new international environmental governance. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 19(1), 131–144.Google Scholar
Kopra, S. (2013). China’s Arctic interests. In Heininen, L., Exner-Pirot, H., & Plouffe, J. (Eds.), Arctic yearbook 2013 (pp. 107–124). Akureyri: Northern Research Forum.Google Scholar
Kraska, J. (Ed.). (2011). Arctic Security in an Age of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagutina, M., & Leksyutina, Y. (2019). BRICS countries’ strategies in the Arctic and the prospects for consolidated BRICS agenda in the Arctic. The Polar Journal, 9(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landriault, M., Chater, A., Wilson Rowe, E., & Lackenbauer, P. Whitney. (2019). Governing Complexity in the Arctic Region. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landriault, M., & Minard, P. (2016). Does standing up for sovereignty pay off politically? Arctic military announcements and governing party support in Canada from 2006 to 2014. International Journal, 71(1), 41–61.Google Scholar
Lijphardt, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loukacheva, N. (2010). Arctic governance. In Loukacheva, N. (Ed.), Polar law textbook (pp. 125–146). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
Lundestad, I., & Tunsjø, Ø. (2015). The United States and China in the Arctic. Polar Record, 51(4), 392–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medby, I. A. (2018). Articulating state identity: ‘Peopling’ the Arctic state. Political Geography, 62, 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medby, I. A. (2019). Language-games, geography, and making sense of the Arctic. Geoforum, 107, 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, R. W. (2014). Westphalian sovereignty and realism in contemporary international security. In Murray, R. W. & Nuttall, A. D. (Eds.), International relations and the Arctic: Understanding policy and governance (pp. 25–50). Amherst: Cambria.Google Scholar
Neumann, I. B. (1994). A region-building approach to Northern Europe. Review of International Studies, 20(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, M. (1998). Protecting the Arctic: Indigenous Peoples and Cultural Survival. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Olsen, I. H., & Shadian, J. M. (2018). Greenland and the Arctic Council: Subnational regions in a time of Arctic westphalianisation. In Kristensen, K. S. & Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (Eds.), Greenland and the international politics of a changing Arctic postcolonial paradiplomacy between high and low politics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Østerud, Ø., & Hønneland, G. (2014). Geopolitics and international governance in the Arctic. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 5(2), 156–176.Google Scholar
Parsons, J., Dinwoodie, J., & Roe, M. (2011). Northern opportunities: A strategic review of Canada’s Arctic icebreaking services. Marine Policy, 35(4), 549–556.Google Scholar
Pelaudeix, C. (2014). What is Arctic governance? A critical assessment of the diverse meanings of “Arctic governance”. In Alfredsson, G., Koivurova, T., & Ágústsson, H. Ó. (Eds.), The yearbook of polar law, Vol. 6 (pp. 398–426). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, 1(1), 13–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottem, S. V. (2017). The use of Arctic science: POPs, Norway and the Stockholm Convention. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 8, 246–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergunin, A., & Konyshev, V. (2014). Russia in search of its Arctic strategy: Between hard and soft power? The Polar Journal, 4(1), 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sil, R., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2010). Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, P. E., Tasch, J., & Gerhardt, H. (2015). Contesting the Arctic: Rethinking Politics in the Circumpolar North. London: I.B.Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, T. (2011). The Arctic and Antarctic regimes and the limits of polar comparativism. German Yearbook of International Law, 54, 315–349.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2013). Regime interplay in Arctic shipping governance: Explaining regional niche selection. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(1), 65–85.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S., & Hønneland, G. (Eds.). (2007). International Cooperation and Arctic Governance: Regime Effectiveness and Northern Region Building. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stone, D. P. (2015). The Changing Arctic Environment: The Arctic Messenger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stubb, A. (2009). A new Arctic era and Finland’s Arctic policy. Keynote Speech in the 20th Anniversary Seminar of the Arctic Centre. http://arcticcentre.ulapland.fi/docs/20_Stubb_Arktinenkeskus29092009.pdf Google Scholar
Temby, O. (2015). What are levels of analysis and what do they contribute to international relations theory? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 28(4), 721–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., & Belkin, A. (Eds.). (1996). Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Väätänen, V. (2019). Securing anticipatory geographies: Finland’s Arctic strategy and the geopolitics of international competitiveness. Geopolitics, OnlineFirst, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderBerg, J. D. (2018). Optimal Arctic port locations: A quantitative composite multiplier analysis of potential sites. Polar Geography, 41(1), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Soest, C., & Stroh, A. (2018). Comparisons across world regions: Managing conceptual, methodological, and practical challenges. In Ahram, A. I., Köllner, P., & Sil, R. (Eds.), Comparative area studies: Methodological rationales and cross-regional applications (pp. 66–84). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wæver, O. (2017). Afterword: The Arctic security constellation. Politik, 20(3), 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. (2007). Arctic unity, Arctic difference: Mapping the reach of Northern discourses. Polar Record, 43(2), 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson Rowe, E. (2020). Analyzing frenemies: An Arctic repertoire of cooperation and rivalry. Political Geography, 76, 102072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wormbs, N. (Ed.). (2018). Competing Arctic Futures: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. R. (1994). International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (1998). Creating Regimes: Arctic Accords and International Governance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. R. (2016). Governing the antipodes: International cooperation in Antarctica and the Arctic. Polar Record, 52(2), 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. R. (2019). Constructing the “new” Arctic: The future of the circumpolar North in a changing global order. Outlines of Global Transformations, 12(5), 6–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. R., Berkman, P. A., & Vylegzhanin, A. N. (Eds.). (2020). Governing Arctic Seas: Regional Lessons from the Bering Strait and Barents Sea, Volume 1. Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yurdusev, A. N. (1993). “Level of analysis” and “unit of analysis”: A case for distinction. Millennium, 22(1), 77–88.Google Scholar
Zellen, B. S. (2009). On Thin Ice: The Inuit, the State, and the Challenge of Arctic Sovereignty. Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar