Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T13:30:15.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Z-Scan Measurements on Molten Diphenylbutadiene in the Isotropic Liquid State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

P. A. Fleitz ,
R. L. Sutherland  and
T. J. Bunning
P. A. Fleitz
Affiliation:
Systran Corporation, 4126 Linden Avenue, Dayton, OH 45432
R. L. Sutherland
Affiliation:
Science Applications International Corp., 101 Woodman Drive, Dayton, OH, 45431
T. J. Bunning
Affiliation:
Materials Directorate, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433
Get access

Abstract

The two-photon absorption cross-section for diphenylbutadiene heated to the isotropic liquid state has been measured using the Z-scan technique. In this experiment, the solid diphenylbutadiene was heated using a temperature controlled hot stage above its melting point. Z-scan measurements using 35ps laser pulses at 532nm were then carried out on molten diphenylbutadiene. The value of the two-photon absorption cross-section at 532nm was measured to be σ2 = (38±8) × 10−50cm4s/photon-molecule. This value corresponds well with the cross-section measured previously for diphenylbutadiene dissolved in chloroform using the degenerate four-wave mixing technique.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 374: Symposia ZB – Materials for Optical Limiting , 1994 , 211
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sutherland, R.L., Rea, E., Natarajan, L.V., Pottenger, T., and Fleitz, P. A., J. Chem. Phys. 98, 2593–2603 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Sheik-Bahae, M., Said, A.A., Wei, T.H., Hagan, D.J., and Stryland, E.W. Van, IEEE J.Quantum Electron. 26, 760–769 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Wei, T.H., Hagan, D.J., Sence, M.J., Stryland, E.W. Van, Perry, J.W., and Coulter, D.R., Appl. Phys. B 54, 46–51 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Fleitz, P.A., McLean, D.G., and Sutherland, R.L., SPIE Proceedings 2229, 33–40 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Li, L., Hu, G., Palffy-Muhoray, P., Lee, M.A., and Yuan, H.J., “SPIE Proceedings 1692, 107–117 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Anderson, R.J.M., Holtom, G.R., and McClain, W.M., J. Chem. Phys. 70, 4310–4315 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Swofford, R.L. and McClain, W.M., J. Chem. Phys. 59, 5740–5741 (1973).Google Scholar
8. Fang, H.L., Gustafson, T.L., and Swofford, R.L., J. Chem. Phys. 78, 1663–1669 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Bennett, J.A. and Birge, R.R., J. Chem. Phys. 73, 4234–4246 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Fleitz, P.A., Sutherland, R.L., Natarajan, L.V., Pottenger, T., and Fernelius, N.C., Opt. Lett. 17, 716–718 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Sutherland, R.L., unpublished results.Google Scholar
12. Brant, M.C., Brandelik, D.M., McLean, D.G., Sutherland, R.L., and Fleitz, P.A., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 256 (to be published November 1994).Google Scholar