Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:51:34.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stick-Slip Fracture of Polymer/Metal Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Y. Toivola
Affiliation:
Dept of Chemical Engineering and Materials ScienceUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
B.P. Somerday
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, CA 94551
R. Shediac
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, CA 94551
M.P. Ivill
Affiliation:
Dept of Materials ScienceUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Get access

Abstract

The adhesion of a thin-film of PMMA to substrates consisting of Ti or Al was measured using a four-point bend technique. Initial results revealed that cracks propagated along the PMMA/metal interfaces at stable rates. Subsequent experiments showed intermittent (“stick-slip”) interfacial crack propagation consisting of cycles of crack initiation, unstable propagation, and arrest. To investigate the origin of stick-slip fracture behavior at PMMA/metal interfaces the effect of water uptake by PMMA on fracture behavior was studied. Four-point bend sandwich specimens were stored in vacuum or deionized water environments at either 25 °C or 65 °C for a period of 7 days prior to testing. The PMMA/Al system stored at 25 °C showed a transition from stable to stick-slip crack propagation when the exposure environment was changed from vacuum to water. Interface crack propagation was stable for both the PMMA/Ti and PMMA/Al systems on exposure to 65 °C water, but the critical strain energy release rate, GC was markedly reduced, indicating that water uptake promoted stick-slip fracture up to some critical degree of hydration. No change in stick-slip behavior was observed from a variation in imposed load-point displacement rate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hruby, J., MRS Bul. 26 337 (2001)Google Scholar
2. Charalambides, P.G., Lund, J., Evans, A. G. and McMeeking, R. M., J. App. Mech., 56 77 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Hakeem, M. I. and Phillips, M. G., J. Mater. Sci., 13 2284 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Hakeem, M. I. and Phillips, M. G., J. Mater. Sci., 14 2901 (1979).Google Scholar
5. Yamini, S. and Young, R. J., Polymer, 18 1075 (1977).Google Scholar
6. Gledhill, R. A., Kinloch, A. J., Yamini, S. and Young, R. J., Polymer, 19 574 (1978)Google Scholar
7. Frounchi, M., Chaplin, R. P. and Burford, R. P., Polymer, 35 752 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Davis, D. M. and Waters, N. E., J. Dental Res., 66 1128 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Montes, G. Marcos, , G. and Draughn, R. A., J. Biomed. Mat. Res., 21 629 (1987).Google Scholar