Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:52:44.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Protein Adsorption on the Surface Functionalized Planar Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Li-Lin Tay
Affiliation:
lilin.tay@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, National Research Council, Building M-50, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0R6, Canada
Nelson Rowell
Affiliation:
nelson.rowell@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, National Research Council, Canada
Rabah Boukherroub
Affiliation:
rabah.boukherroub@iemn.univ-lille1.fr, France
David Lockwood
Affiliation:
david.lockwood@nrc.gc.ca, Canada
Get access

Abstract

The peak energy of photoluminescence (PL) from an undecylenic acid functionalized porous Si demonstrated a large PL red-shift (∼ 75 nm) during 2.5 hours of protein incubation in our previous work. [1] Here we present a similar in-situ PL study of surface functionalized planar Si (Si:COOH). The PL of Si:COOH exhibited a 5 nm red-shift in its peak frequency and an approximately 10% drop in its intensity after incubation in a protein solution. Vibrational spectroscopic characterization was carried out upon the Si:COOH sample for which we observed the PL red-shift. The infrared absorption spectra showed clear evidence of protein adsorption on Si:COOH. This correlation study between the PL peak energy and the vibrational spectrum provided strong evidence that the observed red-shift was due to the formation of semiconductor-protein (Si:COOH:BSA) complexes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tay, L., Rowell, N. R., Boukherroub, R., Lockwood, D. J., J. Vacuum Sci. Tech. A, submitted (2005)Google Scholar
2 Lin, V.S.Y. Motesharei, K., Dancil, K.P. S., Sailor, M.J., Ghadiri, M. R., Science 278, 840 (1997).Google Scholar
3 Chan, S., Horner, S.R., Miller, B.L., Fauchet, P.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 638, F10.4.1 (2001)Google Scholar
4 Tay, L., Rowell, N., Lockwood, D.J., Boukherroub, R., Proc. SPIE, 5578, 99, 2004 Google Scholar
5 Boukherroub, R., Wojtyk, J.T.C., Wayner, D. D. M., Lockwood, D.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 149, H59(2002)Google Scholar
6 Sailor, M. J., Lee, E. J., Adv. Mat., 9, 783 (1997).Google Scholar
7 Tay, L., Rowell, N. L., Boukherroub, R., Lockwood, D. J., J. Vacuum Sci. Tech. A, submitted (2005)Google Scholar
8 Seker, F., Meeker, K., Kuech, T. F., Ellis, A.B., Chem. Rev., 100, 2505 (2000).Google Scholar
9 Rochat, N., Chabli, A., Bertin, F., Olivier, M., Vergnaud, C., and Mur, P., J. Appl. Phys. 91, 5029 (2002).Google Scholar
10 Milosevic, M., Berets, S.L., and Fadeev, A.Y., Appl. Spectro. 57, 724 (2004).Google Scholar