Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:47:45.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moisture effects of crack initiation in nanocrystalline silicon: a hybrid density-functional/molecular-dynamics study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Shuji Ogata
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Sciences, Yamaguchi University, Ube 755–8611, Japan
Rachid Belkada
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Sciences, Yamaguchi University, Ube 755–8611, Japan Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Kawaguchi 332–0012, Japan
Fuyuki Shimojo
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860–8555, Japan
Aiichiro Nakano
Affiliation:
CCLMS, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA70803–4001, USA Computer Science Department, University of Southern California, Los Angels, CA90089, USA
Get access

Abstract

A hybrid quantum-mechanical/molecular-dynamics simulation is performed for a cracked-Si model under tension with multiple H2O molecules around the crack-front, to investigate possible effects of the environmental molecules on fracture initiation in Si. Electronic structures near the crack-front are calculated quantum-mechanically on the basis of the density-functional theory. The quantum-mechanical atoms are embedded in a system of classical atoms. The hybrid simulation results show significant effects of stress intensity factor on the reaction processed of the H2O molecules at the crack front.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

IEEE, Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS), 1999 IEEE 12th International (IEEE, New York, 1999).Google Scholar
Nanotechnology Research Directions, IWGN Workshop Report, edited by Roco, M.C., Williams, S., and Alvisatos, P. (Int'l Technology Research Inst., Loyola College, Baltimore, 1999), http://itri.loyola.edu/nano/IWGN.Research.Directions/.Google Scholar
Lawn, B., Fracture of Brittle Solids, 2nd Ed. (Cambridge, New York, 1995).Google Scholar
Muhlstein, C., Brown, S. and Ritchie, R.O., Sensors and Actuators A94, 177 (2001).Google Scholar
Wong-Ng, W., White, G.S., Freiman, S.W., and Lindsay, C.G., Comp. Mater. Sci. 6, 63 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Ogata, S., Shimojo, F., Nakano, A., Vashishta, P., and Kalia, R.K., Comp. Phys. Comm. 149, 30 (2002).Google Scholar
7. Ogata, S., Lidorikis, E., Shimojo, F., Nakano, A., Vashishta, P., and Kalia, R.K., Comp. Phys. Comm. 138, 143 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Pérez, R. and Gumbsch, P., Acta. Mater. 48, 4517 (2000).Google Scholar
9. Stillinger, F.H. and Weber, T.A., Phys. Rev. B 31, 5262 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Hohenberg, P. and Kohn, W., Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).Google Scholar
11. Kohn, W. and Sham, L. J., Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).Google Scholar
12. See, e.g., Payne, M.C., Teter, M.P., Allan, D.C., Arias, T.A., and Joannopoulos, J.D., Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 1045 (1992).Google Scholar