Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:19:19.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In-Situ Neutron Diffraction Study of the Behavior of AL6XN Stainless Steel Under Biaxial Loading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Michael Gharghouri
Affiliation:
Michael.Gharghouri@nrc.gc.ca, National Research Council, Canadian Neutron Beam Centre, Chalk River Laboratories, Bldg. 459, Stn. 18, Chalk River, MA, K0J 1J0, Canada, (613) 584-8811 x4936, (613) 584-4040
Tito Marin
Affiliation:
tm268@cornell.edu, Cornell University, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 196 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States
Ronald B Rogge
Affiliation:
Ronald.Rogge@nrc.gc.ca, National Research Council, Canadian Neutron Beam Centre, Chalk River Laboratories, Bldg. 459, Stn. 18, Chalk River, K0J 1J0, Canada
Paul R Dawson
Affiliation:
prd5@cornell.edu, Cornell University, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 196 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States
Get access

Abstract

In–situ neutron diffraction has been used to measure lattice strains parallel to two principal stress directions in biaxially-loaded AL6XN stainless steel. A new fixture was developed for loading thin-walled tubular specimens through combinations of internal pressure and axial loading. Under these conditions, the principal directions (σzz and σθθ in a cylindrical r, θ, z coordinate system) remain constant with respect to the initial crystallographic texture regardless of the level of biaxiality, a distinct advantage for diffraction experiments over the traditional tension/torsion tests for which this condition does not hold. Specimens were first pressurized to the level required to obtain a chosen value of σθθ. The axial load was then increased to reach the yield surface at different σθθzz ratios, ranging from uniaxial to balanced biaxial loading (0, 0.4, 0.7, 1 according to Tresca). The {200}, {220}, {222}, and {311} reflections were measured in the axial and hoop directions as a function of axial load. A sequence of axial loading/unloading episodes was applied for different levels of plastic deformation. Under uniaxial tension, the {200} reflection showed the highest axial strains, followed by the {311}, and {220}/{222} reflections. With increasing internal pressure (biaxiality), the axial lattice strains corresponding to a given axial stress tended to decrease, and the responses of the various reflections tended to merge.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dawson, P. R., Boyce, D. E., and Rogge, R. B., Mater. Sci. Eng. 399A, 13 (2005)Google Scholar
2. Holden, T. M., Holt, R. A., and Pang, J. W. L., Metall. Mater. Trans., 33A, 749 (2002)10.1007/s11661-002-0141-2Google Scholar
3. Rangaswamy, P., Bourke, M. A. M., Brown, D. W., Kaschner, G. C., Rogge, R. B., Stout, M. G., and Tome, C. N., Metall. Mater. Trans., 33A, 757 (2002)10.1007/s11661-002-0142-1Google Scholar
4. Dawson, P., Boyce, D., MacEwen, S., and, Rogge, R., Mater. Sci. Eng., 313A, 123 (2001)10.1016/S0921-5093(01)00967-4Google Scholar
5. Hutchings, M. T., Withers, P. J., Holden, T. M., and Lorentzen, T., Introduction to the Characterization of Residual Stress by Neutron Diffraction, (Taylor and Francis, 2005) p. 50 Google Scholar