Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:59:46.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High Temperature Implantation in Graphite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

G. Braunstein
Affiliation:
Department of Physics;
B.S. Elman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics;
M.S. Dresselhaus
Affiliation:
Department of Physics; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science;
G. Dresselhaus
Affiliation:
Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory;Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
T. Venkatesan
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, USA
Get access

Abstract

In previous studies it was found that when highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) is implanted at room temperature, the damage caused by the implantation could be completely annealed by heating the sample to temperatures higher than ∼ 2500°C. However at these high temperatures, the implanted species was found to diffuse out of the sample, as evidenced by the disappearance of the impurity peak in the Rutherford backscattering (RBS) spectrum. If, on the other hand, the HOPG crystal was held at a high temperature (≥ 600°C) during the implantation, partial annealing could be observed. The present work further shows that it is possible to anneal the radiation damage and simultaneously to retain the implants in the graphite lattice by means of high temperature implantation (Ti ≥ 450°C) followed by annealing at 2300°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kelly, B.T., Physics of Graphite (Applied Science Publishers Ltd., Essex, 1981).Google Scholar
2. Elman, B.S., Dresselhaus, M.S., Braunstein, G., Dresselhaus, G., Venkatesan, T., Wilkens, B. and Gibson, M., Proceedings of this Symposium.Google Scholar
3. Venkatesan, T., Elman, B.S., Braunstein, G., Dresselhaus, M.S. and Dresselhaus, G., Proceedings of this Symposium.Google Scholar
4. Dresselhaus, M.S. and Dresselhaus, G., Advances in Physics 30, 139 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Marchand, A. and Pacault, A., “Nouveau Traite de Chemie Minerale” vol. VII, No. 1, 457 (1968).Google Scholar
6. Fishbach, D. in: Chemistry and Physics of Carbon vol. 7, Walker, P.L. Jr. ed. (Marcel Dekker, New York 1971) p. 1.Google Scholar
7. Elman, B.S., Ph.D. Thesis, M.I.T., 1983 (unpublished).Google Scholar
8. Braunstein, G. and Kalish, R., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. 209/210, 387 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Dennis, J.R. and Hale, E.B., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 1119 (1978).Google Scholar
10. Elman, B.S., Hom, M., Maby, E. and Dresselhaus, M.S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 20, 341346 (1983).Google Scholar