Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T03:25:44.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Graphite Intercalation Compounds Prepared in Hydrofluoric Acid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

X. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Center for Advanced Materials Research, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-4003, michael.lemer@orst.edu
M.M. Lerner
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Center for Advanced Materials Research, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-4003, michael.lemer@orst.edu
Get access

Abstract

The graphite intercalation compounds CxC8F17SO3 · yF and CxN(SO2CF3)2 are readily prepared under ambient conditions in 48 % hydrofluoric acid, using the oxidant K2MnF6. The product compositions are evaluated by mass uptake, TGA, and elemental analysis. PXRD peak position and peak width analyses indicate that the stable product CxC8F17SO3 · yF is obtained after 50 h. (x ≅ 18, y ≅ 4) and is comprised of a solid solution of stage 2 and 3. This material can be obtained within 1 h. at 50 °C. The addition of up to 83 vol. % conc. HNO3 or 17 % fuming H2SO4 produces a stage 2 intercalation compound within hours. Stage 2 CxN(SO2CF3)2 (x = 37) is obtained within 15 minutes under ambient condition in HF. The anion orientations for these GICs are evaluated by structural refinement. Larger anions containing –SO2CnF2n+1 substitutents can also be intercalated, although the reaction rates are very slow.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bartlett, N., McQuillan, B., Intercalafion Chemistry; Whittingham, S.; Jacobson, A., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1982, pp.1953.Google Scholar
2. Ozawa, K., Sol. St. Ionics 69, p. 212 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Buckley, J., Edie, D., Eds., Carbon-carbon materials and composites, Noyes Publ.: NJ, 1993.Google Scholar
4. Horn, D., Boehm, H.P., Mater. Sci. Eng. 31, p. 87 (1977).Google Scholar
5. Ruisinger, B., Boehm, H. P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 26, No 3, p. 253 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Zhang, Z., Lerner, M., Chem. Mater. 8, p. 257 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Boehm, H. P., Helle, W., Ruisinger, B., Syn. Met 23, p. 395 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Bourelle, E., Douglade, J., Metrot, A., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 244, p. 227 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Kang, F., Leng, Y., Carbon 35, 8, p. 1089 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Bode, H., Jenssen, H., Bandte, F., Angew. Chem. 65, p. 304 (1953).Google Scholar
11. Williamson, G., Hall, W., Acta Metallurgica 1, p. 22 (1953).Google Scholar
12. hehre, Warren I., Shusterman, Alan I., and Wayne Huang, W., A Laboratory Book of Computational Organic Chemistry, Wavefunction Inc., 1996, pp. 6.Google Scholar
13. Su, Z., Coppens, P., Acta Crys., A 53, p. 749 (1997).Google Scholar
14. Mallouk, T., Bartlett, N., J. Chem. Soc., Chem Commun. p. 103 (1983).Google Scholar
15. Johansson, P., Gejji, S. P., Tegenfeldt, J., Lindgren, J., J. Electrochimica Acta, 43, p. 1375 (1998).Google Scholar