Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:57:11.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fracture mechanisms of GaAs under nanoscratching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

J.-M. Solletti
Affiliation:
Faculty of Basic Science, IPMC, EPFL, CH-1015-Lausanne, Switzerland.
M. Parlinska-Wojtan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Basic Science, IPMC, EPFL, CH-1015-Lausanne, Switzerland.
J. Tharian
Affiliation:
EMPA Überlandstrasse 129, CH-8600 Dübendorf.
K. Wasmer
Affiliation:
EMPA Feuerwerkstrasse 39, CH – 3602 Thun.
J. Michler
Affiliation:
EMPA Feuerwerkstrasse 39, CH – 3602 Thun.
C. Ballif
Affiliation:
University of Neuchâtel, A.-L. Breguet 2, CH-2000 Neuchâtel.
D. Schulz
Affiliation:
Bookham technologies plc, Binzstrasse 17 CH – 8045 Zürich.
A. Karimi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Basic Science, IPMC, EPFL, CH-1015-Lausanne, Switzerland.
Get access

Abstract

Nanoscratching on GaAs (001) by a pyramidal diamond tip (Berkovitch) indenter has been carried on under different loads, scratching velocities and directions. Plastic deformation and fractures induced by scratching have been investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM), and by scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM, respectively). Surface images revealed radial and surface tensile cracks. Focused ion beam (FIB) milling of the contact area revealed median and shear fracture distribution in the volume. The different cracks were characterized for various scratching conditions in terms of their direction of propagation, extension and frequencies. Plastic deformations have been characterized by vertical displacement of material. No purely ductile zone was observed, GaAs deformation occurred by fractures and plastic strain. Their preponderances are discussed in terms of material properties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ericson, F., Hjort, K., Schweitz, J.-A, Andersson, S. and Janzén, E., J. Cryst. Growth 143, 2228 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Zamponi, C., Männig, U., Staab, T.E.M., Maier, K., Eichler, S. and Hammer, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 41284130 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Keer, L. M. and Kuo, C. H., Int. J. Solids Structures 29, 18191826 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Hill, R. in The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, (Clarendon, Oxford 1950) pp. 103106.Google Scholar
5. Chiang, S. S., Marshall, D. B. and Evans, A. G., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 298311 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Bucaille, J. L., Felder, E. and Hochstetter, G., Wear 249, 422432 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Tabor, D. in The Hardness of Metals (Clarendon, Oxford 1951) p. 73.Google Scholar
8. Hoehn, J. W., Venkataraman, S. K., Huang, H., and Gerberich, W. W., Mat. Sci. Eng. A 192/193, 301308 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Yasutake, K., Konishi, Y., Adachi, K., Yoshii, K., Umeno, M. and Kawabe, H., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 27, 22382246 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Margevicius, R. W. and Gumbsch, P., Phil. Mag. A 78, 567581 (1998).Google Scholar