Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:58:53.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect Of Base Pressure In Sputter Deposition On Characteristics Of Indium Tin Oxide Thin Film

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Byung Hak Lee
Affiliation:
Display R & D Center, Samsung Display Devices Co., Ltd. 575 Shin-Dong, Paldal-Ku, Suwon, Kyungki-Do, Korea
Choong-Hoon Yi
Affiliation:
Display R & D Center, Samsung Display Devices Co., Ltd. 575 Shin-Dong, Paldal-Ku, Suwon, Kyungki-Do, Korea
Lee Gon Kim
Affiliation:
Display R & D Center, Samsung Display Devices Co., Ltd. 575 Shin-Dong, Paldal-Ku, Suwon, Kyungki-Do, Korea
Si-Hyun Lee
Affiliation:
Display R & D Center, Samsung Display Devices Co., Ltd. 575 Shin-Dong, Paldal-Ku, Suwon, Kyungki-Do, Korea
Get access

Abstract

A novel approach to sputter deposit low resistivity indium tin oxide thin films in cost effective way has been made. To reduce the complication of out-gassing from organic substances that are deposited at prior process steps in the flat panel display manufacturing, DC+RF magnetron sputtering was performed with a relatively high base pressure. Introduction of impurity atoms originated from residual air in the chamber into the film produced the change in lattice as well as microstructure of the film. Sputter deposition with higher base pressure resulted in lower resistivity of the film. Increase in the mobility of the carrier resulted in resistivity decrease. Resistivity as low as 1.5×10−4 Ω cm has been achieved with DC 0.67 W/cm2 + RF 0.67 W/cm2 power density and 10−5 Torr base pressure. X-ray diffraction analysis showed as much as 0.2 % increase in lattice constant resulted from higher base pressure sputtering. No further improvement of conductivity was observed for the base pressure over 10−5 Torr, suggesting impurity introduction saturation into the film.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Chopra, K. L., Major, S., and Pandya, D. K., Thin Solid Films, 102, 1 (1983)Google Scholar
2. Naseem, S. and Coutts, T. J., Thin Solid Films, 138, 65 (1986)Google Scholar
3. Groth, R., Phys. Status Solidi, 14, 69 (1966)Google Scholar
4. Ryaboya, L. A. and Savitskaya, Y. S., Thin Solid Films, 2, 141 (1968)Google Scholar
5. Hamberg, I. and Granqvist, C. G., J. Appl. Phys. 60, R123 (1986)Google Scholar
6. Stollenwerk, J., Ocker, B., and Kretschmer, K. H., Digest of Technical Papers, (Display Manufacturing Technology Conference, Jan. 1995, Society for Information Display), p. 111 Google Scholar
7. Shigesato, Y., Hayashi, Y., Masui, A., and Haranou, T., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 30, 814 (1991)Google Scholar
8. Ishibashi, S., Higuchi, Y., Ota, Y., and Nakamura, K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8, 1399 (1990)Google Scholar
9. Ridge, M. I. and Howson, R. P., Thin Solid Films, 96, 121 (1982)Google Scholar