Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:27:52.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dissolution Behavior and Fission Product Release from Irradiated Thoria-Urania Fuel in Groundwater at 90°C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

James L. Jerden Jr
Affiliation:
Chemical Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A.
J. C. Cunnane
Affiliation:
Chemical Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The dissolution behavior and fission-product release from irradiated thoria-urania fuel was studied by immersing fuel samples in J-13 well water at 90°C. The samples are from the Shippingport Light Water Breeder Reactor and consist of binary solid solutions of (U,Th)O2 with UO2 contents varying from 2.0 to 5.2 Wt.%. The post-irradiation U isotopic composition of the samples used in our experiments is: 87.3% 233U, 10.4% 234U, 1.8% 235U, and <0.5% 238U, 236U, 232U. Burn up values for the samples range from 22.3 to 40.9 megawatt-days per kg-metal. Our tests were performed on polished disks and on crushed and sieved samples in stainless-steel reaction vessels with air-filled head-space. After 196 days of reaction, samples showed no evidence for corrosion at the micrometer scale. Concentration ranges (μgL-1) of key radionuclides in filtered (∼5 nm pore size) leachates were: 0.1 – 15 90Sr, 0.9 – 7.0 99Tc, 0.1 – 35.2 137Cs,<0.2 – 0.8 233U, <0.1 – 0.7 232Th. Concentrations of 237Np, 239Pu, 240Pu and 241Am were all <0.2 μgL-1. The relatively high concentrations of the fission products 90Sr and 137Cs occur early during leaching and decrease for later samplings. Matrix dissolution rates for the irradiated thoria-urania samples range from ∼3x10-3 to <3×10-5 mg m-2day-1 and are at least two orders of magnitude lower than those measured for UO2 spent fuels under similar experimental conditions.

Type
articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Taylor, P., Hocking, W., Johnson, L., McEachern, R., Nucl. Technol. 116, 222230 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Sunder, S. and Miller, N. H., J. Nucl. Mater. 279, 118126 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Richardson, K. D., Campbell, W. R., Clayton, J. C., Smith, B. C., End-of-Life Destructive Examination of Light Water Breeder Reactor Fuel Rods, WAPD-TM-1606, October 1987.Google Scholar
4. Olson, G. L., McCardell, R. K., Illum, D. B., Fuel Summary Report: Shippingport Light Water Breeder Reactor, INEEL/EXT-98–00799 Rev.1, January 1999.Google Scholar
5. Giovengo, J. F., Goldberg, I., Sphar, C. D., Fission Gas Release From High Burn-up ThO2 and ThO2-UO2 Fuels Irradiated at Low Temperature, WAPD-TM-1350, May, 1982.Google Scholar
6. Harrar, J. E., Carley, W. F., Isherwood, E., Raber, , Report of the committee to review the justification of J-13 well water in Nevada nuclear waste storage investigations. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCID-21867, Livermore California. (1990).Google Scholar
7. Forsythe, R. S. and Werme, L. O., J. Nucl. Mater. 190, 319, (1992).Google Scholar
8. Hubert, S., Barthelet, K., Fourest, B., Lagarde, G., Dacheux, N., Baglan, N., J. Nucl. Mater. 297, 206213, (2001).Google Scholar
9. Langmuir, D., Herman, J. S., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 44, 17531766 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Grenthe, J., Fuger, J., Konings, R., Lemire, R. J., Muller, A. B., Nguyen-Trung, C., Wanner, H., Chemical Thermodynamics, Volume 1: Chemical Thermodynamics of Uranium: North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1, 714p (1992).Google Scholar
11. Shoesmith, D. W., J. Nucl. Mater., 282, 131, (2000).Google Scholar