Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:05:28.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Differences between the InyGa1−yAs/GaAs Interface and GaAs/InyGa1−yAs Interface in Superlattice over a InxGa1−xAs (x<y) Buffer Layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

X.J Wang
Affiliation:
National Research Center for Optoelectronic Technology, Institute of Semiconductors, CAS, Beijing 100083, P.R.China
L.X Zheng
Affiliation:
National Research Center for Optoelectronic Technology, Institute of Semiconductors, CAS, Beijing 100083, P.R.China
Z.B Xiao
Affiliation:
National Research Center for Optoelectronic Technology, Institute of Semiconductors, CAS, Beijing 100083, P.R.China
Z.P Zhang
Affiliation:
National Integrated Optoelectronics Laboratories, Semiconductor Institute Region, Beijing 100083, P.R.China
X.W Hu
Affiliation:
National Research Center for Optoelectronic Technology, Institute of Semiconductors, CAS, Beijing 100083, P.R.China
Q.M Wang
Affiliation:
National Integrated Optoelectronics Laboratories, Semiconductor Institute Region, Beijing 100083, P.R.China
Get access

Abstract

The InyGa1−yAs/GaAs superlattice on InxGa1−x.As (x<y) buffer layer was grown by MOCVD. The well layer is under compressive strain and the barrier layer is under tensile strain. However, both layers do not exceed the calculated critical value based on the M−yAs interface was smoother than the InyGa1−yAs/GaAs interface; the Indium composition gradual region at the GaAs/InyGal1−yAs interface was narrower than that at the InyGa 1−yAs/GaAs interface; in InyGa1−yAs alloy layer, the Indium composition near the GaAs/InyGa1-yAs interface was higher than that near another interface. For the first time, we explained the composition profile in this kind of superlattice based on the indium segregation theory. A new strain relaxation model, in which the 30-degree and 90-degree shockley partial dislocations were taken into account under both tensile and compressive strains, was presented to explain the difference of the smoothness between the GaAs/InyGa1−yAs interface and the InyGa 1−yAs/GaAs interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bonard, J., «Adsorption on Metal Surfaces», Blsorier Press, New York, 1983Google Scholar
2. Bruisma, R. and Zangwill, A., Europhys.Lett.4(1987)729 Google Scholar
3. Hornstra, J. and Bartcls, W.I.,J.Cryst.Growth.44(1978)513 Google Scholar
4. Grabow, M. and Gilmer, G., MatRes.Soc. Proc.94(1987)13 Google Scholar
5. Merwe, J.H. Van der and Bal, C.A.B. in «Epitaxial Growth», Part B, Academic Press, New York, (1975)193 Google Scholar
6. Mattews, J. W. and Blakcslee, A.B.,J.Cryst.Growth 27(1974)118;32(1976)265Google Scholar
7. Brian Dodson, W. and Fritz, I.J., Crystal Properties& Preparation, vol.21, (1989)29 Google Scholar
8. Matthews, J.W., «Epitaxial Growth », Academic Press, New York, (1975)581 Google Scholar
9. Hull, D. and Bacon, D.J., «Introduction to Dislocations», Pergamon Press, Oxford, (1984)91 Google Scholar
10. Fitzgerald, E.A., Ast, D.G., Kirchner, P.D., Pettit, G.D., and Woodall, J.M., J.Appl.Phys. 63(3)(1988)693 Google Scholar
11. Viegers, M.P.A., Iieuwma, C.W.T. Bulle, Zalm, P.C. and Maree, P.M.J., Mat.Res.Soc.Proc.37(1985)331 Google Scholar
12. Maree, P.M.J., Olthof, , Frenken, J.W.M.,Veen, J.F. van der, Bulle-Lieuwma, C.W.T.,Viegers, M.P.A., and Zalm, P.C., J.Appl.Phys.58(1985)3097 Google Scholar
13. Hirth, J.P., «Theory of Dislocation», 2nd. ed., Wiley Press, New York, 1982 Google Scholar
14. Petruzllo, J., Leys, M.R., Appl.Phys.Lett.53(24)(1988)2414 Google Scholar