Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:04:38.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applications of in Situ Cosmogenic Nuclides in the Geologic Site Characterization of Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. C. Gosse ,
C. D. Harrington  and
J. W. Whitney
J. C. Gosse
Affiliation:
EES- 1, MS D462, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545.
C. D. Harrington
Affiliation:
EES- 1, MS D462, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545.
J. W. Whitney
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center MS 425, Denver, CO 80225
Get access

Abstract

The gradual buildup of rare isotopes from interactions between cosmic rays and atoms in an exposed rock provides a new method of directly determining the exposure age of rock surfaces. The cosmogenic nuclide method can also provide constraints on erosion rates and the length of time surface exposure was interrupted by burial. Numerous successful applications of the technique have been imperative to the complete surface geologic characterization of Yucca Mountain, Nevada, a potential high level nuclear waste repository. The 10Be exposure age of Black Cone lava, within a ten mile radius of the proposed repository site, is 840 ± 210 kyr (in agreement with previous K/Ar dates of 1.0 ± 0.1 Ma). Rates of erosion of the tuff bedrock (< 0.4 cm/kyr from 7 10Be measurements) and of hillslope colluvium (∼ 0.5 cm/kyr from 10Be dates on boulder deposits) preclude denudation of the mountain as a concern. Neotectonic concerns (rate of slip and timing of last significant movement along faults) are also being addressed with in situ 14C and 10Be measurements on scarp surfaces and on fault-dissected landforms where no surficial expression of the fault is preserved.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 412: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX , 1995 , 799
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1. Nishiizumi, K., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 94, 17907–17915 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Jull, A. J. T., Lifton, N., Phillips, W. M., Quade, J., Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phy.s Res. B, 308–310 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Lal, D., Earth and Planetary Science Letters 104, 424–439 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Nishiizumi, K., et al., Earth and Planetary Science Letters 104, 440–454 (1991).Google Scholar
5. For similar treatment of other erosion rate data see [4]; Macciaroli, P., PhD. Dissertation, Univ. Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1995; J. C. Gosse, D. R. Grant, J. Klein, B. Lawn, CANQUA-CGRG Conf. Abstr., Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland, St. Johns , CA19 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Gosse, J. C., Evenson, E. B., Klein, J., Lawn, B., Middleton, R., Geology 23, 877–880 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Gosse, J. C., Klein, J., Evenson, E. B., Lawn, B., Middleton, R., Science 268, 1329–1333 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Gosse, J. C., Harrington, C., Reedy, R., Radiocarbon, May, 1996, proceedings review, (accepted).Google Scholar
9. Total (whole rock) chemistry was used because the low abundance (< 3%) and fine-grained nature of the quartz in the tuff made it unfeasible to separate a sufficient mass of the mineral from the tuff. This demonstrates the universal nature of the cosmogenic dating tool. The 10Be whole rock production rates were calculated using production rates estimated for production from the major elements in the tuff [J. Klein, pers. commun., 1995]. The whole rock production rates ranged from 90% to 95% of the rate for pure quartz and the estimated 1 σ uncertainty is ∼ 10%.Google Scholar
10. Whitney, J.W., Harrington, C. D., GSA Bulletin 105, 1008–1018 (1993).Google Scholar
11. US Department of Energy, Topical Report: Evaluation of the potentially adverse condition “Evidence for extreme erosion during the Quaternary Period at Yucca Mountain, Nevada” (1993), Vol. YMP/92-41-TPR.Google Scholar
12. Harrington, C. D., W.Whitney, J., Jull, A. J. T., Phillips, W., USGS Circular (accepted).Google Scholar
13. Crowe, B., et al., Status of volcanism studies for the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report (Los Alamos, NM, 1995), Vol. LA–I 2908–MS.Google Scholar