Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:35:13.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Investigation of the Al/n-GaAs Diodes with High Schottky Barrier Heights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

C-P. Chen
Affiliation:
Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Materials Science and Engineering Department, 1509 University Ave., Madison, WI. 53706
Y. A. Chang
Affiliation:
Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Materials Science and Engineering Department, 1509 University Ave., Madison, WI. 53706
T.F. Kuech
Affiliation:
Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Chemical Engineering Department, 1415 Johnson Dr., Madison, WI. 53706
Get access

Abstract

Thermally stable Al/n-GaAs Schottky contacts, up to annealing temperature at 500 °C for 20 seconds, have been realized by sputter deposition from an Al target to (100) n-GaAs at a base pressure ∼2×10−7 Torr. The Schottky barrier height was 0.75 eV (0.9 eV) when using the I-V (C-V) method with an ideality factor of 1.09 for the as-deposited samples. The Schottky barrier height increased to 0.97 eV (1.06 eV) with an ideality factor of 1.07 after annealing at 400 °C for 20 seconds. This barrier height, 0.97 eV, is the highest value reported for Al/n-GaAs diodes. The interfacial stability between Al and GaAs has been examined by cross section transmission electron microscopy. A (200) dark field cross section transmission electron microscopy image of the contact after annealing at 600 °C showed that the (Ga,Al)As phase formed at the interface and the enhancement of the Schottky barrier height was due to the formation of this phase.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Schottky, W., Naturwissenschaften 26, 843 (1938).Google Scholar
2 Bardeen, J., Phys. Rev. 71, 717 (1947).Google Scholar
3 Spicer, W.E., Lindau, I., Skeath, P.R., Su, C.Y., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 17, 1019 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Tejedor, C., Flores, F., and Louis, E., J. Phys. C 10, 2163 (1977).Google Scholar
5 Louis, S.G., and Cohen, M.L., Phys. Rev. B 13, 2461 (1976).Google Scholar
6 Missous, M., Rhoderick, E.H., and Singer, K.E., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 3189 (1986).Google Scholar
7 Johnson, N.M., Magee, T.J., and Peng, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 13, 838, (1976).Google Scholar
8 Svensson, S.P., Landgren, G., and Andersson, T.G., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 4474 (1983).Google Scholar
9 Wang, W.I., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B1, 574 (1983).Google Scholar
10 Panish, M.B. and Sumski, S.J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 30, 129 (1969).Google Scholar
11 Sze, S.M., in Physics of Semiconductor Devices, John Wiley & Sons Press, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
12 Revva, P., Langer, J.M., Missous, M. and Peaker, A.R., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 416 (1993).Google Scholar
13 Chang, Y.A., in Advanced Metallization and Processing for Devices and Circuits-II (Eds., Katz, A., Nission, Y.I., Murarka, S.P. and Harper, D.M.E.), Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. 260, 43 (1992).Google Scholar
14 Huang, T.S., Peng, J.G., and Lin, C.C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B11, 756 (1993).Google Scholar