Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:45:39.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AC and DC Studies of Non-Exponential Relaxation Processes in Superionic Conductors: Correlation of Conductivity and NMR Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

C.A. Angell
Affiliation:
Department of ChemistryPurdue UniversityWest Lafayette, IN 47907
S.W. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & EngineeringIowa State University110 Engineering Annex Ames, IA 50011
Get access

Abstract

This paper considers the results of NMR relaxation studies of fast ion glasses in the light of variable frequency electrical conductivity measurements. We show that the low activation energy observed for relaxation processes studied at constant frequency below the temperature of the T1minimum is reproduced by the corresponding constant frequency conductivity measurements. Other characteristics of the constant frequency conductivity in this low activation energy regime, such as the unphysically low pre-exponent, match with the corresponding observations for NMR measurements. Since the activation energy observed at constant frequency in the frequency-dependent regime for conductivity depends on the characteristic departure from exponential relaxation for the conductivity process, we conclude that the NMR activation energy is likewise a simple consequence of the nonexponential character of ionic relaxation in the glass. In this case, the low activation energy attributed to processes probed by NMR relaxation is simply a misinterpretation since it is found, in the wide frequency range studies available to admittance bridge measurements, that all elements of the relaxation spectrum have essentially equal activation energies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Macedo, P.B., Moynihan, C.T. and Bose, R., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 13, 171 (1972).Google Scholar
2. Grant, R.J., Ingram, M.D., Turner, L.D.S., and Vincent, C.A., J. Phys. Chem., 82, 2838 (1978).Google Scholar
3. Wong, J. and Angell, C.A., “Glass: Structure by Spectroscopy”, Marcel Dekker, New York, N.Y., (1976) Chapter 11.Google Scholar
4. Almond, D.P., Duncan, G.K. and West, A.R., J. Non-Cryst. Sol., 74, 285 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Angell, C.A., Solid State Ionics, 18 &19, 72 (1986); Solid Electrolytes, Ed. T. Takahashi (in press).Google Scholar
6. Funke, K., Z. Phys. Chem. Neue Folge, 154, 251 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Martin, S.W., Mat. Chem. Phys. (in press).Google Scholar
8. Ngai, K.L. and Jain, H., Solid State Ionics, 18 &19, 362 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Gobel, E., Muller-Warmuth, W. and Olyschlager, H., J. Mag. Res., 36, 371 (1979).Google Scholar
10. Ngai, K.L., Rendell, R.W., Rajagopal, A.K. and Teitler, S., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 484, 150, (1986).Google Scholar
11. Borjesson, L., Torell, L.M., Martin, S.W., Liu, Changle and Angell, C.A., Physics Letters, 125, 330 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Martin, S.W. and Angell, C.A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 83, 185 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Martin, S.W., Bischof, H.J., Mali, M., Roos, J. and Brinkman, D., Solid State Ionics, 18 & 19, 421 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Borjesson, L., Martin, S.W., Torell, L. and Angell, C.A., Solid State Ionics, 18 & 19, 431 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Angell, C.A., Solid State Ionics, 18 & 19, 431 (1986).Google Scholar
16. Kawamura, J. and Shimoji, M., J. Non-Cryst. Sol., 88, 281 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Borjesson, L. and Torell, L.M., Solid State Ionics, 25, 85 (1987).Google Scholar
18. Martin, S.W. and Torgenson, D. (to be published).Google Scholar
19. Martin, S.W., Torgenson, D., Tatsumisago, M. and Angell, C.A. (to be published).Google Scholar