Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-kc5xb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T19:44:51.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of the Leaching Behaviour of Sintered UO2 in Groundwater Using Nuclear Microprobe Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Patrick Trocellier
Affiliation:
Cea-Cnrs, Laboratoire Pierre Süe, Centre d’Etudes de Saclay, 91191 Gifsur Yvette (France)
Jean Paul Gallien
Affiliation:
Cea-Cnrs, Laboratoire Pierre Süe, Centre d’Etudes de Saclay, 91191 Gifsur Yvette (France)
Christelle Cachoir
Affiliation:
Cea-Cnrs, Laboratoire Pierre Süe, Centre d’Etudes de Saclay, 91191 Gifsur Yvette (France)
Pierre Toulhoat
Affiliation:
Cea, Section de Géochimie (DCC/DESD/SESD), Centre d’Etudes de Fontenay aux Roses, 92265 Fontenay aux Roses (France).
Get access

Abstract

The leaching behaviour of sintered UO2 pellets has been studied in synthetic groundwater at 96 °C under strictly controlled conditions (CO2 partial pressure, O2 partial pressure, pH and redox potential). Results obtained in oxidizing conditions (O2 content varying from 5 to 25 ppm) show a strong initial uranium release in solution during the first five days and a solubility control essentially driven by the growth of U(VI) species such as oxides, hydrates and carbonates. Results obtained in reducing conditions (use of a mineralogical buffer of Ni(0)/Ni(ll) with E0 = -0.257 Volts) show a very weak uranium release in solution close to 10-11 mole/l and a solubility control essentially driven by the formation of U(IV) compounds such as coffinite or uraninite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wang, R. and Katayama, Y.B., Nucl. Chem. Waste Management 3 (1982) 83.Google Scholar
2. Johnson, L.H., Shoesmith, D.W., Lunansky, G.E., Bailey, M.G. and Tremaine, P.R., Nucl. Technol. 56 (1982) 238.Google Scholar
3. Forsyth, R.S. and Werme, L.O., J. Nucl. Mater. 190 (1992) 3.Google Scholar
4. Gallien, J.P., PhD Thesis, January 1994, University of Orsay (France).Google Scholar
5. Cachoir, C., Progress Report “Undergraduate Teaching of Radioactivity, Radioelements and Radiochemistry”, July 1994, University of Orsay (France).Google Scholar
6. Gallien, J.P. et al., submitted for publication to J. Nucl. Mat..Google Scholar
7. Trocellier, P. and Gallien, J.P., Nucl; Instr. and Meth. B93 (1994) 311.Google Scholar
8. Berthier, B. et al., Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Nuclear Microprobe Technology and Applications, 10–14 October 1994, Shanghaï (China).Google Scholar
9. Parkhurst, D.L., Donald, C.T., Plummer, L.N., U.S. Geol. Survey Water Res. Invest. Report 8096 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Woo Song, Kun and Seung Yang, Myung, J. Nucl. Mater. 209 (1994) 270.Google Scholar
11. OECD/NEA Uranium Thermodynamical Data Base, Grenthe, I. et al., 1992.Google Scholar
12. Janeczek, J. and Ewing, R.C., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV, MRS Symposium Proceedings volume 257, pp. 497.Google Scholar
13. Trocellier, P., Gallien, J.P. and Cachoir, C., Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Nuclear Microprobe Technology and Applications, 1014 October 1994, Shanghaï (China).Google Scholar