Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:40:15.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stresses in Amorphous Gd-Fe Alloy Thin Films Deposited by Magnetron Sputtering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Zhi-Feng Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, CHINA.
Qi-Gang Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, CHINA.
Yu-Dian Fan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, CHINA.
Get access

Abstract

Amorphous Gd-Fe alloy thin films were made by D.C. planar magnetron sputtering under various deposition conditions (e.g., film thickness, composition, working pressure of Ar, negative bias voltage and deposition rate). The stress, the film composition and the content of entrapped Ar in the films were measured respectively. The experimental results showed that in this case the working pressure of Ar and the negative bias voltage did not change the composition of the films, and the stresses were all compressive except for the films deposited in a very high working pressure of Ar. The origin of the compressive stress can be attributed to the atomic peening effect produced by fast neutral working gas atoms rebounded from the sputtering target. The magnitude of the compressive stress depends not only on the amount of Ar atoms incorporated in the films but also on the film microstructure such as the packing density.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Naoe, M., Yamanaka, S., and Hoshi, Y., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–16, 646 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Katayama, T., Hirano, M., Hoizumi, Y., Kawanishi, K., and Tsushima, T., Trans. Magn. MAG–13, 1603 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Suzuki, Y., Takayama, S., Kirino, F., and Ohta, N., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–23, 2275 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Tsunashima, S., Takagi, H., Kamegaki, K., Fujii, T., and Uchiyama, S., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–14, 844 (1978).Google Scholar
5. Takagi, H., Tsunashima, S., and Uchiyama, S., J. Appl. Phys. 50, 1642 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Niihara, T., Takayama, S., and Sugita, Y., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–21, 1638 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Chen, Q.M., Fan, Y.D., and Li, H.D., Vacuum, 38, 491 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Zhou, Z.F. and Fan, Y.D., in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties, edited by Bravman, J.C., Nix, W.D., Barnett, D.M., and Smith, D.A. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 130, Pittsburgh, PA 1988) PP. 383388.Google Scholar
9. Stobiecki, T. and Jankowski, H., J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 23, 299 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Hoffman, R.W., in Physics of Nonmetallic Thin Films, edited by Dupuy, C.H.S. and Cachard, A. (NATO Adv. Study Inst. Ser.,1976), B14, p.273.Google Scholar
11. Konishi, H., Euriki, S., and Matsumoto, G., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 19, 1009 (1980).Google Scholar
12. Hoffman, D.W. and Thornton, J.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 20, 355 (1982).Google Scholar
13. Cuomo, J.J. and Gambino, R.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 14, 152 (1977).Google Scholar
14. Nowick, A.S. and Mader, S.R., IBM J. Dev. Res. 13, 358 (1965).Google Scholar
15. Cuomo, J.J., Harper, J.M.E., Guarnieri, C.R., Yee, D.S., Attanasio, L.J., Angilello, J., Wu, C.T., and Hammond, R.H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 20, 349 (1982).Google Scholar