Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:37:09.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sound Absorption Characteristics of Porous Steel Manufactured by Lost Carbonate Sintering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Miao Lu
Affiliation:
miao.lu@liv.ac.uk, University of Liverpool, Department of Engineering, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Carl Hopkins
Affiliation:
carlh@liv.ac.uk, University of Liverpool, School of Architecture, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Yuyuan Zhao
Affiliation:
y.y.zhao@liv.ac.uk, University of Liverpool, Department of Engineering, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Gary Seiffert
Affiliation:
aru@liv.ac.uk, University of Liverpool, School of Architecture, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

This paper investigates the sound absorption characteristics of porous steel samples manufactured by Lost Carbonate Sintering. Measurements of the normal incidence sound absorption coefficient were made using an impedance tube for single-layer porous steel discs and assemblies comprising four layers of porous steel discs. The sound absorption coefficient was found not to vary significantly with pore size in the range of 250-1500 μm. In general, the absorption coefficient increases with increasing frequency and increasing thickness, and peaks at specific frequencies depending on the porosity. An increase in porosity tends to increase the frequency at which the sound absorption coefficient reaches this peak. An advantage was found in using an assembly of samples with gradient porosities of 75%-70%-65%-60% as it gave higher and more uniform sound absorption coefficients than an assembly with porosities of 75%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ashby, M.F., Metal Foams: A Design Guide, (Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, 2000) p. 171.Google Scholar
2 Morse, P.M., Vibration and Sound, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1948).Google Scholar
3 Lu, T.J., Chen, F. and He, D.P., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1697 (2000).10.1121/1.1286812Google Scholar
4 Lu, T.J., Acta Mech. Sin. 18, 457 (2002).Google Scholar
5 Han, F.S., Zhu, Z. and Liu, C, Acta Acoust. 84, 573 (1998).Google Scholar
6 Han, F.S., Seiffert, G., Zhao, Y.Y. and Gibbs, B., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36, 294 (2004).10.1088/0022-3727/36/3/312Google Scholar
7 Bo, Z. and Tianning, C., Appl. Acoust. 70, 337 (2009).10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.03.004Google Scholar
8 Zhao, Y.Y., Fung, T., Zhang, L.P. and Zhang, F.L., Scrip. Mater. 52, 295 (2005).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.10.012Google Scholar
9. Zhang, L.P. and Zhao, Y.Y., J. Eng. Manufacture, 222, 267 (2008).10.1243/09544054JEM832Google Scholar
10BS EN ISO 10534-2:2001, Acoustics-Determination of sound absorption coefficient and impedance in impedance tubes, Part2: transfer-function method.Google Scholar
11 Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F., Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997) p. 303.10.1017/CBO9781139878326Google Scholar