Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:02:37.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radionuclide Release Behavior of Light Water Reactor Spent Fuel Under Hydrothermal Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

William L. Neal ,
Shirley A. Rawson  and
William M. Murphy
William L. Neal
Affiliation:
Westinghouse Hanford Company, P.O. Box 1970, Richland, WA 99352
Shirley A. Rawson
Affiliation:
Westinghouse Hanford Company, P.O. Box 1970, Richland, WA 99352
William M. Murphy
Affiliation:
Westinghouse Hanford Company, P.O. Box 1970, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

The Basalt Waste Isolation Project has performed initial characterization of the release behavior of radionuclides from ATM-101 spent fuel reacted under hydrothermal conditions. Results to date indicate that 1) 14C, 90Sr, 129I, and 137Cs exhibit preferential release to solution relative to the actinides, 2) 239+240Pu, 241Am, and 244Cm ratios in solution are consistent with stoichiometric dissolution of the spent fuel matrix, whereas uranium concentrations are higher than those predicted for stoichiometric dissolution, 3) 137Cs release varies as a function of the fluid to solid mass ratio, and 4) 14C, 129I, and 137Cs release is affected by fuel particle size and/or fuel washing.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 112: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI , 1987 , 505
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Apted, M.J., Rockwell Hanford Operations report RHO-BW-SA-228P, 1982.Google Scholar
2. Salter, P.F., Burnell, J.R., and Lane, D.L., in Advances in Ceramics edited by Clark, D.E., White, W.B., and Machiels, A.J. (The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio, 1986) pp. 79–89.Google Scholar
3. Burnell, J.R., Myers, J., and Coles, D.G., Geol. Soc. Am. Abs. Prog. 17, 535 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Burnell, J.R., Coles, D.G., and Thomas, L.E., in Advances in Ceramics edited by Clark, D.E., White, W.B., and Machiels, A.J. (The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio, 1986) pp. 361–371.Google Scholar
5. Uziemblo, N.H., Thomas, L.E., Schoenlein, L.H., Mastel, B., and Jenson, E.D., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X edited by Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1987) pp. 161–171.Google Scholar
6. Rawson, S.A., Neal, W.L., and Burnell, J.R., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, edited by Apted, M.J. and Westerman, R., this volume (1988).Google Scholar
7. Johnson, L.H., Garisto, N.C., and Stroes-Gascoyne, S., in Waste Management ′85 edited by Post, R.G. (Tucson, Arizona, 1985) pp. 479–482.Google Scholar
8. Forsyth, R.S., and Werme, L.O., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX edited by Werme, L.O. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1985) pp. 327–336.Google Scholar
9. Wilson, C.N., and Shaw, H.F., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X edited by Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1987) pp.123–130.Google Scholar
10. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H., and Sellinger, D.M., in Nucl. Technol., 77, 320 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Bamer, J.O., Pacific Northwest Laboratory report PNL-5109, Rev. 1, UC-70, 1985.Google Scholar
12. Dill, J.A., Jones, T.E., Marcy, A.D., Baechler, M.O., and Payne, J.R., Rockwell Hanford Operations report SD-BWI-TD-013, 1985.Google Scholar
13. Seyfried, W.E. Jr., Gordon, P.C., and Dickson, F.W., Am. Min., 64, 646 (1979).Google Scholar
14. Wilson, C. N., Westinghouse Hanford Company report HEDL-TME-85–22, 1987.Google Scholar